Tác động của chính sách tiền tệ tới rủi ro mất khả năng thanh toán tại các Ngân Hàng Thương Mại Việt Nam - 21


134. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R., 1998. Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1113-1155.

135. Labonte, M. và Makinen, G. E., 2008. Monetary policy and the Federal Reserve: current policy and conditions. HeinOnline.

136. Laeven, L., Levine, R., 2009. Bank governance, regulation and risk taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 93, 259-275 Laeven, L., Valencia, F., 2013. Systemic banking crises database. IMF Economic Review, 61, 225-270.

137. Lambert, F., Ueda, K., 2014. The effects of unconventional monetary policies on bank soundness. IMF Working Papers, 152. Levine, R., 1999. Law, finance, and economic growth. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 8, 8-35.

138. Lastra, Rosa María & Schiffman, Henry N, 1999. Bank failures and bank insolvency law in economies in transition. Kluwer Law International, The Hague ; London.

139. Lepetit, Laetitia and Strobel, Frank, 2013. Bank Insolvency Risk and Time- Varying Z-Score Measures (July 1, 2013). Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, Vol. 25, pp. 73-87, 2013; doi:10.1016/j.intfin.2013.01.004. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2412678

140. Maddaloni, A., Peydró, J.-L., 2011. Bank risk-taking, securitization, supervision, and low interest rates: Evidence from the Euro-area and the U.S. lending standards. Review of Financial Studies, 24, 2121-2165.

141. Mannasoo, K., Mayes, D. G., 2009. Explaining bank distress in Eastern European transition economies. Journal of Banking and Finance, 33, 244-253.

142. Marcucci, J., Quagliariello, M., 2009. Asymmetric effects of the business cycle on bank credit risk. Journal of Banking and Finance, 33, 1624-1635.

143. Martínez-Peria, M. S., Schmukler, S., 2001. Do depositors punish banks for bad behavior? Market discipline, deposit insurance, and banking crises. Journal of Finance, 56, 1029-1051.

144. Menkhoff, L., 2013. Foreign exchange intervention in emerging markets: A survey of empirical studies. World Economy, 36, 1187-1208.


145. Mian, A., 2003. Foreign, private domestic, and government banks: New evidence from emerging markets. University of Chicago working paper.

146. Mishkin, F. S, 2011. Monetary policy strategy: Lessons from the crisis. NBER Working Papers 16755.

147. Mishkin, F. S., 2013. The economics of money, banking, and financial markets. Pearson education.

148. Mishkin, F. S., 2000. Inflation Targeting in Emerging-Market Countries. American Economic Review, 90 (2): 105-109.

149. Modigliani, F. and Miller, M.H., 1963. Corporate Income Taxes and the Cost of Capital: A Correction. American Economic Review, 53, 433-443.

150. Mohamed Aymen Ben Moussa, 2015. The Determinants of Bank Liquidity: Case of Tunisia; International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues Vol. 5, No. 1, 2015, pp.249-259.

151. Montoro, C., Moreno, R., 2011. The use of reserve requirements as a policy instrument in Latin America. BIS Quarterly Review, March 2011, 53-65.

152. Moulton, B. R., 1990. An illustration of a pitfall in estimating the effects of aggregate variables on micro units. Review of Economics and Statistics, 72, 334-338.

153. Nguyen, V. H. T., Boateng, A., 2015. An analysis of involuntary excess reserves, monetary policy and risk- taking behaviour of Chinese banks. International Review of Financial Analysis, 37, 63-72.

154. Olivero, M. P., Yuan, L., Jeon, B.N., 2011. Consolidation in banking and the lending channel of monetary transmission: Evidence from Asia and Latin America. Journal of International Money and Finance, 30 (6), 1034-1054.

155. Paligorova, T., Santos, J. C., 2012. Monetary policy and bank risk-taking: Evidence from the corporate loan market. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Working Paper.


156. Papadamou, S., Sidiropoulos, M., Spyromitros, E., 2014. Does central bank transparency affect stock market volatility? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 31, 362-377.

157. Parente, P. M. D. C., Santos Silva, J. M. C., 2016. Quantile regression with clustered data. Journal of Econometric Methods, 5, 1-15.

158. Peek, J., Rosengren, E., 1995. Bank lending and the transmission of monetary policy. In: J. Peek and E. Rosengren (eds.), Is Bank Lending Important for the Transmission of Monetary Policy? Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Conference Series 39, 47-68.

