O'sullivan, A (2012), Urban Economics 8Th, Mcgraw-Hill/irwin, New York.


110. Grout, C. A., Jaeger, W. K., & Plantinga, A. J (2011), ‘Land-use regulations and property values in Portland, Oregon: A regression discontinuity design approach’, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 41(2), 98-107.

111. Guo, Y., Peeta, S., & Somenahalli, S (2017), ‘The impact of walkable environment on single-family residential property values’, Journal of Transport and Land Use, 10(1), 241-261.

112. Gutiérrez, J (2001), ‘Location, economic potential and daily accessibility: an analysis of the accessibility impact of the high-speed line Madrid–Barcelona– French border’, Journal of Transport Geography, 9(4), 229-242.

113. Haila. A (1990), ‘The theory of land rent at the crossroads’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 8(3), 275-296.

114. Haila. A (2015), Urban land rent: Singapore as a property state, John Wiley & Sons, UK.

115. Hall, P., & Tewdwr-Jones, M (2010), Urban and regional planning: Routledge, New York.

116. Hallett, G (1979), Urban land economics: Principles and policy, Springer, New York.

117. Hammel, D. J (1999), ‘Re-establishing the rent gap: an alternative view of capitalised land rent’, Urban Studies, 36(8), 1283-1293.

118. Han, W., Zhang, X., & Zheng, X (2020), ‘Land use regulation and urban land value: Evidence from China’, Land Use Policy, 92, 104432.

Có thể bạn quan tâm!

Xem toàn bộ 301 trang tài liệu này.

119. Handy, S. L (1992), ‘Regional versus local accessibility: neo-traditional development and its implications for non-work travel’, Built Environment, 18(4), pp. 253-267.

120. Handy, S. L., & Clifton, K. J (2001), ‘Evaluating neighborhood accessibility: Possibilities and practicalities’, Journal of transportation and statistics, 4 (2/3), 67-78.

Nghiên cứu các yếu tố tác động đến gia tăng giá trị đất đô thị tại Việt Nam - 25

121. Haninger, K., Ma, L., & Timmins, C (2017), ‘The value of brownfield remediation’, Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 4(1), 197-241.

122. Hannah, L., Kim, K.-H., & Mills, E. S (1993), ‘Land use controls and housing prices in Korea’, Urban Studies, 30(1), 147-156.

123. Hansen, D., Mowen, M., & Guan, L (2007), Cost management: accounting and control, Cengage Learning, USA.

124. Hansen, W. G (1959), ‘How accessibility shapes land use’, Journal of the American Institute of planners, 25(2), 73-76.

125. Harvey, D (1974), ‘Class-monopoly rent, finance capital and the urban revolution’, Regional Studies, 8(3-4), 239-255.

126. Harvey, D (2001), Spaces of capital: Towards a critical geography, Routledge, New York.

127. Harvey, D (2006), The Limits to Capital, Verso, New York.


128. Harvey, D (2012), Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution, Verso, New York.

129. Harvey, J (1996), Urban land economics 4th, Macmillan Press, New York.

130. Hawley, Z., Miranda, J. J., & Sawyer, W. C (2018), ‘Land values, property rights, and home ownership: Implications for property taxation in Peru’, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 69, 38-47.

131. Healey, P (1997), Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies, Macmillan International Higher Education,UBc Press, London.

132. Healey, P (2010), Making better places: The planning project in the twenty-first century, Palgrave Macmillan, UK.

133. Henderson, J. V (2009), ‘The effect of residential land market regulations on urban welfare’, In Somik V. LallMila FreireBelinda YuenRobin RajackJean- Jacques Helluin (eds), Urban Land Markets, Springer, New York, pp. 25-49.

134. HHendricks, A., Kalbro, T., Llorente, M., Vilmin, T., & Weitkamp, A (2017), ‘Public Value Capture of Increasing Property Values–What are “Unearned Increments”?’, In R. D.-G. Erwin Hepperle, Reinfried Mansberger, Jenny Paulsson, Józef Hernik and Thomas Kalbro (eds.), Land Ownership and Land Use Development: The Integration of Past, Present, and Future in Spatial Planning and Land Management Policies, ETH Zürich: Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek, pp. 257-281.

