Trang chủ / Chăn Nuôi

Năng Suất Thịt Thời Điểm 9 Tháng Tuổi Theo Tính Biệt


One-way ANOVA: 3TT versus Tinh biet


Method


Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05


Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.


Factor Information


Factor Levels Values TT 2 C, D


Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value TT 1 0.08817 0.08817 1.56 0.216

Error 58 3.27367 0.05644

Total 59 3.36183


Model Summary


S 0.237576


Means

R-sq 2.62%

R-sq(adj)

0.94%

R-sq(pred)

0.00%

TT N

Mean

StDev

95% CI

C 30

5.3000

0.2519 (5.2132, 5.3868)

D 30

5.3767

0.2223 (5.2898, 5.4635)

Có thể bạn quan tâm!

Xem toàn bộ 306 trang tài liệu này.

Đặc điểm sinh trưởng và mối tương quan đa hình gen POU1F1 với tính trạng sinh trưởng của dê địa phương Định Hóa - 25


Pooled StDev = 0.237576


Tukey Pairwise Comparisons


Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence


TT

N

Mean

Grouping

D

30

5.3767

A

C

30

5.3000

A


Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.


One-way ANOVA: 6TT versus Tinh biet


Method


Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05


Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.


Factor Information


Factor Levels Values TT 2 C, D


Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value TT 1 0.2042 0.2042 1.85 0.179

Error 58 6.3857 0.1101

S 0.331810

R-sq 3.10%

R-sq(adj)

1.43%

R-sq(pred)

0.00%


Means



TT N

Mean

StDev 95% CI

C 30

5.8933

0.3695 (5.7721, 6.0146)

D 30

6.0100

0.2893 (5.8887, 6.1313)

Pooled

StDev =

0.331810

Total 59 6.5898 Model Summary


Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence TT N Mean Grouping

D 30 6.0100 A

C 30 5.8933 A


Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.


One-way ANOVA: 9TT versus Tinh biet


Method


Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05


Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.


Factor Information


Factor Levels Values TT 2 C, D


Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value TT 1 0.3375 0.3375 1.53 0.222

Error 58 12.8243 0.2211

Total 59 13.1618


Model Summary


S

R-sq

R-sq(adj)

R-sq(pred)

0.470222

2.56%

0.88%

0.00%


Means


TT N Mean StDev 95% CI

C 30 6.347 0.561 ( 6.175, 6.519)

D 30 6.4967 0.3577 (6.3248, 6.6685)


Pooled StDev = 0.470222


Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence TT N Mean Grouping

D 30 6.4967 A

C 30 6.347 A


Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.


One-way ANOVA: 12TT versus Tinh biet


Method


Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05


Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.


Factor Information


Factor Levels Values TT 2 C, D


Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value TT 1 0.0807 0.08067 0.23 0.634

Error 50 20.3787 0.35136

Total 51 20.4593


Model Summary


S 0.592753


Means

R-sq 0.39%

R-sq(adj)

0.00%

R-sq(pred)

0.00%

TT N

Mean

StDev

95% CI

C 26

6.660

0.715 ( 6.443, 6.877)

D 26

6.7333

0.4373 (6.5167, 6.9500)


Pooled StDev = 0.592753


Tukey Pairwise Comparisons


Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence


TT

N

Mean Grouping

D

26

6.7333 A

C

26

6.660 A


Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.


1.5. NĂNG SUẤT THỊT

1.Năng suất thịt tại ở 9 tháng tuổi

Descriptive Statistics: KL song, Kl moc ham, TL moc ham, KL thit xe, TL thit xe,

...


