Phát triển kiến thức và thực hành nghiệp vụ của giáo viên Toán tương lai để dạy học thống kê

[107] Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Hurd, J. (2004). A deeper look at lesson study.

Educational Leadership, 61(5), 18–22.

[108] Lien, L. T. B., & Minh, T. K. (2018). Model of mathematical knowledge in teaching the topic of derivativein high school and applying to develop the professional capacity of future mathematics teachers. Vietnam Journal of Education, 5, 188-194.

[109] Linda L. Cooper & Felice S. Shore (2008). Students' Misconceptions in Interpreting Center and Variability of Data Represented via Histograms and Stem-and-Leaf Plots, Journal of Statistics Education, 16(2), 14-27.

[110] Madden, S. R. (2011). Statistically, technologically, and contextually provocative tasks: Supporting teachers' informal inferential reasoning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13(1-2), 109-131.

[111] Makar, K., & Confrey, J. (2005). “Variation-talk”: articulating meaning in statistics. Statistics Education Research Journal, 4(1), 27–54.

[112] Mason, J. (2008). PCK and beyond. In P. Sullivan, & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Vol. 1. Knowledge and beliefs in mathematics teaching and teaching development (pp. 301-322). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

[113] McClain, K., Cobb, P., & Gravemeijer, K. (2000). Supporting students' ways of reasoning about data. US Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Educational Resources Information Center.

[114] Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M., & Lee, C. (2002). Teaching students the stochastic nature of statistical concepts in an introductory statistics course. Statistics Education Research Journal, 1(2), 22-37.

[115] Meredith, A. (1995). Terry’s learning: Some limitations of Shulman’s pedagogical content knowledge. Cambridge Journal of Education, 25(2), 175–187.

Có thể bạn quan tâm!

Xem toàn bộ 277 trang tài liệu này.

[116] Meyer, R. D., & Wilkerson, T. L. (2011). Lesson study: The impact onteachers’ knowledge for teaching mathematics. In L. C. Hart, A. Alston, &A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematicseducation (pp. 15–26). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

[117] Moss, J., Messina, R., Morley, E., & Tepylo, D. (2012). Sustaining professional collaborations over 6 years: Using Japanese Lesson Study to improve the teaching and learning of mathematics. Professional collaborations in mathematics teaching and learning: Seeking success for all, 297-309.

[118] Mosvold R, Fauskanger J. (2014). Teachers’ beliefs about mathematical horizon content knowledge. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 9(3): 311-327.

[119] Murata, A. (2011). Introduction: Conceptual overview of lesson study.

Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education, 1-12.

[120] Murata, A., Bofferding, L., Pothen, B. E., Taylor, M. W., & Wischnia, S. (2012). Making connections among student learning, content, and teaching: Teacher talk paths in elementary mathematics lesson study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(5), 616-650.

[121] Nacarato, A., & Grando, R. (2014). Teachers’ professional development in a stochastics investigation community. In Sustainability in Statistics Education. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS9), Flagstaff, Arizona, USA. Voorburg: International Association of Statistics Education.

[122] National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

[123] Navidi, W. (2011). Statistics for Scientists and Engineers. In Technometrics

(Vol. 7, Issue 4).

[124] Nguyen Thi Dieu, & Le Thai Bao Thien Trung (2020). Building the teaching activities statistical charts in Mathematics secondary education curriculum 2018 for junior high school. Ho Chi Minh City University of Education Journal of Science, 17(5), 798-807.

[125] Ni Shuilleabhain, A. (2016). Developing mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in lesson study: Case study findings. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 5(3), 212-226.

[126] Ni Shuilleabhain, A., & Clivaz, S. (2017). Analyzing teacher learning in lesson study: Mathematical knowledge for teaching and levels of teacher activity. Quadrante: Revista de Investigacao em Educacao Matematica, 26(2), 99-125.

[127] Perry, R., Lewis, C., Friedkin, S., & Baker, E. (2009). Teachers’ knowledge development during lesson study: Impact of toolkit-supported lesson study on teachers’ knowledge of mathematics for teaching. AERA. San Diego.

