Am Nguyen Phu Thang, A Student Of Phd Geography Program In Hcm University Of Education. I Am

TOURIST’S QUESTIONAIRE

Dear Sir or Madam.

I am Nguyen Phu Thang, a student of PhD Geography program in HCM University of Education. I am conducting the thesis with topic “Angiang Tourism Development with the neighbouring region in Mekong Delta”.

Concerned about continuous development of tourism sector in Angiang province, the questionaire are created, in order to receive your feedbacks of tourist’s destinations in Angiang province. We would be grateful if you would fill in this questionare. We so much apreciate of your answers as genuinely and spontaneously as posible. This will only take about 5 minutes of your time. The declared information is only used for evaluation purposes; all details of this information will be strictly no disclosure.

PART I. INFORMATION OF YOUR TRIP

1. How many times you have been in Angiang?

1. One 3. Three times

2. Twice 4. More

2. Which sources of information of your trip you approached (mark the appropriate answer, more answers possible)?

1. Friends, relatives 4. Tivi, radio

2. Internet 5. Tourist company

3. Newspaper, magazine 6.Other s (details)

3. What is your main purpose for this trip?

1. Rest and relaxation 5. Business

2. Visiting relatives or friends 6. Attending conference, workshop

3. Religious purpose 7. Health

4. Official declare 8.Other s (details)

4. Which services and products do you prefer in this trip? (mark the appropriate answer, more answers possible)

1. Religious tourism 3. Ecotourism

2. Cultural tourism 4.Other s (details)

5. Which destinations do you like in Angiang? (mark the appropriate answer, more answers possible)

1. Temple of Ba Chua Xu Nui Sam 5. Cam Mountain Entertaiment park

2. Tra Su cajuput forest 6. Oc Eo archaeological park

3. Xvayton Khmer pagoda 7. Ton Duc Thang president monument

4. Cho Moi Islands 8.Other s (details)……………..

6. Do you organize your trip by tourist company or by your own self?

1. Your self

2. Tourist company

PART II. YOUR EVALUATING ON THE FACTORS EFFECTING ON LINKAGES IN TOURISM DEVELOPMENT BETWEEN AN GIANG AND THE NEIGHBORING REGION (CAN THO, KIEN GIANG, DONG THAP)

7. Please indicate your oppinions of the factors effecting on linkages in tourism development between An Giang and the neighboring region with following levels: 1 Total disagree 2 Disagree 3 – No ideas 4 Agree 5 – Total agree

Contents

Evaluating
Tourism natural resources has more advantages for linkage with the neighboring region
Topology	1	2	3	4	5
Climate	1	2	3	4	5
River and canals
Ecological system	1	2	3	4	5
Argricultural landscape
Tourism cultural resources has more advantages for linkage with the neighboring region
Festivals	1	2	3	4	5
Cultural, historical monuments	1	2	3	4	5
Old trade villages	1	2	3	4	5
Cuisine, foods	1	2	3	4	5
Sport, Culture and Architech events	1	2	3	4	5
Infrastructure and technology has more advantages for linkage with the neighboring region
Transportation	1	2	3	4	5
Communication system	1	2	3	4	5
Electricity and water servive providers	1	2	3	4	5
Promoting and managing technology for tourism	1	2	3	4	5
Supplements (location and distance, social – economic, secure and politic)
Geographical location	1	2	3	4	5
Secure, politic	1	2	3	4	5
Income and demand	1	2	3	4	5
Policies for tourim development with the neighboring region
Policies for linkages in tourism	1	2	3	4	5
Policies for investment in regional tourism	1	2	3	4	5
Policies for regional promoting	1	2	3	4	5
Policies for regional products development	1	2	3	4	5
Policies for regional infrastructure	1	2	3	4	5
Policies for regional action plan	1	2	3	4	5
TOURISM DEVELOPMENT IN AN GIANG WITH THE NEIGHBORING REGION
Tourism sector has high growth with the neighboring region	1	2	3	4	5
Tourism sector contribute to change regional and province economic structure	1	2	3	4	5
Tourism sector promotes the cooperation of An Giang and the neighboring region.	1	2	3	4	5

Có thể bạn quan tâm!

Xem toàn bộ 266 trang tài liệu này.

PART III. YOUR FEEDBACKS OF TOURIST DESTINATIONS

8. Below are listed some statements which refer to the indicators of tourist destinations you have experienced in. For each statement please indicate to what extent you agree with it. “1” means lowest level, and “5” means highest level

For example: Attraction

1 – Completely not attractive 5 – Completely attractive

STT

Indicators	Evaluations
1	Attraction	1	2	3	4	5
2	Time of activities	1	2	3	4	5
3	Location and approaching	1	2	3	4	5
4	Tourism infrastructure (transportations, communication, hotel and restaurants, etc)	1	2	3	4	5
5	Connection ability	1	2	3	4	5
6	Capacity	1	2	3	4	5
7	Management level	1	2	3	4	5
8	Enviroment	1	2	3	4	5
9	Staffs (actress, waitress in restaurant, hotels, ect)	1	2	3	4	5

