Sinh Trưởng Tích Lũy Của Dê Định Hóa Có Kiểu Gen D1D1, D1D2

One-way ANOVA: TL moc ham versus Thang tuoi

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values Thang tuoi 2 12TT, 9TT

Analysis of Variance

Source

DF	Adj SS Adj MS	F-Value P-Value
Thang tuoi	1	9.478 9.478	5.00 0.042
Error	14	26.543 1.896
Total	15	36.021

Có thể bạn quan tâm!

Xem toàn bộ 306 trang tài liệu này.

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred) 1.37692 26.31% 21.05% 3.76%

Means Thang

tuoi N Mean StDev 95% CI

12TT 8

55.135	1.485 (54.091, 56.179)
9TT 8	53.595	1.260 (52.551, 54.640)

Pooled StDev = 1.37692

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Thang

tuoi N

Mean

Grouping

12TT 8

55.135

9TT 8

53.595

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: KL thit xe versus Thang tuoi

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values Thang tuoi 2 12TT, 9TT

Analysis of Variance

Source

DF	Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
Thang tuoi	1	16.20 16.201 15.89 0.001
Error	14	14.27 1.020
Total	15	30.47

Model Summary

R-sq	R-sq(adj)	R-sq(pred)
1.00973	53.16%	49.82%	38.82%
Means
Thang tuoi N	Mean	StDev	95% CI
12TT 8	8.500	1.198 (7.734, 9.266)
9TT 8	6.488	0.778 (5.722, 7.253)

Pooled StDev = 1.00973

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence Thang

tuoi N Mean Grouping 12TT 8 8.500 A

9TT 8 6.488 B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: TL thit xe versus Thang tuoi

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values Thang tuoi 2 12TT, 9TT

Analysis of Variance

Source

DF	Adj SS Adj MS	F-Value P-Value
Thang tuoi	1	2.734 2.734	0.42 0.527
Error	14	90.803 6.486
Total	15	93.537

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred) 2.54675 2.92% 0.00% 0.00%

Means Thang

tuoi N Mean StDev 95% CI 12TT 8 43.802 2.442 (41.871, 45.734)

9TT 8 42.976 2.648 (41.044, 44.907)

Pooled StDev = 2.54675

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Thang

tuoi N

Mean

Grouping

12TT 8

43.802

9TT 8

42.976

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: KL thit tinh versus Thang tuoi

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values Thang tuoi 2 12TT, 9TT

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Thang tuoi 1 9.226 9.2264 16.75 0.001

Error 14 7.712 0.5509

Total 15 16.939

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred) 0.742207 54.47% 51.22% 40.53%

Means Thang

tuoi N Mean StDev 95% CI

12TT 8

6.325	0.893 (5.762, 6.888)
9TT 8	4.806	0.552 (4.243, 5.369)

Pooled StDev = 0.742207

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence Thang

tuoi N Mean Grouping 12TT 8 6.325 A

9TT 8 4.806 B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: TL thit tinh versus Thang tuoi

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values Thang tuoi 2 12TT, 9TT

Analysis of Variance

Source

DF	Adj SS Adj MS	F-Value P-Value
Thang tuoi	1	2.229 2.229	0.67 0.425
Error	14	46.295 3.307
Total	15	48.524

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred) 1.81847 4.59% 0.00% 0.00%

Means Thang

tuoi N Mean StDev 95% CI 12TT 8 32.594 1.834 (31.215, 33.973)

9TT 8 31.847 1.803 (30.468, 33.226)

Pooled StDev = 1.81847

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Thang

tuoi N

Mean

Grouping

12TT 8

32.594

9TT 8

31.847

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: KL Xuong versus Thang tuoi

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values Thang tuoi 2 12TT, 9TT

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Thang tuoi 1 0.9312 0.93123 13.57 0.002

Error 14 0.9605 0.06861

S	R-sq	R-sq(adj)	R-sq(pred)
0.261936	49.22%	45.60%	33.68%

Total 15 1.8918 Model Summary

Means


Thang tuoi N	Mean	StDev	95% CI
12TT 8	2.095	0.303	( 1.896, 2.294)
9TT 8	1.6125	0.2134	(1.4139, 1.8111)

Pooled StDev = 0.261936

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Thang

tuoi N

Mean

Grouping

12TT 8

2.095

9TT 8

1.6125

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: TL Xuong versus Thang tuoi

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values Thang tuoi 2 12TT, 9TT

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Thang tuoi 1 0.05718 0.05718 0.11 0.745

Error 14 7.28136 0.52010

Total 15 7.33854

Model Summary

R-sq	R-sq(adj)	R-sq(pred)
0.721178	0.78%	0.00%	0.00%
Means
Thang tuoi N	Mean	StDev	95% CI
12TT 8	10.794	0.658 (10.247, 11.341)
9TT 8	10.674	0.779 (10.128, 11.221)

Pooled StDev = 0.721178

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Thang

tuoi

Mean

Grouping

12TT

10.794

9TT

10.674

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

2. KẾT QUẢ XỬ LÝ NỘI DUNG 2

2.1 SINH TRƯỞNG TÍCH LŨY CỦA DÊ ĐỊNH HÓA CÓ KIỂU GEN D1D1, D1D2

One-way ANOVA: KLSS versus Kiểu gen

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information Factor Levels Values

Source	DF Adj SS Adj MS	F-Value P-Value
Kiểu gen	1 0.03151 0.03151	1.45 0.233
Error	62 1.34469 0.02169
Total	63 1.37619

Kiểu gen 2 D1D1, D1D2 Analysis of Variance

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred) 0.147270 2.29% 0.71% 0.00%

Means

Kiểu gen N Mean StDev 95% CI

D1D1 32 1.7369 0.1547 (1.6848, 1.7889)

D1D2 32 1.6925 0.1394 (1.6405, 1.7445)

Pooled StDev = 0.147270

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Kiểu gen

N	Mean Grouping
D1D1	32	1.7369 A
D1D2	32	1.6925 A

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

Tukey Simultaneous 95% CIs