Summary of Scale, Structure of Tourist Amount and Revenue in Tourism Development in Cuc Phuong National Park, Cat Ba National Park and


Because of the exponential increase from about 6 billion to more than 20 billion VND; Cuc Phuong and Cat Ba National Parks fluctuate around 5 - 8 billion VND. Tam Dao, Bai Tu Long and Xuan Thuy National Parks have low revenue (less than 1 billion VND). In these National Parks, investment projects to develop ecotourism for many reasons have not been widely implemented. Bai Tu Long National Park is currently planning to establish a Center for Tourism and Environmental Education.The school is the focal point for organizing ecotourism development activities (Nguyen Thanh Tuan, 2012) . Xuan Thuy National Park has not had effective management so ecotourism activities have not been developed yet.given due attention and there is a situation of "extermination" of rare bird species.of Vietnam; renovating lakes and lagoons for aquaculture, damaging the environment and destroyingThe ecological landscape of Tam Dao National Park is broken by the main residents.agriculture so tourism activities still take place spontaneously to increase income, facilitiesPoor technical quality, monotonous tourism products so the development of eco-tourism has not beencommensurate with potential (Bui Minh Nguyet, 2013).

Thanks to the development of ecotourism, the lives of local people in Cat Ba and Ba Ria-Vung Tau National Parks have also improved.Because, Cuc Phuong has improved significantly. Almost every village/commune has a cultural house, and children of thehouseholds are invested in education, universalized general education and many people have gone on to higher education.college, university, postgraduate level... Among them, some children have graduated and returned to work.return to the locality to participate in tourism. Thanks to the policy of encouraging tourism, manyHouseholds in national parks have built spacious houses and invested in convenient technical facilities.techniques to welcome guests. Thanks to increased tourism income and increased environmental awareness,The situation of local people illegally entering the forest to hunt and exploit timber has decreased significantly and almost disappeared.still exists for households that have participated in tourism; some prestigious members areelected as cadres of the Women's Union, the Protection Team of the village/commune and participate in management work insome parts in national parks . Awareness of compliance with regulations in the community and especiallyis that respect for NDDP conservation regulations has improved markedly.

After a preliminary survey and assessment, analyzing the above characteristics of resource value and level of ecotourism development in the national parks of the Red River Delta and the Red River Delta, the study further interviewed the opinions of 11 experts. The results showed that 11/11 experts also agreed that the selection of 03 national parks Cat Ba, Cuc Phuong and Ba Vi was reasonable, ensuring representativeness and being able to solve the objectives/answer the research questions. From there, the topic continued to explore, learn and collect information providing the context and current status of ecotourism development in these national parks in a more specific way, which can be clearly seen through statistics on the number of visitors and revenue (Table 4.1).

79


Table 4.1: Summary of scale, structure of visitors and revenue in ecotourism development in Cuc Phuong National Park, Cat Ba National Park and

Ba Vi National Park period 2014 - 2017



Report content


Unit

calculate

2014

2015

2016

2017

Chrysanthemum

Direction

Cat Ba

Ba Vi

Chrysanthemum

Direction

Cat Ba

Ba Vi

Chrysanthemum

Direction

Cat Ba

Ba Vi

Chrysanthemum

Direction

Cat Ba

Ba Vi

A. Total number of visitors

Hit

guest

61,700

179,560

149,195

71,600

305,000

216,050

91,677

398,200

371,821

111,100

505,075

379,838

1. Domestic guests

Number of visitors

48,700

107,030

3.171

59,000

218,477

2,594

77,200

286,120

3,438

97,000

363,294

377,564

2. International guests

Number of visitors

13,000

72,530

146,024

12,600

86,523

213,456

14,477

112,080

368,383

14000

141,781

2,274

B. Total revenue

Billion VND

4.7

3.05

5.7

5.3

3.95

9.12

6.38

4.69

15.11

8,019

8.46

20.35

1. Entrance fee

Billion VND

2.18

1.98

5.2

2.58

2.55

7.5

3,393

2.95

13.0

5,561

4,971

17.81

2. Room service

Billion VND

1,693

0.6

0

1,799

0.9

0

2,026

1.2

0

1,783

2.8

0

3. Passenger transportation

Million Dong

0

0

499

0

0

742

0

0

1,236

0

0

1,780

4. Guest guide

Million Dong

251.6

0

0

273.1

0

0

274.1

0

0

350

60

0

5. Food service

Million Dong

300

100

0

300

110

0

300.9

120

0

325

278

0

6. Association, joint venture

Million Dong

0

320

470

0

350

500

0

370

500

0

304

0

7. Lip rental

forest school

Million Dong

0

15

380.4

0

15

380.4

0

15

380.4

0

0

754.4

8. Parking fee

Million Dong

68.9

10

0

157.6

15

0

237.5

25

0

190.2

40

0

9. Other Income

Million Dong

231.8

10

0

191.7

10

0

154.9

10

0

0

10

0

Maybe you are interested!

Summary of Scale, Structure of Tourist Amount and Revenue in Tourism Development in Cuc Phuong National Park, Cat Ba National Park and

Source: Business summary report of Cuc Phuong, Ba Vi and Cat Ba National Parks in the period 2014 - 2017


The statistics table shows that in the period from 2014 to 2017, the highest number of tourists was in Cat Ba National Park, followed by Ba Vi National Park and the lowest was Cuc Phuong National Park. However, the highest revenue belonged to Ba Vi National Park (double or triple that of the remaining national parks). The reason, through in-depth interviews with the Management Board of Cat Ba National Park, is that although it attracts many tourists, the direct revenue mainly comes from affiliated and joint venture units; the National Park only receives 15% of the total revenue from those affiliated and joint venture sources; the revenue from leasing the forest environment is insignificant because the policy has not yet been agreed upon. In addition to direct revenue from entrance and transportation fees, Ba Vi National Park also has significant revenue from affiliated and joint ventures; especially revenue from leasing the forest environment for tourism. Cuc Phuong National Park does not have any affiliated or joint venture activities; leasing forest environment for tourism, the ability to attract visitors and revenue are both low. In general, the development of ecotourism in national parks from 2014 to present has had positive changes. However, compared to the potential and advantages, national parks in the Red River Delta and the Red River Delta have not yet effectively exploited ecotourism business, the benefits from ecotourism development for local people are still not much; some of the basic reasons are that cooperation activities, joint ventures within and outside the community are not really effective; management work is still slow to innovate.

Cuc Phuong National Park (Ninh Binh) operates under the state management mechanism, ecotourism is mainly exploited at the park's visitor reception center and Khanh village. The National Park applies a policy of rotating the distribution of visitors to business households and dividing benefits among households directly receiving visitors, the National Park Management Board and the rest goes to the community welfare fund. However, business efficiency is still very low (Cuc Phuong National Park Management Board said that Khanh village receives 500 - 600 visitors/year, with insignificant income). Cat Ba National Park has a number of local people participating in ecotourism but it is scattered and lacks concentration. The National Park also has links with a number of businesses participating in ecotourism business but the direct revenue is mainly for them, the development of ecotourism has not really brought many benefits to local people. Ba Vi National Park is a pioneer in the model of encouraging "land allocation, forest allocation", leasing forest environment to people for ecotourism business, but local people with sufficient capacity and financial potential to start their own business are very rare, mainly working for outside enterprises and not proactively cooperating to develop additional business relationships, so the direct benefits to local people are not much.

The research results in the context of Cat Ba, Cuc Phuong and Ba Vi National Parks have basically outlined a fairly comprehensive "picture" of the characteristics of ecotourism development, the participation of local people and the role of some social factors (connection, cooperation, respect for community norms, etc.) affecting the benefits of local people when they participate in ecotourism development. These results will continue to be supplemented through survey research, exploratory factor analysis and testing of models and research hypotheses of the topic.


4.1.2. Describe the demographic characteristics of the study sample

Initially, the study planned to have a sample size of 323 (after adding 10% reserve) , the result was 318 qualified questionnaires (reaching a rate of 97.3%). This number still ensures the principle of sample selection according to the requirements of exploratory factor analysis EFA and multiple regression for the research scope of the topic (as analyzed in section 3.3.2.). The characteristics of the selected research sample to participate in the survey have the following results:

Table 4.2: Descriptive statistics of the study sample (n = 318)


TT

Characteristic

Frequency

Rate (%)


1


Sex

Total

318

100

Female

173

54.4

Male

145

45.6


2


Year old

Total

318

100

< 25

30

9.4

25 – 30

59

18.5

31 – 40

109

34.3

41 – 50

81

25.5

> 50

39

12.3


3


Nation

Total

318

100

Muong

120

37.7

Knife

54

17.0

Terrible

144

45.3


4


Level

education

Total

318

100

Secondary School

84

26.4

High School

144

45.3

Intermediate

21

6.6

College

16

5.0

University

52

16.4

Master

1

0.3


5


Main job

Total

318

100

Management (National Park, Hotel, Tourist Area)

18

5.7

Homestay business

62

19.5

Entertainment service business

5

1.6

Restaurant business

23

7.2

Staff (room, reception, cooking...)

186

58.5

Selling souvenirs, local products

24

7.5


6

Average monthly income (VND)

Total

318

100

< 2,000,000

32

10.1

2,000,000 < 4,000,000

139

43.7

4,000,000 < 9,000,000

131

41.2

> 9,000,000

16

5.0

Source: Author's survey results


Regarding gender: as well as the gender characteristics of labor in the tourism industry in Vietnam in general, women make up the majority more than men, but in the national parks of the Red River Delta and the Red River Delta, this ratio is not too different. Of which, there are 145 men (accounting for 45.6%), and 173 women (accounting for 54.4%).

