Năng Suất Thịt Thời Điểm 9 Tháng Tuổi Theo Tính Biệt

One-way ANOVA: 3TT versus Tinh biet

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values TT 2 C, D

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value TT 1 0.08817 0.08817 1.56 0.216

Error 58 3.27367 0.05644

Total 59 3.36183

Model Summary

S 0.237576

Means

R-sq 2.62%	R-sq(adj) 0.94%	R-sq(pred) 0.00%
TT N	Mean	StDev	95% CI
C 30	5.3000	0.2519 (5.2132, 5.3868)
D 30	5.3767	0.2223 (5.2898, 5.4635)

Có thể bạn quan tâm!

Xem toàn bộ 306 trang tài liệu này.

Pooled StDev = 0.237576

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

N	Mean	Grouping
D	30	5.3767	A
C	30	5.3000	A

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: 6TT versus Tinh biet

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values TT 2 C, D

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value TT 1 0.2042 0.2042 1.85 0.179

Error 58 6.3857 0.1101

S 0.331810	R-sq 3.10%	R-sq(adj) 1.43%	R-sq(pred) 0.00%
Means
TT N	Mean	StDev 95% CI
C 30	5.8933	0.3695 (5.7721, 6.0146)
D 30	6.0100	0.2893 (5.8887, 6.1313)
Pooled	StDev =	0.331810

Total 59 6.5898 Model Summary

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence TT N Mean Grouping

D 30 6.0100 A

C 30 5.8933 A

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: 9TT versus Tinh biet

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values TT 2 C, D

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value TT 1 0.3375 0.3375 1.53 0.222

Error 58 12.8243 0.2211

Total 59 13.1618

Model Summary

R-sq	R-sq(adj)	R-sq(pred)
0.470222	2.56%	0.88%	0.00%

Means

TT N Mean StDev 95% CI

C 30 6.347 0.561 ( 6.175, 6.519)

D 30 6.4967 0.3577 (6.3248, 6.6685)

Pooled StDev = 0.470222

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence TT N Mean Grouping

D 30 6.4967 A

C 30 6.347 A

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: 12TT versus Tinh biet

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values TT 2 C, D

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value TT 1 0.0807 0.08067 0.23 0.634

Error 50 20.3787 0.35136

Total 51 20.4593

Model Summary

S 0.592753

Means

R-sq 0.39%	R-sq(adj) 0.00%	R-sq(pred) 0.00%
TT N	Mean	StDev	95% CI
C 26	6.660	0.715 ( 6.443, 6.877)
D 26	6.7333	0.4373 (6.5167, 6.9500)

Pooled StDev = 0.592753

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

N	Mean Grouping
D	26	6.7333 A
C	26	6.660 A

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

1.5. NĂNG SUẤT THỊT

1.Năng suất thịt tại ở 9 tháng tuổi

Descriptive Statistics: KL song, Kl moc ham, TL moc ham, KL thit xe, TL thit xe,

...

Variable

N	N*	Mean	SE Mean	StDev	Variance	CoefVar	Minimum	Maximum
KL song	8	0	15.050	0.323	0.915	0.837	6.08	13.900	16.200
Kl moc ham	8	0	8.075	0.236	0.667	0.445	8.26	7.300	9.000
TL moc ham	8	0	53.595	0.445	1.260	1.587	2.35	52.143	55.556
KL thit xe	8	0	6.488	0.275	0.778	0.605	11.99	5.600	7.400
TL thit xe	8	0	42.976	0.936	2.648	7.010	6.16	40.000	45.679
KL thit tinh	8	0	4.806	0.195	0.552	0.305	11.48	4.200	5.450
TL thit tinh	8	0	31.847	0.637	1.803	3.250	5.66	29.795	33.654
KL Xuong	8	0	1.6125	0.0754	0.2134	0.0455	13.23	1.3500	1.9000
TL Xuong	8	0	10.674	0.275	0.779	0.607	7.30	9.643	11.728

2.Năng suất thịt thời điểm 9 tháng tuổi theo tính biệt

One-way ANOVA: KL song versus Tính biệt

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis. Factor Information

Factor Levels Values Tính biệt 2 C9TT, D9TT

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Tính biệt 1 5.1200 5.1200 41.51 0.001

Error 6 0.7400 0.1233

Total 7 5.8600 Model Summary

R-sq	R-sq(adj)	R-sq(pred)
0.351188	87.37%	85.27%	77.55%
Means Tính biệt N	Mean	StDev	95% CI
C9TT 4	14.250	0.351 (13.820, 14.680)
D9TT 4	15.850	0.351 (15.420, 16.280)

Pooled StDev = 0.351188

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence Tính

biệt N Mean Grouping D9TT 4 15.850 A

C9TT 4 14.250 B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: Kl moc ham versus Tính biệt

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values Tính biệt 2 C9TT, D9TT

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Tính biệt 1 2.6450 2.64500 33.77 0.001

Error 6 0.4700 0.07833

Total 7 3.1150

Model Summary

R-sq	R-sq(adj)	R-sq(pred)
0.279881	84.91%	82.40%	73.18%
Means
Tính biệt N	Mean	StDev	95% CI
C9TT 4	7.5000	0.1826 (7.1576, 7.8424)
D9TT 4	8.650	0.351 ( 8.308, 8.992)

Pooled StDev = 0.279881

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence Tính

biệt N Mean Grouping D9TT 4 8.650 A

C9TT 4 7.5000 B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: TL moc ham versus Tính biệt

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values Tính biệt 2 C9TT, D9TT

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Tính biệt 1 7.403 7.4032 11.98 0.013

Error 6 3.707 0.6178

Total 7 11.110

Model Summary

R-sq	R-sq(adj)	R-sq(pred)
0.785994	66.64%	61.08%	40.69%
Means
Tính biệt N	Mean	StDev	95% CI
C9TT 4	52.633	0.471 (51.672, 53.595)
D9TT 4	54.557	1.007 (53.596, 55.519)

Pooled StDev = 0.785994

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence Tính

biệt N Mean Grouping D9TT 4 54.557 A

C9TT 4 52.633 B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: KL thit xe versus Tính biệt

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values Tính biệt 2 C9TT, D9TT

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Tính biệt 1 4.0613 4.06125 141.26 0.000

Error 6 0.1725 0.02875

S	R-sq	R-sq(adj)	R-sq(pred)
0.169558	95.93%	95.25%	92.76%
Means
Tính biệt N	Mean	StDev	95% CI
C9TT 4	5.7750	0.1555 (5.5676, 5.9824)
D9TT 4	7.2000	0.1826 (6.9926, 7.4074)

Total 7 4.2338 Model Summary

Pooled StDev = 0.169558

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence Tính

biệt N Mean Grouping D9TT 4 7.2000 A

C9TT 4 5.7750 B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

Xem tất cả 306 trang.

Ngày đăng: 19/02/2023