9. Choose apropriate solutions you think best for Angiang tourism development in linked with neighbouring provinces (Can Tho, Kien Giang, Dong Thap)

STT

Solutions	Yes	No
1	Designing tours connecting other tourist destination of the provice	1	2
2	Enhancing the quality of the transportation in Angiang and neighbouring area	1	2
3	Preserving of the historic sites	1	2
4	Increasing of level of security in destinations	1	2
5	Encouraging the advertising program for tourist	1	2
6	Improving of the quality of staffs	1	2
7	Adjust the prices and convenient	1	2
8	Other	1	2

PART IV. YOUR PROFILE

10. Country…………………………

11. Education:

1. Under highschool (primary, secondary) 3. Colleges and career training school

2. High school 4. University and higher

12. Ocupation:

1. Worker/staff 3. Businesses

2. Student/pupil 4. Others

13. Age……………….

14. Gender: Male Fe rmale

15. Income (per month – US dollars):

1. < 500 3. 1000 2000

2. 500 – 1000 4. > 2000

THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION!

PHỤ LỤC 2.2. KẾT QUẢ THỐNG KÊ MÔ TẢ

2.2.1. Kênh tham khảo

$thamkhao Frequencies

Responses		Percent of Cases
N	Percent	Percent of Cases
thamkhaoa	Bạn bè, người thân	202	55.6%	68.0%
	Internet	83	22.9%	27.9%
	Sách báo, tạp chí	26	7.2%	8.8%
	Tivi, radio	34	9.4%	11.4%
	Công ty du lịch, lữ hành	8	2.2%	2.7%
	Khác	10	2.8%	3.4%
Total		363	100.0%	122.2%

2.2.2. Địa điểm yêu thích

$diadiem Frequencies

Responses		Percent of Cases
N	Percent	Percent of Cases
diadiema	Miếu Bà Chúa Xứ núi Sam	232	34.3%	77.3%
	Rừng tràm Trà Sư	135	20.0%	45.0%
	Chùa Xvayton	20	3.0%	6.7%
	Cù lao Giêng	7	1.0%	2.3%
	Khu du lịch núi Cấm	211	31.2%	70.3%
	Khu di chỉ nghệ thuật Óc Eo	37	5.5%	12.3%
	Khu lưu niệm chủ tịch Tôn Đức Thắng	32	4.7%	10.7%
	Khác	2	.3%	.7%
Total		676	100.0%	225.3%

2.2.3. Số lần đến An Giang

Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	1 lần	118	39.3	39.3	39.3
	2 lần	67	22.3	22.3	61.7
	3 lần	58	19.3	19.3	81.0
	> 3 lần	57	19.0	19.0	100.0
	Total	300	100.0	100.0

2.2. 4. Mục đích của khách

Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	Tôn giáo, tín ngưỡng	143	47.7	47.7	47.7
	Thăm họ hàng, bạn bè	37	12.3	12.3	60.0
	Du lịch nghỉ dưỡng, tham quan	83	27.7	27.7	87.7
	Thông tin, báo chí	10	3.3	3.3	91.0
	Thương mại	2	.7	.7	91.7
	Chữa bệnh	4	1.3	1.3	93.0
	Khác	21	7.0	7.0	100.0
	Total	300	100.0	100.0

2.2.5. Sản phẩm loại hình yêu thích

Sản phẩm loại hình yêu thích

		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	Du lịch tâm linh	123	41.0	41.0	41.0
	Du lịch văn hóa	70	23.3	23.3	64.3
	Du lịch sinh thái	100	33.3	33.3	97.7
	Khác	7	2.3	2.3	100.0
	Total	300	100.0	100.0

2.2.6. Hình thức tổ chức

Hình thức tổ chức

Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	Tự tổ chức	260	86.7	86.7	86.7
	Theo chương trình du lịch	27	9.0	9.0	95.7
	Hình thức khác	13	4.3	4.3	100.0
	Total	300	100.0	100.0

2.2.7. Nghề nghiệp

Nghề nghiệp

Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	Công nhân viên chức	64	21.3	21.3	21.3
	Học sinh sinh viên	63	21.0	21.0	42.3
	Kinh doanh	96	32.0	32.0	74.3
	Khác	77	25.7	25.7	100.0
	Total	300	100.0	100.0

2.2.8. Giới tính

Giới tính

Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	Nam	168	56.0	56.0	56.0
	Nữ	132	44.0	44.0	100.0
	Total	300	100.0	100.0

2.2.9. Thu nhập

Thu nhập

Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	< 2 triệu	72	24.0	24.0	24.0
	2-6 triệu	133	44.3	44.3	68.3
	6-10 triệu	77	25.7	25.7	94.0
	10-20 triệu	15	5.0	5.0	99.0
	>20 triệu	3	1.0	1.0	100.0
	Total	300	100.0	100.0

2.2.10. Tuổi

nhóm tuổi

Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	<25	111	37.0	37.0	37.0
	26 - 35	81	27.0	27.0	64.0
	36 - 50	58	19.3	19.3	83.3
	>50	50	16.7	16.7	100.0
	Total	300	100.0	100.0

