Daotao8
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
Rat khong dong y | 15 | 11.5 | 11.5 | 11.5 | |
Khong dong y | 15 | 11.5 | 11.5 | 23.1 | |
Valid | Trung lap Dong y | 35 35 | 26.9 26.9 | 26.9 26.9 | 50.0 76.9 |
Rat dong y | 30 | 23.1 | 23.1 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Có thể bạn quan tâm!
-
Đánh Giá Của Nhân Viên Về Nhóm Nhân Tố Đội Ngũ Giảng Viên Giảng Dạy -
Một Số Giải Pháp Nhằm Hoàn Thiện Và Nâng Cao Hiệu Quả Công Tác Đào Tạo Nguồn Nhân Lực Tại Công Ty Cổ Phần Dệt May 29/3 -
Hoàn thiện công tác đào tạo và phát triển nguồn nhân lực tại Công ty Cổ phần Dệt May 29/3 - 11
Xem toàn bộ 98 trang tài liệu này.
Giangvien1
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
Rat khong dong y | 4 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.1 | |
Khong dong y | 8 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 9.2 | |
Valid | Trung lap Dong y | 25 49 | 19.2 37.7 | 19.2 37.7 | 28.5 66.2 |
Rat dong y | 44 | 33.8 | 33.8 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Giangvien2
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
Rat khong dong y | 1 | .8 | .8 | .8 | |
Khong dong y | 9 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 7.7 | |
Valid | Trung lap Dong y | 34 47 | 26.2 36.2 | 26.2 36.2 | 33.8 70.0 |
Rat dong y | 39 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Giangvien3
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
Rat khong dong y | 5 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.8 | |
Khong dong y | 11 | 8.5 | 8.5 | 12.3 | |
Valid | Trung lap Dong y | 34 44 | 26.2 33.8 | 26.2 33.8 | 38.5 72.3 |
Rat dong y | 36 | 27.7 | 27.7 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Giangvien4
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
Rat khong dong y | 1 | .8 | .8 | .8 | |
Khong dong y | 13 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.8 | |
Valid | Trung lap Dong y | 31 50 | 23.8 38.5 | 23.8 38.5 | 34.6 73.1 |
Rat dong y | 35 | 26.9 | 26.9 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Giangvien5
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
Rat khong dong y | 5 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.8 | |
Khong dong y | 8 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 10.0 | |
Valid | Trung lap Dong y | 27 47 | 20.8 36.2 | 20.8 36.2 | 30.8 66.9 |
Rat dong y | 43 | 33.1 | 33.1 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Giangvien6
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
Rat khong dong y | 3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | |
Khong dong y | 10 | 7.7 | 7.7 | 10.0 | |
Valid | Trung lap Dong y | 27 51 | 20.8 39.2 | 20.8 39.2 | 30.8 70.0 |
Rat dong y | 39 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Ungdungdaotao1
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
Rat khong dong y | 4 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.1 | |
Khong dong y | 9 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 10.0 | |
Valid | Trung lap Dong y | 39 32 | 30.0 24.6 | 30.0 24.6 | 40.0 64.6 |
Rat dong y | 46 | 35.4 | 35.4 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Ungdungdaotao2
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
Rat khong dong y | 7 | 5.4 | 5.4 | 5.4 | |
Khong dong y | 11 | 8.5 | 8.5 | 13.8 | |
Valid | Trung lap Dong y | 35 47 | 26.9 36.2 | 26.9 36.2 | 40.8 76.9 |
Rat dong y | 30 | 23.1 | 23.1 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Ungdungdaotao3
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
Rat khong dong y | 3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | |
Khong dong y | 15 | 11.5 | 11.5 | 13.8 | |
Valid | Trung lap Dong y | 29 43 | 22.3 33.1 | 22.3 33.1 | 36.2 69.2 |
Rat dong y | 40 | 30.8 | 30.8 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Ungdungdaotao4
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
Rat khong dong y | 4 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.1 | |
Khong dong y | 23 | 17.7 | 17.7 | 20.8 | |
Valid | Trung lap Dong y | 35 50 | 26.9 38.5 | 26.9 38.5 | 47.7 86.2 |
Rat dong y | 18 | 13.8 | 13.8 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Ketquacongviec1
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
Rat khong dong y | 2 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | |
Khong dong y | 12 | 9.2 | 9.2 | 10.8 | |
Valid | Trung lap Dong y | 20 33 | 15.4 25.4 | 15.4 25.4 | 26.2 51.5 |
Rat dong y | 63 | 48.5 | 48.5 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Ketquacongviec2
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
Rat khong dong y | 2 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | |
Khong dong y | 16 | 12.3 | 12.3 | 13.8 | |
Valid | Trung lap Dong y | 20 42 | 15.4 32.3 | 15.4 32.3 | 29.2 61.5 |
Rat dong y | 50 | 38.5 | 38.5 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Ketquacongviec3
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
Rat khong dong y | 10 | 7.7 | 7.7 | 7.7 | |
Khong dong y | 9 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 14.6 | |
Valid | Trung lap Dong y | 27 42 | 20.8 32.3 | 20.8 32.3 | 35.4 67.7 |
Rat dong y | 42 | 32.3 | 32.3 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Ketquacongviec4
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
Rat khong dong y | 5 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.8 | |
Khong dong y | 11 | 8.5 | 8.5 | 12.3 | |
Valid | Trung lap Dong y | 29 45 | 22.3 34.6 | 22.3 34.6 | 34.6 69.2 |
Rat dong y | 40 | 30.8 | 30.8 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Ketquacongviec5
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
Rat khong dong y | 3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | |
Khong dong y | 16 | 12.3 | 12.3 | 14.6 | |
Valid | Trung lap Dong y | 21 38 | 16.2 29.2 | 16.2 29.2 | 30.8 60.0 |
Rat dong y | 52 | 40.0 | 40.0 | 100.0 | |
Total | 130 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
2. Cronbach’s Alpha
Reliability Statistics
N of Items | |
.763 | 8 |
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Item Deleted | Scale Variance if Item Deleted | Corrected Item- Total Correlation | Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted | |
Daotao1 | 22.73 | 28.524 | .579 | .717 |
Daotao2 | 23.47 | 30.995 | .407 | .747 |
Daotao3 | 23.32 | 28.329 | .638 | .708 |
Daotao4 | 23.44 | 31.395 | .300 | .769 |
Daotao5 | 23.09 | 31.247 | .339 | .760 |
Daotao6 | 23.22 | 29.322 | .532 | .726 |
Daotao7 | 23.15 | 28.736 | .588 | .716 |
Daotao8 | 23.12 | 31.117 | .358 | .757 |
Reliability Statistics
N of Items | |
.864 | 6 |
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Item Deleted | Scale Variance if Item Deleted | Corrected Item- Total Correlation | Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted | |
Giangvien1 | 19.17 | 14.824 | .796 | .816 |
Giangvien2 | 19.22 | 16.748 | .584 | .854 |
Giangvien3 | 19.37 | 16.405 | .530 | .866 |
Giangvien4 | 19.29 | 16.472 | .603 | .851 |
Giangvien5 | 19.22 | 15.287 | .695 | .835 |
Giangvien6 | 19.23 | 15.202 | .760 | .823 |
