Trang chủ / Thanh Khoản

Các yếu tố ảnh hưởng đến thanh khoản của các ngân hàng thương mại cổ phần Việt Nam - 10


Mô hình Pooled và mô hình FEM



Fixed-effects (within) regression


Number of obs =


160

Group variable: stt

Number of groups =

20

R-sq: within = 0.9436

Obs per group: min =

8

between = 0.8974

avg =

8.0

overall = 0.9067

max =

8


F(7,133) =

317.67

corr(u_i, Xb) = -0.4741

Prob > F =

0.0000

Có thể bạn quan tâm!

Xem toàn bộ 86 trang tài liệu này.

Các yếu tố ảnh hưởng đến thanh khoản của các ngân hàng thương mại cổ phần Việt Nam - 10


liq

Coef.

Std. Err.


t P>|t|


[95% Conf.

Interval]

llr

-.0637266

.1869031


-0.34 0.734


-.4334137

.3059605

size

2.164963

.7032338


3.08 0.003


.7739939

3.555932

ldr

.7989638

.0214917


37.18 0.000


.7564542

.8414735

cap

-.3346026

.1058841


-3.16 0.002


-.5440373

-.125168

roa

-.208649

.5355128


-0.39 0.697


-1.267872

.8505745

inf

-.2022211

.0476316


-4.25 0.000


-.2964345

-.1080077

gdp

-.029855

.3334755


-0.09 0.929


-.6894565

.6297466

_cons

-62.2695

23.28494


-2.67 0.008


-108.3262

-16.21279

sigma_u

3.8505437







sigma_e

2.0919242







rho

.77210932

(fraction

of

variance due

to

u_i)



F test that all u_i=0: F(19, 133) = 5.51 Prob > F = 0.0000


.



Mô hình Pooled và mô hình REM



Random-effects GLS regression


Number of obs =


160

Group variable: stt

Number of groups =

20

R-sq: within = 0.9358

Obs per group: min =

8

between = 0.9714

avg =

8.0

overall = 0.9559

max =

8


Wald chi2(7) =

2562.58

corr(u_i, X) = 0 (assumed)

Prob > chi2 =

0.0000


liq

Coef.

Std. Err.


z P>|z|


[95% Conf.

Interval]

llr

-.147162

.185352


-0.79 0.427


-.5104453

.2161213

size

-.6517105

.4358801


-1.50 0.135


-1.50602

.2025989

ldr

.7830578

.0189564


41.31 0.000


.745904

.8202116

cap

-.466585

.1059283


-4.40 0.000


-.6742007

-.2589693

roa

.1897917

.5399621


0.35 0.725


-.8685147

1.248098

inf

-.3192243

.0449899


-7.10 0.000


-.4074029

-.2310457

gdp

.1766115

.3482895


0.51 0.612


-.5060233

.8592464

_cons

30.29753

14.83956


2.04 0.041


1.212528

59.38253

sigma_u

1.3392198







sigma_e

2.0919242







rho

.29069846

(fraction

of

variance due

to

u_i)



.

. xttest0


Breusch and Pagan Lagrangian multiplier test for random effects


liq[stt,t] = Xb + u[stt] + e[stt,t]


Estimated results:


Var sd = sqrt(Var

liq

157.0187

12.53071

e

4.376147

2.091924

u

1.79351

1.33922

)


Mô hình FEM và mô hình REM

Coefficients


(b) fe

(B)

re

(b-B)

Difference

sqrt(diag(V_b-V_B)) S.E.

llr

-.0637266

-.147162

.0834354

.024029

size

2.164963

-.6517105

2.816674

.5518571

ldr

.7989638

.7830578

.0159061

.0101266

cap

-.3346026

-.466585

.1319823

.

roa

-.208649

.1897917

-.3984406

.

inf

-.2022211

-.3192243

.1170032

.015642

gdp

-.029855

.1766115

-.2064665

.

b = consistent under Ho and Ha; obtained from xtreg B = inconsistent under Ha, efficient under Ho; obtained from xtreg


Test: Ho: difference in coefficients not systematic


chi2(7) = (b-B)'[(V_b-V_B)^(-1)](b-B)

= 16.58

Prob>chi2 = 0.0203

(V_b-V_B is not positive definite)


Fixed-effects (within) regression

Number of obs

=

160

Group variable: stt

Number of groups

=

20

R-sq: within

=

0.9436

Obs

per

group:

min

=

8

between

=

0.8974




avg

=

8.0

overall

=

0.9067




max

=

8




F(7,133)

=

317.67

corr(u_i, Xb)

=

-0.4741

Prob > F

=

0.0000



liq

Coef.

