The impact of personality, education and experience on social entrepreneurship intention - 23

Fatoki, O., 2014. The entrepreneurial intention of undergraduate students in South Africa: The influences of entrepreneurship education and previous work experience. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(7), 294.

Fayolle, A. and Gailly, B., 2015. The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial attitudes and intention: Hysteresis and persistence. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 75-93.

Felin, T. and Hesterly, W.S., 2007. The knowledge-based view, nested heterogeneity, and new value creation: Philosophical considerations on the locus of knowledge. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 195-218.

Ferreira, FA, 2018. Mapping the field of arts-based management: Bibliographic coupling and co-citation analyses. Journal of Business Research, 85(348-357. Fitzsimmons, JR and Douglas, EJ, 2011. Interaction between considerations and desirability in the formation of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business

Maybe you are interested!

• Strengthening Inspection, Evaluation, and Experience Sharing in Medical Ethics Education for Students
• Comprehensive Fundamental Innovation of Vietnamese Education and Its Impact on the Need for Innovation in the Teaching and Learning Process
• Impact of the Demand for Fundamental and Comprehensive Innovation in Education and Training
• Mobile Phone Usage in Hanoi Inner City Area zt2i3t4l5ee zt2a3gsconsumer,consumption,consumer behavior,marketing,mobile marketing zt2a3ge zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts - Test the relationship between demographic variables and consumer behavior for Mobile Marketing activities The analysis method used is the Chi-square test (χ2), with statistical hypotheses H0 and H1 and significance level α = 0.05. In case the P index (p-value) or Sig. index in SPSS has a value less than or equal to the significance level α, the hypothesis H0 is rejected and vice versa. With this testing procedure, the study can evaluate the difference in behavioral trends between demographic groups. CHAPTER 4 RESEARCH RESULTS During two months, 1,100 survey questionnaires were distributed to mobile phone users in the inner city of Hanoi using various methods such as direct interviews, sending via email or using questionnaires designed on the Internet. At the end of the survey, after checking and eliminating erroneous questionnaires, the study collected 858 complete questionnaires, equivalent to a rate of about 78%. In addition, the research subjects of the thesis are only people who are using mobile phones, so people who do not use mobile phones are not within the scope of the thesis, therefore, the questionnaires with the option of not using mobile phones were excluded from the scope of analysis. The number of suitable survey questionnaires included in the statistical analysis was 835. 4.1 Demographic characteristics of the sample The structure of the survey sample is divided and statistically analyzed according to criteria such as gender, age, occupation, education level and personal income. (Detailed statistical table in Appendix 6) - Gender structure: Of the 835 completed questionnaires, 49.8% of respondents were male, equivalent to 416 people, and 50.2% were female, equivalent to 419 people. The survey results of the study are completely consistent with the gender ratio in the population structure of Vietnam in general and Hanoi in particular (Male/Female: 49/51). - Age structure: 36.6% of respondents are <23 years old, equivalent to 306 people. People from 23-34 years old accounting for the highest proportion: 44.8% equivalent to 374 people, people aged 35-45 and >45 are 70 and 85 people equivalent to 8.4% and 10.2% respectively. Looking at the results of this survey, we can see that the young people - youth account for a large proportion of the total number of people participating in the survey. Meanwhile, the middle-aged people including two age groups of 35 - 45 and >45 have a low rate of participation in the survey. This is completely consistent with the reality when Mobile Marketing is identified as a Marketing service aimed at young people (people under 35 years old). - Structure by educational level: among 835 valid responses, 541 respondents had university degrees, accounting for the highest proportion of ~ 75%, 102 had secondary school degrees, ~ 13.1%, and 93 had post-graduate degrees, ~ 11.9%. - Occupational structure: office workers and civil servants are the group with the highest rate of participation with 39.4%, followed by students with 36.6%. Self-employed people account for 12%, retired housewives are 7.8% and other occupational groups account for 4.2%. The survey results show that the student group has the same rate as the group aged <23 at 36.6%. This shows the accuracy of the survey data. In addition, the survey results distributed by occupational criteria have a rate almost similar to the sample division rate in chapter 3. Therefore, it can be concluded that the survey data is suitable for use in analysis activities. - Income structure: the group with income from 3 to 5 million has the highest rate with 39% of the total number of respondents. This is consistent with the income structure of Hanoi people and corresponds to the average income of the group of civil servants and office workers. Those People with no income account for 23%, income under 3 million VND accounts for 13% and income over 5 million VND accounts for 25%. 