135. Henneberry, J (1998), ‘Transport investment and house prices’, Journal of Property Valuation and Investment, 16(2), 144-158.

136. Hess, D. B., & Almeida, T. M (2007), ‘Impact of proximity to light rail rapid transit on station-area property values in Buffalo, New York’, Urban Studies, 44(5-6), 1041-1068.

137. Higgins, C (2015), A Value Planning Framework for Predicting and Recapturing the Value of Rapid Transit Infrastructure, Doctoral dissertation, McMaster University, Canada.

138. Higgins, C. D., & Kanaroglou, P. S (2016), ‘Forty years of modelling rapid transit’s land value uplift in North America: Moving beyond the tip of the iceberg’, Transport Reviews, 36(5), 610-634.

139. Hilber, C. A., & Robert-Nicoud, F (2013), ‘On the origins of land use regulations: Theory and evidence from US metro areas’, Journal of Urban Economics, 75, pp. 29-43.

140. Hoàng Văn Cường (2006), 'Cơ sở hình thành các chính sách kinh tế trong quản lý đất đai theo cơ chế thị trường', Tạp chí Địa chính, số 2, tập (4/2006), tr.25-29.

141. Hoàng Văn Cường. (2018), 'Cơ sở kinh tế của chính sách đất đai', Tham luận trình bài tại Hội thảo chia sẻ kinh nghiệm quốc tế về kinh tế đất, Bộ Tài nguyên và Môi Trường, Hà Nội, ngày 17 tháng 7 năm 2018.

142. Hoàng Văn Cường, Nguyễn Thị Hải Yến, & Nguyễn Thanh Lân (2019), 'Nghiên cứu tổng quan về kinh tế đất và khai thác các nguồn thu từ đất', Kỷ yếu Hội thảo


Khoa học Quốc gia: Khuyến nghị sửa đổi những vấn đề kinh tế trong Luật Đất đai 2013, Trường Đại học Kinh tế Quốc dân, Hà Nội, tr.181-204.

143. Hoàng Việt và Hoàng Văn Cường (2008), Bình ổn giá quyền sử dụng đất đô thị ở Việt Nam Hà Nội, Nhà xuất bản Chính trị Quốc gia, Hà Nội.

144. Hong, Y.-H., & Brubaker, D (2010), ‘Integrating the proposed property tax with the public leasehold system’, In Y. M. Joyce & Y.-H. Hong (Eds.), China’s local public finance in transition, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, pp. 165-190.

145. Hopkins, L. D (2001), Urban development: The logic of making plans, Island Press, Washington DC.

146. Hubacek, K., & Van den Bergh, J. C (2006), ‘Changing concepts of ‘land’in economic theory: from single to multi-disciplinary approaches’, Ecological Economics, 56(1), 5-27.

147. Hubacek, K., & Vazquez, J (2009), ‘The Economics of Land Use Change’, In Gowdy, J. M. (Ed.), Economics Interactions with Other Disciplines – Volume II, EOLSS Publications, pp 43-56.

148. Huu Phe, H. and Wakely, P (2000), ‘Status, quality and the other trade-off: Towards a new theory of urban residential location’, Urban Studies, 37(1), 7-35.

149. Ibeas, Á., Cordera, R., dell’Olio, L., Coppola, P., & Dominguez, A (2012), ‘Modelling transport and real-estate values interactions in urban systems’, Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 370-382.

150. Ingram, D. R (1971), ‘The concept of accessibility: a search for an operational form’, Regional Studies, 5(2), 101-107.

151. Ingram, G., & Hong, Y (2012), ‘Land value capture: types and outcomes’, In Gregory K. Ingram and Yu-Hung Hong (eds), Value Capture and Land Policies, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Massachusetts, pp 3-18.

