Năng Suất Thịt Tại Thời Điểm 12 Tháng Tuổi

One-way ANOVA: TL thit xe versus Tính biệt

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values Tính biệt 2 C9TT, D9TT

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Tính biệt 1 47.944 47.9444 255.75 0.000

Error 6 1.125 0.1875

Total 7 49.069

Model Summary

R-sq	R-sq(adj)	R-sq(pred)
0.432975	97.71%	97.33%	95.92%
Means
Tính biệt N	Mean	StDev	95% CI
C9TT 4	40.528	0.570 (39.998, 41.057)
D9TT 4	45.424	0.223 (44.894, 45.953)

Có thể bạn quan tâm!

Xem toàn bộ 306 trang tài liệu này.

Pooled StDev = 0.432975

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence Tính

biệt N Mean Grouping D9TT 4 45.424 A

C9TT 4 40.528 B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: KL thit tinh versus Tính biệt

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values Tính biệt 2 C9TT, D9TT

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Tính biệt 1 2.05031 2.05031 150.25 0.000

Error 6 0.08187 0.01365

S	R-sq	R-sq(adj)	R-sq(pred)
0.116815	96.16%	95.52%	93.17%
Means
Tính biệt N	Mean	StDev	95% CI
C9TT 4	4.3000	0.0913 (4.1571, 4.4429)
D9TT 4	5.3125	0.1377 (5.1696, 5.4554)

Total 7 2.13219 Model Summary

Pooled StDev = 0.116815

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence Tính

biệt N Mean Grouping D9TT 4 5.3125 A

C9TT 4 4.3000 B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: TL thit tinh versus Tính biệt

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values Tính biệt 2 C9TT, D9TT

Analysis of Variance

Source DF

Adj SS Adj MS	F-Value P-Value
Tính biệt 1	22.2682 22.2682	275.89 0.000
Error 6	0.4843 0.0807
Total 7	22.7525

Model Summary

R-sq	R-sq(adj)	R-sq(pred)
0.284102	97.87%	97.52%	96.22%

Means


Tính biệt N	Mean	StDev	95% CI
C9TT 4	30.179	0.349	( 29.831, 30.526)
D9TT 4	33.5155	0.1997	(33.1679, 33.8631)

Pooled StDev = 0.284102

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Tính

biệt N

Mean

Grouping

D9TT 4

33.5155

C9TT 4

30.179

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: KL Xuong versus Tính biệt

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values Tính biệt 2 C9TT, D9TT

Analysis of Variance

Source

DF	Adj SS	Adj MS	F-Value	P-Value
Tính biệt	1	0.28125	0.281250	45.00	0.001
Error	6	0.03750	0.006250
Total	7	0.31875

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred) 0.0790569 88.24% 86.27% 79.08%

Means Tính

biệt N Mean StDev 95% CI C9TT 4 1.4250 0.0645 (1.3283, 1.5217)

D9TT 4 1.8000 0.0913 (1.7033, 1.8967)

Pooled StDev = 0.0790569

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence Tính

biệt N Mean Grouping D9TT 4 1.8000 A

C9TT 4 1.4250 B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: TL Xuong versus Tính biệt

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values Tính biệt 2 C9TT, D9TT

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Tính biệt 1 3.6634 3.66343 37.71 0.001

Error 6 0.5828 0.09714

S	R-sq	R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)
0.311671	86.27%	83.99% 75.60%

Total 7 4.2463 Model Summary

Means


Tính biệt N	Mean	StDev	95%	CI
C9TT 4	9.998	0.292	( 9.616,	10.379)
D9TT 4	11.351	0.330	(10.970,	11.733)

Pooled StDev = 0.311671

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence Tính

biệt N Mean Grouping D9TT 4 11.351 A

C9TT 4 9.998 B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

3.Năng suất thịt tại thời điểm 12 tháng tuổi

Descriptive Statistics: KL song, Kl moc ham, TL moc ham, KL thit xe, TL thit xe,

...

Variable

N	N*	Mean	SE Mean	StDev	Variance	CoefVar	Minimum	Maximum
KL song	8	0	19.325	0.586	1.658	2.748	8.58	17.500	21.200
Kl moc ham	8	0	10.675	0.420	1.188	1.411	11.13	9.300	12.100
TL moc ham	8	0	55.135	0.525	1.485	2.205	2.69	53.143	57.075
KL thit xe	8	0	8.500	0.423	1.198	1.434	14.09	7.200	9.900
TL thit xe	8	0	43.802	0.863	2.442	5.962	5.57	41.143	46.698
KL thit tinh	8	0	6.325	0.316	0.893	0.797	14.12	5.300	7.400
TL thit tinh	8	0	32.594	0.648	1.834	3.363	5.63	30.286	34.906
KL Xuong	8	0	2.095	0.107	0.303	0.092	14.45	1.790	2.450
TL Xuong	8	0	10.794	0.233	0.658	0.434	6.10	9.945	11.611

4. Năng suất thịt ở thời điểm 12 tháng tuổi

One-way ANOVA: KL song versus Tính biệt

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis. Factor Information

Factor Levels Values

Tính biệt 2 C12TT, D12TT Analysis of Variance

Source DF

Adj SS Adj MS	F-Value P-Value
Tính biệt 1	18.6050 18.6050	177.19 0.000
Error 6	0.6300 0.1050
Total 7	19.2350

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred) 0.324037 96.72% 96.18% 94.18%

Means

Tính biệt N Mean StDev 95% CI C12TT 4 17.800 0.294 (17.404, 18.196)

D12TT 4 20.850 0.351 (20.454, 21.246)

Pooled StDev = 0.324037

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Tính biệt

N	Mean Grouping
D12TT	4	20.850 A
C12TT	4	17.800 B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: Kl moc ham versus Tính biệt

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values

Tính biệt 2 C12TT, D12TT

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Tính biệt 1 9.2450 9.2450 88.05 0.000

Error 6 0.6300 0.1050

S	R-sq R-sq(adj)	R-sq(pred)
0.324037	93.62% 92.56%	88.66%

Total 7 9.8750 Model Summary

Means


Tính biệt	N	Mean	StDev	95% CI
C12TT	4	9.600	0.294	( 9.204, 9.996)
D12TT	4	11.750	0.351	(11.354, 12.146)

Pooled StDev = 0.324037

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Tính biệt N

Mean	Grouping
D12TT 4	11.750	A
C12TT 4	9.600	B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: TL moc ham versus Tính biệt

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values

Tính biệt 2 C12TT, D12TT

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Tính biệt 1 11.730 11.7295 19.00 0.005

Error 6 3.703 0.6172

Total 7 15.433

Model Summary

R-sq R-sq(adj)	R-sq(pred)
0.785644	76.00% 72.00%	57.34%

Means


Tính biệt	N	Mean StDev	95% CI
C12TT	4	53.924 0.833	(52.963, 54.885)
D12TT	4	56.346 0.735	(55.384, 57.307)

Pooled StDev = 0.785644

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Tính biệt N

Mean	Grouping
D12TT 4	56.346	A
C12TT 4	53.924	B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

Xem tất cả 306 trang.

Ngày đăng: 19/02/2023