4.2 Mobile phone usage in Hanoi inner city area According to the survey results, most respondents said they had used the phone for more than 1 year, specifically: 68.4% used mobile phones from 4 to 10 years, 23.2% used from 1 to 3 years, 7.8% used for more than 10 years. Those who used mobile phones for less than 1 year accounted for only a very small proportion of ~ 0.6%. (Table 4.1) Table 4.1: Time spent using mobile phones Frequency Ratio (%) Valid Percentage Cumulative Percentage Alid <1 year 5 .6 .6 .6 1-3 years 194 23.2 23.2 23.8 4-10 years 571 68.4 68.4 92.2 >10 years 65 7.8 7.8 100.0 Total 835 100.0 100.0 The survey indexes on the time of using mobile phones of consumers in the inner city of Hanoi are very impressive for a developing country like Vietnam and also prove that Vietnamese consumers have a lot of experience using this high-tech device. Moreover, with the majority of consumers surveyed having a relatively long time of use (4-10 years), it partly proves that mobile phones have become an important and essential item in people's daily lives. When asked about the mobile phone network they are using, 31% of respondents said they are using the network of Vietel company, 29% use the network of of Mobifone company, 27% use Vinaphone company's network and 13% use networks of other providers such as E-VN telecom, S-fone, Beeline, Vietnammobile. (Figure 4.1). Figure 4.1: Mobile phone network in use Compared with the announced market share of mobile telecommunications service providers in Vietnam (Vietel: 36%, Mobifone: 29%, Vinaphone: 28%, the remaining networks: 7%), we see that the survey results do not have many differences. However, the statistics show that there is a difference in the market share of other networks because the Hanoi market is one of the two main markets of small networks, so their market share in this area will certainly be higher than that of the whole country. According to a report by NielsenMobile (2009) [8], the number of prepaid mobile phone subscribers in Hanoi accounts for 95% of the total number of subscribers, however, the results of this survey show that the percentage of prepaid subscribers has decreased by more than 20%, only at 70.8%. On the contrary, the number of postpaid subscribers tends to increase from 5% in 2009 to 19.2%. Those who are simultaneously using both types of subscriptions account for 10%. (Table 4.2). Table 4.2: Types of mobile phone subscribers Frequency Ratio (%) Valid Percentage Cumulative Percentage Valid Prepay 591 70.8 70.8 70.8 Pay later 160 19.2 19.2 89.9 Both of the above 84 10.1 10.1 100.0 Total 835 100.0 100.0 The above figures show the change in the psychology and consumption habits of Vietnamese consumers towards mobile telecommunications services, when the use of prepaid subscriptions and junk SIMs is replaced by the use of two types of subscriptions for different purposes and needs or switching to postpaid subscriptions to enjoy better customer care services. In addition, the majority of respondents have an average spending level for mobile phone services from 100 to 300 thousand VND (406 ~ 48.6% of total respondents). The high spending level (> 500 thousand VND) is the spending level with the lowest number of people with only 8.4%, on the contrary, the low spending level (under 100 thousand VND) accounts for the second highest proportion among the groups of respondents with 25.4%. People with low spending levels mainly fall into the group of students and retirees/housewives - those who have little need to use or mainly use promotional SIM cards. (Table 4.3). Table 4.3: Spending on mobile phone charges Frequency Ratio (%) Valid Percentage Cumulative Percentage Valid <100,000 212 25.4 25.4 25.4 100-300,000 406 48.6 48.6 74.0 300,000-500,000 147 17.6 17.6 91.6 >500,000 70 8.4 8.4 100.0 Total 835 100.0 100.0 The statistics in Table 4.3 are similar to the percentages in the NielsenMobile survey results (2009) with 73% of mobile phone users having medium spending levels and only 13% having high spending levels. The survey results also showed that up to 31% ~ nearly one-third of respondents said they sent more than 10 SMS messages/day, meaning that on average they sent 1 SMS message for every working hour. Those with an average SMS message volume (from 3 to 10 messages/day) accounted for 51.1% and those with a low SMS message volume (less than 3 messages/day) accounted for 17%. (Table 4.4) Table 4.4: Number of SMS messages sent per day Frequency Ratio (%) Valid Percentage Cumulative Percentage Valid <3 news 142 17.0 17.0 17.0 3-10 news 427 51.1 51.1 68.1 >10 news 266 31.9 31.9 100.0 Total 835 100.0 100.0 Similar to sending messages, those with an average message receiving rate (from 3-10 messages/day) accounted for the highest percentage of ~ 55%, followed by those with a high number of messages (over 10 messages/day) ~ 24% and those with a low number of messages received daily (under 3 messages/day) remained at the bottom with 21%. (Table 4.5) Table 4.5: Number of SMS messages received per day Frequency Ratio (%) Valid Percentage Cumulative Percentage Valid <3 news 175 21.0 21.0 21.0 3-10 news 436 55.0 55.0 76.0 >10 news 197 24.0 24.0 100.0 Total 835 100.0 100.0 When comparing the data of the two result tables 4.4 and 4.5, we can see the reasonableness between the ratio of the number of messages sent and the number of messages received daily by the interview participants. 4.3 Current status of SMS advertising and Mobile Marketing According to the interview results, in the 3 months from the time of the survey and before, 94% of respondents, equivalent to 785 people, said they received advertising messages, while only a very small percentage of 6% (only 50 people) did not receive advertising messages (Table 4.6). Table 4.6: Percentage of people receiving advertising messages in the last 3 months Frequency Ratio (%) Valid Percentage Cumulative Percentage Valid Have 785 94.0 94.0 94.0 Are not 50 6.0 6.0 100.0 Total 835 100.0 100.0 The results of Table 4.6 show that consumers in the inner city of Hanoi are very familiar with advertising messages. This result is also the basis for assessing the knowledge, experience and understanding of the respondents in the interview. This is also one of the important factors determining the accuracy of the survey results. In addition, most respondents said they had received promotional messages, but only 24% of them had ever taken the action of registering to receive promotional messages, while 76% of the remaining respondents did not register to receive promotional messages but still received promotional messages every day. This is the first sign indicating the weaknesses and shortcomings of lax management of this activity in Vietnam. (Table 4.7) div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; vertical-align: 6pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; vertical-align: 6pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 5.5pt; vertical-align: 3pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 8.5pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Courier New", monospace; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s25 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s26 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s27 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 1.5pt; } div.maincontent .s28 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s29 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s30 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s31 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s32 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s33 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s35 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s36 { color: #F00; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s37 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s38 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 8.5pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s39 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s40 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 7pt; vertical-align: 4pt; } div.maincontent .s41 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s42 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s43 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 7.5pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s44 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 7pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s45 { color: #F00; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s46 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 7pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s47 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s48 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s49 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s50 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; } div.maincontent .s51 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s52 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s53 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s54 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s55 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s56 { color: #00F; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s57 { color: #00F; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s58 { color: #00F; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s59 { color: #00F; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s60 { color: #00F; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s61 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s62 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s63 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .content_head2 { color: #F00; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s64 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s67 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; } div.maincontent .s68 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } div.maincontent .s69 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } div.maincontent .s70 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex
• Education and health promotion - 4

Venturing, 26(4), 431-440.

Forbes, DP, 2005. The Effects of Strategic Decision Making on Entrepreneurial Self–Efficacy. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 599-626.

Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F., 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.

Forster, F. and Grichnik, D., 2013. Social entrepreneurial intention formation of corporate volunteers. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 4(2), 153-181.

Frances, N., 2008. The end of charity: Time for social enterprise. Allen & Unwin.

Fuller, B., Liu, Y., Bajaba, S., Marler, LE and Pratt, J., 2018. Examining how the personality, self-efficacy, and anticipatory cognitions of potential entrepreneurs shape their entrepreneurial intentions. Personality and Individual Differences, 125(1), 120-125.

Gamst, F.C., 1991. Foundations of social theory. Anthropology of Work Review,

12(3), 19-25.

Garson, G.D., 2012. Testing statistical assumptions . Asheboro: Statistical Associates Publishing.

Gerbing, DW and Anderson, JC, 1988. An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2), 186-192.

Germak, AJ and Robinson, JA, 2014. Exploring the motivation of nascent social entrepreneurs. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 5(1), 5-21.

Gorman, G., Hanlon, D. and King, W., 1997. Some research perspectives on entrepreneurship education, enterprise education and education for small business management: a ten-year literature review. International Small Business Journal, 15(3), 56-77.

Granovetter, M., 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.

Greenslade, JH and White, KM, 2005. The prediction of above-average participation in volunteerism: A test of the theory of planned behavior and the volunteer functions inventory in older Australian adults. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145(2), 155-172.

Guerrero, M., Rialp, J. and Urbano, D., 2008. The impact of desirability and considerations on entrepreneurial intentions: A structural equation model. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(1), 35-50.

Gürol, Y. and Atsan, N., 2006. Entrepreneurial characteristics among university students: Some insights for entrepreneurship education and training in Turkey. Education+ Training, 48(1), 25-38.

Haines, R., Street, MD and Haines, D., 2008. The influence of perceived importance of an ethical issue on moral judgment, moral obligation, and moral intent. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(2), 387-399.

Hair Jnr, J., Black, W., Babin, B. and Anderson, R., 2010. Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective. United States: Prentice Hall.

Hair Jr, JF, Hult, GTM, Ringle, C. and Sarstedt, M., 2016. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Los Angeles, California: Sage publications.

Hansemark, OC, 1998. The effects of an entrepreneurship program on need for achievement and locus of control of reinforcement. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 4(1), 28-50.

Harding, R. and Cowling, M. 2006. Social entrepreneurship monitor . London: Global Entrepreneurship Monitor.

Haugh, H., 2007. New strategies for a sustainable society the growing contribution of social entrepreneurship. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(4), 743-749.

Helm, ST and Andersson, FO, 2010. Beyond taxonomy: An empirical validation of social entrepreneurship in the nonprofit sector. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 20(3), 259-276.

Henseler, J., Ringle, CM and Sarstedt, M., 2015. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.

Hermans, HJ, 1970. A questionnaire measure of achievement motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54(4), 353.

Herrington, M. and Kelley, D., 2013. African entrepreneurship–Sub-Saharan African Regional Report 2012. The Graduate School of Business, University of Cape Town, Cape Town,

Hindle, K., Klyver, K. and Jennings, D.F. 2009. An “informed” intention model: Incorporating human capital, social capital, and gender variables into the theoretical model of entrepreneurial intentions. Understanding the Entrepreneurial Mind. New York: Springer.

Hitt, M.A., Bierman, L., Shimizu, K. and Kochhar, R., 2001. Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 13-28.

Hitt, M.A., Bierman, L., Uhlenbruck, K. and Shimizu, K., 2006. The importance of resources in the internationalization of professional service firms: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1137-1157.

Hockerts, 2017. Determinants of Social Entrepreneurial Intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 105-130.

Hockerts, K., 2015a. How hybrid organizations turn antagonistic assets into complementarities. California Management Review, 57(3), 83-106.

Hockerts, K., 2015b. The Social Entrepreneurial Antecedents Scale (SEAS): a validation study. Social Enterprise Journal, 11(3), 260-280.

Hockerts, K., 2018. The Effect of Experiential Social Entrepreneurship Education on Intention Formation in Students. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 9(3), 234-256.

Hornaday, J.A. and Aboud, J., 1971. Characteristics of successful entrepreneurs.

Personnel Psychology, 24(2), 141-153.

Hsu, C.-Y. and Wang, S.-M., 2018. Social entrepreneurial intentions and its influential factors: A comparison of students in Taiwan and Hong Kong. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(3), 385-395.

Hsu, DK, Burmeister-Lamp, K., Simmons, SA, Foo, M.-D., Hong, MC and Pipes, JD, 2019. “I know I can, but I don't fit”: Perceived fit, self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial intention. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(2), 311-326.

Hyrsky, K. and Tuunanen, M., 1999. Innovativeness and risk-taking prospensity: A cross-cultural study of Finnish and US entrepreneurs and small business owners. Liiketaloudellinen Aikakauskirja, 1(1), 238-256.

Ip, C.Y., Liang, C., Wu, S.-C., Law, KMY and Liu, H.-C., 2018a. Enhancing social entrepreneurial intentions through entrepreneurial creativity: A comparative study between Taiwan and Hong Kong. Creativity Research Journal, 30(2), 132-142.

Ip, C.Y., Wu, S.-C., Liu, H.-C. and Liang, C., 2018b. Social entrepreneurial intentions of students from Hong Kong. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 27(1), 47-64.

Ip, C.Y., Wu, S.-C., Liu, H.-C. and Liang, C., 2017. Revisiting the antecedents of social entrepreneurial intentions in Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 6(3), 301-323.

İrengün, O. and Arıkboğa, Ş., 2015. The effect of personality traits on social entrepreneurship intentions: a field research. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195(1186-1195.

Jackson, D.N., 2004. Jackson personality inventory, revised: Manual. Sigma Assessment Systems, Incorporated.

Janssen, F., Fayolle, A. and Wuilaume, A., 2018. Researching bricolage in social entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 30(3-4), 450- 470.

Jemari, MA, Kasuma, J., Kamaruddin, HM, Tama, HA, Morshidi, I. and Suria, K., 2017. Relationship between human capital and social capital towards social entrepreneurial intention among the public university students. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 4(12), 179-184.

Jilinskaya-Pandey, M. and Wade, J., 2019. Social entrepreneur quotient: An international perspective on social entrepreneurs. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 1-23.

John, O.P. and Srivastava, S., 1999. The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of personality: Theory and Research, 2(1999), 102-138.

Jones, MV, Coviello, N. and Tang, YK, 2011. International Entrepreneurship research (1989-2009): A domain ontology and thematic analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(6), 632-659.

Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. 2013. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I. Singapore: World Scientific.

Kautonen, T., Hatak, I., Kibler, E. and Wainwright, T., 2015. Emergence of entrepreneurial behavior: The role of age-based self-image. Journal of Economic Psychology, 50(1), 41-51.

Kautonen, T., Luoto, S. and Tornikoski, ET, 2010. Influence of work history on entrepreneurial intentions in 'prime age'and 'third age': A preliminary study. International Small Business Journal, 28(6), 583-601.

Keat, OY, Selvarajah, C. and Meyer, D., 2011. Inclination towards entrepreneurship among university students: An empirical study of Malaysian university students. International Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 2(4), 206–220. Kedmenec, I., Rebernik, M. and Peric, J., 2015. The impact of individual characteristics on intentions to pursue social entrepreneurship. Ekonomski

Pregled, 66(2), 119-137.

Kibler, E. and Kautonen, T., 2016. The moral legitimacy of entrepreneurs: An analysis of early-stage entrepreneurship across 26 countries. International Small Business Journal, 34(1), 34-50.

Kirby, D.A. and Ibrahim, N., 2011. The case for (social) entrepreneurship education in Egyptian universities. Education+ Training, 53(5), 403-415.

Kolvereid, L., Iakovleva, T. and Kickul, J., 2006. An Integrated Model of Entrepreneurial Intentions (Summary). Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 26(8), 5.

Kolvereid, L. and Isaksen, E., 2006. New business start-up and subsequent entry into self-employment. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(6), 866-885.

Koseoglu, M.A., Rahimi, R., Okumus, F. and Liu, J., 2016. Bibliometric studies in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 61(180-198.

Kozan, MK, Öksoy, D. and Özsoy, O., 2006. Growth plans of small businesses in Turkey: Individual and environmental influences. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(1), 114-129.

Krippendorff, K., 2004. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology Sage, Thousand Oaks. London: Sage publications.

Krueger Jr, NF 2003. The cognitive psychology of entrepreneurship. Handbook of entrepreneurship research. Boston, MA: Springer.

Krueger Jr, NF, Reilly, MD and Carsrud, AL, 2000. Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5-6), 411-432.

Krueger, NF and Brazeal, DV, 1994. Entrepreneurial potential and potential entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(3), 91-104.

Lacap, JPG, Mulyaningsih, HD and Ramadani, V., 2018. The mediating effects of social entrepreneurial antecedents on the relationship between prior experience and social entrepreneurial intention: The case of Filipino and Indonesian university students. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 9(3), 329-346.

Lanero, A., Vázquez, J.-L. and Aza, CL, 2016. Social cognitive determinants of entrepreneurial career choice in university students. International Small Business Journal, 34(8), 1053-1075.

Lanero, A., Vázquez, JL, Gutiérrez, P. and García, MP, 2011. The impact of entrepreneurship education in European universities: an intention-based approach analysis in the Spanish area. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 8(2), 111-130.

Langkamp Bolton, D. and Lane, MD, 2012. Individual entrepreneurial orientation: Development of a measurement instrument. Education+ Training, 54(2/3), 219-233.

Leadbeater, C., 1997. The rise of the social entrepreneur. London: Demos.

Lee, H.-S., Flores, LY, Navarro, RL and Kanagui-Muđoz, M., 2015. A longitudinal test of social cognitive career theory's academic persistence

model among Latino/a and White men and women engineering students.

Journal of Vocational Behavior, 88(1), 95-103.

Lee, I., 2015. A social enterprise business model for social entrepreneurs: theoretical foundations and model development. International Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 3(4), 269-301.

Lee, M.-C., 2009. Understanding the behavioral intention to play online games: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. Online information review, 33(5), 849-872.

Lehner, O.M. and Kansikas, J., 2012. Opportunity recognition in social entrepreneurship: A thematic meta analysis. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 21(1), 25-58.

Lehner, O.M. and Nicholls, A., 2014. Social finance and crowdfunding for social enterprises: A public–private case study providing legitimacy and leverage. Venture Capital, 16(3), 271-286.

Lent, RW and Brown, SD, 2008. Social cognitive career theory and subjective well-being in the context of work. Journal of Career Assessment, 16(1), 6-21.

Lent, RW, Brown, SD and Hackett, G., 1994. Toward a unified social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79-122.

Lent, R.W., Brown, S.D. and Hackett, G., 2002. Social cognitive career theory.

Career Choice and Development, 4(1), 255-311.

Lent, RW, Ireland, GW, Penn, LT, Morris, TR and Sappington, R., 2017. Sources of self-efficacy and outcome expectations for career exploration and decision-making: A test of the social cognitive model of career self-management. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 99(1), 107-117.

Lepoutre, J., Justo, R., Terjesen, S. and Bosma, N., 2013. Designing a global standardized methodology for measuring social entrepreneurship activity: the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor social entrepreneurship study. Small Business Economics, 40(3), 693-714.