Summer monsoon occurs from May to August. Due to the high mountain terrain, the southwest wind is blocked and changes direction to northwest wind. This hot and dry wind causes many difficulties for production and forest protection.
In addition, there are East and Southeast winds blowing from the sea, which prevail from September to April of the following year. These winds often blow alternately with the Northeast monsoon and have low speed (except in the case of storms, the strongest wind speed can reach level 12).
5, Hydrological regime:
Located in the basins of the Chay River, Trooc River, Son River, ... are all the upstream of the Gianh River. Because the terrain here is a large limestone area, ancient Karst, strongly weathered and complexly divided, the phenomenon of underground water flow is common. Looking at the map, there are no large rivers and streams, on the ground there are some small streams flowing openly but interrupted when flowing underground through caves. In the rainy season, most rivers and streams have high water levels, creating large flows, causing local floods, but after the rain, the water quickly recedes through the "suction eyes". The flood season from September to November coincides with the months of heaviest rain. Big floods often appear between September and October of the year.
In addition to the main rainy season, the area is also affected by the minor monsoon rains in May and June. The minor monsoon rains sometimes cause major floods. During the dry season (from January to July), small streams in the area become "dead streams", and the Chay and Son rivers have very low water levels and minimal flows.
Observations of hydro-climatic data show that the dry season lasts from June to September, the rainy season is concentrated from August to November. Therefore, the most favorable tourist season is spring and summer (from March to September). Although the weather is hot during this period, it is very suitable for boating on the river to sightsee and visit caves.
However, during the rainy season, from September to October, sometimes lasting until December, there is a lot of rain concentrated in these months, high water, traffic jams and flooded caves. Therefore, it is completely unsuitable for tourism here, perhaps this is also true for tourism in Quang Binh and the North Central region.
With the weather and hydrological climate, we see that tourism in PN-KB National Park is completely seasonal and determined by natural conditions.
4.1.1.2 Geomorphological landscape resources (Karst):
(1) Landscape
According to the results of geological and geomorphological research over the past years by scientists, guidance documents, reports of Phong Nha - Ke Bang National Park and through a general survey of the whole area, the following results were obtained:
Karst terrain creates a natural landscape of limestone mountains of nearly 71,000 hectares, accounting for 82% of the area of the National Park. The complex endogenous and exogenous geological processes that have been taking place since the Triassic until now are the cause of the diversity of the terrain and geomorphology of the area with the following types:
Non-Karst terrain: low hills, round tops, flat surfaces, abrasive terraces - accumulated along the Son and Chay river valleys and distributed along the edge of the central limestone massif.
Transitional terrain, with complex interspersion between limestone blocks and terrigenous terrain. The Hung Lau - Table Rock Area (PKPHST), Hung Dang Area (PKBVNNI), PKDVHC.
Karst terrain is typical of ancient tropical Karst, formed mainly in the Cenozoic, occupying about 2/3 of the area of the National Park, creating the largest limestone desert in the world (Pierre G. 1966).
Phong Nha - Ke Bang has a fairly developed karst system, with many types of geomorphology and unique karst landscapes, typical of humid tropical karst, with the following types of karst landscapes:
- Karren : These are very common karst terrains, including holes, hollows, crevices, grooves, etc., with strange shapes, sizes ranging from very small (1-2 mm) to quite large (5-10 m), jagged, sharp, and very difficult to travel. The deep hole at Km 18, Road 20 is very typical and is considered the deepest Kast sinkhole in Vietnam (with a depth of more than 255 m), possibly even the deepest in Southeast Asia. This sinkhole is estimated to be more than 400 million years old, which further affirms the global value of the area.
- Funnels, karst valleys : These are places with funnel-shaped terrain, measuring tens to hundreds of meters. Funnels caused by cave collapses often have vertical walls, caves at the bottom, surface water intakes, and are partly covered by clay, tree humus, and limestone boulders. (Km12, Km30, Road 20, BVNN subdivision)
- Karst valleys: are karst valleys that extend for hundreds of hectares, the bottom of which may have underground water sources and surface flows. This type of terrain is only found in Thung Tre with an area of approximately 198 hectares;
- Blind valley: is a blocked valley section, in the lower part there are a few drainage caves. When it rains heavily, water from all over pours in, these caves are blocked, cannot drain in time, flooding can occur like in the Gao Forest along Highway 20.
- Karst fields : are flat fields, can have surface runoff, typically Hung Tre area.
- Erosion plain : has relatively flat terrain, with remaining mountains such as in Phuc Trach, Xuan Trach, Son Trach.
- Elevated karst landforms: including peaks, ranges, blocks, towers, etc., varying in size and shape, rising high among low terrains such as the Hung Lau - Da Ban area of PKPHST.
(2) Cave
With the vast Karst terrain spanning millions of years of formation, it has formed the most unique cave and underground river system in the world. Experts have estimated that there are over 300 large and small caves here. Although the survey has not been complete, 128 caves have been identified in 3 cave systems: Phong Nha cave system, Vom cave system and Chay cave system.
Table 4.2 Statistics of cave systems in the study area
STT
Cave system name | Total number of caves | Total length length (km) | |
1 | Phong Nha Cave System | 68 | 70.4 |
2 | Vault Cave System | 31 | 40.5 |
3 | Cave System | 29 | 7.1 |
Total length | 128 | 118 km |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Proposal Group on Landscape Restoration and Protection, Tourism Resources -
Comparing Some Outstanding Tourist Resources Of Hanoi And Bangkok (Thailand) -
Assessment of surface water resources in Dong Nai river basin to serve sustainable development goals in the context of climate change - 2 -
The Role of the Department of Education and Training in Mobilizing Resources to Build National Standard Primary Schools
Of the 128 caves investigated above, 37 large caves with a total length of over 87 km have been well known. Famous caves in the National Park include: Phong Nha Cave, Paradise Cave and most recently Son Doong Cave, the largest cave in the world, recently discovered by scientists.
Currently in 2009, it belongs to the Phong Nha cave system with a surveyed length of 6.5 km, 120 m high, 140 m wide. This is considered the largest cave in the world, far surpassing Deer Cave in Malaysia - the largest cave in the world at that time (2 km long, 90 m wide, 100 m high).
According to the assessment of local people through interviews and field surveys according to the following criteria: Attractive, Safe, Sustainable, Seasonal and Connected. 37 potential caves have been identified, however, with accessibility conditions, out of these 37 caves, only 10 caves have potential and can be exploited for tourism.
All geological and geomorphological values have been recognized by UNESCO as World Natural Heritage according to criterion (i) - 2002 (now Criterion (viii) - 2005).
4.1.1.3 Geology
Figure 4.1: Dark Cave - a type of karst cave Figure 4.2: Ancient Kasrt Tower is very popular Based on the results of geological research and World Heritage Records, it shows that
The history of the evolution of geological formations and the paleontological world, the evolution of geomorphology and the diversity of landforms are closely linked to the history of the development of the Earth's crust. Each stage of development is shaped by a characteristic structural type called an architectural plan. The region
Phong Nha - Ke Bang today is the result of the synthesis of 5 major development stages in the history of the Earth's crust development in the region:
1) Late Ordovician - Silurian period (463.9 - 430 million years ago): The earth's crust was broken, subsided, forming terrigenous rocks of the Long Dai formation, distributed in a linear manner extending in the Northwest - Southeast direction , containing Graptolithina fossils aged O 3 -S 1 .
2) Middle Devonian to Late Devonian period (386 - 362.5 million years ago): The second time the earth's crust sagged, the sea expanded. The sedimentary composition evolved from siltstone to argillite interbedded with limestone containing corresponding characteristic fossil assemblages.
3) Carboniferous - Permian period (362.5 - 245 million years): The stage of forming limestone blocks of Carboniferous - Permian age, the earth's crust in the PN-KB region was broken for the third time, creating a shallow, isometric basin (inland sea), containing fossils from the Lower Carboniferous to Middle Carboniferous ages, and finally Permian.
4) Mesozoic orogenic stage (Triassic, Jurassic, Cretaceous): PN-KB limestone massif rose above sea level, karst, weathering and erosion occurred.

5) Cenozoic period: The period of mountain building and formation of the ancient Karst cave system of Phong Nha - Ke Bang.
Figure 4.3 Karst topography is common throughout the region.
Here, geological events still exist that demonstrate the dynamic history of the Earth's crust development over 500 million years, from the Ordovician period to the present, "an outstanding model representing the main periods of development in the history of the Earth, containing evidence of life and ongoing geological processes of important significance."
important in the formation of land forms or topographic and geomorphological features” (UNESO-2003).
4.1.2 Biological resources - a typical form of TNDLST


The richness of geology and geomorphology has created Phong Nha - Ke Bang a diversity of ecosystems, including forest ecosystems, limestone mountain ecosystems, soil mountain ecosystems, cave ecosystems, surface river and stream ecosystems and underground river and cave ecosystems. Particularly, forest ecosystems with 15 large habitat types and 9 important vegetation types have been described and identified. The forest cover reaches 93.57% and the area of primary forest reaches over 83.74%, making the National Park with the largest coverage and proportion of primary forest among special-use forests in Vietnam.
Figure 4.4 Limestone mountain vegetation Figure 4.5 Vegetation on soil mountains There are many special habitats here that are of scientific and ecotourism significance.
The most notable are the relatively pristine natural forest habitats on limestone mountains with the largest area among the limestone mountain forests in Vietnam with nearly 71,000 hectares, accounting for 82% of the area. In particular, there exists a tropical evergreen closed forest on limestone mountains at an altitude of over 700m with an area of 22,500 hectares, which is the most unique forest type in Vietnam and in the world.

Figure 4.6 Primitive green cypress forest on limestone mountain >700 m Table 4.3: Area of vegetation types and habitats
Code
Carpet
Carpet type | Area area (ha) | Proportion % | |
1.1 | Tropical humid evergreen closed forest Broadleaf trees on limestone mountains >700m | 21,461.0 | 25.03 |
1.2 | Tropical humid evergreen closed forest broadleaf trees on soil mountains >700m | 2,316.4 | 2.70 |
1.3 | Closed tropical coniferous forest on rocky mountains lime >700m | 1,049.9 | 1.22 |
2.1 | Tropical humid evergreen closed forest Broadleaf trees on limestone mountains below 700m | 45,337.3 | 52.87 |
2.2 | Tropical humid evergreen closed forest broadleaf tree on the hill | 6,857.0 | 8.00 |
2.3 | Anthropogenic secondary forest on limestone mountain | 1,335.7 | 1.56 |
2.4 | Man-made secondary forests on lowland mountains | 1,731.0 | 2.02 |
2.5 | Periodically flooded corridor forest | 154.3 | 0.18 |
2.6 | Shrubs and trees scattered on limestone mountains | 1,289.3 | 1.50 |
2.7 | Grasslands, shrubs and trees scattered on the dirt mountain | 3,829.9 | 4.47 |
2.8 | Habitat on other land | 392.2 | 0.46 |
Total | 85,754 | 100 % |
The National Park area located in the Northern Truong Son region has a very high biodiversity, and is considered one of the 200 biodiversity centers of the world (WWF, 2000). This is home to a large number of flora and fauna species, including many rare and endemic species of global conservation value.
About plants
Through statistics, the initial survey results have identified 193 families, 906 genera, 2,651 species of vascular plants. Of these, 116 species of threatened plants are listed in the Red List, of which 62 species are listed in the Vietnam Red Book, 79 species with a global threat level are listed in the IUCN World Red Book. The flora has up to 419 taxa endemic to Vietnam, of which the orchid group has up to 28 species with 3 species of Paphiopedilum that are still commonly found in nature. (See appendix for more information).
Table 4.4: Statistics of flora of Phong Nha - Ke Bang National Park
Taxon
Number of family | Number of expenses | Number of species | |
1. Psilotophyta | 1 | 1 | 1 |
2. Lycopodiophyta | 2 | 4 | 16 |
3. Equisetophyta | 1 | 1 | 2 |
4. Polypodiophyta | 23 | 73 | 176 |
5. Pinophyta | 6 | 10 | 19 |
6. Magnoliophyta | 160 | 817 | 2437 |
- Magnoliopsida | 131 | 638 | 1909 |
- Liliopsida | 29 | 179 | 528 |
Total | 193 | 906 | 2,651 |
In particular, this region has a monospecific endemic genus Oligoceras belonging to the Euphorbiaceae family with the species Oligoceras eberhardtii. On the other hand, a narrow endemic species found only on limestone mountains in Vietnam is Calocedrus rupestris. In Phong Nha - Ke Bang National Park, Calocedrus rupestris grows almost exclusively on limestone forests at altitudes of over 700m, this forest type is of global importance.