152. Jaeger, W. K (2006), ‘The effects of land-use regulations on property values’,

Environmental Law, vol 36, pp. 105-130.

153. Jaeger, W. K (2013), ‘Determinants of urban land market outcomes: Evidence from California’, Land Use Policy, 30(1), 966-973.

154. Jaeger, W. K., & Plantinga, A. J (2007), How have land-use regulations affected property values in Oregon?, Technical Report, Oregon State University, USA.

155. Jaeger, W. K., Plantinga, A. J., & Grout, C (2012), ‘How has Oregon's land use planning system affected property values?’, Land Use Policy, 29(1), 62-72.

156. Jäger, J. (2003), ‘Urban land rent theory: a regulationist perspective’,

International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(2), 233-249.

157. Jäger, J (2009), ‘Land rent theory’, In R. Kitchin, & Thrift, N. (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, Elsevier, pp. 112-117.

158. Jevons, W. S (1879), The theory of political economy, Macmillan and Company, UK.

159. Jones, J (2008), Land Value for Public Benefit, Labour Land Campaign, London.


160. Jordaan, A. C., Drost, B., & Makgata, M. A (2004), ‘Land value as a function of distance from the CBD: the case of the eastern suburbs of Pretoria’, South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 7(3), 532-541.

161. Jun, M.-J., & Kim, H.-J (2016), ‘The effects of Seoul’s suburban beltway on accessibility, residential development, and housing rents: a transport–land use simulation approach’, The Annals of Regional Science, 56(2), 565-589.

162. Kaiser, E. J., & Godschalk, D. R (1995), ‘Twentieth century land use planning: A stalwart family tree’, Journal of the American Planning Association, 61(3), 365-385.

163. Karl Marx (1894), Capital Volume III , The Process of Capitalist Production as a Whole, Institute of Marxism-Leninism, International Publishers, New York.

164. Kauko, T (2003), ‘Planning processes, development potential and house prices: contesting positive and normative argumentation’, Housing, Theory and Society, 20(3), 113-126.

165. Kerr, D (1996), ‘The theory of rent: From crossroads to the magic roundabout’,

Capital & Class, 20(1), 59-88.

166. Kim, J. H (2011), ‘Linking land use planning and regulation to economic development: a literature review’, Journal of Planning Literature, 26(1), 35-47.

167. Kim, J. H., Pagliara, F., & Preston, J (2005), ‘The intention to move and residential location choice behaviour’, Urban Studies, 42(9), 1621-1636.

168. King, J. E., & McLure, M (2014), History of the Concept of Value, The Economics Discussion Papers, Business School-Economics University of Western Australia.

169. King, R. (1987), ‘Monopoly rent, residential differentiation and the second global crisis of capitalism—the case of Melbourne’, Progress in Planning, 28, 195-298.

170. Kittrell, K. (2012), ‘Impacts of vacant land values: Comparison of metro light rail station areas in Phoenix, Arizona’, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board (2276), 138-145.

171. Kivell, P. (1993), Land and the city: patterns and processes of urban change, Routledge, New York.

172. Knight, R. L., & Trygg, L. L (1977a), ‘Evidence of land use impacts of rapid transit systems’, Transportation, 6(3), 231-247.

173. Knight, R. L., & Trygg, L. L (1977b), Land use impacts of rapid transit: implications of recent experience, truy cập ngày 30 tháng 6 năm 2019, tại: https://www.osti.gov/scitech/servlets/purl/5952387.

174. Kohlhepp, D. B., & Kohlhepp, K. J (2018), Real Estate Development Matrix, Routledge, New York.

175. Kok, N., Monkkonen, P., & Quigley, J. M (2014), ‘Land use regulations and the value of land and housing: An intra-metropolitan analysis’, Journal of Urban Economics, 81(2014), 136-148.


176. Koster, H. R., & Rouwendal, J (2012), ‘The impact of mixed land use on residential property values’, Journal of Regional Science, 52(5), 733-761.

