A relic tree is a tree planted by leaders, famous people or evidence of a historical event. A relic tree can be a historical, cultural, scientific or other socially influential relic. In some cases, a tree can be both a relic and an ancient tree.
Con Son relics are associated with historical relics, with the names of heroes and cultural celebrities such as Nguyen Trai, Than Nguyen Dan... Mentioning Con Son is talking about temples, shrines, legends that are preserved and passed down from generation to generation. These relics are hidden under the canopy of vast green pine forests, cool all year round with fresh climate. The flora at the relic site is managed by two agencies, Chi Linh Forest Management Board and Con Son Relic Management Board, however, the direct conservation and maintenance is still the Con Son Relic Management Board. Therefore, the restoration and conservation of historical relics always plays a key role.
Protecting ancient trees and relic trees not only has the meaning of preserving history but also serves as a document, living evidence to educate and communicate about love for the homeland and country for everyone, every generation. Ancient trees and relic trees are also highlights that create unique landscapes and beauty, are the highlight of the large landscape painting, through which people can learn to see the changes in the atmosphere and ecosystem over time, thereby having positive impacts to protect and maintain the existing landscapes and to embellish and upgrade them to suit the general landscape while still ensuring the historical elements of the relics.
4.6.1. List of ancient trees


Figure 4.11: Ancient Banyan Tree Figure 4.12: Ancient Pine Tree
The assessment of ancient trees is not only through observation and investigation in the field but also based on historical factors, the formation of the tree, combined with indicators of diameter and height. From the indicators, we have the following table of results:
Table 4.8 List of ancient trees
TT
Tree name | Location | Year old | D1.3(cm) | Hvn (m) | Tree status | |
1 | Pine tree | Before Hun Temple | >600 | 76.8 | 13.6 | Trees grow normally, tree height and canopy are controlled. The tree canopy is not beautiful. |
2 | Big Tree | In Hun Temple yard (2 trees) | >600 | 60 | 6 | Old tree, rough trunk, diseased, bad canopy, leaning trunk |
3 | Big Tree | In Hun Temple yard (4 trees) | 70 | 42.5 | 4.8 | The tree is leaning, has a bad canopy, a rough trunk and is infested with pests and diseases. |
4 | Pine tree | Mountainside, mountain top | >100 | 45.8 | 15.6 | The tree grows well, has a straight trunk and even canopy. |
5 | Pine tree | Mountainside, mountain top | >600 | 77.2 | 17.1 | Very few remain, some trees have rotten trunks and roots. Trees have straight trunks, even canopy, and develop. least. |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Research on landscape assessment for agricultural, forestry and tourism development in Dong Thap Muoi area, Dong Thap province - 15 -
Separate Assessment of the Favorability of Landscape Types for the Forestry Industry in the Dong Thap Muoi Region. -
Cultural changes in the livelihoods of residents at Trang An Scenic Landscape Complex under the impact of tourism - 23 -
Proposal Group on Landscape Restoration and Protection, Tourism Resources
4.6.2 List of relic trees
At the Con Son relic site, there are not many relic trees so there has not been a specific plan and not much attention. These trees were planted by leaders as souvenirs during their visits to the Con Son relic site, to mark important times and events at historical sites.
Table 4.9 List of relic trees
TT
Tree name Year of planting | Grower | Position | D1.3 (cm) | Hvn (m) | |
1 | Linden (September 14, 2008) | Nguyen Tan Dung | Prime minister | 8.4 | 4 |
2 | Hairy Banyan Tree (February 14, 2005) | Tran Duc Luong | President | 23 | 7.7 |
3 | Banyan Tree | Nguyen Minh Triet | President | 12 | 4.8 |
4.7.Landscape of the study area
4.7.1. Current landscape diagram of Con Son relic site
An overview of the Con Son relic site can be seen as follows: At the foot of Ky Lan mountain is Con Son pagoda (Hun pagoda), in front of the pagoda is Con Son lake. From the pagoda, go up about 50m to Ngoc well, continue up about 10 stone steps to Dang Minh tower. Go up to the top of the mountain about 1800m to Ban Co Tien. From Ban Co Tien, turn right to meet Con Son stream, continue down to Nguyen Trai's old house. From here, turn right to go up to Tran Nguyen Dan temple, go down about 500m to Nguyen Trai temple. Most of the historical architectural works have been repaired and renovated, the roads have also been expanded and upgraded, convenient for tourists to travel. However, synonymous with the innovation of infrastructure and architectural works, a large number of forest trees were cut down, especially ancient pine trees were lost, in addition to the adverse impact on the growth, development, recovery and regeneration of the forest, causing the Con Son forest to increasingly degrade, not ensuring the forest ecosystem as well as the landscape value and aesthetics of the entire Con Son relic site.