Std. Err.


t P>|t|


[95% Conf.

Interval]

llr

-.0637266

.1869031


-0.34 0.734


-.4334137

.3059605

size

2.164963

.7032338


3.08 0.003


.7739939

3.555932

ldr

.7989638

.0214917


37.18 0.000


.7564542

.8414735

cap

-.3346026

.1058841


-3.16 0.002


-.5440373

-.125168

roa

-.208649

.5355128


-0.39 0.697


-1.267872

.8505745

inf

-.2022211

.0476316


-4.25 0.000


-.2964345

-.1080077

gdp

-.029855

.3334755


-0.09 0.929


-.6894565

.6297466

_cons

-62.2695

23.28494


-2.67 0.008


-108.3262

-16.21279

sigma_u

3.8505437







sigma_e

2.0919242







rho

.77210932

(fraction

of

variance due

to

u_i)


F test that all u_i=0: F(19, 133) = 5.51 Prob > F = 0.0000


.

. xttest3


Modified Wald test for groupwise heteroskedasticity in fixed effect regression model


H0: sigma(i)^2 = sigma^2 for all i


chi2 (20) = 1113.38

Prob>chi2 = 0.0000

Phụ lục 6: Kiểm định tự tương quan của nhiễu


Wooldridge test for autocorrelation in panel data H0: no first-order autocorrelation

F( 1, 19) = 17.234

Prob > F = 0.0005


Source

SS

df

MS

Model

23925.9204

7

3417.98863

Residual

1040.04898

152

6.84242752

Total

24965.9694

159

157.018675

Number of obs

=

160

F( 7, 152)

=

499.53

Prob > F

=

0.0000

R-squared

=

0.9583

Adj R-squared

=

0.9564

Root MSE

=

2.6158


liq

Coef.

Std. Err.

t

P>|t|

[95% Conf.

Interval]

llr

-.3288658

.1848442

-1.78

0.077

-.6940614

.0363299

size

-1.330127

.3459204

-3.85

0.000

-2.01356

-.6466945

ldr

.7711189

.0161669

47.70

0.000

.7391781

.8030596

cap

-.5343982

.1076637

-4.96

0.000

-.7471088

-.3216876

roa

.7008307

.5349821

1.31

0.192

-.3561302

1.757792

inf

-.3746466

.0481105

-7.79

0.000

-.4696982

-.2795951

gdp

.1521229

.3942509

0.39

0.700

-.6267962

.931042

_cons

53.93969

12.16591

4.43

0.000

29.90357

77.9758


Fixed-effects (within) regression

Number of obs

=

160

Group variable: stt

Number of groups

=

20

R-sq: within

=

0.9436

Obs

per

group:

min

=

8

between

=

0.8974




avg

=

8.0

overall

=

0.9067




max

=

8




F(7,133)

=

317.67

corr(u_i, Xb)

=

-0.4741

Prob > F

=

0.0000



liq

Coef.

Std. Err.


t P>|t|


[95% Conf.

Interval]

llr

-.0637266

.1869031


-0.34 0.734


-.4334137

.3059605

size

2.164963

.7032338


3.08 0.003


.7739939

3.555932

ldr

.7989638

.0214917


37.18 0.000


.7564542

.8414735

cap

-.3346026

.1058841


-3.16 0.002


-.5440373

-.125168

roa

-.208649

.5355128


-0.39 0.697


-1.267872

.8505745

inf

-.2022211

.0476316


-4.25 0.000


-.2964345

-.1080077

gdp

-.029855

.3334755


-0.09 0.929


-.6894565

.6297466

_cons

-62.2695

23.28494


-2.67 0.008


-108.3262

-16.21279

sigma_u

3.8505437







sigma_e

2.0919242







rho

.77210932

(fraction

of

variance due

to

u_i)


F test that all u_i=0: F(19, 133) = 5.51 Prob > F = 0.0000


.


