25. Hatherly, D. J., and Parker, L. D. (1988), Performance Auditing Outcomes: A Comparative Study, Financial Accountability & Management, 4 (1), pp: 21-41.
26. Hamburger, P. (1989). Efficiency auditing by the Australian Audit Office: Reform and reaction under three auditors-general. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 2(3), pp: 3-21.
27. Holms, M. (1992), Public Sector Management Reform: Convergence or Divergence, International Journal of Policy and Administration, 5(4), pp: 472-483.
28. Hui Fan (2012), Government Performance auditing demand research based on the neo-institutional economics, China Finance Review International, 2(2), pp: 100-102;
29. Jacobs, K. (1998). Value for money auditing in New Zealand: Competing for control in the public sector, British Accounting Review, 30(4), pp: 343-360.
30. Knapp.P & Turksema. R (2009), Improving Effectiveness of Performance Auditing;
31. Kells.S & Hodge.G (2010), Redefining the Performance Auditing Space,
The Asia Pacific Journal of Puclic Administration, 32(1), pp: 63-88
32. King & ctg (1994), Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, One of Princeton University Press's Notable Centenary Titles.
Có thể bạn quan tâm!
-
Đề Xuất Quan Điểm Và Định Hướng Phát Triển Kiểm Toán Hoạt Động -
Tăng Cường Khả Năng Triển Khai Kiểm Toán Hoạt Động (Nhân Tố Khả Năng Của Sav) -
Nhân tố ảnh hưởng đến sự hình thành và phát triển kiểm toán hoạt động trong lĩnh vực công ở Việt Nam - 22
Xem toàn bộ 184 trang tài liệu này.
33. Lapsley,I. and Pong, C.M. K. (2000), Modernization versus problematization: value-for money audit in public services, The European Accounting Review, 9 (4), Pp: 541-567.
34. Leeuw.F (1996), Performance auditing, new public management and performance improvement: questions and challenges, In Performance Auditing and the Modernisation of Government, Paris: OECD, pp: 80-105.
35. Leeuw.F (2011), On the effects, lack of effects and pervese effects of performance audit, In Performance Auditing: Contributing to Accountability in Democratic Government, UK, pp: 231-247.
36. Liggio, C. D. (1974). The Expectation Gap: The Accountant’s Waterloo,
Journal of Contemporary Business, 3(3), pp: 27 – 44.
37. Lindeberg & Tobias (2007), The Ambiguous Identity of Auditing,
Financial Accountability and Management, 23(3).
38. Lonsdale.J & ctg (2011), Conclusions: Performance Audit – An Effective Force in Difficult Time?, Contributing to Accountability in Democratic Government, UK: pp. 311-351.
39. McCrae & Vada (1997), Performance audit scope and the independence of the Australian Commonwealth Auditor-General, Financial Accountability and Management, 13(3), pp: 203-223.
40. Miller, P. and Rose, N. (1990), Governing economic life, Economy and Society, 19(1), pp: 1-31.
41. Morin.D (2001), Influence of Value for Money Audit on Public Administrations: Looking Beyond Appearances, Financial Accountability and Management, 17 (2), pp: 99-118.
42. Morin, D (2004), Measuring the impact of value-for-money audits: a model for surveying audited managers, Canadian Public Administration, pp: 141- 164.
43. Mulgan, R. (2000), Accountability: An ever-expanding concept?, Public Administration, 78(3).
44. Mulgan, R. (2001), Auditors-General: Cuckoos in the Managerialist Nest?, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 60(2), pp: 24-34.
45. Nath & cộng sự (2011), Public Sector Performance Auditing and Accountability: A Fijian Case Study, Doctor Thesis, The University of Waikato.
46. Nath & cộng sự (2005), Public Sector Performance Auditing: Emergence, Purpose and Meaning. The University of Waikato, Department of Accounting. Working Paper Series, 40 p.
47. O’Leary (1996), Performance audits: Could they become mandatory for public companies?, Mangerial Aditing Journal, Vol.11(1), pp: 14-18.
48. Pallot, J. (2003), A Wider Accountability? The Audit Office and New Zealand’s Bureaucratic Revolution, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 14, pp: 133-155.
