Correlations
hl | nlpv | du | tc | pthh | ||
hl | 1.000 | .320 | .426 | .433 | .285 | |
nlpv | .320 | 1.000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | |
Pearson Correlation | du | .426 | .000 | 1.000 | .000 | .000 |
tc | .433 | .000 | .000 | 1.000 | .000 | |
pthh | .285 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 1.000 | |
hl | . | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | |
nlpv | .000 | . | .500 | .500 | .500 | |
Sig. (1-tailed) | du | .000 | .500 | . | .500 | .500 |
tc | .000 | .500 | .500 | . | .500 | |
pthh | .000 | .500 | .500 | .500 | . | |
hl | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | |
nlpv | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | |
N | du | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 |
tc | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | |
pthh | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 |
Có thể bạn quan tâm!
- Kiểm Định Về Sự Phù Hợp Của Mô Hình Hồi Quy.
- Giải Pháp Nâng Cao Chất Lượng Dịch Vụ Cho Vay Dành Cho Khách Hàng Cá Nhân Tại Ngân Hàng Tmcp Quốc Dân Chi Nhánh Huế
- Đánh giá chất lượng dịch vụ cho vay dành cho khách hàng cá nhân tại Ngân hàng Thương mại Cổ phần Quốc Dân chi nhánh Huế - 10
Xem toàn bộ 88 trang tài liệu này.
Variables Entered/Removeda
Model | Variables Entered | Variables Removed | Method |
1 | pthh, tc, du, nlpvb | . | Enter |
a. Dependent Variable: hl
b. All requested variables entered.
Model Summaryb
Model | R | R Square | Adjusted R Square | Std. Error of the Estimate | Durbin-Watson |
1 | .744a | .553 | .539 | .67893804 | 1.713 |
a. Predictors: (Constant), pthh, tc, du, nlpv
b. Dependent Variable: hl
ANOVAa
Model | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F | Sig. | |
Regression | 71.380 | 4 | 17.845 | 38.713 | .000b | |
1 | Residual | 57.620 | 125 | .461 | ||
Total | 129.000 | 129 |
a. Dependent Variable: hl
b. Predictors: (Constant), pthh, tc, du, nlpv
Coefficientsa
Model | Unstandardized | Coefficients | Standardized Coefficients | t | Sig. | Collinearity | Statistics | ||
B | Std. Error | Beta | Tolerance | VIF | |||||
(Constant) | -3.148E-016 | .060 | .000 | 1.000 | |||||
nlpv | .320 | .060 | .320 | 5.353 | .000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||
1 | du | .426 | .060 | .426 | 7.132 | .000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | |
tc | .433 | .060 | .433 | 7.249 | .000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||
pthh | .285 | .060 | .285 | 4.773 | .000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
a. Dependent Variable: hl
Collinearity Diagnosticsa
Model | Dimension | Eigenvalue | Condition Index | Variance | Proportions | |||
(Constant) | nlpv | du | tc | pthh | ||||
1 | 1.000 | 1.000 | .00 | .15 | .14 | .70 | .00 | |
2 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.00 | .00 | .00 | .00 | .00 | |
1 | 3 | 1.000 | 1.000 | .00 | .19 | .53 | .28 | .00 |
4 | 1.000 | 1.000 | .00 | .00 | .00 | .00 | 1.00 | |
5 | 1.000 | 1.000 | .00 | .65 | .33 | .01 | .00 |
a. Dependent Variable: hl
Residuals Statisticsa
Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Std. Deviation | N | |
Predicted Value | -2.4109719 | 1.3220025 | 0E-7 | .74386583 | 130 |
Residual | -3.66153955 | 1.45256519 | 0E-8 | .66832898 | 130 |
Std. Predicted Value | -3.241 | 1.777 | .000 | 1.000 | 130 |
Std. Residual | -5.393 | 2.139 | .000 | .984 | 130 |
a. Dependent Variable: hl
PHỤ LỤC 6: MỨC ĐỘ ĐÁNH GIÁ TỪNG YẾU TỐ
Statistics
PTHH1 | PTHH2 | PTHH3 | PTHH4 | |
Valid N Missing Mean | 130 0 3.9846 | 130 0 3.9077 | 130 0 3.9000 | 130 0 3.8846 |
Frequency Table
PTHH1
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
khong dong y | 4 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.1 | |
trung lap | 31 | 23.8 | 23.8 | 26.9 | |
Valid | dong y | 58 | 44.6 | 44.6 | 71.5 |
rat dong y | 37 | 28.5 | 28.5 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
PTHH2
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
khong dong y | 5 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.8 | |
trung lap | 28 | 21.5 | 21.5 | 25.4 | |
Valid | dong y | 71 | 54.6 | 54.6 | 80.0 |
rat dong y | 26 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
PTHH3
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