Figure 4.13: Diagram of Con Son relic site
4.7.2. Assessment of biodiversity in the relic site
In total, the plant species distributed in the Con Son relic site do not have much value. In addition to providing wood, resin, creating landscape, regulating climate and having great significance for historical relics, the flora here does not have much value. The tree composition is poor, the structure of the flora system does not create clear levels. The layer of large and medium-sized trees with long lifespans occupy the top space with a small number, sparse foliage, low coverage density, not concentrated. Below are shade-loving and shade-tolerant tree species with different small and medium-sized trees but the canopy has not closed yet, so the creation of vertical space levels is still unclear. The layer of shrubs, fresh carpets and extra-storey plants is not developed evenly, there are places with 70-80% coverage, but there are places with only 40-50%, even in areas with large slopes, only bare soil and rocks are seen.
The reasons for the uneven development of forest flora, the decline in the number of species, and the increasingly poor quality of forests are due to steep mountainous terrain, weather and climate changes, environmental pollution, water and soil sources. However, the underlying cause is the indiscriminate exploitation of forests, lack of human awareness, and no plan to plant additional trees to increase the forest area. The process of visiting and traveling by visitors from all over the world has greatly affected the forest restoration process, along with littering, causing environmental pollution and affecting the landscape of the relic site. In addition, some ancient trees are too old, and are not cared for or protected, so many trees are infected with pests and diseases, and their trunks rot, leading to death and collapse.
4.7.2.1. Con Son Pagoda
In the temple area, the main vegetation is Pine and Lychee, forming the upper and middle layers of trees, with quite large heights and sizes. In addition, in the temple grounds, there are some ornamental trees with beautiful flowers, leaves, and colors such as banyan trees, cycads, and fig trees. However, the quality of these trees is very poor, they are affected by pests, broken, rotten, and the canopy is unbalanced, not creating the inherent beauty of the tree shape. The number of ornamental trees and flowering trees is not much, the colors are not diverse, and do not make a strong impression on visitors.
4.7.2.2. Jade well
The area around the Jade Well is mainly wild plants, in addition there are a few Pine trees, Acacia trees, the quality of the trees is very poor, infested with pests, average height 1.5m-1.8m, bad canopy. In front of the Jade Well yard, there are two Dai trees, the trees grow poorly, the trunk and canopy are bad. Here, besides stopping, resting and enjoying the water at the Jade Well, the landscape factor of the tree species as well as the diversity of plants in this area do not make a strong impression on visitors.
4.7.2.3. First chess board
The area around the chessboard is mainly Acacia and Pine trees, these trees have relatively equal height and size. However, the number of ancient Pine trees has almost disappeared, the reason is that the process of renovating this area has greatly affected the ecosystem as well as the diversity of the forest. The trees are sparse, the density of trees is low, the canopy is simple, not closed, creating a poor space, lacking color. In front of the chessboard, there are two Sanh and De trees, but due to lack of care and attention, the trees grow poorly, are invaded by pests and parasites, making the trees ugly.
4.7.2.4. Stone table
The vegetation here is mainly pine, acacia, and acacia, forming a high tree layer, the low layer is mainly wild plants. Around Thach Ban, due to the great impact of humans, the trees grow poorly, even die, the number of trees and species has decreased significantly.
4.7.2.5. Nguyen Trai Temple
This area is planned in the most clear and systematic scale, with a diverse number of species and standard quality trees, creating a colorful and impressive campus. In addition to the main trees such as Pine, Acacia, Acacia, and Camphor which grow quite well and evenly, ornamental trees and shade trees such as Magnolia, Areca, Dai, and Cypress... are also planted and cared for quite well. These tree species have fully promoted their functions and effects in creating an ecosystem as well as species diversity for Nguyen Trai Temple in particular and for Con Son relic site in general.