[128] Peters, S. A. (2011). Robust understanding of variation. Statistics Education Research Journal, 10(1), 52–88.

[129] Petrou, M. (2009). Cypriot preservice teachers’ content knowledge and its relationship to their teaching. PME 32, 4, pp 113–120.

[130] Petrou, M. and M. Goulding (2011). Conceptualising teachers’ mathematical knowledge in teaching. In T. Rowland and K. Ruthven (Eds.), Mathematical Knowledge in Teaching, Springer, New York, 9–25.

[131] Pfannkuch, M. and D. Ben-Zvi (2011). Developing teachers’ statistical thinking. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, and C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching Statistics in School Mathematics-Challenges for Teaching and Teacher Education, Springer, New York, 323–333.

[132] Pierce, R., & Chick, H. (2011). Teachers’ beliefs about statistics education. In Teaching statistics in school mathematics-Challenges for teaching and teacher education (pp. 151-162). Springer, Dordrecht.

[133] Philipp, R. A. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect. Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 1, 257-315.

[134] Phuong, N. T. H., & Minh, T. K. (2018). Prospective mathematics teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching histograms in statistics. Vietnam Journal of Education, 5: 195-201.

[135] da Ponte, J. P. (2011). Teachers’ knowledge, practice, and identity: essential aspects of teachers’ learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(6), 413-417.

[136] da Ponte, J. P. (2017). Lesson studies in initial mathematics teacher education. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies.

[137] Radford, L., & Demers, S. (2004). Communication et apprentissage: réperes conceptuels et pratiques pour la salle de classe de mathématiques. Centre franco-ontarien de ressources pédagogiques.

[138] Richardson, J. (2004). Lesson study: Teachers learn how to improve instruction. Tools for schools, 7(4), 1-6.

[139] Ridgway, J., Nicholson, J., & McCusker, S. (2011). Developing statistical literacy in students and teachers. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, & C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching statistics in school mathematics-chal- lenges for teaching and teacher education: A joint ICMI/IASE study (pp. 311–322). Dordrecht: Springer.

[140] Rowland, T. (2005). The Knowledge Quartet: A tool for developing mathematics teaching. In: A. Gagatsis (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th Mediterranean conference on mathematics education (pp. 69–81). Nicosia: Cyprus Mathematical Society.

[141] Rowland, T. (2007). Developing knowledge for teaching: A theoretical loop. In: S. Close, D. Corcoran, & T. Dooley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd national conference on research in mathematics education (pp. 14–27). Dublin: St Patrick’s College.

[142] Rowland, T., Huckstep, P., & Thwaites, A. (2003). The knowledge quartet. In: J. Williams (Ed.), Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 23(3), 97–102.

[143] Runesson, U. (2015). Pedagogical and learning theories and the improvement and development of lesson and learning studies. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 4(3), 186–193.

[144] Saito, E., Tsukui, A., & Tanaka, Y. (2008). Problems on primary school- based in-service training in Vietnam: A case study of Bac Giang province. International Journal of Educational Development, 28(1), 89-103.

[145] Sánchez-Sánchez, E. A., & Gómez-Blancarte, A. L. (2015). La negociación de significado como proceso de aprendizaje: el easo de un programa de desarello profesional en la enseđanza de la estadistica [Negotiation of meanings as a learning process: A professional development program to teach statisties). Reviste Latinouniericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa, 18(3), 387 - 419.

[146] Santos, R., & da Ponte, J. P. (2013). Prospective elementary school teachers’ interpretation of central tendency measures during a statistical investigation. In Proceedings of the Eighth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME8). Ankara: Middle East Technical University.

[147] Shaughnessy, J. M. (2007). Research on statistics learning and reasoning. In

F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 957–1009). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

[148] Shin, D. (2020). Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ Selective Attention and Professional Knowledge–Based Reasoning About Students’ Statistical Thinking. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1-19.