khong dong y | 4 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.1 | |
trung lap | 31 | 23.8 | 23.8 | 26.9 | |
Valid | dong y | 69 | 53.1 | 53.1 | 80.0 |
rat dong y | 26 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
PTHH4
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
khong dong y | 6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | |
trung lap | 25 | 19.2 | 19.2 | 23.8 | |
Valid | dong y | 77 | 59.2 | 59.2 | 83.1 |
rat dong y | 22 | 16.9 | 16.9 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Statistics
NLPV1 | NLPV2 | NLPV3 | NLPV4 | NLPV5 | ||
N | Valid Missing | 130 0 | 130 0 | 130 0 | 130 0 | 130 0 |
Mean | 4.0000 | 3.7308 | 3.9154 | 3.8692 | 3.7846 |
Frequency Table
NLPV1
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
khong dong y | 9 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 6.9 | |
trung lap | 23 | 17.7 | 17.7 | 24.6 | |
Valid | dong y | 57 | 43.8 | 43.8 | 68.5 |
rat dong y | 41 | 31.5 | 31.5 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
NLPV2
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
khong dong y | 9 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 6.9 | |
trung lap | 33 | 25.4 | 25.4 | 32.3 | |
Valid | dong y | 72 | 55.4 | 55.4 | 87.7 |
rat dong y | 16 | 12.3 | 12.3 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
NLPV3
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
khong dong y | 3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | |
trung lap | 35 | 26.9 | 26.9 | 29.2 | |
Valid | dong y | 62 | 47.7 | 47.7 | 76.9 |
rat dong y | 30 | 23.1 | 23.1 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
NLPV4
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
khong dong y | 8 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 6.2 | |
trung lap | 32 | 24.6 | 24.6 | 30.8 | |
Valid | dong y | 59 | 45.4 | 45.4 | 76.2 |
rat dong y | 31 | 23.8 | 23.8 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
NLPV5
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
khong dong y | 5 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.8 | |
trung lap | 39 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 33.8 | |
Valid | dong y | 65 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 83.8 |
rat dong y | 21 | 16.2 | 16.2 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Statistics
TC1 | TC2 | TC3 | TC4 | TC5 | ||
N | Valid Missing | 130 0 | 130 0 | 130 0 | 130 0 | 130 0 |
Mean | 4.0154 | 3.9923 | 3.8846 | 3.9462 | 4.0615 |
Frequency Table
TC1
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
khong dong y | 6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | |
trung lap | 23 | 17.7 | 17.7 | 22.3 | |
Valid | dong y | 64 | 49.2 | 49.2 | 71.5 |
rat dong y | 37 | 28.5 | 28.5 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
TC2
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
khong dong y | 7 | 5.4 | 5.4 | 5.4 | |
trung lap | 26 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 25.4 | |
Valid | dong y | 58 | 44.6 | 44.6 | 70.0 |
rat dong y | 39 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
TC3
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
khong dong y | 6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | |
trung lap | 28 | 21.5 | 21.5 | 26.2 | |
Valid | dong y | 71 | 54.6 | 54.6 | 80.8 |
rat dong y | 25 | 19.2 | 19.2 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
TC4
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
khong dong y | 6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | |
trung lap | 27 | 20.8 | 20.8 | 25.4 | |
Valid | dong y | 65 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 75.4 |
rat dong y | 32 | 24.6 | 24.6 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
TC5
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
khong dong y | 3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | |
trung lap | 27 | 20.8 | 20.8 | 23.1 | |
Valid | dong y | 59 | 45.4 | 45.4 | 68.5 |
rat dong y | 41 | 31.5 | 31.5 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Statistics
DU1 | DU2 | DU3 | DU4 | DU5 | ||
N | Valid Missing | 130 0 | 130 0 | 130 0 | 130 0 | 130 0 |
Mean | 3.7154 | 3.7846 | 3.8538 | 3.8846 | 3.8000 |
Frequency Table
DU1
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
rat khong dong | 1 | .8 | .8 | .8 | |