Reliability Statistics
N of Items | |
.824 | 5 |
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Item Deleted | Scale Variance if Item Deleted | Corrected Item- Total Correlation | Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted | |
Ungdungdaotao1 | 14.35 | 11.021 | .646 | .781 |
Ungdungdaotao2 | 14.55 | 11.134 | .623 | .788 |
Ungdungdaotao3 | 14.39 | 10.690 | .712 | .762 |
Ungdungdaotao4 | 14.75 | 12.171 | .504 | .821 |
Reliability Statistics
N of Items | |
.851 | 6 |
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Item Deleted | Scale Variance if Item Deleted | Corrected Item- Total Correlation | Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted | |
Ketquacongviec1 | 19.04 | 18.719 | .704 | .814 |
Ketquacongviec2 | 19.20 | 19.805 | .560 | .840 |
Ketquacongviec3 | 19.39 | 17.806 | .702 | .813 |
Ketquacongviec4 | 19.34 | 20.784 | .445 | .860 |
Ketquacongviec5 | 19.22 | 18.496 | .684 | .817 |
3. One Sample T-test
One-Sample Statistics
N | Mean | Std. Deviation | Std. Error Mean | |
Daotao1 | 130 | 3.78 | 1.253 | .110 |
Daotao2 | 130 | 3.04 | 1.197 | .105 |
Daotao3 | 130 | 3.18 | 1.193 | .105 |
Daotao4 | 130 | 3.07 | 1.365 | .120 |
Daotao5 | 130 | 3.42 | 1.299 | .114 |
Daotao6 | 130 | 3.28 | 1.221 | .107 |
Daotao7 | 130 | 3.35 | 1.213 | .106 |
Daotao8 | 130 | 3.38 | 1.278 | .112 |
Giangvien1 | 130 | 3.93 | 1.028 | .090 |
Giangvien2 | 130 | 3.88 | .948 | .083 |
Giangvien3 | 130 | 3.73 | 1.077 | .094 |
Giangvien4 | 130 | 3.81 | .973 | .085 |
Giangvien5 | 130 | 3.88 | 1.061 | .093 |
Giangvien6 | 130 | 3.87 | 1.007 | .088 |
Ungdungdaotao1 | 130 | 3.82 | 1.089 | .095 |
Ungdungdaotao2 | 130 | 3.63 | 1.094 | .096 |
Ungdungdaotao3 | 130 | 3.78 | 1.078 | .095 |
Ungdungdaotao4 | 130 | 3.42 | 1.033 | .091 |
Ketquacongviec1 | 130 | 4.10 | 1.070 | .094 |
Ketquacongviec2 | 130 | 3.94 | 1.084 | .095 |
Ketquacongviec3 | 130 | 3.75 | 1.203 | .105 |
Ketquacongviec4 | 130 | 3.80 | 1.088 | .095 |
Ketquacongviec5 | 130 | 3.92 | 1.125 | .099 |
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 4 | ||||||
t | df | Sig. (2-tailed) | Mean Difference | 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference | ||
Lower | Upper | |||||
Daotao1 | -2.030 | 129 | .044 | -.223 | -.44 | -.01 |
Daotao2 | -9.160 | 129 | .000 | -.962 | -1.17 | -.75 |
Daotao3 | -7.793 | 129 | .000 | -.815 | -1.02 | -.61 |
Daotao4 | -7.774 | 129 | .000 | -.931 | -1.17 | -.69 |
Daotao5 | -5.133 | 129 | .000 | -.585 | -.81 | -.36 |
Daotao6 | -6.678 | 129 | .000 | -.715 | -.93 | -.50 |
Daotao7 | -6.075 | 129 | .000 | -.646 | -.86 | -.44 |
Daotao8 | -5.489 | 129 | .000 | -.615 | -.84 | -.39 |
Giangvien1 | -.768 | 129 | .444 | -.069 | -.25 | .11 |
Giangvien2 | -1.480 | 129 | .141 | -.123 | -.29 | .04 |
Giangvien3 | -2.851 | 129 | .005 | -.269 | -.46 | -.08 |
Giangvien4 | -2.253 | 129 | .026 | -.192 | -.36 | -.02 |
Giangvien5 | -1.240 | 129 | .217 | -.115 | -.30 | .07 |
Giangvien6 | -1.481 | 129 | .141 | -.131 | -.31 | .04 |
Ungdungdaotao1 | -1.853 | 129 | .066 | -.177 | -.37 | .01 |
Ungdungdaotao2 | -3.850 | 129 | .000 | -.369 | -.56 | -.18 |
Ungdungdaotao3 | -2.278 | 129 | .024 | -.215 | -.40 | -.03 |
Ungdungdaotao4 | -6.366 | 129 | .000 | -.577 | -.76 | -.40 |
Ketquacongviec1 | 1.066 | 129 | .289 | .100 | -.09 | .29 |
Ketquacongviec2 | -.647 | 129 | .519 | -.062 | -.25 | .13 |
Ketquacongviec3 | -2.406 | 129 | .018 | -.254 | -.46 | -.05 |
Ketquacongviec4 | -2.095 | 129 | .038 | -.200 | -.39 | -.01 |
Ketquacongviec5 | -.780 | 129 | .437 | -.077 | -.27 | .12 |