Evaluating job satisfaction of employees at Minh An Hue Wood Processing Company Limited

Advancement training

Statistics

DTTT1	DTTT2	DTTT3	DTTT4	DTTT
N Valid Missing	125 9	125 9	125 9	125 9	125 9
Mean	4.15	3.70	3.88	3.51	3.8100
Std. Deviation	.554	.599	.679	.577	.47136
Variance	.307	.358	.461	.333	.222
Minimum	3	2	2	2	2.25
Maximum	5	5	5	5	4.75

Maybe you are interested!

Evaluating job satisfaction of employees at Minh An Hue Wood Processing Limited Company - 2
Factors affecting job satisfaction of employees of Joint Stock Commercial Bank for Foreign Trade of Vietnam in Ho Chi Minh City - 17
Factors affecting job satisfaction of bank credit officers in Ho Chi Minh City - 13
Evaluating the effectiveness of agricultural and forestry farming models on limestone terrain in Yen Minh district, Ha Giang province as a basis for planning the district's agricultural and forestry development - 10
The impact of job satisfaction on employees' intention to quit Saigon Commercial Joint Stock Bank - 16

DTTT1

Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
	Neutral	11	8.2	8.8	8.8
Valid	Agree Totally agree	84 30	62.7 22.4	67.2 24.0	76.0 100.0
	Total	125	93.3	100.0
Missing	System	9	6.7
Total		134	100.0

DTTT2

Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Disagree	3	2.2	2.4	2.4
Neutral	38	28.4	30.4	32.8
Valid Agree	78	58.2	62.4	95.2
Totally agree	6	4.5	4.8	100.0
Total	125	93.3	100.0
Missing System	9	6.7
Total	134	100.0

DTTT3

Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	cumulative Percent
	Disagree	4	3.0	3.2	3.2
	Neutral	25	18.7	20.0	23.2
Valid	Agree	78	58.2	62.4	85.6
	Totally agree	18	13.4	14.4	100.0
	Total	125	93.3	100.0
Missing	System	9	6.7
Total		134	100.0

DTTT4

Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
	Disagree	3	2.2	2.4	2.4
	Neutral	57	42.5	45.6	48.0
Valid	Agree	63	47.0	50.4	98.4
	Totally agree	2	1.5	1.6	100.0
	Total	125	93.3	100.0
Missing	System	9	6.7
Total		134	100.0

Salary and benefits

Statistics

LTPL2	LTPL3	LTPL4	LTPL
Valid N Missing	125 9	125 9	125 9	125 9
Mean	3.90	3.82	3.91	3.8747
Std. Deviation	.749	.723	.762	.66217
Variance	.562	.522	.581	.438
Minimum	2	2	2	2.00
Maximum	5	5	5	5.00

LTPL2

Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Disagree	3	2.2	2.4	2.4
Neutral	33	24.6	26.4	28.8
Valid Agree	63	47.0	50.4	79.2
Totally agree	26	19.4	20.8	100.0
Total	125	93.3	100.0
Missing System	9	6.7
Total	134	100.0

LTPL3

Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	cumulative Percent
	Disagree	3	2.2	2.4	2.4
	Neutral	37	27.6	29.6	32.0
Valid	Agree	65	48.5	52.0	84.0
	Totally agree	20	14.9	16.0	100.0
	Total	125	93.3	100.0
Missing	System	9	6.7
Total		134	100.0

LTPL4

Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	cumulative Percent
Disagree	3	2.2	2.4	2.4
Neutral	33	24.6	26.4	28.8
Valid Agree	61	45.5	48.8	77.6
Totally agree	28	20.9	22.4	100.0
Total	125	93.3	100.0
Missing System	9	6.7
Total	134	100.0