khong dong y | 5 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 4.6 | |
Valid | trung lap dong y | 42 64 | 32.3 49.2 | 32.3 49.2 | 36.9 86.2 |
rat dong y | 18 | 13.8 | 13.8 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
DU2
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
rat khong dong | 1 | .8 | .8 | .8 | |
khong dong y | 6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 5.4 | |
Valid | trung lap dong y | 33 70 | 25.4 53.8 | 25.4 53.8 | 30.8 84.6 |
rat dong y | 20 | 15.4 | 15.4 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
DU3
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
khong dong y | 6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | |
trung lap | 34 | 26.2 | 26.2 | 30.8 | |
Valid | dong y | 63 | 48.5 | 48.5 | 79.2 |
rat dong y | 27 | 20.8 | 20.8 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
DU4
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
khong dong y | 8 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 6.2 | |
trung lap | 31 | 23.8 | 23.8 | 30.0 | |
Valid | dong y | 59 | 45.4 | 45.4 | 75.4 |
rat dong y | 32 | 24.6 | 24.6 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
DU5
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
khong dong y | 5 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.8 | |
trung lap | 35 | 26.9 | 26.9 | 30.8 | |
Valid | dong y | 71 | 54.6 | 54.6 | 85.4 |
rat dong y | 19 | 14.6 | 14.6 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Statistics
CT1 | CT2 | CT3 | CT4 | CT5 | ||
N | Valid Missing | 130 0 | 130 0 | 130 0 | 130 0 | 130 0 |
Mean | 3.8154 | 3.7538 | 3.7692 | 4.0154 | 3.6923 |
Frequency Table
CT1
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
khong dong y | 3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | |
trung lap | 41 | 31.5 | 31.5 | 33.8 | |
Valid | dong y | 63 | 48.5 | 48.5 | 82.3 |
rat dong y | 23 | 17.7 | 17.7 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
CT2
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
khong dong y | 3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | |
trung lap | 44 | 33.8 | 33.8 | 36.2 | |
Valid | dong y | 65 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 86.2 |
rat dong y | 18 | 13.8 | 13.8 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
CT3
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
khong dong y | 4 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.1 | |
trung lap | 36 | 27.7 | 27.7 | 30.8 | |
Valid | dong y | 76 | 58.5 | 58.5 | 89.2 |
rat dong y | 14 | 10.8 | 10.8 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
CT4
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
khong dong y | 3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | |
trung lap | 27 | 20.8 | 20.8 | 23.1 | |
Valid | dong y | 65 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 73.1 |
rat dong y | 35 | 26.9 | 26.9 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
CT5
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
khong dong y | 5 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.8 | |
trung lap | 39 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 33.8 | |
Valid | dong y | 77 | 59.2 | 59.2 | 93.1 |
rat dong y | 9 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Statistics
HL1 | HL2 | HL3 | |
Valid N Missing Mean | 130 0 3.9538 | 130 0 3.8385 | 130 0 3.7385 |
Frequency Table
HL1
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
khong dong y | 5 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.8 | |
trung lap | 30 | 23.1 | 23.1 | 26.9 | |
Valid | dong y | 61 | 46.9 | 46.9 | 73.8 |
rat dong y | 34 | 26.2 | 26.2 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
HL2
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
khong dong y | 6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | |
trung lap | 30 | 23.1 | 23.1 | 27.7 | |
Valid | dong y | 73 | 56.2 | 56.2 | 83.8 |
rat dong y | 21 | 16.2 | 16.2 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
HL3
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
khong dong y | 6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | |
trung lap | 38 | 29.2 | 29.2 | 33.8 | |
Valid | dong y | 70 | 53.8 | 53.8 | 87.7 |
rat dong y | 16 | 12.3 | 12.3 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |