Sinh Trưởng Tương Đối Của Dê Định Hóa

One-way ANOVA: 10 -11TT versus Tinh biet

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values TT 2 C, D

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value TT 1 1636 1636.3 4.76 0.033

Error 50 19919 343.4

Total 51 21555

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred) 18.5317 7.59% 6.00% 1.11%

Means

TT N Mean StDev 95% CI

C 26 38.00 16.67 (31.23, 44.77)

D 26 48.44 20.22 (41.67, 55.22)

Pooled StDev = 18.5317

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence TT N Mean Grouping

D 26 48.44 A

C 26 38.00 B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: 11-12TT versus Tinh biet

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values TT 2 C, D

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value TT 1 20045 20044.6 45.75 0.000

Error 50 25409 438.1

Total 51 45454

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred) 20.9306 44.10% 43.14% 40.18%

Means

TT N Mean StDev 95% CI

C 26 34.89 20.80 (27.24, 42.54)

D 26 71.44 21.06 (63.80, 79.09)

Pooled StDev = 20.9306

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence TT N Mean Grouping

D 26 71.45 A

C 26 34.89 B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: SS -12TT versus Tinh biet

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values TT 2 C, D

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value TT 1 1013.3 1013.32 146.41 0.000

Error 50 401.4 6.92

Total 51 1414.7

Model Summary

S 2.63081

R-sq 71.63%	R-sq(adj) 71.14%	R-sq(pred) 69.64%
Means
TT N	Mean	StDev 95% CI
C 26	43.562	2.196 (42.600, 44.523)
D 26	51.781	3.003 (50.819, 52.742)
Pooled	StDev =	2.63081

Có thể bạn quan tâm!

Xem toàn bộ 306 trang tài liệu này.

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence TT N Mean Grouping

D 26 51.781 A

C 26 43.562 B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

1.3. SINH TRƯỞNG TƯƠNG ĐỐI CỦA DÊ ĐỊNH HÓA

Descriptive Statistics: Ss -1TT, 1 - 2TT, 2 - 3TT, 3 - 4TT, 4 - 5TT, 5 - 6TT, 6 - 7TT, 7-8TT, 8-9TT, 9-10TT, 10-11TT,11-12TT

Variable N

N*	Mean	SE Mean	StDev	Minimum	Maximum
Ss -1TT 60			0	17.477	0.346	2.678	12.500	22.414
1 -	2TT	60	0	8.934	0.266	2.063	4.348	14.706
2 -	3TT	60	0	6.284	0.214	1.656	2.632	10.000
3 -	4TT	60	0	4.864	0.203	1.571	2.229	9.259
4 -	5TT	60	0	4.208	0.164	1.267	1.630	7.792
5 -	6TT	60	0	3.247	0.128	0.993	0.691	5.814
6 -	7TT	60	0	3.008	0.132	1.026	1.163	5.696
7 -	8TT	60	0	2.556	0.116	0.901	0.855	6.109
8 -	9TT	60	0	2.4868	0.0951	0.7366	0.8197	4.0816
9 -	10TT	52	0	2.151	0.108	0.834	0.862	4.601
10 - 11TT		52	0 1.914		0.105	0.811	0.629	4.318
11 - 12TT		52	0 2.129		0.133	1.032	0.311	4.441

SINH TRƯỞNG TƯƠNG ĐỐI THEO TÍNH BIỆT

One-way ANOVA: Ss -1TT versus Tinh biet

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis. Factor Information

Factor Levels Values TT 2 C, D

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value TT 1 2.020 2.020 0.28 0.600

Error 58 421.146 7.261

Total 59 423.166

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred) 2.69465 0.48% 0.00% 0.00%

Means

TT N Mean StDev 95% CI

C 30 17.293 2.669 (16.308, 18.278)

D 30 17.660 2.720 (16.675, 18.645)

Pooled StDev = 2.69465

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

TT N Mean Grouping D 30 17.660 A

C 30 17.293 A

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: 1 - 2TT versus Tinh biet

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values TT 2 C, D

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value TT 1 0.255 0.2548 0.06 0.809

Error 58 250.869 4.3253

Total 59 251.124

Model Summary

S 2.07974

Means

R-sq 0.10%	R-sq(adj) 0.00%	R-sq(pred) 0.00%
TT N	Mean	StDev	95% CI
C	30	9.000	2.022 (8.239, 9.760)
D	30	8.869	2.136 (8.109, 9.629)

Pooled StDev = 2.07974

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence TT N Mean Grouping

C 30 9.000 A

D 30 8.869 A

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: 2 - 3TT versus Tinh biet

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values TT 2 C, D

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value TT 1 0.446 0.4460 0.16 0.690

Error 58 161.410 2.7829

Total 59 161.856

Model Summary

S 1.66821

Means

R-sq 0.28%	R-sq(adj) 0.00%	R-sq(pred) 0.00%
TT N	Mean	StDev	95% CI
C 30	6.371	1.669 (5.761, 6.980)
D 30	6.198	1.668 (5.588, 6.808)
Pooled	StDev =	1.66821

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence TT N Mean Grouping

C 30 6.371 A

D 30 6.198 A

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: 3 - 4TT versus Tinh biet

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values TT 2 C, D

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value TT 1 2.677 2.677 1.09 0.302

Error 58 142.874 2.463

Total 59 145.550

Model Summary

S 1.56950

Means

R-sq 1.84%	R-sq(adj) 0.15%	R-sq(pred) 0.00%
TT N	Mean	StDev	95% CI
C 30	5.075	1.675 (4.501, 5.648)
D 30	4.652	1.456 (4.079, 5.226)
Pooled	StDev =	1.56950

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence TT N Mean Grouping

C 30 5.075 A

D 30 4.652 A

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

One-way ANOVA: 4 - 5TT versus Tinh biet

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values TT 2 C, D

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value TT 1 3.222 3.222 2.04 0.158

Error 58 91.546 1.578

Total 59 94.767

Model Summary

S 1.25633

Means

R-sq 3.40%	R-sq(adj) 1.73%	R-sq(pred) 0.00%
TT N	Mean	StDev	95% CI
C 30	4.440	1.438 (3.981, 4.899)
D 30	3.977	1.043 (3.517, 4.436)
Pooled	StDev =	1.25633

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence TT N Mean Grouping

C 30 4.440 A

D 30 3.977 A

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.