According to Do Trong Dung (2011) in Sustainable Ecotourism Development in Northwest Vietnam, in terms of natural conditions assessment , the assessment level and assessment scores of criteria for the ability to exploit sustainable ecotourism are determined as follows:
- Location and accessibility: Location and accessibility are very important in implementing ecotourism activities. In fact, there are many places with resources to develop tourism, but because of remoteness and difficult roads, ecotourism exploitation is limited for these locations. The level of suitability in terms of location and accessibility of a tourist destination is divided into 4 equivalent levels as follows ( Table 3.5) :
Table 3.5. Criteria for assessing the level of convenience of location criteria and accessibility for community-based tourism development
Main indicators
(distance, travel time and number of popular means of transport)
Rating level | Rating Points | |
Distance from 10 - 100km, travel time is no more than 3 hours, can be traveled by 2 - 3 popular means of transport. | RTL | 4 |
Distance from 100 - 200km, travel time over 3 hours, can be reached by 2 popular means of transport. | TL | 3 |
Distance over 200km or under 500km, travel time is about 5 hours, can be reached by 1-2 popular means of transport. | TĐTL | 2 |
Distance over 300km, travel time about over 10 hours, can be reached by 1-2 popular means of transport. | ITL | 1 |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Resource Accessibility Criteria Assessment -
How to Rank Skills Assessment by Criteria, Component Skills -
Statistics of Average Scores of Each Criteria of Nlth in Students Through Assessment Times with Measure 1 (Round 1) -
Map of Assessment of the Favorability of Natural Resources for Tourism Development in Mountainous Districts of Tri - Thien Area

- Time of tourism activities: It is also necessary to require the most suitable time of climate conditions for the health of tourists and the most suitable time for ecotourism activities. Time of tourism activities determines the regularity and seasonality of tourism activities. Time of tourism activities in the assessment area can be assessed according to 4 levels corresponding to the following favorable levels (Table 3.6):
Table 3.6. Criteria for assessing the level of convenience in terms of tourism operating time for community-based tourism development
Main indicators
(number of days available for tourism activities and number of days in the year with climate conditions suitable for human health . )
Rating level | Rating Points | |
There are over 200 days a year that can be used for tourism activities. There are over 180 days a year that have climate conditions suitable for human health. | RTL | 4 |
There are over 150 - 200 days a year that can be used for tourism activities. There are over 120 - 180 days a year that have climate conditions suitable for human health. | TL | 3 |
There are over 100 – 150 days a year that can be used for tourism activities. There are over 90 – 120 days a year that have climate conditions suitable for human health. | TĐTL | 2 |
There are less than 100 days a year that can be used for tourism activities. There are less than 90 days a year that have climate conditions suitable for human health. | ITL | 1 |
- Ability to combine with tourist spots and routes:
Organizing tourism territory is one of the most important tasks of the tourism industry. Therefore, a national park that can combine with other tourist spots and routes in the surrounding area is a driving force for tourism development. Being close to other attractive tourist spots in the region helps the national park to organize a package tour in which the national park is an important ecotourism spot. Assessment of accessibility to other tourist spots and routes can be divided into the following 4 levels (Table 3.7):
Table 3.7. Criteria for assessing the level of convenience in terms of the ability to combine with routes and tourist spots for developing community-based tourism
Main indicators
(close to other unique and attractive tourist destinations and can organize a number of other tourist routes and types of tourism)
Rating level | Rating Points | |
Nearly 5 other unique and attractive tourist destinations. Organized 5 tourist routes with many different types of tourism. | RTL | 4 |
Near 3-5 other unique and attractive tourist destinations. Organize 3 tourist routes with many different types of tourism. | TL | 3 |
Near 2-3 other unique and attractive tourist spots. Organize 2-3 tourist routes with many different types of tourism. | TĐTL | 2 |
Not close to any tourist attractions or just close to another tourist attraction. Organize a tour route. | ITL | 1 |
- Tourism infrastructure: includes road systems, electricity, water, means of communication, transportation, etc. Infrastructure is very important for tourism activities. If the above conditions are lacking, tourism implementation must be suspended or if implemented, negative impacts will threaten environmental sustainability (Table 3.8).
