The capacity of travel companies is limited in organizing MICE services, lack of entertainment facilities...etc...
For Hai Phong MICE tourism to truly develop, the city and the tourism industry need to invest in building a reasonable process for this type.
When analyzing each specific product aspect as above, it can be seen that, basically, Hai Phong tourism products are built on attractive and unique resources, but the services of those products are still limited. Therefore, when the products reach customers, there are still weaknesses in quality. Moreover, Hai Phong tourism does not have any specific products. With such potential products, Hai Phong tourism needs to have orientations to further improve the quality and create a brand for its tourism products.
3.3.2. Current status of tourism development by territory
3.3.2.1. Tourist attractions
By 2015, according to statistics from the Department of Culture, Sports and Tourism, Hai Phong had 86 tourist attractions, of which 14 were recognized as local tourist attractions, and there were no national tourist attractions. Including: Trang Trinh Nguyen Binh Khiem relic (Vinh Bao district); Tien Lang hot mineral water eco-tourism (Tien Lang district); Voi mountain relic (An Lao district); 177 high point (Cat Hai district); Cat CI, II, III beaches (Cat Hai district); Lan Ha Bay (Cat Hai district); City center strip (Hai Phong inner city); City museum (Hai Phong inner city); Hang Kenh communal house (Hai Phong inner city); Han Dau international tourism (Do Son district); Dau island (Do Son district); Bao Dai villa (Do Son district); Trang Kenh - Bach Dang national historical relic complex (Thuy Nguyen district); Mac Dynasty Memorial Site and Mac Family Temple (Kien Thuy District).
Tourist attractions are distributed in the districts of the city. They are cultural or natural tourist attractions. However, not all of them are attractive to tourists. This partly reflects the current situation of many limitations of Hai Phong tourism. Some more typical tourist attractions such as the relic of Trang Trinh Nguyen Binh Khiem, Tien Lang hot mineral spring, the Mac Dynasty memorial site... have also attracted tourists, but the number is not much. For example, the Mac Dynasty relic site welcomes an average of about 40,000 visitors.
tourism every year, focusing on the first 3 months of the year (with the opening writing festival on the 6th day of the first lunar month) and the 8th lunar month with the death anniversary of Thai To Mac Dang Dung. The number of visitors here is mainly domestic, very few international visitors (mainly Chinese, British, French...). The purpose of domestic visitors is to go to the temple, sightseeing; for international visitors is to visit relatives, on official business.
With the criteria for evaluating selected tourist destinations ( See Appendix 3 ), the project has evaluated a number of typical tourist destinations, recognized as local tourist destinations ( See Appendix 22 for details ). Most of the tourist destinations are operating at a good level, however, there are still differences between tourist destinations. Tourist destinations near the city center, convenient for tourists to travel, have more opportunities for development, and better infrastructure and technical facilities. Elephant Mountain tourist destination, although having potential, has not been developed for a long time.
Table 3.17. Summary of evaluations of typical tourist attractions in Hai Phong city
Unit: Point
Criteria
Relics Trinh Nguyen Binh Khiem (district) Vinh Bao) | Tien Lang hot mineral spring (Tien Lang district) | Elephant Mountain (An Lao district) | Historical relic - scenic spot Trang Kenh - Bach Dang (Thuy Nguyen district) | Monument of Mac Dynasty Memorial and Family Temple Mac (Kien Thuy district) | |
1. Ability to attract customer market | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
2. Distance from tourist destination center, traffic | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
3. Capacity of tourist attractions | 5 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 4 |
4. Technical facilities for tourism tourist spot | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
5. Ability to link to points, other tourist areas in the tourist area | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Overall Score - Quality of Operations | 20 (Good) | 17 (Good) | 15 (Medium) | 20 (Good) | 18 (Good) |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Summary of Scale, Structure of Tourist Amount and Revenue in Tourism Development in Cuc Phuong National Park, Cat Ba National Park and -
Solutions for tourism development in Tien Lang - 10
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism, tourism development
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
- District People's Committees and authorities of communes with tourist attractions should support, promote, and provide necessary information to people, helping them improve their knowledge about tourism. Raise tourism awareness for local people.
*
* *
Due to limited knowledge and research time, the thesis inevitably has shortcomings. Therefore, I look forward to receiving guidance from teachers, experts as well as your comments to make the thesis more complete.
