# Đánh Giá Của Công Nhân Viên Về Các Nhân Tố Ảnh Hưởng Đến Sự Hài Lòng Lao

Nghiên cứu các nhân tố ảnh hưởng đến sự hài lòng trong công việc của nhân viên Công ty cổ phần 207 - 12

24

 0.272 1.009 97.372 25 0.26 0.963 98.335 26 0.238 0.88 99.215 27 0.212 0.785 100.000

Có thể bạn quan tâm!

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

Rotated Component Matrixa

 Component 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DTTT4 .862 DTTT3 .796 DTTT2 .790 DTTT1 .721 LUONG2 .824 LUONG1 .767 LUONG3 .739 LUONG4 .737 DIEUKIEN4 .797 DIEUKIEN1 .790 DIEUKIEN3 .784 DIEUKIEN2 .682 LANHDAO1 .841 LANHDAO2 .780 LANHDAO3 .735 LANHDAO4 .686 PHUCLOI2 .805 PHUCLOI1 .804 PHUCLOI3 .731 PHUCLOI4 .614 DONGNGHIEP4 .782 DONGNGHIEP3 .721 DONGNGHIEP2 .705 DONGNGHIEP1 .675 BCCV1 .795 BCCV4 .744 BCCV2 .678 BCCV3 .609

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.

a. Rotation converged in 6 iterations.

Kiểm định KMO và Bartlett’s Test biến phụ thuộc

KMO and Bartlett's Test

.684

103.622

3

.000

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy.

Approx. Chi-Square

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Df Sig.

Total Variance Explained

Component

 Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative % 1 1.998 66.608 66.608 1.998 66.608 66.608 2 .559 18.637 85.245 3 .443 14.755 100.000

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

1. Phân tích tương quan và hồi quy

Phân tích tương quan

Correlations

 LANHDAO BCCV DIEUKIEN DONGNGHIEP LUONG LANHDAOBCCVDIEUKIENDONGNGHIEPLUONGPHUCLOI DTTTHLCV Pearson CorrelationSig. (2-tailed) NPearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)NPearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)NPearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)NPearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)NPearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)NPearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)NPearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)N 1 .050 .003 .103 .164* .542 .975 .210 .045 150.050 1501 150.002 150.272** 150-.006 .542 .984 .001 .938 150 150 150 150 150 .003 .002 1 .036 -.034 .975 .984 .663 .683 150.103 150.272** 150.036 1501 150.010 .210 .001 .663 .902 150.164* 150-.006 150-.034 150.010 1501 .045 .938 .683 .902 150.023 150.084 150.119 150.052 150.213** .778 .306 .147 .525 .009 150.014 150.048 150.275** 150.004 150.025 .862 .562 .001 .966 .763 150.337** 150.376** 150.100 150.386** 150.506** .000 .000 .226 .000 .000 150 150 150 150 150

Correlations

 PHUCLOI DTTT HLCV LANHDAOBCCV DIEUKIEN DONGNGHIEP LUONGPHUCLOIDTTTHLCV Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)NPearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)NPearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)NPearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)NPearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)NPearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)NPearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)NPearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)N .023 .014 .337 .778 .862 .000 150 150 150 .084 .048 .376 .306 .562 .000 150 150 150 .119 .275 .100 .147 .001 .226 150.052 150.004** 150.386 .525 .966 .000 150.213* 150.025 150.506 .009 .763 .000 150 150 150 1 .015 .457 .853 .000 150.015 1501 150.099** .853 .229 150.457** 150.099** 1501 .000 .229 150 150 150

Phân tích hồi quy

Correlations

 HLCV LANHDAO BCCV DIEUKIEN DONGNGHIEP Pearson CorrelationSig. (1-tailed)N HLCV LANHDAO BCCV DIEUKIEN DONGNGHIEP LUONG PHUCLOI DTTTHLCVLANHDAO BCCV DIEUKIEN DONGNGHIEP LUONG PHUCLOI DTTTHLCV LANHDAO BCCV DIEUKIEN DONGNGHIEP LUONG PHUCLOIDTTT 1.000 .337 .376 .100 .386 .337 1.000 .050 .003 .103 .376 .050 1.000 .002 .272 .100 .003 .002 1.000 .036 .386 .103 .272 .036 1.000 .506 .164 -.006 -.034 .010 .457 .023 .084 .119 .052 .099 .014 .048 .275 .004 . .000 .000 .113 .000 .000 . .271 .487 .105 .000 .271 . .492 .000 .113 .487 .492 . .332 .000 .105 .000 .332 . .000 .022 .469 .342 .451 .000 .389 .153 .073 .263 .115 .431 .281 .000 .483 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150

