So Sánh Năng Suất Thịt Tại Thời Điểm 9 Và 12 Tháng Tuổi

One-way ANOVA: KL thit xe versus Tính biệt

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values

Tính biệt 2 C12TT, D12TT

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Tính biệt 1 9.6800 9.68000 161.33 0.000

Error 6 0.3600 0.06000

Total 7 10.0400

Model Summary

R-sq R-sq(adj)	R-sq(pred)
0.244949	96.41% 95.82%	93.63%

Có thể bạn quan tâm!

Xem toàn bộ 306 trang tài liệu này.

Means


Tính biệt	N	Mean StDev	95% CI
C12TT	4	7.4000 0.1826	(7.1003, 7.6997)
D12TT	4	9.600 0.294	( 9.300, 9.900)

Pooled StDev = 0.244949

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Tính biệt N

Mean	Grouping
D12TT 4	9.600	A
C12TT 4	7.4000	B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: TL thit xe versus Tính biệt

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values

Tính biệt 2 C12TT, D12TT

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Tính biệt 1 39.880 39.8801 129.10 0.000

Error 6 1.853 0.3089

Total 7 41.734

Model Summary

R-sq R-sq(adj)	R-sq(pred)
0.555791	95.56% 94.82%	92.10%

Means


Tính biệt	N	Mean StDev	95% CI
C12TT	4	41.570 0.460	(40.890, 42.250)
D12TT	4	46.035 0.637	(45.355, 46.715)

Pooled StDev = 0.555791

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Tính biệt N

Mean	Grouping
D12TT 4	46.035	A
C12TT 4	41.570	B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: KL thit tinh versus Tính biệt

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values

Tính biệt 2 C12TT, D12TT

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Tính biệt 1 5.2813 5.28125 106.07 0.000

Error 6 0.2988 0.04979

S	R-sq R-sq(adj)	R-sq(pred)
0.223140	94.65% 93.75%	90.48%

Total 7 5.5800 Model Summary

Means


Tính biệt	N	Mean StDev	95% CI
C12TT	4	5.5125 0.1931	(5.2395, 5.7855)
D12TT	4	7.138 0.250	( 6.864, 7.411)

Pooled StDev = 0.223140

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Tính biệt

N	Mean	Grouping
D12TT	4	7.138	A
C12TT	4	5.5125	B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: TL thit tinh versus Tính biệt

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values

Tính biệt 2 C12TT, D12TT

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Tính biệt 1 21.286 21.2863 56.60 0.000

Error 6 2.257 0.3761

Total 7 23.543

Model Summary

R-sq R-sq(adj)	R-sq(pred)
0.613276	90.41% 88.82%	82.96%

Means


Tính biệt	N	Mean	StDev	95%	CI
C12TT	4	30.962	0.605	(30.212,	31.713)
D12TT	4	34.225	0.622	(33.474,	34.975)

Pooled StDev = 0.613276

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence Tính biệt N Mean Grouping

D12TT 4 34.225 A

C12TT 4 30.962 B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: KL Xuong versus Tính biệt

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values

Source DF Adj SS	Adj MS	F-Value P-Value
Tính biệt 1 0.62720	0.627200	257.75 0.000
Error 6 0.01460	0.002433
Total 7 0.64180

Tính biệt 2 C12TT, D12TT Analysis of Variance

Model Summary

R-sq R-sq(adj)	R-sq(pred)
0.0493288	97.73% 97.35%	95.96%

Means


Tính biệt	N	Mean	StDev	95% CI
C12TT	4	1.8150	0.0265	(1.7546, 1.8754)
D12TT	4	2.3750	0.0645	(2.3146, 2.4354)

Pooled StDev = 0.0493288

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Tính biệt

N	Mean	Grouping
D12TT	4	2.3750	A
C12TT	4	1.8150	B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: TL Xuong versus Tính biệt

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values

Tính biệt 2 C12TT, D12TT

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Tính biệt 1 2.8399 2.83985 87.27 0.000

Error 6 0.1952 0.03254

Total 7 3.0351

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred) 0.180391 93.57% 92.49% 88.56%

Means


Tính biệt	N	Mean StDev	95%	CI
C12TT	4	10.1982 0.1933	( 9.9775,	10.4189)
D12TT	4	11.3899 0.1665	(11.1692,	11.6106)

Pooled StDev = 0.180391

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence Tính biệt N Mean Grouping

D12TT 4 11.3899 A

C12TT 4 10.1982 B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

5.So sánh năng suất thịt tại thời điểm 9 và 12 tháng tuổi

One-way ANOVA: KL song versus Thang tuoi

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values Thang tuoi 2 12TT, 9TT

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Thang tuoi 1 73.10 73.103 40.78 0.000

Error 14 25.09 1.793

Total 15 98.20

Model Summary

R-sq	R-sq(adj)	R-sq(pred)
1.33884	74.44%	72.62%	66.62%
Means
Thang tuoi N	Mean	StDev	95% CI
12TT 8	19.325	1.658 (18.310, 20.340)
9TT 8	15.050	0.915 (14.035, 16.065)

Pooled StDev = 1.33884

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Thang tuoi N

Mean

Grouping

12TT 8

19.325

9TT 8

15.050

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: Kl moc ham versus Thang tuoi

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values Thang tuoi 2 12TT, 9TT

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Thang tuoi 1 27.04 27.0400 29.14 0.000

Error 14 12.99 0.9279

Total 15 40.03

Model Summary

R-sq	R-sq(adj)	R-sq(pred)
0.963253	67.55%	65.23%	57.62%
Means
Thang tuoi N	Mean	StDev	95% CI
12TT 8	10.675	1.188 (9.945, 11.405)
9TT 8	8.075	0.667 (7.345, 8.805)

Pooled StDev = 0.963253

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Thang

tuoi N

Mean

Grouping

12TT 8

10.675

9TT 8

8.075

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.