159. Rajan, R. G., 2006. Has finance made the world riskier? European Financial Management, 12, 499-533.

160. Roy, A., 1952. Safety first and the holding of assets. Econometrica, 20, 431– 449.

161. Schaeck, K., Cihák, M., 2010. Competition, efficiency, and soundness in banking: An industrial organization perspective. European Banking Center Discussion Paper No. 2010-20S. Stiroh,

162. Swanson, E. T., 2006. Federal Reserve transparency and financial market forecasts of short-term interest rates. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 38, 791-819.

163. Taylor, J. B., 2007. Housing and monetary policy. NBER Working Papers 13682.

164. Taylor, J. B., 2014. Causes of the financial crisis and the slow recovery: A ten-year perspective. In: M. N. Baily and J. B. Taylor (ed.), Across the Great Divide: New Perspectives on the Financial Crisis, Hoover Institution, Stanford University, 51-65.

165. Tobin, J., 1969. A General Equilibrium Approach To Monetary Theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1(1), 15-29. doi:10.2307/1991374.


166. Tovar, C. E., Garcia-Escribano, M., Vera Martin, M., 2012. Credit growth and the effectiveness of reserve requirements and other macroprudential instruments in Latin America. IMF Working Paper WP/12/142.

167. Valencia, F., 2014. Monetary policy, bank leverage, and financial stability. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. 47, 20-38.

168. Van der Cruijsen, C., Eijffinger, S., 2010. The economic impact of central bank transparency: A survey. In P. L. Siklos, M. T. Bohl and M. E. Wohar (ed.), Challenges in Central Banking: The Current Institutional Environment and Forces Affecting Monetary Policy, Cambridge University Press, 261-319.

169. Woodford, M., 2012. Inflation targeting and financial stability. NBER Working Papers 17967.ACCEPTED.


PHỤ LỤC 1: BẢNG THỐNG KÊ MÔ TẢ BIẾN NGHIÊN CỨU



Variable

Obs

Mean

Std. Dev.

Min

Max

zscore

300

23.98102

11.48096

1.32173

62.19548

mp_i1

300

.0660692

.0255972

.04375

.1183333

mp_i2

300

.0854233

.024424

.06375

.1333333

cr

300

.1962818

.0859924

.0885

.3753

fxi

300

1.036094

.0333158

.9913957

1.09083

inf

300

.08424

.0690287

.0063

.2297

sm

300

.20431

.0542346

.12

.298

inc

300

.0176324

.0299349

.0005517

.3610977

gro

300

.0600761

.0052783

.0524737

.0681

lerner

300

.296084

.0839612

.0214135

.608538

Có thể bạn quan tâm!

Xem toàn bộ 184 trang tài liệu này.

Tác động của chính sách tiền tệ tới rủi ro mất khả năng thanh toán tại các Ngân Hàng Thương Mại Việt Nam - 21



zscore

mp_i1

mp_i2

cr

fxi

inf

sm

inc

gro

lerner ins

zscore

1.0000










mp_i1

0.1203

1.0000









mp_i2

0.1222

0.9993

1.0000








cr

0.1430

-0.2086

-0.2082

1.0000







fxi

0.1461

0.4627

0.4488

0.4813

1.0000






inf

0.1978

0.8018

0.7976

0.1905

0.7298

1.0000





sm

0.0989

-0.1787

-0.1552

0.5685

0.0095

0.0182

1.0000




inc

0.0208

-0.0653

-0.0648

-0.0955

-0.1047

-0.0958

-0.0252

1.0000



gro

-0.1095

-0.3343

-0.3555

0.0328

0.0562

-0.2153

-0.4937

0.0116

1.0000


lerner

0.1612

0.1462

0.1485

0.5026

0.4026

0.3208

0.3448

-0.1788

-0.1120

1.0000

ins

0.1925

0.4753

0.4744

0.7025

0.5432

0.6008

0.3699

-0.1151

-0.2282

0.5134 1.0000


Dynamic panel-data estimation, two-step system GMM



Group variable: id

Number of obs

=

270

Time variable : nam

Number of groups

=

30

Number of instruments = 12

Obs per group: min

=

9

F(7, 29) = 97.10

avg

=

9.00

Prob > F = 0.000

max

=

9


zscore

Coef.