Correlations

 LUONG PHUCLOI DTTT HLCV .506 .457 .099 LANHDAO .164 .023 .014 BCCV -.006 .084 .048 Pearson Correlation DIEUKIENDONGNGHIEP -.034.010 .119.052 .275.004 LUONG 1.000 .213 .025 PHUCLOI .213 1.000 .015 DTTT .025 .015 1.000 HLCV .000 .000 .115 LANHDAO .022 .389 .431 BCCV .469 .153 .281 Sig. (1-tailed) DIEUKIENDONGNGHIEP .342.451 .073.263 .000.483 LUONG . .004 .382 PHUCLOI .004 . .427 DTTT .382 .427 . HLCV 150 150 150 LANHDAO 150 150 150 N BCCVDIEUKIEN 150150 150150 150150 DONGNGHIEP 150 150 150 LUONG 150 150 150

PHUCLOI

DTTT

 150150 150150 150150

Coefficientsa

Model

 Unstandardized Coefficients StandardizedCoefficients t Sig. B Std. Error Beta (Constant) -.167 .280 -.595 .553 LANHDAO .144 .033 .223 4.323 .000 BCCV .167 .033 .264 5.013 .000 1 DIEUKIENDONGNGHIEP .036.200 .039.039 .049.269 .9245.092 .357.000 LUONG .242 .032 .400 7.606 .000 PHUCLOI .216 .035 .323 6.178 .000 DTTT .032 .032 .054 1.021 .309

Coefficientsa

Model

 Correlations Collinearity Statistics Zero-order Partial Part Tolerance VIF (Constant) LANHDAO .337 .341 .218 .962 1.040 BCCV .376 .388 .253 .917 1.091 1 DIEUKIENDONGNGHIEP .100.386 .077.393 .047.257 .905.916 1.1051.092 LUONG .506 .538 .384 .923 1.083 PHUCLOI .457 .460 .312 .930 1.076 DTTT .099 .085 .052 .920 1.087

Đánh giá độ phù hợp của mô hình

odel

 R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate Change Statistics R Square Change F Change df1 1 .799a .638 .620 .342 .638 35.789 7

Model Summaryb

Model

 Change Statistics Durbin-Watson df2 Sig. F Change 1 142a .000 1.867

a. Predictors: (Constant), DTTT, DONGNGHIEP, LUONG, LANHDAO, PHUCLOI, BCCV, DIEUKIEN

b. Dependent Variable: HLCV

ANOVAa

Model

 Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig. 1 RegressionResidualTotal 29.272 7 4.182 35.789 .000b 16.592 142 .117 45.864 149

a. Dependent Variable: HLCV

b. Predictors: (Constant), DTTT, DONGNGHIEP, LUONG, LANHDAO, PHUCLOI, BCCV, DIEUKIEN

Kiểm định phân phối chuẩn của phần dư

2. Đánh giá của công nhân viên về các nhân tố ảnh hưởng đến sự hài lòng lao

động tại công ty Cổ phần 207

Lãnh đạo

 LANHDAO1 LANHDAO2 LANHDAO3 LANHDAO4 LANHDAO N Valid MissingMeanMode 150 150 150 150 150 0 0 0 0 0 4.13 4.03 3.79 3.83 3.94 5 5 5 4 4

LANHDAO1

 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Hoan toan khong dong y 2 1.3 1.3 1.3 Khong dong y 15 10.0 10.0 11.3 Valid Trung lapDong y 22 14.7 14.7 26.0 33 22.0 22.0 48.0 Hoan toan dong y 78 52.0 52.0 100.0 Total 150 100.0 100.0

LANHDAO2

 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Hoan toan khong dong y 2 1.3 1.3 1.3 Khong dong y 15 10.0 10.0 11.3 Valid Trung lapDong y 25 16.7 16.7 28.0 43 28.7 28.7 56.7 Hoan toan dong y 65 43.3 43.3 100.0 Total 150 100.0 100.0

LANHDAO3

 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Hoan toan khong dong y 12 8.0 8.0 8.0 Khong dong y 10 6.7 6.7 14.7 Valid Trung lapDong y 27 18.0 18.0 32.7 50 33.3 33.3 66.0 Hoan toan dong y 51 34.0 34.0 100.0 Total 150 100.0 100.0

LANHDAO4

 Frequency Percent Valid Percent CumulativePercent Hoan toan khong dong y 5 3.3 3.3 3.3 Khong dong y 14 9.3 9.3 12.7 Valid Trung lapDong y 32 21.3 21.3 34.0 50 33.3 33.3 67.3 Hoan toan dong y 49 32.7 32.7 100.0 Total 150 100.0 100.0

Bản chất công việc

Statistics

 BCCV1 BCCV2 BCCV3 BCCV4 BCCV N Valid MissingMeanMode 150 150 150 150 150 0 0 0 0 0 3.75 3.07 3.38 3.53 3.44 5 2 2 4 4

BCCV1

 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Hoan toan khong dong y 8 5.3 5.3 5.3 Khong dong y 16 10.7 10.7 16.0 Valid Trung lapDong y 38 25.3 25.3 41.3 31 20.7 20.7 62.0 Hoan toan dong y 57 38.0 38.0 100.0 Total 150 100.0 100.0

BCCV2

 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Hoan toan khong dong y 9 6.0 6.0 6.0 Khong dong y 53 35.3 35.3 41.3 Valid Trung lapDong y 34 22.7 22.7 64.0 26 17.3 17.3 81.3 Hoan toan dong y 28 18.7 18.7 100.0 Total 150 100.0 100.0

BCCV3

 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Hoan toan khong dong y 3 2.0 2.0 2.0 Khong dong y 42 28.0 28.0 30.0 Valid Trung lapDong y 35 23.3 23.3 53.3 35 23.3 23.3 76.7 Hoan toan dong y 35 23.3 23.3 100.0 Total 150 100.0 100.0

BCCV4

 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Hoan toan khong dong y 8 5.3 5.3 5.3 Valid Khong dong yTrung lap 2536 16.724.0 16.724.0 22.046.0 Dong y 41 27.3 27.3 73.3

Hoan toan dong y

Total

 40150 26.7100.0 26.7100.0 100

Điều kiện làm việc

Statistics

 DIEUKIEN1 DIEUKIEN2 DIEUKIEN3 DIEUKIEN4 DIEUKIEN N Valid MissingMeanMode 150 150 150 150 150 0 0 0 0 0 3.66 3.92 3.66 3.67 3.73 3 4 4 4 4

DIEUKIEN1

 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Hoan toan khong dong y 4 2.7 2.7 2.7 Khong dong y 6 4.0 4.0 6.7 Valid Trung lapDong y 58 38.7 38.7 45.3 51 34.0 34.0 79.3 Hoan toan dong y 31 20.7 20.7 100.0 Total 150 100.0 100.0

DIEUKIEN2

 Frequency Percent Valid Percent CumulativePercent Hoan toan khong dong y 1 .7 .7 .7 Khong dong y 12 8.0 8.0 8.7 Valid Trung lapDong y 34 22.7 22.7 31.3 54 36.0 36.0 67.3 Hoan toan dong y 49 32.7 32.7 100.0 Total 150 100.0 100.0

DIEUKIEN3

 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Hoan toan khong dong y 5 3.3 3.3 3.3 Khong dong y 9 6.0 6.0 9.3 Valid Trung lapDong y 51 34.0 34.0 43.3 52 34.7 34.7 78.0 Hoan toan dong y 33 22.0 22.0 100.0 Total 150 100.0 100.0

DIEUKIEN4

 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Hoan toan khong dong y 5 3.3 3.3 3.3 Khong dong y 16 10.7 10.7 14.0 Valid Trung lap 30 20.0 20.0 34.0 Dong y 71 47.3 47.3 81.3 Hoan toan dong y 28 18.7 18.7 100.0

Ngày đăng: 30/06/2022
Đánh giá:
4.4/5 (1 bình chọn)