[149] Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

[150] Shulman, L. (2015). PCK: Its genesis and exodus. In A. K. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 3–13). New York: Routledge.

[151] Speer, N. M., & Wagner, J. F. (2009). Knowledge needed by a teacher to provide analytic scaffolding during undergraduate mathematics classroom discussions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40, 530-562.

[152] Stigler, J. & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the World’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York, NY: Free Press.

[153] Takahashi, A. (2014). Supporting the effective implementation of a new mathematics curriculum: A case study of school-based lesson study at a Japanese public elementary school. In Y. Li & G. Lappan (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum in school education (pp. 417-441). Dordrecht: Springer Science +Business Media.

[154] Takahashi, A., Watanabe, T., Yoshida, M., &Wang-Iverson, P. (2005). Improving content and pedagogical knowledge through kyozaikenyu. In P. Wang-Iverson & M. Yoshida (Eds.), Building our understanding of lesson study (pp. 101–110). Philadelphia: Research for Better School.

[155] Takahashi, A., & McDougal, T. (2016). Collaborative lesson research: Maximizing the impact of lesson study. ZDM, 48(4), 513-526.

[156] Takahashi, A., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Ideas for establishing lesson-study communities. Teaching children mathematics, 10(9), 436-443.

[157] Tepylo, D. H., & Moss, J. (2011). Examining change in teacher mathematical knowledge through lesson study. In L. C. Hart, A. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education: Learning together (pp. 59–77).

[158] Tirosh, D., Tsamir, P., Levenson, E., & Tabach, M. (2011). From preschool teachers’ professional development to children’s knowledge: comparing sets. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14, 113-131.

[159] Minh, T. K., & Lien, L. T. B. (2018). Vietnamese prospective mathematics teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching derivative and implications for teacher preparation programs. In Hsieh, F.-J. (Ed.), (2018). Proceedings of the 8th ICMI-East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education (pp. 124-133), Vol 2, Taipei, Taiwan: EARCOME.

[160] Van Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. (2010). The teacher education knowledge base: pedagogical content knowledge. In (3rd ed.)., International encyclopedia of education, Vol. 7, (pp. 656-661) Amsterdam: Elsevier.

[161] Vui, T. (2006). Using lesson study as a means to innovation. Proceedings of APEC International Symposium on Innovation and Good Practice for Teaching and Learning Mathematics through Lesson Study, Khon Kaen Session, Thailand, 167–180.

[162] Watanabe, T., Takahashi, A., & Yoshida, M. (2008). Kyozaikenkyu: A critical step for conducting effective lesson study and beyond. Inquiry into mathematics teacher education, 5, 131-142.

[163] Watson, J. M., & Nathan, E. L. (2010). Approaching the borderlands of statistics and mathematics in the classroom: qualitative analysis engendering and unexpected journey. Statistics Education Research Journal, 9(2), 69-87.

[164] Whitaker, D., & Jacobbe, T. (2017). Students' understanding of bar graphs and histograms: Results from the LOCUS assessments. Journal of Statistics Education, 25(2), 90-102.

[165] Wild, C. & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry.

International Statistical Review, 67(3), 223-248.

[166] Wilkie, K., & Clarke, D. (2015). Pathways to Professional Growth: Investigating Upper Primary School Teachers’ Perspectives on Learning to Teach Algebra. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(4): 87-118.

[167] Yoshida, M. (2008). Exploring ideas for a mathematics teacher educator’s contribution to lesson study: Towards improving teachers’ mathematical content and pedagogical knowledge. In International Handbook of Mathematics Teacher Education: Volume 2 (pp. 85-106). Brill Sense.

[168] Yoshida, M., & Jackson, W. C. (2011). Response to part V: Ideas for developing mathematical pedagogical content knowledge through lesson study. In Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education (pp. 279-288). Springer, Dordrecht.

[169] Zazkis, R., & Mamolo, A. (2011). Reconceptualizing knowledge at the mathematical horizon. For the Learning of Mathematics, 21(2), 8-13.