Relationship with colleagues

Statistics

MQH1	MQH2	MQH3	MQH4	MQH
Valid N Missing	125 9	125 9	125 9	125 9	125 9
Mean	4.08	3.79	3.73	3.71	3.8667
Std. Deviation	.667	.722	.700	.682	.58199
Variance	.445	.521	.490	.465	.339
Minimum	3	2	2	2	2.33
Maximum	5	5	5	5	5.00

MQH1

Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Neutral	23	17.2	18.4	18.4
Valid Agree Totally agree	69 33	51.5 24.6	55.2 26.4	73.6 100.0
Total	125	93.3	100.0
Missing System	9	6.7
Total	134	100.0

MQH2

Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
	Disagree	2	1.5	1.6	1.6
	Neutral	42	31.3	33.6	35.2
Valid	Agree	61	45.5	48.8	84.0
	Totally agree	20	14.9	16.0	100.0
	Total	125	93.3	100.0
Missing	System	9	6.7
Total		134	100.0

MQH3

Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Total and Percent
Disagree	4	3.0	3.2	3.2
Neutral	40	29.9	32.0	35.2
Valid Agree	67	50.0	53.6	88.8
Totally agree	14	10.4	11.2	100.0
Total	125	93.3	100.0
Missing System	9	6.7
Total	134	100.0

MQH4

Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	cumulative e Percent
Disagree	5	3.7	4.0	4.0
Neutral	37	27.6	29.6	33.6
Valid Agree	72	53.7	57.6	91.2
Totally agree	11	8.2	8.8	100.0
Total	125	93.3	100.0
Missing System	9	6.7
Total	134	100.0

Satisfaction

Statistics

HL1	HL2	HL3	HL
Valid	125	125	125	125
N Missing	9	9	9	9
Mean	4.43	4.09	3.96	4.1600
Std. Deviation	.513	.684	.677	.52466
Variance	.263	.468	.458	.275
Minimum	3	2	2	2.67
Maximum	5	5	5	5.00

HL1

Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
	Neutral	1	.7	.8	.8
	Agree	69	51.5	55.2	56.0
Valid	Completely Agree	55	41.0	44.0	100.0
	Total	125	93.3	100.0
Missin g	System	9	6.7
Total		134	100.0

HL2

Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Disagree Neutral Agree Valid Completely copper Total Missing System Total	1	.7	.8	.8
	21	15.7	16.8	17.6
	69	51.5	55.2	72.8
	34	25.4	27.2	100.0
	125	93.3	100.0
	9	6.7
	134	100.0

HL3

Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
	Disagree	4	3.0	3.2	3.2
	Neutral	19	14.2	15.2	18.4
Valid	Agree	80	59.7	64.0	82.4
	Completely copper idea	22	16.4	17.6	100.0

Total

125	93.3	100.0
Missing System	9	6.7
Total	134	100.0

FACTOR ANALYSIS

Factor analysis for independent variables

First time

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling

Adequacy.

.787
Approx. Chi-Square Bartlett's Test of	1696.41 0
Sphericity df	231
Sig.	.000

Total Variance Explained

Component

Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings			Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings
Total	% of Variance	cumulative %	Total	% of Variance	cumulative %
1	7,452	33,870	33,870	3.275	14,886	14,886
2	2,145	9,748	43,619	2,903	13,197	28,083
3	1,596	7,257	50,875	2,675	12,161	40,244
4	1,377	6,257	57,132	2,645	12,021	52,266
5	1,312	5,962	63,094	2,382	10,829	63,094

Rotated Component Matrix a

Component

BCCV2

BCCV5

.871

.837

BCCV3

.673
BCCV4	.621
BCCV1	.537
LTPL2		.918
LTPL4		.913
LTPL3		.517
LTPL1		.382
LTPL5		.376
DTTT4			.831
DTTT2			.829
DTTT1			.617
DTTT3			.616
DKLV3				.822
DKLV1				.703
DKLV2				.689
DKLV4				.510
MQH2					.752
MQH3					.687
MQH4					.633
MQH1					.533