Table 3.8. Criteria for assessing the level of convenience of infrastructure criteria for developing community-based tourism
Main indicators
(level of synchronization of tourism infrastructure)
Rating level | Rating Points | |
Has synchronous infrastructure, full amenities, meeting international standards. | RTL | 4 |
Has synchronous infrastructure, full amenities, meeting national standards. | TL | 3 |
Have a infrastructure but it is not synchronized and not convenient enough. | TĐTL | 2 |
There is still a lack of infrastructure, but the existing material conditions are only of low quality and temporary. | ITL | 1 |
3.1.3. Conduct assessment
3.1.3.1. Assessment of DLSTDVCĐ resource conditions by sub-region
Based on the natural geographical characteristics and distribution of ethnic minorities in the Northeast region (section 2.3.2) and based on the weight of criteria on community-based tourism resources (appendix 7.1), it is possible to determine the potential for community-based tourism resources in the Northeast region according to sub-regions (appendix 10).
3.1.3.2. Assessment of the ability to exploit DLSTDVCĐ
a) For the criteria to assess the level of convenience in location and accessibility
Based on the current status of the tourism transportation system (section 2.1.1.1) and the actual survey of tourism in the Northeast region along the routes: Hanoi - Bac Giang - Lang Son route along National Highway 1 with the main attractions being relics and scenic spots in Lang Son (Chi Lang Pass, Nhat - Nhi - Tam Thanh cave, Mac Dynasty citadel, Tien pagoda, markets and border gates, festivals and craft villages...); Hanoi - Thai Nguyen - Bac Kan - Cao Bang route connected to National Highway 3 with eco-tourism and cultural attractions: Ba Be Lake, Pac Bo Cave, Ban Gioc Waterfall, Dinh Hoa ATK, Nui Coc Lake...; Hanoi - Tuyen Quang - Ha Giang route connected to National Highway 2 with the main attractions being Hung Temple, My Lam, Vuong's palace, Mong ethnic village, Khau Vai love market...; The Hanoi - Phu Tho - Yen Bai - Lao Cai route is connected to the Hanoi - Lao Cai railway and National Highway 70 with tourist destinations such as Sa Pa, Thac Ba Lake....; The Hanoi - Quang Ninh route follows National Highway 5, 18 and by sea to visit tourist destinations such as Ha Long, Tuan Chau, Yen Tu, Mong Cai, Van Don.... (Table 3.9) :
Table 3.9. Assessment of the level of location and accessibility for developing community-based tourism in the Northeast region
Main indicators
(distance, travel time and number of popular means of transport)
Subregions | |
Distance from 10 - 100km, travel time is no more than 3 hours, can be traveled by 2 - 3 popular means of transport. | Region IX and subregions VIa, VIb, VII, |
VIIIb, VIc | |
Distance from 100 - 200km, travel time over 3 hours, can be reached by 2 popular means of transport. | Subregions Ib, IIIb, IVc, Vb and region X |
Distance over 200km or under 500km, travel time is about 5 hours, can be reached by 1-2 popular means of transport. | Subregions Ia, VIIIa, IIa, IIb, Va, IVa, IVb, IIIA |
Distance over 300km, travel time about over 10 hours, can be reached by 1-2 popular means of transport. | No regions/sub-regions |
b) Regarding the criteria on tourism operation time: According to the assessment of the tourism development research institute for the Northern mountainous provinces to serve the tourism development planning until 2030: the Northeast region has only 3 months (June, July, August) with climate unsuitable for human health and tourism activities. The remaining months are very suitable and appropriate. At the same time, based on the bioclimatic characteristics of the Northeast region ( section 2.1.17) , the criteria on tourism operation time in the Northeast region are determined (table 3.10):
Table 3.10. Assessment of the convenience of tourism operating hours by sub-region of the Northeast
Main indicators
(number of days available for tourism activities and number of days in the year with climate conditions suitable for human health)
Regions and subregions | |
There are over 200 days a year that can be used for tourism activities. There are over 180 days a year that have suitable climate conditions. suitable for human health | Va, Vb, VIa, VIc, Ivc |
There are over 150 - 200 days in a year that can be used for tourism activities. There are over 120 - 180 days in a year with conditions. climate conditions suitable for human health | Regions I, II, III, VII, VIII, IX, X and subregions IVa, IVb, VIb |
There are over 100 – 150 days a year where tourism activities can be carried out well. There are over 90 – 120 days a year where the weather conditions are favorable. suitable for human health | No regions/sub-regions |
There are less than 100 days a year that can be used for tourism activities. There are less than 90 days a year with favorable climatic conditions. suitable for human health | No region/subregion |