PHỤ LỤC 2.3. PHÂN TÍCH EFA VÀ MLRA

TT	Nhóm nhân tố	Kí hiệu nhân tố	Giải thích
1	CSHT và công nghệ	X1	Giao thông vận tải
		X2	Điện, nước
		X3	TTLL và công nghệ
2	Chính sách	X4	Chính sách liên kết vùng
		X5	Chính sách thu hút đầu tư
		X6	Chính sách quảng bá, xúc tiến
		X7	Chính sách phát triển sản phẩm
		X8	Chính sách hạ tầng
		X9	Chính sách quy hoạch
3	TNDL	X10	Địa hình
		X11	Khí hậu
		X12	Sông ngòi
		X13	Hệ sinh thái
		X14	Cảnh quan sinh thái nông nghiệp
		X15	Lễ hội
		X16	Di tích LS – VH
		X17	Làng nghề
		X18	Ẩm thực
		X19	Sự kiện văn hóa, thể thao, xã hội
4	Các yếu tố bổ trợ (vị trí – khoảng cách, tình hình kinh tế, xã hội, an ninh, chính trị)	X20	Vị trí – khoảng cách
		X21	Đời sống kinh tế, xã hội
		X22	Tình hình an ninh, chính trị

2.3.1. Mã hóa biến (nhân tố) ảnh hưởng đến liên kết giữa An Giang và vùng phụ cận

2.3.2. Hệ số Cronbach Anpha và Item Correlation

Reliability Statistics

Item-Total Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha	N of Items
.806	3

	Scale Mean if Item Deleted	Scale Variance if Item Deleted	Corrected Item- Total Correlation	Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted
X1	7.96	1.734	.597	.795
X2	8.10	1.613	.714	.671
X3	8.05	1.750	.654	.735

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha

N of Items
.849	6

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item- Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted

20.53

8.163

.613

.827

20.50

8.565

.606

.829

20.60

8.000

.683

.814

20.68

8.131

.631

.824

20.70

8.132

.653

.819

Item-Total Statistics

20.80 8.007 .606 .829

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha

N of Items
.784	5

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha

N of Items
.867	5

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted	Scale Variance if Item Deleted	Corrected Item- Total Correlation	Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted
X1	7.96	1.734	.597	.795
X2	8.10	1.613	.714	.671
X3	8.05	1.750	.654	.735

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item- Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted

20.53

8.163

.613

.827

20.50

8.565

.606

.829

20.60

8.000

.683

.814

20.68

8.131

.631

.824

20.70

8.132

.653

.819

20.80

8.007

.606

.829

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted	Scale Variance if Item Deleted	Corrected Item- Total Correlation	Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted
X10	14.73	4.994	.436	.781
X11	14.81	4.576	.573	.739
X12	14.83	4.411	.615	.725
X13	14.75	4.282	.646	.713
X14	14.84	4.514	.530	.754

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted	Scale Variance if Item Deleted	Corrected Item- Total Correlation	Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted
X15	14.99	5.609	.598	.860
X17	14.97	5.103	.720	.831
X18	14.90	5.261	.725	.830
X19	14.89	5.235	.726	.830

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted	Scale Variance if Item Deleted	Corrected Item- Total Correlation	Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted
X20	7.04	2.727	.668	.813
X21	6.66	2.479	.832	.650
X22	6.41	2.871	.622	.855

2.3.3. Kiểm định KMO và Bartlett's; Tổng phương sai trích (Total Variance Explained)

KMO và Bartlett's

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy.

.796
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity	Approx. Chi-Square	2938.569
	Df	231

Total Variance Explained

Component

Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings
Total	Total	% of Variance	Cumulative %
1	5.599	5.599	25.448	25.448
2	2.646	2.646	12.026	37.474
3	2.586	2.586	11.755	49.229
4	1.907	1.907	8.668	57.897
5	1.314	1.314	5.974	63.871

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis

2.3.4. Ma trận xoay Rotated Component Matrixa

Component
1	2	3	4	5
X8	.772
X6	.764
X7	.756
X5	.705
X9	.680
X4	.662
X19		.798
X17		.792
X16		.786
X18		.784
X15		.740
X13			.783
X12			.769
X11			.718
X14			.689
X10			.607
X21				.934
X20				.845
X22				.802
X2					.870
X3					.799
X1					.767

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.

2.3.5. Phân tích MRLA

Model Summary

Model

R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the

Estimate

Durbin-Watson

.604a

.364

.354

.39876

1.780

a. Predictors: (Constant), VT_KT, TN_TN, HATANG, TN_NV, CHINHSACH

b. Dependent Variable: PHATTRIEN

ANOVAb

Model

Sum of Squares	df	Mean Square	F	Sig.
1	Regression	26.794	5	5.359	33.702	.000a
	Residual	46.748	294	.159
	Total	73.542	299

a. Predictors: (Constant), VT_KT, TN_TN, HATANG, TN_NV, CHINHSACH