177. Krier, J. E (2009), ‘Evolutionary theory and the origin of property rights’, Cornell Law Review, 95 (1), 139-159.

178. Krugman, P., Wells, R., & Graddy, K (2014), Essentials of economics, third edition,Worth Publishers, United States of America.

179. Kumari, A., & Sharma, A. K (2017), ‘Infrastructure financing and development: A bibliometric review’, International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 16(2017), 49-65.

180. Lall, S. V., Freire, M., Yuen, B., Rajack, R., & Helluin, J.-J. (2009), Urban Land Markets: Improving land management for successful urbanization, Springer Science & Business Media,New York.

181. Landis, J., Guhathakurta, S., & Zhang, M (1994), Capitalization of transit investments into single-family home prices: A comparative analysis of five California rail transit systems, Report, University of California Transportation Center, USA.

182. Lê Văn Bính. (2017), Phân tích các nhân tác động tới giá bất động sản trong việc thực hiện chính sách tài chính – Nghiên cứu trên địa bàn thành phố Hà Nội, Luận án tiến sĩ, Trường Đại học Kinh tế Quốc dân, Hà Nội.

183. Leung, H.-L (2003), Land use planning made plain, University of Toronto Press, London.

184. Levine-Schnur, R. (2018), ‘Revitalizing Land Use Law: The Burdens-Benefits Ratio Principle’, In Amnon Lehavi (Ed), One Hundred Years of Zoning and the Future of Cities, Springer, Switzerland, pp. 201-219.

185. Li, M. M., & Brown, H. J (1980), ‘Micro-neighborhood externalities and hedonic housing prices’, Land Economics, 56(2), 125-141.

186. Lin, R., & Zhu, D (2014), ‘A spatial and temporal analysis on land incremental values coupled with land rights in China’, Habitat International, 44, 168-176.

187. Lipietz, A. (1985), ‘A Marxist approach to urban ground rent: the case of France’,. In V. B. M. Ball, M. Edwards and M. Folin. (Ed.), Land Rent, Housing and Urban Planning: A European Perspective, Routledge, London, pp. 129-155.

188. Lorenz, D., Dent, P., & Kauko, T (2018), Value in a Changing Built Environment, John Wiley & Sons, UK.

189. Loucks, W. N. (1930), ‘The unearned increment in land values and its social implications’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 148(1), 67-81.

190. Louw, E., & Bruinsma, F (2006), ‘From mixed to multiple land use’, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 21(1), 1-13.

191. Lowry, I. S (1964), A model of metropolis, RAND Corporation, USA.


192. Malekzadeh, A., & Chung, E (2019), ‘A review of transit accessibility models: Challenges in developing transit accessibility models’, International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 1-16.

193. March, A (2010), ‘Practising theory: When theory affects urban planning’,

Planning Theory, 9(2), 108-125.

194. Martínez, L. M. G., & Viegas, J. M (2012), ‘The value capture potential of the Lisbon Subway’, Journal of Transport and Land Use, 5(1), 65-82.

195. Mathur, S. (2014), Innovation in public transport finance: Property value capture, Ashgate Publishing limited, England.

196. McLaughlin, R. B (2012), ‘Land use regulation: Where have we been, where are we going?’, Cities, 29 (2012), S50-S55.

197. McMahan, J. (2007), Professional property development, McGraw Hill Professional, New York.

198. Méndez, F (2006), ‘The value of legal housing titles: An empirical study’,

Journal of housing Economics, 15(2), 143-155.

199. Miceli, T. J., Munneke, H. J., Sirmans, C., & Turnbull, G. K (2011), ‘A question of title: Property rights and asset values’, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 41(6), 499-507.

200. Michael, J. A., & Palmwuist, R. B (2009), ‘Environmental Land Use Restriction and Property Values’, Vermont Journal of Environmental Law, 11 (2009), 437-464.

201. Mill, J. S (1884), Principles Of Political Economy (Vol. 5), G. Bell and sons, New York.

202. Mohammad, S. I., Graham, D. J., Melo, P. C., & Anderson, R. J (2013), ‘A meta- analysis of the impact of rail projects on land and property values’, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 50 (2013), 158-170.