c) Regarding the ability to combine with tourist routes and destinations: based on the field survey process and the results shown on the map of tourist routes and destinations in the Northeast region, the ability to combine with tourist routes and destinations is assessed as follows (Table 3.11):
Table 3.11. Assessment of the level of convenience in terms of the ability to combine with routes and tourist destinations by sub-region of the Northeast
Main indicators
(close to other unique and attractive tourist destinations and able to organize a number of other tourist routes and types of tourism)
Region/subregion | |
Nearly 5 other unique and attractive tourist destinations. Organized 5 tourist routes with many different types of tourism. | VIa, VIc, IXa, Xb |
Near 3-5 other unique and attractive tourist destinations. Organize 3 tourist routes with many different types of tourism. | Ia, Ib, IIa, IIb, IVa, And,Xb. |
Near 2-3 other unique and attractive tourist spots. Organize 2-3 tourist routes with many different types of tourism. | Regions III, VII, VIII and subregions IVb, IVc, Vb, Vc, VIb, IXb, Xa |
Not close to any tourist attractions or just close to another tourist attraction. Organize a tour route. | No regions/sub-regions |
d) Regarding the level of convenience in infrastructure serving tourism: Based on the actual field survey and the current status of infrastructure serving tourism in the Northeast region (section 2.1.1). The criteria for assessing the level of convenience in infrastructure serving tourism in the Northeast region are shown as (Table 3.12):
Table 3.12. Assessment of the level of tourism infrastructure convenience by sub-region of the Northeast
Main indicators
(level of synchronization of tourism infrastructure)
Region/Sub-region | |
Has synchronous infrastructure, full amenities, meeting international standards. | Xb, Ia |
Has synchronous infrastructure, full amenities, meeting national standards. | No regions/sub-regions |
Have a infrastructure but it is not synchronized and not convenient enough.
Ib, Xb and regions II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX | |
There is still a lack of infrastructure, but the existing material conditions are only of low quality and temporary. | No regions/sub-regions |
3.1.4. Evaluation results
The evaluation results according to the levels and average scores (applying formula CT1) of the criteria are as follows (Table 3.13):
Table 3.13. Summary of results of assessment of the level of favorable conditions for developing community-based tourism in the Northeast region of Vietnam
TT
Region/subregion | Criteria group on DLST resources | Criteria group on the ability to exploit DLSTDVCĐ | Average score | Rating level | |||||||
Creature | Indigenous culture | Terrain | Climate | Location and accessibility | Tour operating hours | Ability to combine lines and points DL | Infrastructure tourism | ||||
(0.36) | (0.36) | (0.18) | (0.10) | (0.25) | (0.25) | (0.25) | (0.25) | ||||
1 | Ia | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3.40 | RTL |
2 | Ib | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3.09 | RTL |
3 | IIa | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3.20 | RTL |
4 | IIb | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2.70 | TĐTL |
5 | IIIa | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2.93 | TL |
6 | IIIb | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2.79 | TL |
7 | IVa | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2.48 | TĐTL |
8 | IVb | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3.07 | RTL |
9 | IVc | 3 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2.89 | TL |
10
And | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3.19 | RTL | |
11 | Vb | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2.56 | TĐTL |
12 | Vc | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3.20 | RTL |
13 | VIa | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3.57 | RTL |
14 | VIb | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3.14 | RTL |
15 | VIc | 1 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3.03 | TL |
16 | VII | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2.92 | TL |
17 | VIIIa | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2.08 | ITL |
18 | VIIIb | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2.69 | TĐTL |
19 | IXa | 1 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2.94 | TL |
20 | IXb | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2.73 | TĐTL |
21 | Distant | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2.01 | ITL |
22 | Xb | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3.47 | RTL |
Applying (2.2.) we have:
Relatively favorable: 2.41 ≤ X 2 < 2.74
Less favorable: <Favorable: 2.74 ≤ X 3 < 3.07 Very favorable: 3.07 ≤ X 4 < 3.4 |
The results of Table 3.9 show the level of favorable conditions for developing tourism in the Northeast region as follows (Figure 3.1):
1.Very favorable includes region I, and sub-regions IIa, IVb, Va, Vc, VIa, VIb, Xb. 2.Favourable: region III, region VII, sub-regions IVc, VIc, IXa.
3. Relatively favorable: Sub-regions IIb, IVa, Vb, VIIIb, IXb. 4. Less favorable: Sub-regions VIIIa, Xa.