Random-effects GLS regression

Number of obs

=

160

Group variable: stt

Number of groups

=

20

R-sq: within

=

0.9358

Obs

per

group:

min

=

8

between

=

0.9714




avg

=

8.0

overall

=

0.9559




max

=

8




Wald chi2(7)

=

2562.58

corr(u_i, X)

=

0 (assumed)

Prob > chi2

=

0.0000


liq

Coef.

Std. Err.


z P>|z|


[95% Conf.

Interval]

llr

-.147162

.185352


-0.79 0.427


-.5104453

.2161213

size

-.6517105

.4358801


-1.50 0.135


-1.50602

.2025989

ldr

.7830578

.0189564


41.31 0.000


.745904

.8202116

cap

-.466585

.1059283


-4.40 0.000


-.6742007

-.2589693

roa

.1897917

.5399621


0.35 0.725


-.8685147

1.248098

inf

-.3192243

.0449899


-7.10 0.000


-.4074029

-.2310457

gdp

.1766115

.3482895


0.51 0.612


-.5060233

.8592464

_cons

30.29753

14.83956


2.04 0.041


1.212528

59.38253

sigma_u

1.3392198







sigma_e

2.0919242







rho

.29069846

(fraction

of

variance due

to

u_i)



Dynamic panel-data estimation, one-step system GMM


Group variable: stt

Number of obs

=

140

Time variable : nm

Number of groups

=

20

Number of instruments = 36

Obs per group: min

=

7

Wald chi2(7) = 894.73

avg

=

7.00

Prob > chi2 = 0.000

max

=

7



liq


Coef.

Robust Std. Err.


z


P>|z|


[95% Conf.


Interval]

llr

-.128746

.593368

-0.22

0.828

-1.291726

1.034234

size

-2.705092

1.20886

-2.24

0.025

-5.074415

-.3357701

ldr

.874899

.0429911

20.35

0.000

.790638

.95916

cap

-1.069733

.3255415

-3.29

0.001

-1.707782

-.431683

roa

.9381612

.7759511

1.21

0.227

-.5826749

2.458997

inf

-.2665436

.0745557

-3.58

0.000

-.41267

-.1204171

gdp

.3141882

.4958502

0.63

0.526

-.6576604

1.286037

_cons

95.03698

41.29835

2.30

0.021

14.09371

175.9803

Instruments for orthogonal deviations equation Standard

FOD.L.roa

GMM-type (missing=0, separate instruments for each period unless collapsed) L(1/7).roa

Instruments for levels equation Standard

L.roa

_cons

GMM-type (missing=0, separate instruments for each period unless collapsed) D.roa

Arellano-Bond test for AR(1) in first differences: z = -1.81 Pr > z = 0.070 Arellano-Bond test for AR(2) in first differences: z = 0.67 Pr > z = 0.503

Sargan test of overid. restrictions: chi2(28) = 40.84 Prob > chi2 = 0.055 (Not robust, but not weakened by many instruments.)

Hansen test of overid. restrictions: chi2(28) = 10.75 Prob > chi2 = 0.999 (Robust, but weakened by many instruments.)


Difference-in-Hansen tests of exogeneity of instrument subsets: GMM instruments for levels

Hansen test excluding group: chi2(21) = 9.06 Prob > chi2 = 0.989 Difference (null H = exogenous): chi2(7) = 1.69 Prob > chi2 = 0.975

iv(L.roa)

Hansen test excluding group: chi2(27) = 10.89 Prob > chi2 = 0.997 Difference (null H = exogenous): chi2(1) = -0.14 Prob > chi2 = 1.000

..... Xem trang tiếp theo?
⇦ Trang trước - Trang tiếp theo ⇨

Ngày đăng: 09/12/2023