MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING HO CHI MINH CITY UNIVERSITY OF LAW
FACULTY OF COMMERCIAL LAW
----- -----
PHAM THANH NGA
OWNERSHIP REGIME FOR FOREST RESOURCES IN VIETNAM
MASTER OF COMMERCIAL LAW
HO CHI MINH CITY – 2015
HO CHI MINH CITY UNIVERSITY OF LAW FACULTY OF COMMERCIAL LAW
--------
BACHELOR OF LAW THESIS
OWNERSHIP REGIME FOR FOREST RESOURCES IN VIETNAM
STUDENT: PHAM THANH NGA Course: 36 Student ID: 1155010223
INSTRUCTOR: MSc. NGUYEN THI NGOC LAN
Dr. PHAM VAN VO (support)
HO CHI MINH CITY – 2015
COMMITMENT
I hereby declare: This graduation thesis is the result of my own research, conducted under the scientific guidance of Master Nguyen Thi Ngoc Lan, ensuring honesty and compliance with regulations on citation and reference notes. I take full responsibility for this declaration.
Ho Chi Minh City, July 2015
Author
Pham Thanh Nga
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
ABBREVIATIONS
ABBREVIATIONS | |
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development | Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development |
Law on Protection and Development | Law on Forest Protection and Development 2004 |
RDD | Special use forest |
RPH | Protective forest |
RSX | Production forest |
People's Committee | People's Committee |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Ownership regime for forest resources in Vietnam - 2
-
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales zt2i3t4l5ee zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science zt2a3ge zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators: a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness b. Tourist capacity The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students. c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune: Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time. Minh Chau island commune: Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year. d. Sustainability The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes. landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable. e. Location and accessibility Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf: - Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route: Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm. - Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route: Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don. f. Infrastructure Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists. 3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1). 3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows: Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient. Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level. Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable. 3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development For Minh Chau commune: + Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12. + Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4. + Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12. + Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points + Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points. + Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points. The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table: Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes Attractiveness of self-tourismof course Capacity Mining time Sustainability Location and accessibility Infrastructure Result Point DarkMulti Point DarkMulti Point DarkMulti Point DarkMulti Point DarkMulti Point DarkMulti CommuneMinh Chau 12 12 4 8 12 12 4 4 4 8 6 8 42/52 Quan CommuneLan 6 12 6 8 9 12 4 4 4 8 4 8 33/52 b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development For Quan Lan commune: + The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12. + Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6. + Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9. + Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points. + Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points. + Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points. The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points. Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table: Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes Attractiveness of human tourismliterature Capacity Mining time Sustainability Location and accessibility Infrastructure Result Point DarkMulti Point DarkMulti Point DarkMulti Point DarkMulti Point DarkMulti Point DarkMulti Quan CommuneLan 12 12 6 8 9 12 4 4 4 8 4 8 39/52 Minh CommuneChau 6 12 4 8 12 12 4 4 4 8 6 8 36/52 Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching. Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019) 3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix: Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island Internal agent Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general quite wild, originalintact general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous. External agents Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high. Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that: To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to: - Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...) - Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources) div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex
-
Research on the Current Characteristics of Forest Resources and Factors Affecting Forest Resources Management in the National Park Area
-
Current Status of Soc Son Protective Forest Resources for Tourism Purposes
-
Human Ecological Pyramid for Studying the Impact of Local Buffer Zone Communities on Forest Resources
INDEX
INTRODUCTION 1
CHAPTER 1. OVERVIEW OF OWNERSHIP REGIME FOR FOREST RESOURCES IN VIETNAM 4
1.1 Some concepts 4
1.1.1 Concept of forest and forest resources 4
1.1.2 Concept of forest owner 8
1.2 Basis for establishing the regime of public ownership of forest resources in Vietnam
.......................................................................................................................... 9
1.2.1 Theoretical basis 9
1.2.2 Legal basis 11
1.3 Characteristics of the people's ownership regime for forest resources in Vietnam 14
CONCLUSION OF CHAPTER 1. 19
CHAPTER 2. CURRENT STATUS OF FOREST OWNERSHIP IN VIETNAM 20
2.1 Private ownership of production forests is plantation forests 20
2.1.1. Basis for establishing 20
2.1.2. Method of exercising private ownership rights over planted forests 21
2.1.3. Current status of private ownership of planted forests 24
2.2 Forms of State ownership of forests 26
2.2.1 Basis for establishment 26
2.2.2 State forest coordination methods 27
2.2.3 Current status of forest use rights implementation in Vietnam 35
2.3 Directions for improving laws on forest ownership in Vietnam 40
CONCLUSION OF CHAPTER 2. 45
CONCLUSION 46
INTRODUCTION
1. Reason for choosing the topic
As an important part of natural resources, forest resources are considered the cradle of life on Earth and at the same time a source of strong economic and financial development, contributing significantly to the overall strength of a country. The influence of forest resources is not only for each community and each individual country but also has significance on a global scale.
