Sinh Trưởng Tuyệt Đối Của Dê Định Hóa

One-way ANOVA: 7TT versus Tinh biet

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values TT 2 C, D

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value TT 1 38.72 38.7207 98.56 0.000

Error 58 22.79 0.3929

Total 59 61.51

Model Summary

R-sq R-sq(adj)	R-sq(pred)
0.626796	62.95% 62.31%	60.35%

Có thể bạn quan tâm!

Xem toàn bộ 306 trang tài liệu này.

Means

TT N Mean StDev 95% CI

C 30 11.373 0.551 (11.144, 11.602)

D 30 12.980 0.695 (12.751, 13.209)

Pooled StDev = 0.626796

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence TT N Mean Grouping

D 30 12.980 A

C 30 11.373 B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: 8TT versus Tinh biet

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values TT 2 C, D

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value TT 1 42.67 42.6727 106.54 0.000

Error 58 23.23 0.4005

Total 59 65.90

Model Summary

S 0.632873

Means

R-sq 64.75%	R-sq(adj) 64.14%	R-sq(pred) 62.28%
TT N	Mean	StDev	95% CI
C 30	12.640	0.550 (12.409, 12.871)
D 30	14.327	0.706 (14.095, 14.558)

Pooled StDev = 0.632873

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence TT N Mean Grouping

D 30 14.327 A

C 30 12.640 B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: 9TT versus Tinh biet

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values TT 2 C, D

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value TT 1 46.46 46.4640 107.93 0.000

Error 58 24.97 0.4305

Total 59 71.43

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred) 0.656138 65.04% 64.44% 62.59%

Means

TT N Mean StDev 95% CI

C 30

14.010	0.587 (13.770, 14.250)
D 30	15.770	0.719 (15.530, 16.010)

Pooled StDev = 0.656138

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence TT N Mean Grouping

D 30 15.770 A

C 30 14.010 B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: 10TT versus Tinh biet

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values TT 2 C, D

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value TT 1 47.70 47.7042 93.01 0.000

Error 50 29.75 0.5129

Total 51 77.45

Model Summary

R-sq R-sq(adj)	R-sq(pred)
0.716172	61.59% 60.93%	58.90%

Means

TT N Mean StDev 95% CI

C 26 15.333 0.608 (15.072, 15.595)

D 26 17.117 0.810 (16.855, 17.378)

Pooled StDev = 0.716172

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence TT N Mean Grouping

D 26 17.117 A

C 26 15.333 B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: 11TT versus Tinh biet

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values TT 2 C, D

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value TT 1 65.94 65.9402 110.85 0.000

Error 50 34.50 0.5949

Total 51 100.44

Model Summary

S 0.771269

Means

R-sq 65.65%	R-sq(adj) 65.06%	R-sq(pred) 63.24%
TT N	Mean	StDev	95% CI
C 26	16.473	0.638 (16.191, 16.755)
D 26	18.570	0.885 (18.288, 18.852)

Pooled StDev = 0.771269

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence TT N Mean Grouping

D 26 18.570 A

C 26 16.273 B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: 12TT versus Tinh biet

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values TT 2 C, D

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value TT 1 152.96 152.961 187.47 0.000

Error 50 47.32 0.816

Total 51 200.28

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred) 0.903276 76.37% 75.96% 74.71%

Means

TT N Mean StDev 95% CI

C 26

17.520	0.729 (17.190, 17.850)
D 26	20.713	1.049 (20.383, 21.043)

Pooled StDev = 0.903276

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence TT N Mean Grouping

D 26 20.713 A

C 26 17.520 B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

1.2. SINH TRƯỞNG TUYỆT ĐỐI CỦA DÊ ĐỊNH HÓA

Variable	N	N*	Mean	SE	Mean	StDev	Minimum	Maximum
Ss - 1TT	60	0	61.72		1.53	11.81	40.00	86.67
1 -	2TT	60	0	51.56	1.56	12.06	26.67	83.33
2 -	3TT	60	0	49.00	1.73	13.38	20.00	83.33
3 -	4TT	60	0	47.22	2.05	15.89	23.33	86.67
4 -	5TT	60	0	48.83	1.84	14.23	20.00	80.00
5 -	6TT	60	0	44.06	1.92	14.86	10.00	83.33
6 -	7TT	60	0	46.28	2.20	17.05	16.67	90.00
7 -	8TT	60	0	42.90	1.96	15.20	13.33	90.00
8 -	9TT	60	0	46.89	1.85	14.35	16.67	83.33
9 -	10TT	52	0	44.50	2.24	17.36	20.00	100.00
10 - 11TT	52	0	43.22	2.47		19.11	13.33	103.33
11 - 12TT	52	0	53.17	3.58		27.76	6.67	103.33
SS - 12TT	52	0	47.671	0.632		4.897	39.452	60.274

Descriptive Statistics: Ss - 1TT, 1 - 2TT, 2 - 3TT, 3 - 4TT, 4 - 5TT, 5 - 6TT, 6 - 7TT, 7 – 8TT, 8 – 9TT, 9 – 10TT, 10 – 11TT, 11 – 12TT, SS – 12 TT.

SINH TRƯỞNG TUYỆT ĐỐI THEO TÍNH BIỆT

One-way ANOVA: Ss -1TT versus Tinh biet

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis. Factor Information

Factor Levels Values TT 2 C, D

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value TT 1 1276 1275.7 10.64 0.002

Error 58 6957 120.0

Total 59 8233 Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred) 10.9524 15.50% 14.04% 9.57%

Means


TT N	Mean	StDev	95%	CI
C 30	57.11	9.50	(53.11,	61.11)
D 30	66.33	12.23	(62.33,	70.34)

Pooled StDev = 10.9524

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

TT N Mean Grouping D 30 66.33 A

C 30 57.11 B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: 1-2TT versus Tinh biet

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values TT 2 C, D

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value TT 1 500.7 500.7 3.59 0.063

Error 58 8087.4 139.4

Total 59 8588.1

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred) 11.8084 5.83% 4.21% 0.00%

Means

TT N Mean StDev 95% CI

C 30 48.67 10.88 (44.35, 52.98)

D 30 54.44 12.67 (50.13, 58.76)

Pooled StDev = 11.8084

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence TT N Mean Grouping

D 30 54.44 A

C 30 48.67 A

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

Xem tất cả 306 trang.

Ngày đăng: 19/02/2023