Thu nhập
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Levene Statistic | df1 | df2 | Sig. | ||
REGR factor score for analysis 3 | 2 | .966 | 3 | 136 | .411 |
REGR factor score for analysis 3 | 4 | .587 | 3 | 136 | .625 |
REGR factor score for analysis 3 | 5 | 4.430 | 3 | 136 | .005 |
REGR factor score for analysis 3 | 6 | .596 | 3 | 136 | .619 |
REGR factor score for analysis 3 | 7 | 1.575 | 3 | 136 | .198 |
Có thể bạn quan tâm!
- Sự Tăng Giảm Của Thu Nhập, Chi Phí Và Lợi Nhuận Của Vib Huế Qua 3 Năm
- Kiểm Định Độ Tin Cậy Nhân Tố “ Ảnh Hưởng Môi Trường Xung Quanh”
- Kiểm Định Mann-Whitney& Kruskal-Wallis Sự Khác Biệt Trong Đánh Giá Của Các Đối Tượng Khách Hàng Khác Nhau Về Nhân Tố 1(Sự Hữu Ích) Và 3 (Giảm Rủi Ro)
- Nghiên cứu động cơ sử dụng dịch vụ Internet Banking của khách hàng cá nhân tại ngân hàng TMCP Quốc Tế - Chi nhánh Huế - 16
Xem toàn bộ 137 trang tài liệu này.
ANOVA
Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F | Sig. | ||
REGR factor score 2 for | Between Groups | .917 | 3 | .306 | .301 | .825 |
analysis 3 | Within Groups | 138.083 | 136 | 1.015 | ||
Total | 139.000 | 139 | ||||
REGR factor score 4 for | Between Groups | .562 | 3 | .187 | .184 | .907 |
analysis 3 | Within Groups | 138.438 | 136 | 1.018 | ||
Total | 139.000 | 139 | ||||
REGR factor score 5 for | Between Groups | 5.708 | 3 | 1.903 | 1.941 | .126 |
analysis 3 | Within Groups | 133.292 | 136 | .980 | ||
Total | 139.000 | 139 | ||||
REGR factor score 6 for | Between Groups | 3.842 | 3 | 1.281 | 1.289 | .281 |
analysis 3 | Within Groups | 135.158 | 136 | .994 | ||
Total | 139.000 | 139 | ||||
REGR factor score 7 for | Between Groups | 8.574 | 3 | 2.858 | 2.980 | .034 |
analysis 3 | Within Groups | 130.426 | 136 | .959 | ||
Total | 139.000 | 139 |
2.30 Kiểm định mối quan hệ giữa các biến độc lập và biến phụ thuộc nhị phân
Group Statistics
N | Mean | Std. Deviation | Std. Error Mean | |||
REGR factor score | 2 | co | - | |||
for analysis 3 | 108 | 3.866295 | .97934033 | .09423707 | ||
4E-2 | ||||||
khong | 32 | .1304875 | 1.07266919 | .18962291 | ||
REGR factor score | 4 | co | - | |||
for analysis 3 | 108 | 9.908398 | 1.03175025 | .09928021 | ||
3E-2 | ||||||
khong | 32 | .3344084 | .81237900 | .14360968 | ||
REGR factor score | 5 | co | - | |||
for analysis 3 | 108 | 6.154056 | 1.05069438 | .10110311 | ||
9E-2 | ||||||
khong | 32 | .2076994 | .78467066 | .13871149 | ||
REGR factor score | 6 | co | - | |||
for analysis 3 | 108 | 1.187604 | 1.03420521 | .09951644 | ||
5E-1 | ||||||
khong | 32 | .4008165 | .75968444 | .13429451 | ||
REGR factor score | 7 | co | - | |||
for analysis 3 | 108 | 5.232598 | .97742342 | .09405261 | ||
6E-2 | ||||||
khong | 32 | .1766002 | 1.06986796 | .18912772 |
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for Equality of Variances | t-test for Equality of Means | |||||||
F | Sig. | t | df | Sig. (2- tailed) | Mean Difference | Std. Error Difference | ||
REGR | Equal | |||||||
factor | variances | 1.053 | .307 | -.840 | 138 | .403 | -.16915042 | .20148318 |
score 2 | assumed | |||||||
for | Equal | |||||||
analysis 3 | variances not assumed | -.799 | 47.367 | .428 | -.16915042 | .21174861 | ||
REGR | Equal | |||||||
factor | variances | 2.233 | .137 | -2.183 | 138 | .031 | -.43349243 | .19859783 |
score 4 | assumed | |||||||
for | Equal | |||||||
analysis 3 | variances not assumed | -2.483 | 63.509 | .016 | -.43349243 | .17458608 | ||
REGR | Equal | |||||||
factor | variances | 2.582 | .110 | -1.342 | 138 | .182 | -.26923999 | .20069258 |
score 5 | assumed | |||||||
for | Equal | |||||||
analysis 3 | variances not assumed | -1.569 | 67.193 | .121 | -.26923999 | .17164707 | ||
REGR | Equal | |||||||
factor | variances | 3.650 | .058 | -2.636 | 138 | .009 | -.51957695 | .19709534 |
score 6 | assumed | |||||||
for | Equal | |||||||
analysis 3 | variances not assumed | -3.108 | 68.417 | .003 | -.51957695 | .16714825 | ||
