Các yếu tố ảnh hưởng đến tính thanh khoản của các ngân hàng thương mại cổ phần Việt Nam - 10

[22] Vodová, P., 2011b. Determinants of Commercial Banks Liquidity in Slovakia, Project GACR, P403/11/P234: Liquidity risk of commercial banks in the Visegrad countries, 740-747.

[23] Vodová, P., 2012. Determinants of commercial ban s’ liquidity in Poland, Proceedings of 30th International Conference Mathematical Methods in Economics, 962-967.

[24] Vodová, P., 2013. Determinants of Commercial Bank Liquidity in Hungary,

Financial Internet Quarterly “e-Finanse”, No. 9, 64-71.


Tài liệu khác


[25] áo cáo thường niên Ngân hàng Nhà nước. <http://www.sbv.gov.vn>


[26] Quyết định số 254/QĐ-TTg của Thủ tướng Chính phủ: Phê duyệt Đề án "Cơ cấu lại hệ thống các tổ chức tín dụng giai đoạn 2011-2015” ngày 01/03/2012.

[27] Tổng cục thống kê Việt Nam. <https://www.gso.gov.vn>

PHỤ LỤC


Phụ Lục 1: Kết quả hồi quy L1 theo Pool OLS, Fix effect, Random effect và kiểm định F-test, Hausman

. regress L1 CAP NPL ROE TOA GDP MIR


Source

SS

df

MS

Model

.537745134

6

.089624189

Residual

2.10231997

227

.009261321

Total

2.6400651

233

.011330752

Có thể bạn quan tâm!

Xem toàn bộ 95 trang tài liệu này.

Các yếu tố ảnh hưởng đến tính thanh khoản của các ngân hàng thương mại cổ phần Việt Nam - 10

Number of obs

=

234

F( 6, 227)

=

9.68

Prob > F

=

0.0000

R-squared

=

0.2037

Adj R-squared

=

0.1826

Root MSE

=

.09624



L1

Coef.

Std. Err.

t

P>|t|

[95% Conf.

Interval]

CAP

-.1574045

.1385689

-1.14

0.257

-.4304503

.1156413

NPL

-1.246979

.5242611

-2.38

0.018

-2.280019

-.213938

ROE

.0932373

.0807325

1.15

0.249

-.0658436

.2523182

TOA

-.0135327

.006715

-2.02

0.045

-.0267645

-.000301

GDP

-2.415594

1.422869

-1.70

0.091

-5.219314

.3881268

MIR

1.360746

.2504931

5.43

0.000

.8671574

1.854335

_cons

.4328807

.12319

3.51

0.001

.1901385

.6756229


F(6,202)

=

19.01

Prob > F

=

0.0000

corr(u_i, Xb) = -0.0671



L1

Coef.

Std. Err.


t P>|t|


[95% Conf.

Interval]

CAP

-.1133719

.1202565


-0.94 0.347


-.3504909

.1237472

NPL

-1.707346

.4523787

-3.77 0.000

-2.599336

-.8153563

ROE

.1585879

.0676006

2.35 0.020

.0252945

.2918813

TOA

-.0147613

.0082411

-1.79 0.075

-.0310108

.0014883

GDP

-2.567123

1.103629

-2.33 0.021

-4.743234

-.3910117

MIR

1.323747

.2001373

6.61 0.000

.9291207

1.718373

_cons

.4584307

.113381

4.04 0.000

.2348685

.6819929

sigma_u

.0687333







sigma_e

.07237213






rho

.47422909

(fraction

of

variance due

to

u_i)

F test that all u_i=0: F(25, 202) = 7.98 Prob > F = 0.0000



Wald

chi2(6)

=

112.87

corr(u_i,

X) = 0

(assumed)

Prob

> chi2

=

0.0000



L1

Coef.

Std. Err.


z P>|z|


[95% Conf.