4.7.3. Assessment of the appropriateness of the landscape in the Con Son relic site
Con Son relic site has a prime geographical location, located on Ky Lan mountain, covered by pine forests with ancient pine trees planted since the Tran Nguyen Dan period, from Ky Lan mountain you can see Con Son lake, adjacent to Ky Lan mountain is Ngu Nhac mountain. This is a miraculous arrangement of nature for the Con Son scenic relic site. Here, there are historical relics associated with the lives of heroes and cultural celebrities such as Tran Nguyen Dan, Tran Hung Dao, Nguyen Trai preserved and conserved under architectural works such as Tran Nguyen Dan temple, Nguyen Trai temple, Thach Ban, famous places with ancient legends such as Ban Co Tien, Gieng Ngoc... All historical architectural works are located in quite beautiful locations, leaning against the mountain behind, overlooking the lake in front with an airy and poetic space. The works have been restored and renovated many times but still retain the ancient architectural features of each period. Although there is a specific plan, it mainly focuses on architectural works and forgets about landscape elements.
In general, Con Son relic has a beautiful landscape and still retains natural elements, architectural works of great historical and cultural value, ensuring historical authenticity. The image of the pine forest is green all year round, hidden under the forest canopy are historical relics, appearing and disappearing, vague in the mist and clouds, creating a magical, poetic feeling, arousing curiosity for tourists when coming here. The airy, quiet space, fresh climate, poetic scenery make visitors from all over the world come here not only to burn incense and worship but also have the opportunity to immerse themselves in nature, admire beautiful scenes that few people can encounter in everyday life.
Considering each specific location, the landscape problem has many unreasonable things, lacking harmony and connection with the general landscape. In the process of planning and renovating architectural works, the natural ecosystem of the forest has been broken, the vegetation layer has been lost, causing soil erosion, poor nutrition, and loss of moisture. Therefore, natural pine forests cannot be restored and regenerated. Old trees are not cared for and protected, and are increasingly lost due to exploitation, pests, and aging, while every year there is no plan to plant additional forest trees and take measures to restore the forest's ability to recover. As a result, the forest is increasingly poor in quantity, variety, and quality.
reduced, causing the loss of the inherent beauty of the forest in general and the Con Son relic site in particular. In addition, at the temples and shrines that were built and re-planned, there were only bare architectural works without trees to create landscape or very few left because they were cut down to make way for construction. Therefore, considering the details of each relic site, the Con Son relic site did not achieve the landscape element because it did not ensure aesthetics, lacked connection between architectural works and natural forests, and the natural landscape was seriously degraded.
However, because of focusing too much on the restoration and construction of architectural works to preserve historical, cultural and religious relics, people forget or underestimate the conservation of the flora around the architectural works. Con Son relic site is formed from two factors: flora and architectural works, commonly called landscape. A beautiful and reasonable landscape needs to preserve the inherent history, have harmony between architecture and landscape, be suitable in space and time and have historical, cultural and religious significance. From that, it can be seen that the landscape of the relic site has clearly degraded, the ecosystem has changed greatly, affecting the quantity and quality of species.
The pine forest planted by Tran Nguyen Dan has now been exploited by humans quite a lot. There are very few pine trees left from the mountainside to the foot of the mountain. The trees are poorly developed, have sparse canopies, and are infested with pests and diseases. In addition, the layer of medium-sized trees and shrubs has almost completely disappeared. The main cause is the impact of humans in the process of transporting construction materials to renovate and build architectural works and roads. In addition, the forest has been cut down, changing the ecosystem, forest structure, and climate environment, affecting the growth and development of forest trees, and the ability to regenerate and restore the forest is lost.
At temples and shrines, there are not many miniature landscapes. Apart from a few pine trees and low-rise trees around the architectural works, there are not many ornamental trees or decorative trees around the yard, making the landscape at each location feel monotonous, lacking in color, without highlights or making a big impression when visitors pass by.





