Trang chủ / Tài liệu miễn phí / Luận Án Tiến Sĩ Chăn Nuôi

Sinh Trưởng Tích Lũy Của Dê Định Hóa Có Kiểu Gen D1D1, D1D2


One-way ANOVA: TL moc ham versus Thang tuoi


Method


Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05


Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.


Factor Information


Factor Levels Values Thang tuoi 2 12TT, 9TT


Analysis of Variance


Source

DF

Adj SS Adj MS

F-Value P-Value

Thang tuoi

1

9.478 9.478

5.00 0.042

Error

14

26.543 1.896


Total

15

36.021


Có thể bạn quan tâm!

Xem toàn bộ 306 trang tài liệu này.

Đặc điểm sinh trưởng và mối tương quan đa hình gen POU1F1 với tính trạng sinh trưởng của dê địa phương Định Hóa - 28


Model Summary


S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred) 1.37692 26.31% 21.05% 3.76%


Means Thang

tuoi N Mean StDev 95% CI

12TT 8

55.135

1.485 (54.091, 56.179)

9TT 8

53.595

1.260 (52.551, 54.640)


Pooled StDev = 1.37692


Tukey Pairwise Comparisons


Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence


Thang

tuoi N


Mean


Grouping

12TT 8

55.135

A

9TT 8

53.595

B


Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.


One-way ANOVA: KL thit xe versus Thang tuoi


Method


Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05


Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.


Factor Information


Factor Levels Values Thang tuoi 2 12TT, 9TT


Analysis of Variance


Source

DF

Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value

Thang tuoi

1

16.20 16.201 15.89 0.001

Error

14

14.27 1.020

Total

15

30.47


Model Summary


S

R-sq

R-sq(adj)

R-sq(pred)

1.00973

53.16%

49.82%

38.82%


Means




Thang tuoi N


Mean


StDev


95% CI

12TT 8

8.500

1.198 (7.734, 9.266)

9TT 8

6.488

0.778 (5.722, 7.253)


Pooled StDev = 1.00973


Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence Thang

tuoi N Mean Grouping 12TT 8 8.500 A

9TT 8 6.488 B


Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.


One-way ANOVA: TL thit xe versus Thang tuoi


Method


Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05


Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.


Factor Information


Factor Levels Values Thang tuoi 2 12TT, 9TT


Analysis of Variance


Source

DF

Adj SS Adj MS

F-Value P-Value

Thang tuoi

1

2.734 2.734

0.42 0.527

Error

14

90.803 6.486


Total

15

93.537



Model Summary


S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred) 2.54675 2.92% 0.00% 0.00%


Means Thang

tuoi N Mean StDev 95% CI 12TT 8 43.802 2.442 (41.871, 45.734)

9TT 8 42.976 2.648 (41.044, 44.907)


Pooled StDev = 2.54675


Tukey Pairwise Comparisons


Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence


Thang

tuoi N


Mean


Grouping

12TT 8

43.802

A

9TT 8

42.976

A


Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.


One-way ANOVA: KL thit tinh versus Thang tuoi


Method


Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05


Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.


Factor Information


Factor Levels Values Thang tuoi 2 12TT, 9TT


Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Thang tuoi 1 9.226 9.2264 16.75 0.001

Error 14 7.712 0.5509

Total 15 16.939


Model Summary


S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred) 0.742207 54.47% 51.22% 40.53%


Means Thang

tuoi N Mean StDev 95% CI

12TT 8

6.325

0.893 (5.762, 6.888)

9TT 8

4.806

0.552 (4.243, 5.369)


Pooled StDev = 0.742207


Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence Thang

tuoi N Mean Grouping 12TT 8 6.325 A

9TT 8 4.806 B


Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.


One-way ANOVA: TL thit tinh versus Thang tuoi


Method


Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05


Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.


Factor Information


Factor Levels Values Thang tuoi 2 12TT, 9TT


Analysis of Variance


Source

DF

Adj SS Adj MS

F-Value P-Value

Thang tuoi

1

2.229 2.229

0.67 0.425

Error

14

46.295 3.307


Total

15

48.524



Model Summary


S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred) 1.81847 4.59% 0.00% 0.00%


Means Thang

tuoi N Mean StDev 95% CI 12TT 8 32.594 1.834 (31.215, 33.973)

9TT 8 31.847 1.803 (30.468, 33.226)


Pooled StDev = 1.81847


Tukey Pairwise Comparisons


Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence


Thang

tuoi N


Mean


Grouping

12TT 8

32.594

A

9TT 8

31.847

A


Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.


One-way ANOVA: KL Xuong versus Thang tuoi


Method


Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05


Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.


Factor Information


Factor Levels Values Thang tuoi 2 12TT, 9TT


Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Thang tuoi 1 0.9312 0.93123 13.57 0.002

Error 14 0.9605 0.06861

S

R-sq

R-sq(adj)

R-sq(pred)

0.261936

49.22%

45.60%

33.68%

Total 15 1.8918 Model Summary



Means


Thang tuoi N


Mean


StDev


95% CI

12TT 8

2.095

0.303

( 1.896, 2.294)

9TT 8

1.6125

0.2134

(1.4139, 1.8111)


Pooled StDev = 0.261936


Tukey Pairwise Comparisons


Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence


Thang

tuoi N


Mean


Grouping

12TT 8

2.095

A

9TT 8

1.6125

B


Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.


One-way ANOVA: TL Xuong versus Thang tuoi


Method


Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05


Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.


Factor Information


Factor Levels Values Thang tuoi 2 12TT, 9TT


Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Thang tuoi 1 0.05718 0.05718 0.11 0.745

Error 14 7.28136 0.52010

Total 15 7.33854


Model Summary


S

R-sq

R-sq(adj)

R-sq(pred)

0.721178

0.78%

0.00%

0.00%


Means




Thang tuoi N


Mean


StDev


95% CI

12TT 8

10.794

0.658 (10.247, 11.341)

9TT 8

10.674

0.779 (10.128, 11.221)


Pooled StDev = 0.721178


Tukey Pairwise Comparisons


Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence


Thang

tuoi


N


Mean


Grouping

12TT

8

10.794

A

9TT

8

10.674

A


Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.


2. KẾT QUẢ XỬ LÝ NỘI DUNG 2

2.1 SINH TRƯỞNG TÍCH LŨY CỦA DÊ ĐỊNH HÓA CÓ KIỂU GEN D1D1, D1D2

One-way ANOVA: KLSS versus Kiểu gen


Method


Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05


Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.


Factor Information Factor Levels Values

Source

DF Adj SS Adj MS

F-Value P-Value

Kiểu gen

1 0.03151 0.03151

1.45 0.233

Error

62 1.34469 0.02169


Total

63 1.37619


Kiểu gen 2 D1D1, D1D2 Analysis of Variance


Model Summary


S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred) 0.147270 2.29% 0.71% 0.00%


Means


Kiểu gen N Mean StDev 95% CI

D1D1 32 1.7369 0.1547 (1.6848, 1.7889)

D1D2 32 1.6925 0.1394 (1.6405, 1.7445)


Pooled StDev = 0.147270


Tukey Pairwise Comparisons


Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence


Kiểu gen

N

Mean Grouping

D1D1

32

1.7369 A

D1D2

32

1.6925 A


Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.


Tukey Simultaneous 95% CIs

Xem tất cả 306 trang.

Ngày đăng: 19/02/2023
Trang chủ Tài liệu miễn phí