Các Yếu Tố Ảnh Hưởng Đến Sự Hài Lòng Trong Công Việc Của Người Lao Động Tại Công Ty Tnhh Thương Mại & Kĩ Thuật Mitrudoor, Đà Nẵng

N	Mean	Std. Deviation	Std. Mean	Error
DK1	123	4,16	,762	,069
DK2	123	3,87	,735	,066
DK3	123	4,15	,725	,065
DK4	123	4,13	,757	,068

Có thể bạn quan tâm!

Xem toàn bộ 141 trang tài liệu này.

One-Sample Test

Test Value = 4
t	df	Sig. (2- tailed)	Mean Difference	95% Confidence of the Difference	Interval
t	df	Sig. (2- tailed)	Mean Difference	Lower	Upper
DK1	2,368	122	,019	,163	,03	,30
DK2	-1,963	122	,052	-,130	-,26	,00
DK3	2,364	122	,020	,154	,03	,28
DK4	1,906	122	,059	,130	-,01	,27

3. Đào tạo thăng tiến

DTTT1

Frequency	Percent
	khong dong y	3	2.4
Valid	trung lap dong y	26 83	21.1 67.5
	rat dong y	11	8.9
	Total	123	100.0

DTTT2

Frequency	Percent
	khong dong y	3	2.4
Valid	trung lap dong y	29 77	23.6 62.6
	rat dong y	14	11.4
	Total	123	100.0

DTTT3

Frequency	Percent
	khong dong y	2	1.6
Valid	trung lap dong y	31 71	25.2 57.7
	rat dong y	19	15.4
	Total	123	100.0

One-Sample Statistics

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Mean

Error

DTTT 1

123

3,83

,610

,055

DTTT 2

123

3,83

,649

,059

DTTT 3

123

3,87

,677

,061

One-Sample Test

Test Value = 4

Sig. (2-

tailed)

Mean Difference

95% Confidence of the Difference

Interval

Lower

Upper

DTTT 1

-3,103

122

,002

-,171

-,28

-,06

DTTT 2

-2,917

122

,004

-,171

-,29

-,05

DTTT 3

-2,131

122

,035

-,130

-,25

-,01

4. Thu nhập phúc lợi

TNPL1

Frequency	Percent
	khong dong y	6	4.9
Valid	trung lap dong y	26 51	21.1 41.5
	rat dong y	40	32.5
	Total	123	100.0

TNPL2

Frequency	Percent
	khong dong y	7	5.7
Valid	trung lap dong y	24 51	19.5 41.5
	rat dong y	41	33.3
	Total	123	100.0

TNPL3

Frequency	Percent
	khong dong y	3	2.4
Valid	trung lap dong y	29 47	23.6 38.2
	rat dong y	44	35.8
	Total	123	100.0

One-Sample Statistics

N	Mean	Std. Deviation	Std. Mean	Error
TNPL1	123	4,02	,859	,077
TNPL2	123	4,02	,873	,079
TNPL3	123	4,07	,831	,075

One-Sample Test

Test Value = 4
t	df	Sig. (2- tailed)	Mean Difference	95% Confidence of the Difference	Interval
t	df	Sig. (2- tailed)	Mean Difference	Lower	Upper
TNPL1	,210	122	,834	,016	-,14	,17
TNPL2	,310	122	,757	,024	-,13	,18
TNPL3	,976	122	,331	,073	-,08	,22

5. Lãnh đạo

LD1

Frequency	Percent
	khong dong y	4	3.3
Valid	trung lap dong y	34 62	27.6 50.4
	rat dong y	23	18.7
	Total	123	100.0

LD2

Frequency	Percent
	khong dong y	5	4.1
Valid	trung lap dong y	30 66	24.4 53.7
	rat dong y	22	17.9
	Total	123	100.0

LD3

Frequency	Percent
	khong dong y	5	4.1
Valid	trung lap dong y	32 65	26.0 52.8
	rat dong y	21	17.1
	Total	123	100.0

One-Sample Statistics

N	Mean	Std. Deviation	Std. Mean	Error
LD1	123	3,85	,758	,068
LD2	123	3,85	,754	,068
LD3	123	3,83	,754	,068

One-Sample Test

Test Value = 4
t	df	Sig. (2- tailed)	Mean Difference	95% Confidence of the Difference	Interval
t	df	Sig. (2- tailed)	Mean Difference	Lower	Upper
LD1	-2,261	122	,026	-,154	-,29	-,02
LD2	-2,152	122	,033	-,146	-,28	-,01
LD3	-2,510	122	,013	-,171	-,31	-,04

6. Đồng nghiệp

DN1

Frequency	Percent
	khong dong y	4	3.3
Valid	trung lap dong y	26 76	21.1 61.8
	rat dong y	17	13.8
	Total	123	100.0

DN2

Frequency	Percent
	khong dong y	1	.8
Valid	trung lap dong y	18 63	14.6 51.2
	rat dong y	41	33.3
	Total	123	100.0

DN3

Frequency	Percent
	khong dong y	3	2.4
Valid	trung lap dong y	18 60	14.6 48.8
	rat dong y	42	34.1
	Total	123	100.0

One-Sample Statistics