REGR | Equal | |||||||
factor | variances | 1.137 | .288 | -1.139 | 138 | .257 | -.22892619 | .20105482 |
score 7 | assumed | |||||||
for | Equal | |||||||
analysis 3 | variances not assumed | -1.084 | 47.389 | .284 | -.22892619 | .21122308 |
Mann-Whitney Test
Ranks
N | Mean Rank | Sum of Ranks | ||
REGR factor score | 1 co | 108 | 67.54 | 7294.00 |
for analysis 3 | khong | 32 | 80.50 | 2576.00 |
Total | 140 | |||
REGR factor score | 3 co | 108 | 67.63 | 7304.00 |
for analysis 3 | khong | 32 | 80.19 | 2566.00 |
Total | 140 |
Test Statisticsa
REGR factor score 1 for analysis 3 | REGR factor score 3 for analysis 3 | |
Mann-Whitney U | 1408.000 | 1418.000 |
Wilcoxon W | 7294.000 | 7304.000 |
Z | -1.588 | -1.538 |
Asymp. Sig. (2- tailed) | .112 | .124 |
a. Grouping Variable: co san sang su dung tiep khong
2.31 Kiểm định mối quan hệ giữa các biến định danh và biến phụ thuộc nhị phân
co san sang su dung tiep khong * thu nhap
Crosstab
thu nhap | Total | |||||
< 2 trieu | 2-5 trieu | 5-10 trieu | tren 10 trieu | |||
co san sang su dung | co | 23 | 37 | 35 | 13 | 108 |
tiep khong | khong | 2 | 8 | 16 | 6 | 32 |
Total | 25 | 45 | 51 | 19 | 140 |
Chi-Square Tests
Value | df | Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) | |
Pearson Chi-Square | 6.705a | 3 | .082 |
Likelihood Ratio | 7.305 | 3 | .063 |
Linear-by-Linear Association | 5.932 | 1 | .015 |
N of Valid Cases | 140 |
a. 1 cells (12.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.34.
co san sang su dung tiep khong * nghe nghiep
Crosstab
nghe nghiep | Total | ||||||
hoc sinh, sinh vien | tu doanh | can bo cong chuc | huu tri | khac | |||
co san sang su co | 21 | 28 | 41 | 10 | 8 | 108 | |
dung tiep khong khong | 1 | 6 | 16 | 5 | 4 | 32 | |
Total | 22 | 34 | 57 | 15 | 12 | 140 |
Chi-Square Tests
Value | df | Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) | |
Pearson Chi-Square | 7.266a | 4 | .122 |
Likelihood Ratio | 8.645 | 4 | .071 |
Linear-by-Linear Association | 6.260 | 1 | .012 |
N of Valid Cases | 140 |
a. 2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.74.
co san sang su dung tiep khong * tuoi
Crosstab
tuoi | Total | |||||
18-25 tuoi | 26-35 tuoi | 36-55 tuoi | tren 55 tuoi | |||
co san sang su dung | co | 19 | 54 | 28 | 7 | 108 |
tiep khong | khong | 4 | 16 | 9 | 3 | 32 |
Total | 23 | 70 | 37 | 10 | 140 |
Chi-Square Tests
Value | df | Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) | |
Pearson Chi-Square | .724a | 3 | .867 |
Likelihood Ratio | .731 | 3 | .866 |
Linear-by-Linear Association | .640 | 1 | .424 |
N of Valid Cases | 140 |
a. 1 cells (12.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.29.
co san sang su dung tiep khong * gioi tinh
Crosstab
gioi tinh | Total | |||
nu | nam | |||
co san sang su dung | co | 58 | 50 | 108 |
tiep khong | khong | 16 | 16 | 32 |
Total | 74 | 66 | 140 |
Chi-Square Tests
Value | df | Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) | Exact Sig. (2-sided) | Exact Sig. (1-sided) | |
Pearson Chi-Square | .136a | 1 | .712 | ||
Continuity Correctionb Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association | .028 | 1 | .867 | ||
.136 | 1 | .713 | |||
.841 | .433 | ||||
.135 | 1 | .713 | |||
N of Valid Casesb | 140 |
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 15.09.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
co san sang su dung tiep khong * trinh do hoc van
Crosstab
trinh do hoc van | Total | |||||
duoi cap 3 | cap 3 | trung cap, cao dang | dai hoc, tren dai hoc | |||
co san sang su dung co | 5 | 25 | 27 | 51 | 108 | |
tiep khong khong | 1 | 3 | 8 | 20 | 32 | |
Total | 6 | 28 | 35 | 71 | 140 |
Chi-Square Tests
Value | df | Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) | |
Pearson Chi-Square | 3.608a | 3 | .307 |
Likelihood Ratio | 3.985 | 3 | .263 |
Linear-by-Linear Association | 3.037 | 1 | .081 |
N of Valid Cases | 140 |
a. 2 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.37.