Chapter III Conclusion
Through the issues presented in Chapter II, we can come to some conclusions:
Based on the strengths of available tourism resources, the types of tourism in Tien Lang that need to be promoted in the coming time are sightseeing and resort tourism, discovery tourism, weekend tourism. To improve the quality and diversify tourism products, Tien Lang district needs to combine with local cultural tourism resources, at the same time combine with surrounding areas, build rich tourism products. The strengths of Tien Lang tourism are eco-tourism and cultural tourism, so developing Tien Lang tourism must always go hand in hand with restoring and preserving types of cultural tourism resources. Some necessary measures to support and improve the efficiency of exploiting tourism resources in Tien Lang are: strengthening the construction of technical facilities and labor force serving tourism, actively promoting and advertising tourism, and expanding forms of capital mobilization for tourism development.
CONCLUDE
I Conclusion
1. Based on the results achieved within the framework of the thesis's needs, some basic conclusions can be drawn as follows:
Tien Lang is a locality with great potential for tourism development. The relatively abundant cultural tourism resources and ecological tourism resources have great appeal to tourists. Based on this potential, Tien Lang can build a unique tourism industry that is competitive enough with other localities within Hai Phong city and neighboring areas.
In recent years, the exploitation of the advantages of resources to develop tourism and build tourist routes in Tien Lang has not been commensurate with the available potential. In terms of quantity, many resource objects have not been brought into the purpose of tourism development. In terms of time, the regular service time has not been extended to attract more visitors. Infrastructure and technical facilities are still weak. The labor force is still thin and weak in terms of expertise. Tourism programs and routes have not been organized properly, the exploitation content is still monotonous, so it has not attracted many visitors. Although resources have not been mobilized much for tourism development, they are facing the risk of destruction and degradation.
2. Based on the results of investigation, analysis, synthesis, evaluation and selective absorption of research results of related topics, the thesis has proposed a number of necessary solutions to improve the efficiency of exploiting tourism resources in Tien Lang such as: promoting the restoration and conservation of tourism resources, focusing on investment and key exploitation of ecotourism resources, strengthening the construction of infrastructure and tourism workforce. Expanding forms of capital mobilization. In addition, the thesis has built a number of tourist routes of Hai Phong in which Tien Lang tourism resources play an important role.
Exploiting Tien Lang tourism resources for tourism development is currently facing many difficulties. The above measures, if applied synchronously, will likely bring new prospects for the local tourism industry, contributing to making Tien Lang tourism an important economic sector in the district's economic structure.
REFERENCES
1. Nhuan Ha, Trinh Minh Hien, Tran Phuong, Hai Phong - Historical and cultural relics, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1993
2. Hai Phong City History Council, Hai Phong Gazetteer, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1990.
3. Hai Phong City History Council, History of Tien Lang District Party Committee, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1990.
4. Hai Phong City History Council, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, VNU, Hai Phong Place Names Encyclopedia, Hai Phong Publishing House. 2001.
5. Law on Cultural Heritage and documents guiding its implementation, National Political Publishing House, Hanoi, 2003.
6. Tran Duc Thanh, Lecture on Tourism Geography, Faculty of Tourism, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, VNU, 2006
7. Hai Phong Center for Social Sciences and Humanities, Some typical cultural heritages of Hai Phong, Hai Phong Publishing House, 2001
8. Nguyen Ngoc Thao (editor-in-chief, Tourism Geography, Hai Phong Publishing House, two volumes (2001-2002)
9. Nguyen Minh Tue and group of authors, Hai Phong Tourism Geography, Ho Chi Minh City Publishing House, 1997.
10. Nguyen Thanh Son, Hai Phong Tourism Territory Organization, Associate Doctoral Thesis in Geological Geography, Hanoi, 1996.
11. Decision No. 2033/QD – UB on detailed planning of Tien Lang town, Hai Phong city until 2020.
12. Department of Culture, Information, Hai Phong Museum, Hai Phong relics
- National ranked scenic spot, Hai Phong Publishing House, 2005. 13. Tien Lang District People's Committee, Economic Development Planning -
Culture - Society of Tien Lang district to 2010.
14.Website www.HaiPhong.gov.vn
APPENDIX 1
List of national ranked monuments
STT
Name of the monument
Number, year of decisiondetermine
Location
1
Gam Temple
938 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Cam Khe Village- Toan Thang commune
2
Doc Hau Temple
9381 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Doc Hau Village –Toan Thang commune
3
Cuu Doi Communal House
3207 VH/QĐDecember 30, 1991
Zone II of townTien Lang
4
Ha Dai Temple
938 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Ha Dai Village –Tien Thanh commune
APPENDIX II
STT
Name of the monument
Number, year of decision
Location
1
Phu Ke Pagoda Temple
178/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Zone 1 - townTien Lang
2
Trung Lang Temple
178/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Zone 4 – townTien Lang
3
Bao Khanh Pagoda
1900/QD-UBAugust 24, 2006
Nam Tu Village -Kien Thiet commune
4
Bach Da Pagoda
1792/QD-UB11/11/2002
Hung Thang Commune
5
Ngoc Dong Temple
177/QD-UBNovember 27, 2005
Tien Thanh Commune
6
Tomb of Minister TSNhu Van Lan
2848/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2003
Nam Tu Village -Kien Thiet commune
7
Canh Son Stone Temple
2160/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2003
Van Doi Commune –Doan Lap
8
Meiji Temple
2259/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2002
Toan Thang Commune
9
Tien Doi Noi Temple
477/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2005
Doan Lap Commune
10
Tu Doi Temple
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Doan Lap Commune
11
Duyen Lao Temple
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Tien Minh Commune
12
Dinh Xuan Uc Pagoda
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Bac Hung Commune
13
Chu Khe Pagoda
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Hung Thang Commune
14
Dong Dinh
2848/QD-UBNovember 21, 2002
Vinh Quang Commune
15
President's Memorial HouseTon Duc Thang
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
NT Quy Cao
Ha Dai Temple
Ben Vua Temple
Tien Lang hot spring
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 16pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 6pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Typical Values of Cham Cultural Heritage in Tourism Development -
Current situation and solutions for sustainable tourism development in Thien Cam beach tourist area - Ha Tinh - 1

(Source: Processed from author's investigation results)
3.3.2.2. Tourist area
Currently, Hai Phong has two local tourist areas, Do Son and Cat Ba. These are also the two most prominent tourist destinations of the city in recent times. Tourists coming to Hai Phong mainly participate in sea and island tourism. Do Son and Cat Ba are two tourist areas that attract a large number of visitors, both domestic and foreign.
Table 3.18. Number of tourists to Cat Ba tourist area in the period 2005 - 2015
Unit: 1000 visitors
Target
2005 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | |
International tourists | 12 | 303 | 310 | 321 | 341 | 341.2 | 352.4 |
Domestic tourists | 423 | 823.5 | 893 | 1,014 | 986 | 1,171.8 | 1,215.6 |
Total visitors | 435 | 1,126.5 | 1,203 | 1,335 | 1,327 | 1,513 | 1,568 |
(Source: [48])
Table 3.19. Number of tourists to Do Son tourist area in the period 2005 - 2015
Unit: Number of visitors
Target
2005 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | |
Total visitors | 1,150 | 2,150 | 2,300 | 2,350 | 2,100 | 2,300 | 2,520 |
(Source: [48])
As sea and island tourism products are increasingly invested in, the length of stay of tourists and their spending are also greater than other products. The increase in both quantity and total revenue has shown the important position of sea tourism in Hai Phong's economy.
Table 3.20. Total revenue from tourists to Hai Phong coastal area in the period 2005 - 2015
Unit: Billion VND
Target
2005 | 2010 | 2015 | |
Total revenue from tourists to Cat Ba | 75 | 370 | 769 |
Total revenue from tourists to Do Son | 145 | 215 | 395 |
(Source: [48])
However, the above tables also show that the number of tourists coming to Do Son is higher but the tourism revenue here is lower than that of Cat Ba. To explain this, it can be seen that Do Son tourist destination with its advantage in transportation has attracted a large number of domestic tourists, especially in the summer tourist season but
Do Son cannot welcome many international tourists with high spending ability and long-term stay. International tourists from Western Europe and North America do not know or do not choose Do Son because there are not many activities here to meet their tourism needs, the sea water quality is not good; technical facilities have not been renewed or invested... International tourists come to Do Son mainly to use casino services at Do Son Casino Resort. Faced with this reality, Hai Phong tourism industry needs to have policies to attract more international tourists to Do Son in particular and to the whole city in general.
- Do Son
Do Son is a harmony between the sea, mountains and pine forests; it is a convergence of traditional festivals, historical relics... Typical examples include Do Son beach with 3 areas along with pine hills and green valleys; buffalo fighting festival, Ba De temple, Hang pagoda, Thien Phuc pagoda, Nghieng wharf and Khong So wharf, Han Dau island, etc.
+ Infrastructure in Do Son
Infrastructure in Do Son has been and is being built in a large, methodical and systematic manner. Tourists to Do Son can go by bus, car, taxi, motorbike..., starting from Hai Phong city, crossing Rao bridge along Pham Van Dong street. In addition, the drainage system during the rainy season is also carefully prepared; avoiding flooding on the roads to the tourist area, causing loss of landscape and congestion.
+ Food and accommodation facilities in Do Son
Accommodation facilities in Do Son are very diverse, serving the needs of tourists such as hotels, motels or camping areas... Accommodation facilities always have beautiful locations, so they are convenient for tourists to travel, travel and entertain. Typical examples are H n Dau Resort, Cong Doan Hotel, Bao Dai Hotel... In addition to the criteria of geographical location, accommodation facilities also provide quite convenient and suitable services such as resting rooms, health care, laundry...
Restaurants in this tourist area serve famous seafood specialties of Do Son such as oysters, grouper, geoduck, jellyfish salad, crab, shrimp, squid, etc.
The evaluation table ( Appendix 12 ) shows very good results on the activities of Do Son tourist area (23 points). This is the basis for making Do Son a tourist city in the future.
However, tourism services (mid-range accommodation, additional services) here need to be further upgraded and, in particular, it is necessary to overcome the limitations of the summer sea tourism season to create a new and more classy look for a tourist area with great potential like Do Son.
- Cat Ba
Cat Ba is a famous tourist destination of Hai Phong city, in Cat Hai island district, 30km from the city center. Cat Ba tourism owns the largest limestone archipelago in Vietnam, famous for its forest and sea ecotourism; in which the highlights are primeval forests, cave systems, limestone mountains, beaches, coral reefs... In particular, Cat Ba langur is an endemic primate species in the world, only found in Cat Ba and classified as a species that needs strict protection.
With UNESCO's recognition of Cat Ba archipelago as a World Biosphere Reserve, as well as a Marine Protected Area of Vietnam, and especially in 2013, the scenic beauty of Cat Ba archipelago was ranked as a special national monument, contributing significantly to increasing the growth rate of tourists to Cat Ba in recent years. Cat Ba has 5 key areas: Cat Ba town - Cai Gia urban area, the central area of the National Park
- Viet Hai, Phu Long - Gia Luan, Xuan Dam - Tran Chau - Hien Hao, Lan Ha Bay... This is a place that is very popular with tourists, especially foreign tourists.
The results of the assessment of tourism activities in Cat Ba also showed very good results (21 points) ( Appendix 12 ). Combined with the comments about Cat Ba in the above section, Cat Ba can completely become a developed national tourist area if it is planned more systematically, receives stronger investment, raises awareness of the community and effectively solves the problem of environmental pollution...
However, in general, there is a reality that in these two famous tourist areas of Hai Phong, in addition to the existing advantages, the development is unplanned, spontaneous...; the seasonal limitations of tourism have existed for many years such as degraded service facilities, inadequate tourism human resources due to recruiting seasonal workers with low professional qualifications; high service prices, etc. are problems for local authorities, all levels and sectors. Tourism is on the way to becoming a key economic sector of Hai Phong city, but if development does not go hand in hand with conservation, that development will not be sustainable and
failed to achieve the set target.
3.3.2.3. Tourist route
The Department of Culture, Sports and Tourism of Hai Phong has conducted a survey, evaluation and classification of tourist routes and destinations in the city; built a database and submitted it to the City People's Committee for recognition of 05 local tourist routes along with the 14 local tourist destinations mentioned above. These local tourist routes are:
- Inner city tour
Mainly includes historical and cultural relics such as Du Hang Pagoda, Hang Kenh Communal House, Nghe Temple, City Center Strip, City Museum, Hai Phong Port, Opera House and facilities serving accommodation, food, commerce, entertainment... This is a central route with large capacity combining shopping, sightseeing, entertainment, and business tourism; is an important stop for tourist routes to Hai Phong and surrounding areas.
Besides the tourist routes with two destinations, Do Son and Cat Ba, the inner city route forms the most popular tour in Hai Phong ( Appendix 18 ).
- North Cam River tourist route (Thuy Nguyen)
It is a convergence of tourist attractions such as Gia River Lake with resort and golf course, Vu Yen Island eco-tourism area, Bach Dang historical relic, Tran Quoc Bao temple, Le Ich Moc temple, Kien Bai communal house, Lam Dong pagoda, Trang Kenh relic, eastern mangrove forest strip, Chinh My bamboo and rattan weaving village, My Dong casting village...
The suitable types of tourism for this route are cultural tourism, sightseeing, relaxation, research, experience... Tourists can participate in two directions: cycling and using a boat to experience and visit from Binh bridge.
This is a potential tourist route with many attractive spots and is being invested in by the government and sectors to develop tourism as well as local socio-economic activities.
- Southern tourist route (Kien An, An Lao, Tien Lang, Vinh Bao)
Going along Route 10, towards the Southwest of the city is the journey of the Southern tourist route. This is a route that gathers tourist spots that perform the function of
potential to diversify products for Hai Phong tourism. At the same time, it contributes to creating tourism attraction for neighboring markets along Highway 10 with Phu Lien observatory, Voi mountain tourist site, Trang Trinh Nguyen Binh Khiem relic. This tourist route can exploit types of field tourism, countryside tourism, homestay tourism...
- Hai Phong - Kien Thuy - Do Son - Hai Phong route
This is a tourist route with the famous tourist area of Hai Phong, Do Son. By road, from the city center, cross Rao 1 bridge, go straight on Highway 14, go about 20km to reach Do Son. Besides, the countryside scenery of Kien Thuy district and the Mac Dynasty memorial site are also attractive points in the itinerary of this route.
- Hai Phong - Cat Ba - Hai Phong route
Like the Hai Phong - Kien Thuy - Do Son - Hai Phong tourist route, this tourist route has Cat Ba tourist area as the most special destination. This is a tourist route that attracts a variety of visitors and creates the longest trips compared to other routes.
To take this tour, visitors can choose to take a speedboat from Binh wharf to Cat Ba island. Or they can go by car or motorbike across Tan Vu - Lach Huyen bridge (inaugurated on September 2, 2017) and Got - Cai Vieng wharf to Cat Ba. The ferry at Got wharf operates from 6am to 6pm with a frequency of 30 minutes/trip. From the ferry wharf to the town center is about 20km, the road winds between mountains on one side and the sea on the other. In addition, visitors can go from Ha Long by Tuan Chau ferry, running through Ha Long Bay to Gia Luan wharf, Cat Ba.
Table 3.21. Summary of evaluation of local tourist routes of Hai Phong city
Unit: Point
Criteria
City tour | North River Tourist Route Ban | Southern tourist route | Hai Phong - Kien Thuy - Do Son - Hai Phong tourist route Room | Hai Phong tourist route Room - Cat Ba - Hai Room | |
1. Ability to attract customer market | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
2. Ability to connect with other tourist routes | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
3. Technical infrastructure of the tourist route
5 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | |
4. Traffic routes | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
5. Measures to protect landscape and environment | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
Overall Score - Quality of Operations | 23 (Very good) | 16 (Medium) | 15 (Medium) | 20 (Good) | 20 (Good) |
(Source: Processed from author's investigation results)
Table 3.21 shows that the inner-city tourist routes with stable infrastructure and services, the Hai Phong - Cat Ba tourist route with Cat Ba tourist area and the Hai Phong - Kien Thuy - Do Son - Hai Phong tourist route with Do Son tourist area are the routes that are operating effectively. The North Cam River tourist route and the South route still have some problems related to the environment, infrastructure, accommodation services, entertainment... so although the tourism resources are valuable, they have not really attracted tourists.
3.3.3. General assessment of the current status of tourism development in Hai Phong city (period 2005 - 2015)
The analysis results in sections 3.3.1 and 3.3.2 on the current status of tourism development in Hai Phong city in the period 2005 - 2015 show that:
- On the current status of Hai Phong tourism development by industry
+ Strengths: All indicators are at a relatively developed level.
+ Limitations: Not yet attracting international tourist markets, tourists with high spending ability; lack of large-scale and high-quality accommodation facilities, entertainment services to extend tourists' stay; quality of tourism products is not uniform, there are no specific tourism products; lack of high-quality tourism human resources.
- On the current status of Hai Phong tourism development by territory
+ Strengths: Hai Phong has a large number and variety of tourist attractions, with two famous tourist areas, Cat Ba and Do Son; there are tourist routes spread throughout the city, connecting unique tourist resources.
+ Limitations: There are no national tourist spots, areas, or routes. This is a major limitation for a city that is the center of the region like Hai Phong.