Std. Err.

t

P>|t|

[95% Conf.

Interval]

zscore







L1.

.7332959

.0349532

20.98

0.000

.6618084

.8047833

mp_i1

-77.6337

24.2307

-3.20

0.003

-127.191

-28.07635

lerner

-67.31281

15.25861

-4.41

0.000

-98.52016

-36.10546

inc

-5.837649

5.310698

-1.10

0.281

-16.69925

5.023949

gro

-4.069882

49.1818

-0.08

0.935

-104.658

96.5182

inf

17.60018

8.508213

2.07

0.048

.1989317

35.00143

ins

142.714

32.37464

4.41

0.000

76.50044

208.9276

_cons

-52.03248

15.46953

-3.36

0.002

-83.67123

-20.39373

Warning: Uncorrected two-step standard errors are unreliable.


Instruments for first differences equation Standard

D.(inc gro L.zscore ins)

GMM-type (missing=0, separate instruments for each period unless collapsed) L(1/9).mp_i1 collapsed

Instruments for levels equation Standard

inc gro L.zscore ins

_cons

GMM-type (missing=0, separate instruments for each period unless collapsed) D.mp_i1 collapsed

Arellano-Bond test for AR(1) in first differences: z = -3.76 Pr > z = 0.000 Arellano-Bond test for AR(2) in first differences: z = -0.79 Pr > z = 0.430

Sargan test of overid. restrictions: chi2(4) = 9.13 Prob > chi2 = 0.058 (Not robust, but not weakened by many instruments.)

Hansen test of overid. restrictions: chi2(4) = 6.61 Prob > chi2 = 0.158 (Robust, but weakened by many instruments.)


Difference-in-Hansen tests of exogeneity of instrument subsets: iv(inc gro L.zscore ins)

Hansen test excluding group: chi2(1)

=

0.01

Prob >

chi2

=

0.943

Difference (null H = exogenous): chi2(3)

=

6.61

Prob >

chi2

=

0.085


Group variable: id

Number of obs

=

270

Time variable : nam

Number of groups

=

30

Number of instruments = 12

Obs per group: min

=

9

F(7, 29) = 97.28

avg

=

9.00

Prob > F = 0.000

max

=

9


zscore

Coef.

Std. Err.

t

P>|t|

[95% Conf.

Interval]

zscore







L1.

.7330487

.0350088

20.94

0.000

.6614476

.8046497

mp_i1ins

-136.0426

41.59345

-3.27

0.003

-221.1108

-50.97448

lerner

-67.88617

15.28354

-4.44

0.000

-99.14452

-36.62782

inc

-6.101499

5.33318

-1.14

0.262

-17.00908

4.806078

gro

.0312943

48.83054

0.00

0.999

-99.83838

99.90096

inf

18.33111

8.571848

2.14

0.041

.7997111

35.86251

ins

150.1159

33.00869

4.55

0.000

82.60551

217.6262

_cons

-56.34188

15.63251

-3.60

0.001

-88.31396

-24.3698

Warning: Uncorrected two-step standard errors are unreliable.


Instruments for first differences equation Standard

D.(inc gro L.zscore ins)

GMM-type (missing=0, separate instruments for each period unless collapsed) L(1/9).mp_i1 collapsed

Instruments for levels equation Standard

inc gro L.zscore ins

_cons

GMM-type (missing=0, separate instruments for each period unless collapsed) D.mp_i1 collapsed

Arellano-Bond test for AR(1) in first differences: z = -3.76 Pr > z = 0.000 Arellano-Bond test for AR(2) in first differences: z = -0.80 Pr > z = 0.426

Sargan test of overid. restrictions: chi2(4) = 9.01 Prob > chi2 = 0.061 (Not robust, but not weakened by many instruments.)

Hansen test of overid. restrictions: chi2(4) = 6.28 Prob > chi2 = 0.179 (Robust, but weakened by many instruments.)


Difference-in-Hansen tests of exogeneity of instrument subsets: iv(inc gro L.zscore ins)

Hansen test excluding group: chi2(1)

=

0.01 Prob >

chi2

=

0.930

Difference (null H = exogenous): chi2(3)

=

6.27 Prob >

chi2

=

0.099

..... Xem trang tiếp theo?
⇦ Trang trước - Trang tiếp theo ⇨

Ngày đăng: 05/12/2022