Sinh Trưởng Tích Lũy Của Dê Đực, Dê Cái Định Hóa Có Kiểu Gen D1D1, D1D2

One-way ANOVA: KL3TT versus Kiểu gen

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information Factor Levels Values

Source	DF	Adj SS Adj MS	F-Value	P-Value
Kiểu gen	1	0.2627 0.2627	1.06	0.307
Error	62	15.3447 0.2475
Total	63	15.6073

Có thể bạn quan tâm!

Xem toàn bộ 306 trang tài liệu này.

Kiểu gen 2 D1D1, D1D2 Analysis of Variance

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred) 0.497489 1.68% 0.10% 0.00%

Means


Kiểu gen	N	Mean StDev 95%	CI
D1D1	32	6.6281 0.4933 (6.4523,	6.8039)
D1D2	32	6.5000 0.5016 (6.3242,	6.6758)

Pooled StDev = 0.497489

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Kiểu gen

N	Mean Grouping
D1D1	32	6.6281 A
D1D2	32	6.5000 A

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

Tukey Simultaneous 95% CIs

One-way ANOVA: KL6TT versus Kiểu gen

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information Factor Levels Values

Source	DF Adj SS Adj MS	F-Value	P-Value
Kiểu gen	1 1.792 1.792	1.60	0.211
Error	62 69.411 1.120
Total	63 71.203

Kiểu gen 2 D1D1, D1D2 Analysis of Variance

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred) 1.05808 2.52% 0.94% 0.00%

Means


Kiểu gen	N	Mean StDev 95%	CI
D1D1	32	10.816 1.139 (10.442,	11.190)
D1D2	32	10.481 0.971 (10.107,	10.855)

Pooled StDev = 1.05808

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Kiểu gen

N	Mean	Grouping
D1D1	32	10.816	A
D1D2	32	10.481	A

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

Tukey Simultaneous 95% CIs

One-way ANOVA: KL9TT versus Kiểu gen

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information Factor Levels Values

Source	DF Adj SS Adj MS	F-Value P-Value
Kiểu gen	1 2.890 2.890	1.12 0.295
Error	62 160.448 2.588
Total	63 163.338

Kiểu gen 2 D1D1, D1D2 Analysis of Variance

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)

1.60868

1.77%	0.18%	0.00%
Means
Kiểu gen	N	Mean StDev	95% CI
D1D1	32	15.894 1.629 (15.325, 16.462)
D1D2	32	15.469 1.588 (14.900, 16.037)

Pooled StDev = 1.60868

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Kiểu gen

N	Mean Grouping
D1D1	32	15.894 A
D1D2	32	15.469 A

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

Tukey Simultaneous 95% CIs

One-way ANOVA: KL12TT versus Kiểu gen

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information Factor Levels Values

Source	DF Adj SS Adj MS	F-Value P-Value
Kiểu gen	1 2.890 2.890	0.63 0.432
Error	62 285.824 4.610
Total	63 288.714

Kiểu gen 2 D1D1, D1D2 Analysis of Variance

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)

2.14711

1.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Means
Kiểu gen	N	Mean StDev	95% CI
D1D1	32	20.572 2.172 (19.813, 21.331)
D1D2	32	20.147 2.121 (19.388, 20.906)

Pooled StDev = 2.14711

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Kiểu gen

N	Mean	Grouping
D1D1	32	20.572	A
D1D2	32	20.147	A

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

Tukey Simultaneous 95% CIs

2.2 SINH TRƯỞNG TÍCH LŨY CỦA DÊ ĐỰC, DÊ CÁI ĐỊNH HÓA CÓ KIỂU GEN D1D1, D1D2

One-way ANOVA: KLSS versus Tính biệt

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis. Factor Information

Factor Levels Values

Tính biệt 4 D1c, D1d, D2c, D2d

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Tính biệt 3 0.5800 0.19332 14.57 0.000

Error 60 0.7962 0.01327

Total 63 1.3762 Model Summary

R-sq	R-sq(adj)	R-sq(pred)
0.115197	42.14%	39.25%	34.17%
Means
Tính biệt N	Mean	StDev	95% CI
D1c	16	1.6362	0.1059 (1.5786, 1.6939)
D1d	16	1.8375	0.1290 (1.7799, 1.8951)
D2c	16	1.6087	0.0859 (1.5511, 1.6664)
D2d	16	1.7762	0.1335 (1.7186, 1.8339)

Pooled StDev = 0.115197

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Tính biệt

N	Mean	Grouping
D1d	16	1.8375	A
D2d	16	1.7762	A
D1c	16	1.6362	B
D2c	16	1.6087	B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

Tukey Simultaneous 95% CIs

One-way ANOVA: KL3TT versus Tính biệt

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values

Tính biệt 4 D1c, D1d, D2c, D2d

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Tính biệt 3 10.264 3.42141 38.42 0.000

Error 60 5.343 0.08905

Total 63 15.607

Model Summary

R-sq	R-sq(adj)	R-sq(pred)
0.298416	65.77%	64.05%	61.05%
Means
Tính biệt N	Mean	StDev	95% CI
D1c	16	6.2312	0.2915 (6.0820, 6.3805)
D1d	16	7.0250	0.2864 (6.8758, 7.1742)
D2c	16	6.1062	0.2863 (5.9570, 6.2555)
D2d	16	6.8937	0.3276 (6.7445, 7.0430)

Pooled StDev = 0.298416

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Tính biệt

N	Mean	Grouping
D1d	16	7.0250	A
D2d	16	6.8937	A
D1c	16	6.2312	B
D2c	16	6.1062	B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

Tukey Simultaneous 95% CIs

One-way ANOVA: KL6TT versus Tính biệt

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values

Tính biệt 4 D1c, D1d, D2c, D2d

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Tính biệt 3 47.16 15.7207 39.23 0.000

Error

60	24.04 0.4007
Total	63	71.20

Model Summary

R-sq	R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)
0.632993	66.24%	64.55% 61.58%

Means


					Tính
biệt	N	Mean	StDev	95%	CI
D1c	16	9.925	0.423	( 9.608,	10.242)
D1d	16	11.706	0.898	(11.390,	12.023)
D2c	16	9.691	0.493	( 9.374,	10.007)
D2d	16	11.271	0.610	(10.955,	11.588)

Pooled StDev = 0.632993

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Tính biệt

N	Mean	Grouping
D1d	16	11.706	A
D2d	16	11.271	A
D1c	16	9.925	B
D2c	16	9.691	B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

Tukey Simultaneous 95% CIs

One-way ANOVA: KL9TT versus Tính biệt

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values

Tính biệt 4 D1c, D1d, D2c, D2d

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Tính biệt 3 126.67 42.2238 69.09 0.000

Error 60 36.67 0.6111

Total 63 163.34

Model Summary

R-sq	R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)
0.781732	77.55%	76.43% 74.46%

Means


					Tính
biệt	N	Mean	StDev	95%	CI
D1c	16	14.488	0.750	(14.097,	14.878)
D1d	16	17.300	0.837	(16.909,	17.691)
D2c	16	14.094	0.787	(13.703,	14.485)
D2d	16	16.844	0.749	(16.453,	17.235)

Pooled StDev = 0.781732

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Tính biệt

N	Mean	Grouping
D1d	16	17.300	A
D2d	16	16.844	A
D1c	16	14.488	B
D2c	16	14.094	B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

Tukey Simultaneous 95% CIs