203. Monk, S., & Whitehead, C. M (1999), ‘Evaluating the economic impact of planning controls in the United Kingdom: Some implications for housing’, Land Economics, 75 (1), 74-93.

204. Monkkonen, P (2016), ‘Where do Property Rights Matter More? Explaining the Variation in Demand for Property Titles across Cities in Mexico’, World development, 88 (2016), 67-78.

205. Monkkonen, P., & Ronconi, L (2013), ‘Land use regulations, compliance and land markets in Argentina’, Urban Studies, 50(10), 1951-1969.

206. Mulley, C., Ma, L., Clifton, G., Yen, B., & Burke, M (2016), ‘Residential property value impacts of proximity to transport infrastructure: An investigation of bus rapid transit and heavy rail networks in Brisbane, Australia’, Journal of Transport Geography, 54 (2016), 41-52.

207. Mulley, C., & Tsai, C.-H. P (2016), ‘When and how much does new transport infrastructure add to property values? Evidence from the bus rapid transit system in Sydney, Australia’, Transport Policy, 51 (C), 15-23.


208. Musole, M (2009), ‘Property rights, transaction costs and institutional change: Conceptual framework and literature review’, Progress in Planning, 71(2), 43-85.

209. NNavarro, P., & Carson, R (1991), ‘Growth controls: policy analysis for the second generation,’ Policy Sciences, 24(2), 127-152.

210. NCIF. (2019), Xu hướng đô thị hóa ở Việt Nam giai đoạn 2021-2030 và một số hệ lụy, truy cập ngày 20 tháng 8 năm 2020, từ: http://ncif.gov.vn/Pages/NewsDetail.aspx?newid=21873.

211. Nelson, A. C., Pendall, R., Dawkins, C. J., & Knaap, G. J (2002), ‘The link between growth management and housing affordability: The academic evidence’, In Downs, A. (Ed), Growth management and affordable housing: Do they conflict, Brookings Institution Press, Washington DC, pp. 117-158.

212. Ngô Đức Cát (2000), Giáo trình kinh tế tài nguyên đất, Nhà xuất bản Nông nghiệp, Hà Nội.

213. Nguyễn Đình Bồng (2006), Nghiên cứu đổi mới hệ thống quản lý đất đai để hình thành và phát triển thị trường bất động sản ở Việt Nam, Đề tài Độc lập cấp Nhà nước, Bộ Tài nguyên và Môi trường, Hà Nội.

214. Nguyễn Thành Hưng (2016), Quản lý nhà nước đối với các khoản thu từ đất ở Việt Nam, Luận án tiến sĩ, Trường Đại học Thương mại, Hà Nội.

215. Nguyễn Thanh Lân (2015), 'Bàn về vấn đề sở hữu toàn dân về đất đai ở Việt Nam', Tham luận trình bày tại Hội thảo khoa học Nghiên cứu cơ sở lý luận và thực tiễn của việc chể thế hóa chế độ sở hữu toàn dân về đất đai phù hợp với nền kinh thế thị trường định hướng XHCN trong Luật Đất đai 2013, Hội Khoa học Đất Việt Nam, Hà Nội, ngày 7 tháng 10 năm 2015.

216. Nguyễn Thanh Lân (2018), 'Bàn về chính sách điều tiết giá trị gia tăng từ đất tại Việt Nam', Tạp chí Tài chính, Kỳ 2, Tháng 7/2018 (685), tr.16-19.

217. Nguyễn Xuân Phúc (2019), Tiếp tục đổi mới mạnh mẽ nhằm khai thông, giải phóng tối đa, huy động và sử dụng có hiệu quả mọi nguồn lực, tạo động lực mới đưa đất nước phát triển nhanh, bền vững, truy cập ngày 20 tháng 9 năm 2020, từ http://thutuong.chinhphu.vn/Home/Tiep-tuc-doi-moi-manh-me-nham-khai- thong-giai-phong-toi-da-huy-dong-va-su-dung-co-hieu-qua-moi-nguon-luc-tao- dong-luc-moi-dua-dat-nuoc-phat-trien-nhanh-ben-vung/201911/30579.vgp.