Variable

N

N*

Mean

SE Mean

StDev

Variance

CoefVar

Minimum

Maximum

KL song

8

0

15.050

0.323

0.915

0.837

6.08

13.900

16.200

Kl moc ham

8

0

8.075

0.236

0.667

0.445

8.26

7.300

9.000

TL moc ham

8

0

53.595

0.445

1.260

1.587

2.35

52.143

55.556

KL thit xe

8

0

6.488

0.275

0.778

0.605

11.99

5.600

7.400

TL thit xe

8

0

42.976

0.936

2.648

7.010

6.16

40.000

45.679

KL thit tinh

8

0

4.806

0.195

0.552

0.305

11.48

4.200

5.450

TL thit tinh

8

0

31.847

0.637

1.803

3.250

5.66

29.795

33.654

KL Xuong

8

0

1.6125

0.0754

0.2134

0.0455

13.23

1.3500

1.9000

TL Xuong

8

0

10.674

0.275

0.779

0.607

7.30

9.643

11.728

2.Năng suất thịt thời điểm 9 tháng tuổi theo tính biệt

One-way ANOVA: KL song versus Tính biệt

Method


Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05


Equal variances were assumed for the analysis. Factor Information

Factor Levels Values Tính biệt 2 C9TT, D9TT


Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Tính biệt 1 5.1200 5.1200 41.51 0.001

Error 6 0.7400 0.1233

Total 7 5.8600 Model Summary


S

R-sq

R-sq(adj)

R-sq(pred)

0.351188

87.37%

85.27%

77.55%

Means Tính biệt N


Mean


StDev


95% CI

C9TT 4

14.250

0.351 (13.820, 14.680)

D9TT 4

15.850

0.351 (15.420, 16.280)


Pooled StDev = 0.351188

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence Tính

biệt N Mean Grouping D9TT 4 15.850 A

C9TT 4 14.250 B


Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.


One-way ANOVA: Kl moc ham versus Tính biệt


Method


Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05


Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.


Factor Information


Factor Levels Values Tính biệt 2 C9TT, D9TT


Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Tính biệt 1 2.6450 2.64500 33.77 0.001

Error 6 0.4700 0.07833

Total 7 3.1150


Model Summary


S

R-sq

R-sq(adj)

R-sq(pred)

0.279881

84.91%

82.40%

73.18%


Means




Tính biệt N


Mean


StDev


95% CI

C9TT 4

7.5000

0.1826 (7.1576, 7.8424)

D9TT 4

8.650

0.351 ( 8.308, 8.992)


Pooled StDev = 0.279881


Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence Tính

biệt N Mean Grouping D9TT 4 8.650 A

C9TT 4 7.5000 B


Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.


One-way ANOVA: TL moc ham versus Tính biệt


Method


Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05


Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.


Factor Information


Factor Levels Values Tính biệt 2 C9TT, D9TT


Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Tính biệt 1 7.403 7.4032 11.98 0.013

Error 6 3.707 0.6178

Total 7 11.110


Model Summary


S

R-sq

R-sq(adj)

R-sq(pred)

0.785994

66.64%

61.08%

40.69%


Means




Tính biệt N


Mean


StDev


95% CI

C9TT 4

52.633

0.471 (51.672, 53.595)

D9TT 4

54.557

1.007 (53.596, 55.519)


Pooled StDev = 0.785994


Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence Tính

biệt N Mean Grouping D9TT 4 54.557 A

C9TT 4 52.633 B


Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.


One-way ANOVA: KL thit xe versus Tính biệt


Method


Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05


Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.


Factor Information


Factor Levels Values Tính biệt 2 C9TT, D9TT


Analysis of Variance


Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Tính biệt 1 4.0613 4.06125 141.26 0.000

Error 6 0.1725 0.02875

S

R-sq

R-sq(adj)

R-sq(pred)

0.169558

95.93%

95.25%

92.76%


Means




Tính biệt N


Mean


StDev


95% CI

C9TT 4

5.7750

0.1555 (5.5676, 5.9824)

D9TT 4

7.2000

0.1826 (6.9926, 7.4074)

Total 7 4.2338 Model Summary


Pooled StDev = 0.169558


Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence Tính

biệt N Mean Grouping D9TT 4 7.2000 A

C9TT 4 5.7750 B


Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

..... Xem trang tiếp theo?
⇦ Trang trước - Trang tiếp theo ⇨

Ngày đăng: 19/02/2023