Interval]

CAP

-.122249

.1176097


-1.04 0.299


-.3527598

.1082617

NPL

-1.639494

.4417381

-3.71 0.000

-2.505285

-.7737035

ROE

.149992

.0661508

2.27 0.023

.0203388

.2796451

TOA

-.0147028

.0072884

-2.02 0.044

-.0289878

-.0004178

GDP

-2.544181

1.090554

-2.33 0.020

-4.681627

-.4067351

MIR

1.328771

.1958852

6.78 0.000

.9448435

1.712699

_cons

.4562048

.1075205

4.24 0.000

.2454685

.6669411

sigma_u

.06580307







sigma_e

.07237213






rho

.4525657

(fraction

of

variance due

to

u_i)


. hausman fe1 re1


Coefficients


(b) fe1

(B)

re1

(b-B)

Difference

sqrt(diag(V_b-V_B)) S.E.

CAP

-.1133719

-.122249

.0088771

.0250916

NPL

-1.707346

-1.639494

-.0678521

.0975396

ROE

.1585879

.149992

.0085959

.0139256

TOA

-.0147613

-.0147028

-.0000585

.0038464

GDP

-2.567123

-2.544181

-.0229416

.1693812

MIR

1.323747

1.328771

-.0050244

.041036

b = consistent under Ho and Ha; obtained from xtreg B = inconsistent under Ha, efficient under Ho; obtained from xtreg


Test: Ho: difference in coefficients not systematic


chi2(6) = (b-B)'[(V_b-V_B)^(-1)](b-B)

= 2.33

Prob>chi2 = 0.8873

Phụ Lục 2. Kết quả hồi quy L2 theo Pool OLS, Fix effect, Random effect và kiểm định F-test, Hausman

. regress L2 CAP NPL ROE TOA GDP MIR


Source

SS

df

MS

Model

1.57738596

6

.262897659

Residual

3.61660376

227

.015932175

Total

5.19398972

233

.022291801

Number of obs

=

234

F( 6, 227)

=

16.50

Prob > F

=

0.0000

R-squared

=

0.3037

Adj R-squared

=

0.2853

Root MSE

=

.12622



L2

Coef.

Std. Err.

t

P>|t|

[95% Conf.

Interval]

CAP

.3426365

.1817468

1.89

0.061

-.0154901

.7007631

NPL

-2.094013

.6876204

-3.05

0.003

-3.448948

-.7390783

ROE

.1383944

.1058886

1.31

0.193

-.0702559

.3470448

TOA

-.0094827

.0088074

-1.08

0.283

-.0268374

.007872

GDP

-1.62143

1.866234

-0.87

0.386

-5.298786

2.055927

MIR

2.262981

.3285465

6.89

0.000

1.615591

2.910372

_cons

.2845068

.1615759

1.76

0.080

-.0338736

.6028872


. xtreg L2 CAP NPL ROE

TOA GDP MIR,fe


Fixed-effects (within)

regression

Number

of obs

=

234

Group variable: BANK1


Number

of groups

=

26

R-sq: within

=

0.4494

Obs

per

group:

min

=

9

between

=

0.0059




avg

=

9.0

overall

=

0.2980




max

=

9




F(6,202)

=

27.47

corr(u_i, Xb)

=

-0.0921

Prob > F

=

0.0000



L2

Coef.

Std. Err.


t P>|t|


[95% Conf.

Interval]

CAP

.4777865

.1663422


2.87 0.005


.1497966

.8057763

NPL

-2.418151

.6257431


-3.86 0.000


-3.651977

-1.184325

ROE

.2408883

.0935071


2.58 0.011


.056513

.4252635

TOA

-.0127725

.0113993


-1.12 0.264


-.0352493

.0097044

GDP

-1.498051

1.526571


-0.98 0.328


-4.50811

1.512008

MIR

2.13785

.2768357


7.72 0.000


1.591991

2.683708

_cons

.3080785

.1568319


1.96 0.051


-.001159

.6173161

sigma_u

.08525963







sigma_e

.10010719







rho

.42041234

(fraction

of

variance due

to

u_i)


F test that all u_i=0: F(25, 202) = 6.36 Prob > F = 0.0000

MIR,re


Random-effects GLS regression


Number of obs

=

234

Group variable: BANK1


Number of groups

=

26

R-sq: within = 0.4491


Obs per group: min

=

9

between = 0.0055


avg

=

9.0

overall = 0.3000


max

=

9



Wald chi2(6)

=

163.73

corr(u_i, X) = 0 (assumed)


Prob > chi2

=

0.0000

. xtreg L2 CAP NPL ROE TOA GDP



L2

Coef.

