Kích Thước Một Số Chiều Đo Chính Của Dê Định Hóa

One-way ANOVA: 5 - 6TT versus Tinh biet

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values TT 2 C, D

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value TT 1 6.293 6.2929 7.04 0.010

Error 58 51.828 0.8936

Total 59 58.121

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred) 0.945294 10.83% 9.29% 4.57%

Means

TT N Mean StDev 95% CI

C 30

2.924	0.782 (2.578, 3.269)
D 30	3.571	1.084 (3.226, 3.917)
Pooled	StDev =	0.945294

Có thể bạn quan tâm!

Xem toàn bộ 306 trang tài liệu này.

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence TT N Mean Grouping

D 30 3.571 A

C 30 2.924 B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: 6 - 7TT versus Tinh biet

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values TT 2 C, D

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value TT 1 5.200 5.2002 5.30 0.025

Error 58 56.872 0.9806

Total 59 62.072

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred) 0.990228 8.38% 6.80% 1.95%

Means

TT N Mean StDev 95% CI

C 30 2.714 0.785 (2.352, 3.076)

D 30 3.302 1.160 (2.941, 3.664)

Pooled StDev = 0.990228

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence TT N Mean Grouping

D 30 3.302 A

C 30 2.714 B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: 7 - 8TT versus Tinh biet

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values TT 2 C, D

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value TT 1 0.4451 0.4451 0.54 0.464

Error 58 47.5013 0.8190

Total 59 47.9464

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred) 0.904980 0.93% 0.00% 0.00%

Means

TT N Mean StDev 95% CI

C 30 2.642 1.043 (2.312, 2.973)

D 30 2.470 0.742 (2.139, 2.801)

Pooled StDev = 0.904980

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence TT N Mean Grouping

C 30 2.642 A

D 30 2.470 A

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: 8 - 9TT versus Tinh biet

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values TT 2 C, D

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value TT 1 0.4322 0.4322 0.79 0.377

Error 58 31.5796 0.5445

Total 59 32.0118

Model Summary

S 0.737887

R-sq 1.35%	R-sq(adj) 0.00%	R-sq(pred) 0.00%
Means
TT N	Mean	StDev 95% CI
C 30	2.5716	0.5306 (2.3020, 2.8413)
D 30	2.402	0.899 ( 2.132, 2.672)
Pooled	StDev =	0.737887

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence TT N Mean Grouping

C 30 2.5716 A

D 30 2.402 A

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: 9 - 10TT versus Tinh biet

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values TT 2 C, D

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value TT 1 0.6691 0.6691 0.96 0.331

Error 50 40.3374 0.6955

Total 51 41.0065

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred) 0.833950 1.63% 0.00% 0.00%

Means

TT N Mean StDev 95% CI

C 26 2.257 0.838 (1.952, 2.561)

D 26 2.045 0.830 (1.741, 2.350)

Pooled StDev = 0.833950

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence TT N Mean Grouping

C 26 2.257 A

D 26 2.045 A

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: 10 - 11TT versus Tinh biet

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values TT 2 C, D

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value TT 1 0.8859 0.8859 1.35 0.249

Error 50 37.9230 0.6538

Total 51 38.8089

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred) 0.808607 2.28% 0.60% 0.00%

Means

TT N Mean StDev 95% CI

C 26 1.792 0.784 (1.497, 2.088)

D 26 2.035 0.833 (1.740, 2.331)

Pooled StDev = 0.808607

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence TT N Mean Grouping

D 26 2.035 A

C 26 1.792 A

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: 11 - 12TT versus Tinh biet

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values TT 2 C, D

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value TT 1 21.13 21.1330 29.43 0.000

Error 50 41.65 0.7180

Total 51 62.78

Model Summary

R-sq R-sq(adj)	R-sq(pred)
0.847377	33.66% 32.52%	29.01%

Means


TT N	Mean	StDev	95%	CI
C 26	1.536	0.903	(1.226,	1.846)
D 26	2.723	0.788	(2.413,	3.033)

Pooled StDev = 0.847377

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence TT N Mean Grouping

D 26 2.723 A

C 26 1.536 B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

1.4.KÍCH THƯỚC MỘT SỐ CHIỀU ĐO CHÍNH CỦA DÊ ĐỊNH HÓA

1.4.1 KÍCH THƯỚC MỘT SỐ CHIỀU ĐO (TÍNH CHUNG ĐỰC VÀ CÁI)

1. CAO VÂY

Descriptive Statistics: 1TT, 3TT, 6TT, 9TT, 12TT

Variable N N* Mean SE Mean StDev CoefVar Minimum Maximum

1TT

60	0	32.998	0.198 1.533	4.64	29.800	37.000
3TT	60	0	38.927	0.213 1.650	4.24	35.700	42.400
6TT	60	0	44.307	0.201 1.560	3.52	41.000	47.600
9TT	60	0	48.918	0.247 1.911	3.91	44.800	53.600
12TT	52	0	52.668	0.294 2.278	4.32	48.000	59.000

2. VÒNG NGỰC

Descriptive Statistics: 1TT, 3TT, 6TT, 9TT, 12TT

Variable

N	N*	Mean	SE Mean	StDev	CoefVar	Minimum	Maximum
1TT	60	0	34.993	0.201	1.561	4.46	31.400	38.000
3TT	60	0	42.332	0.365	2.830	6.68	37.000	50.500
6TT	60	0	51.063	0.437	3.382	6.62	44.000	61.000
9TT	60	0	58.498	0.477	3.694	6.31	50.500	71.000
12TT	52	0	64.727	0.602	4.666	7.21	57.000	76.000

3. DÀI THÂN CHÉO

Descriptive Statistics: 1TT, 3TT, 6TT, 9TT, 12TT

Variable N N* Mean SE Mean StDev CoefVar Minimum Maximum

1TT

60	0	33.713	0.220 1.704	5.05	30.200	36.900
3TT	60	0	40.272	0.306 2.373	5.89	36.000	44.900
6TT	60	0	45.793	0.362 2.803	6.12	40.500	50.600
9TT	60	0	51.362	0.449 3.481	6.78	42.500	57.900
12TT	52	0	57.765	0.536 4.154	7.19	49.800	62.900

4. VÒNG ỐNG

Descriptive Statistics: 1TT, 3TT, 6TT, 9TT, 12TT

Variable

N	N*	Mean	SE Mean	StDev	CoefVar	Minimum	Maximum
1TT	60	0	5.0817	0.0225	0.1742	3.43	4.7000	5.5000
3TT	60	0	5.3383	0.0308	0.2387	4.47	5.0000	5.8000
6TT	60	0	5.9517	0.0431	0.3342	5.62	5.0000	6.5000
9TT	60	0	6.4217	0.0610	0.4723	7.36	5.4000	7.2000
12TT	52	0	6.6967	0.0760	0.5889	8.79	5.4000	7.6000

Xem tất cả 306 trang.

Ngày đăng: 19/02/2023