218. North, D. C (1991), ‘Institutions’, Journal of economic perspectives, 5(1), pp. 97-112.

219. O'Brien, D. P (2004), The classical economists revisited, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

220. O'sullivan, A (2012), Urban economics 8th, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York.

221. Oppio, A., Torrieri, F., & Bianconi, M. (2018), ‘Land Value Capture by Urban Development Agreements: The Case of Lombardy Region (Italy)’, In Francesco Calabrò, Lucia Della Spina, Carmelina Bevilacqua (Eds.), International


Symposium on New Metropolitan Perspectives, Springer, Cham, Italy, pp 346- 353.

222. ÖZdilek, Ü (2011), ‘Land value: seven major questions in the analysis of urban land values’, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 70(1), 30-49.

223. Pagliara, F., & Papa, E (2011), ‘Urban rail systems investments: an analysis of the impacts on property values and residents’ location’, Journal of Transport Geography, 19(2), 200-211.

224. Park, J. (2014), ‘Land rent theory revisited’, Science & Society, 78(1), 88-109.

225. PPayne, G. (2001), ‘Urban land tenure policy options: Titles or rights?’, Habitat International, 25(3), 415-429.

226. Phạm Sỹ Liêm (2008, 'Một số vấn đề kinh tế Bất động sản ở nước ta', Tạp chí Người Xây dựng, số 1(2/2008), tr.23-25.

227. Phạm Văn Toàn (2019), Khai thác nguồn lực tài chính từ đất đai trên địa bàn tỉnh Hải Dương, Luận án tiến sĩ, Trường Đại học Kinh tế Quốc dân, Hà Nội.

228. Phan Văn Thọ (2012), Nghiên cứu đề xuất cơ chế, chính sách phân phối giá trị tăng thêm từ đất do qui hoạch; chuyển mục đích sử dụng đất, đầu tư phát triển kết cấu hạ tầng nhằm sửa đổi Luật Đất đai 2003, Đề tài cấp Bộ, Bộ Tài nguyên và Môi trường, Hà Nội.

229. Piketty, T. (2014), Capital in the twenty-first century, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

230. Platteau, J. P. (1996), ‘The evolutionary theory of land rights as applied to sub‐ Saharan Africa: a critical assessment’, Development and change, 27(1), 29-86.

231. Poku-Boansi, M., & Adarkwa, K. K (2016), ‘Determinants of residential location in the Adenta Municipality, Ghana’, GeoJournal, 81(5), 779-791.

232. Polimeni, J. M., & Erickson, J. D (2007), ‘Residential location theory, modeling, and scenario analysis of urban growth and planning’, In JD Erickson, F Messner, I Ring (Eds), Ecological Economics of Sustainable Watershed Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 183-210.

233. Qadeer, M (1981), ‘The nature of urban land’, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 40(2), 165-182.

234. Quigley, J. M., & Rosenthal, L. A (2005), ‘The effects of land use regulation on the price of housing: What do we know? What can we learn?’,Cityscape, (8(1), pp. 69-137.

235. Quốc hội (2013), Hiến pháp năm 2013, ban hành ngày 28 tháng 11 năm 2013.

236. Raco, M., Livingstone, N., & Durrant, D (2019), ‘Seeing like an investor: urban development planning, financialisation, and investors’ perceptions of London as an investment space’, European Planning Studies, 27(6), 1064-1082.

237. Ramírez De La Cruz, E. E., & Jun Park, H (2008), ‘Four Perspectives for Understanding Land Use Regulation in America’, International Review of Public Administration, 13(2), 49-62.

Xem tất cả 301 trang.

Ngày đăng: 24/01/2024
Trang chủ Tài liệu miễn phí