49. Parker & cộng sự. (1986), Value for Money Auditing: Conceptual Development and Operational Issues, Auditing Discussion Paper No. 1, Caulfield: Australian Accounting Research Foundation.
50. Parker.L.D & Guthrie.J (1991), Performance Auditing: The Jurisdiction of the Australian Auditor General –De Jure or De Facto, Financial Accountability & Management, Summer 1991, 5 (2), pp: 107-116.
51. Pollitt & cộng sự. (1997), Performance Auditing. Travellers' Tales, in:CHELIMSKY, E., SHADISH, W. R. (eds.), Evaluation for the 21st Century: a Handbook, Sage, California, 542, pp. 86-108.
52. Pollitt & cộng sự. (1999), Performance Audit and Public Management in Five Countries, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
53. Pollitt, C. (2003), Performance Audit in Western Europe, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 14(2), pp:157-170.
54. Power, M. (1994), The Audit Explosion, Demos, London.
55. Power, M. (2003), “Evaluating the Audit Explosion”, Law & Policy, 25(3), pp:185-202.
56. Pugh (1987), Efficiency auditing and the Australian Audit Office,
Australian Journal of Public Administration, XLVI, pp: 55-65.
57. Put.V & Turksema (2011), Selection of topics, Performance Auditing: Contributing to Accountability in Democratic Government, UK, pp. 51-74.
58. Radcliffe, V. S. (1998), Efficiency audit: An assembly of rationalities and programs, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(4), pp:377-410.
59. Robert F. Nau (1981), What's a good value for R-squared?, University of California, Berkeley
60. Roth. D (1996). Finding the Balance: Achieving a Synthesis between Improved Performance and Enhanced Accountability. In Performance Auditing and the odernisation of Government, Paris: (OECD), pp: 249-259
61. Scanlan, L. (1998), The role of the Auditor-General in the accountability framework and recent developments in Queensland, Accountability and Performance, 4(1), pp: 53-73.
62. Shand, D. & Anand, P. (1996). Performance Auditing in the Public Sector: Approaches and Issues in OECD Member Countries. In Performance Auditing and the Modernisation of Government. Paris: OECD.
63. Smelser (1998), Lựa chọn hợp lý và tình cảm hai chiều trong khoa học xã hội, Diễn văn của Chủ tịch Hội xã hội học Mỹ tại cuộc họp Hội thường niên năm 1997, American Sociolgical Review, 63(1), pp:1-16 (Bản dịch của Bùi Thế Cường 2009).
64. Soka.M.M (2008), Challenges in Intistutionalising Peformance Audits: The Case of Zambia, Masters of Arts in Development Studies, The Hague, Netherlands, 2008.
65. Sutherland & Colin (2008), Performance Audits: Forty years of trying, Accountancy SA, 8, Proquest Central, pp 26.
66. Suzuky.Y (2004), Basic Structure of Government Auditing by a Supreme Audit Institution, Government Auditing Review, 11, pp.39-53.
67. Thompson (1996). Performance auditing: What is it? The Government Accountants Journal, 45(1), pp: 14-25.
68. Trodden, S. A. (1996), The Objectives and Performance of Performance Auditing: the Perspective of a United States Inspector General, In Performance Auditing and the Modernisation of Government. Paris: (OECD), pp. 149-164.
69. Warning C.G & Morgan S.L (2007), Public Sector Performance Auditing in Developing Countries.
70. Yamamoto, K., & Watanabe, M. (1989), Performance auditing in the central government of Japan, Financial Accountability and Management, 5(4), pp: 189-217.
IV. Trang webs
http:// www.intosai.org (trang web của Tổ chức các cơ quan kiểm toán tối
cao).
http://www.audit.wa.gov.au (trang web của Văn phòng Kiểm toán Nhà quốc
gia Úc).
http:// www.intosai.org (trang web của Tổ chức các cơ quan kiểm toán tối
cao).
Kỳ).
http://www.gao.gov (trang web của Văn phòng giải trình trách nhiệm Hoa
http://www.nao.org.uk (trang web của Văn phòng Kiểm toán Anh). http://www.cnao.gov.cn (trang web của Văn phòng Kiểm toán Trung Quốc). http://www.sav.gov.vn (trang web của KTNN Việt Nam)