To protect this resource well, the Vietnamese State pays special attention to building a legal system in the forestry sector to establish a system of specialized management agencies from central to local levels - one of the effective tools on behalf of the State to enforce legal regulations in the actual management and protection of forest resources. And to implement a unified management mechanism nationwide, from the 1980 Constitution onwards, our State has only recognized one ownership regime for forest resources, which is the ownership regime of the entire people. Through a process of development up to now, the ownership regime of the entire people for forest resources has still affirmed its necessary suitability, of course, in terms of content, there must be some changes to adapt to the typical economic - cultural - social situation of the industrialization - modernization period of the country.
Choosing to research the topic of ownership regime for forest resources in Vietnam, the author wishes to reaffirm once again the necessity of the people's ownership regime for forest resources with the leading role of the State ownership form in forest management and protection, along with promoting the improvement of the law on forest resource ownership in our country.
2. Research status of the topic
The ownership regime of the entire people in Vietnam in general is an issue that attracts a lot of attention from scholars and scientists. However, the number of in-depth research topics on the ownership regime for forest resources in particular is not really remarkable. Through research, there are a number of articles and works that directly or indirectly mention the issue of ownership of forest resources in Vietnam that are worth paying attention to, as follows:
In scientific journals:
Hoang Huy Tuan (2013), "Decentralization and ownership in natural resource management: Theoretical approach and contextualization in forest management in Vietnam", Journal of Forestry Science , No. 1/2013, pp.2657-2669.
Vu Long (2005), "On natural forest ownership" posted on the website of the Vietnam Forestry Science Institute.
Nguyen Dai Anh Tuan - Deputy Head of Thua Thien Hue Forest Protection Department (2014), "Socialization of forest resource management - an unfinished problem" posted on the website of the Center for People and Nature.
Scientific report:
To Xuan Phuc & Tran Huu Nghi (2014), Land and forest allocation in the context of forestry sector restructuring: Opportunities for forest development and improving livelihoods in highland areas, Hue.
Thesis:
Nguyen Thi Thu Trang (2012), Decentralization of property ownership in forest allocation to communities in the Central Highlands , Master's thesis in economics, Ho Chi Minh City University of Economics.
Monographs:
Nguyen Thanh Huyen (2013), Law on management and protection of forest resources in Vietnam , National Political Publishing House.
The above articles and research topics mainly focus on studying a part of the content of the forest resource ownership mechanism in Vietnam, not specifically outlining the whole people's ownership regime for forest resources as well as the way of operating forest ownership rights with two forms of ownership according to the provisions of current law. Therefore, the author has chosen to study and clarify the ownership regime for forest resources in Vietnam.
3. Research purpose of the topic
Research and analyze the provisions of Vietnamese law to clarify the nature of the regime of public ownership of forest resources and at the same time study the content of how to implement forest ownership rights in Vietnam according to the law on forest protection and development, thereby proposing directions for improving the law on forest ownership in our country.
4. Subject and scope of the research topic
Research object
The main research object that the topic wants to focus on is the ownership regime for forest resources in Vietnam, more specifically, the legal regulations on the ownership regime for the whole people of forest resources in Vietnam with two forms of ownership: private ownership and state ownership.
Scope of research
The author studies the ownership mechanism for forest resources in Vietnam through studying the provisions of current laws such as the 2013 Constitution, the 2004 Law on Forest Protection and Development, and the 2005 Civil Code (amended and supplemented in 2011).
and legal documents of the Government, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, departments related to the forestry sector...
In addition, to serve the research work, the author also consulted related documents and materials of many authors, researchers or other organizations with research works or professional reports in the forestry field on forest ownership forms, forest management, protection and development in Vietnam.
5. Research methodology
The main research methods are analysis, synthesis and theoretical research methods.
Analysis and synthesis method: this is the method used throughout the topic to synthesize legal regulations on ownership regime as well as methods of implementing ownership rights to forest resources in Vietnam, analyze how to implement ownership models for forest resources, thereby pointing out the advantages and disadvantages of Vietnamese law on forest management and protection.
Theoretical research method: the author collects many domestic and foreign documents from reference books, electronic networks, magazines, etc. for research in order to provide solid and authentic theoretical bases for the topic.
In addition, the author also combines many other methods to achieve high efficiency for the research topic such as the comparative method, comparing the regulations on ownership of forest resources in Vietnam with the forest resource ownership model of some countries in the world, thereby drawing lessons towards perfecting the ownership regime and methods of effective management and protection of this resource in our country. The methodology of dialectical materialism and historical materialism of Marxism-Leninism to study the basis of formation as well as the law on ownership regime for forest resources in Vietnam in parallel with the combination of research methods of analyzing actual data, building hypotheses... to draw conclusions to clarify the research topic.
6. General layout of the thesis
Besides the Introduction, Conclusion, Table of Contents, Appendix and List of References, the content of the topic is structured into two chapters including:
Chapter 1: Overview of forest resource ownership regime in Vietnam Chapter 2: Current status of forest ownership rights in Vietnam.