[170] Zeichner, K., & Liston, D. P. (2006). Teaching student teachers to reflect.

Teacher education: professionalism, social justice and teacher education, 4, 5-34.

[171] Zembylas, M. (2007). Emotional ecology: The intersection of emotional knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge in teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(4), 355-367.

[172] Zhang, Q., & Stephens, M. (2013). Utilising a construct of teacher capacity to examine national curriculum reform in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25,481-502.

[173] Zieffler, A., delMas, R., Garfield, J., & Brown, E. (2014). The symbiotic, mutualistic relationship between modeling and simulation in developing students’ statistical reasoning about inference and uncertainty. In Sustainability in statistics education. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Teaching Statistics, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.

DANH MỤC CÔNG TRÌNH KHOA HỌC LIÊN QUAN ĐẾN LUẬN ÁN

1. Nguyễn Thị Hà Phương, Lê Thị Bạch Liên, Nguyễn Thị Mai Thủy (2017). Phát triển năng lực nghiệp vụ sư phạm cho GV toán THPT trong dạy học sử dụng hình ảnh trực quan theo định hướng của lý thuyết kiến tạo, Tạp chí khoa học, Trường Đại học Sư phạm Đà Nẵng, số: 25(04), tr. 74-84.

2. Lien, L. T. B., Phuong, N. T. H., & Minh, T. K. (2018). A cognitive approach to the evaluation of prospective mathematics teachers’ professional competencies. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language, Society and Culture in Asia Contexts, Editor: Prof. Prabhakara Roa, dkk., Hue, Vietnam: LSCAC, 926-937.

3. Nguyen Thi Ha Phuong, Tran Kiem Minh (2019). Prospective mathematics teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching histograms in statistics, Vietnam Journal of Education, Volume 5 (December 2018) (English version), 195-201.

4. Nguyễn Thị Hà Phương (2019). Vận dụng mô hình các kiểu kiến thức toán để dạy học trong quá trình đào tạo giáo viên toán tương lai ở các trường đại học sư phạm, Tạp chí giáo dục – Bộ Giáo dục và Đào tạo, Số đặc biệt Tháng 7/2019, 240-245.

5. Nguyen Thi Ha Phuong, Tran Kiem Minh (2019). Developing prospective mathematics teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching histograms, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Innovation in Learning Instruction and Teacher Education - ILITE 1, Editor: Nguyen Thuy Linh, Hoang Thi Quyen, 344-352. University of Education publishing house, Ha Noi.

6. Nguyen Thi Ha Phuong, Tran Kiem Minh (2020). Teachers’ knowledge for teaching: Exploring prospective mathematics teachers’ knowledge of measuredge of central tendency from statistical graphs, Proceedings of the 3st International Conference on teacher education renovation (ICTER 2020): Teacher competencies for education 4.0, Editor: Hoang Duc Nguyen, pp 415-428. Thai Nguyen University publishing house, Thai Nguyen.

7. Nguyễn Thị Hà Phương, Trần Kiêm Minh (2021). Phát triển nghiệp vụ cho giáo viên toán tương lai qua nghiên cứu: Trường hợp dạy học các số đo trung tâm trên biểu đồ thống kê, Tạp chí khoa học giáo dục, trường ĐHSP Hà Nội, Số: 66 Issue 3, 187-200.

8. Nguyễn Thị Hà Phương (2021). Đánh giá kiến thức của giáo viên toán tương lai để dạy học giá trị trung bình, trung vị trên biểu đồ phân bố, Tạp chí khoa học, Đại học Huế.

9. Nguyen Thi Ha Phuong, Tran Kiem Minh (2021). Professionnal develoment through lesson study: prospective mathematics teachers’ knowledge for teaching variability in statistical graphs, Proceedings of the 2st International Conference on Innovation in Learning Instruction and Teacher Education - ILITE 2021, p 228-245. University of Education publishing house, Ha Noi.

Xem tất cả 277 trang.

Ngày đăng: 19/02/2023