Std. Err.


z P>|z|


[95% Conf.

Interval]

CAP

.4499393

.1619666


2.78 0.005


.1324907

.767388

NPL

-2.365211

.6082905


-3.89 0.000


-3.557438

-1.172984

ROE

.2255552

.0911666


2.47 0.013


.046872

.4042385

TOA

-.0115033

.0098355


-1.17 0.242


-.0307806

.007774

GDP

-1.551057

1.506791


-1.03 0.303


-4.504313

1.402199

MIR

2.168702

.2701645


8.03 0.000


1.639189

2.698214

_cons

.2976684

.1469056


2.03 0.043


.0097387

.585598

sigma_u

.07952542







sigma_e

.10010719







rho

.38690767

(fraction

of

variance due

to

u_i)



. hausman fe2 re2


Coefficients


(b) fe2

(B)

re2

(b-B)

Difference

sqrt(diag(V_b-V_B)) S.E.

CAP

.4777865

.4499393

.0278471

.037902

NPL

-2.418151

-2.365211

-.0529401

.1467554

ROE

.2408883

.2255552

.015333

.0207903

TOA

-.0127725

-.0115033

-.0012692

.0057624

GDP

-1.498051

-1.551057

.0530063

.2449504

MIR

2.13785

2.168702

-.030852

.0604081

b = consistent under Ho and Ha; obtained from xtreg B = inconsistent under Ha, efficient under Ho; obtained from xtreg


Test: Ho: difference in coefficients not systematic


chi2(6) = (b-B)'[(V_b-V_B)^(-1)](b-B)

= 2.93

Prob>chi2 = 0.8176

Phụ Lục 3. Kết quả hồi quy L3 theo Pool OLS, Fix effect, Random effect và kiểm định F-test, Hausman

. regress L3 CAP NPL ROE TOA GDP MIR


Source

SS

df

MS

Model

.428786926

6

.071464488

Residual

3.79046672

227

.016698091

Total

4.21925365

233

.018108385

Number of obs

=

234

F( 6, 227)

=

4.28

Prob > F

=

0.0004

R-squared

=

0.1016

Adj R-squared

=

0.0779

Root MSE

=

.12922



L3

Coef.

Std. Err.

t

P>|t|

[95% Conf.

Interval]

CAP

.3750097

.1860642

2.02

0.045

.0083759

.7416435

NPL

1.183496

.7039545

1.68

0.094

-.2036247

2.570617

ROE

.2281253

.108404

2.10

0.036

.0145186

.4417321

TOA

.0142889

.0090166

1.58

0.114

-.0034781

.0320558

GDP

-.0627535

1.910565

-0.03

0.974

-3.827464

3.701957

MIR

-1.33461

.336351

-3.97

0.000

-1.997379

-.6718406

_cons

.3817849

.1654141

2.31

0.022

.0558415

.7077283


F(6,202)

=

5.77

Prob > F

=

0.0000

corr(u_i, Xb) = 0.0063



L3

Coef.

Std. Err.


t P>|t|


[95% Conf.

Interval]

CAP

.1782048

.1414994


1.26 0.209


-.1008006

.4572102

NPL

.4143958

.53229


0.78 0.437


-.6351615

1.463953

ROE

.0156434

.0795421


0.20 0.844


-.1411959

.1724827

TOA

-.0000632

.0096968


-0.01 0.995


-.0191832

.0190568

GDP

-.2865151

1.298582


-0.22 0.826


-2.847029

2.273999

MIR

-1.281094

.235491


-5.44 0.000


-1.74543

-.816758

_cons

.6063261

.1334094


4.54 0.000


.3432723

.8693798

sigma_u

.10500852







sigma_e

.08515644







rho

.60326855

(fraction

of

variance due

to

u_i)


F test that all u_i=0: F(25, 202) = 12.83 Prob > F = 0.0000


.

..... Xem trang tiếp theo?
⇦ Trang trước - Trang tiếp theo ⇨

Ngày đăng: 09/08/2022