Regarding ethnicity: Kinh people account for the largest number with 144 people (accounting for 45.3%). This is the ethnic group with the largest proportion because all the surveyed subjects of local people in Cat Ba National Park are Kinh people and this is also 1 of 3 ethnic groups in Ba Vi National Park. Ranked at number 2 is the Muong people with 120 people (accounting for 37.7%). This includes all local people in Cuc Phuong National Park participating in ecotourism and a part in Ba Vi National Park. This shows that the attraction of Cuc Phuong and Ba Vi National Parks is not only the tropical forest with rich and diverse flora and fauna but also the unique indigenous culture associated with the cultural values ​​of the Muong ethnic group - the third largest ethnic minority in Vietnam after the Tay and Thai ethnic groups (Pham Le Hoa, 2017), famous for its own language, costumes, customs, lifestyle and unique artistic values ​​of bronze drums, gongs, epic poems, Muong mo ... The remaining Dao people have 54 people (accounting for 17%), this is an ethnic group only found in Ba Vi National Park within the scope of the study.

In terms of age: the majority of respondents at the time of the survey were of relatively young working age, with the largest proportion being the 31-40 age group, accounting for 34.3%. This is also the group of local human resources that plays a key role in the labor structure of national parks because this age group participates in many different job positions from cooking, reception, housekeeping, entertainment, service, security... to small-scale management positions such as homestay business owners, restaurant owners, team leaders, deputy team leaders of entertainment teams. Ranked second is the middle-aged working age group of 41-50 years old with 81 people (accounting for 25.5%), the remaining groups fluctuate around 10-13%.

Regarding educational level: nearly 80% of local people participating in tourism in the research area do not have a college or university degree. The entire community surveyed in the national parks has only 01 local person participating in ecotourism with a master's degree, 67/318 people have a college degree or higher. The proportion of workers with high school education (THPT) accounts for the highest proportion of 45.3% with 144 people. Ranked second is the secondary school level (THCS) with 84 people, accounting for 26.4%. Thus, the level of professional expertise of local people working in tourism is still relatively low, if there is specialized expertise in the tourism field, it is mainly in the intermediate and college groups with a rate of only 11.6%; workers with university degrees are mostly transferred from other industries.

Main job: according to the interview results, in addition to tourism, local people in Ba Vi, Cuc Phuong, and Cat Ba National Parks also do agriculture, aquaculture, and fishing to improve their living standards because the number of visitors during the year is not much and their income is not high even though tourism is the main job that brings them the main source of income.


The highest proportion of local people participating in tourism is as staff in various departments (room, reception, cooking, performing arts, tour guides, restaurant service, cleaning, security, etc.) with 186 people (accounting for 58.5%); ranked second is homestay business (accounting for 19.5%); the rest of the other jobs account for less than 10%. In particular, the number of people participating in management is still very small (18 people, accounting for 5.7%). This result can be explained by the fact that local people mainly have low educational levels, most of them finish junior high school or high school and then drop out to participate in tourism, so they mainly only work as staff; the group of people with professional qualifications is still very small, they do not have much experience, and have few opportunities to interact and develop.

Average income: the average income of local people participating in tourism in national parks in the Red River Delta and East Sea is generally relatively low. Only 16 people (5%) have an income of over 9 million/month, while the income from 4 to 9 million (41.2%) is low; the rest mainly have an income of under 4 million/month with 171 people (53.8%); this figure is lower than the average income per capita of Vietnam in 2016 of 48.6 million/year, equivalent to 4.05 million/month (2016 statistical yearbook data of the General Statistics Office), but still accounts for the majority. The high-income group is involved in managing tourism development in national parks, managing tourist areas/hotels/restaurants, and homestay business owners. The low-income group, which accounts for the majority of the tourism workforce, is staff in departments or traders of souvenirs and local products.

4.2. Preliminary assessment of the scale using Cronbach's alpha

After completing the questionnaire and conducting the survey research, the topic evaluated the reliability of the scales. The results obtained variables with values ​​consistent with CA after eliminating observations with low total variable correlation coefficients are shown in the following table:

Table 4.3: Preliminary scale test results


Symbol


Observation variable name

Cronbach's Alpha

Soy sauce

total variable


Result

Trust

CA = 0.722

LT1

I believe that the majority of people in the community

We are honest and trustworthy

.518

Continue

LT2

I trust the local government (leadership).

.582

Continue

LT3

I trust the leaders in government.

Central

.490

Continue

LT4

I think our community is established

on the basis of social ethics

.444

Continue

Exchange and sharing

CA = 0.763

CS1

I want to own a business by myself,

or jointly own with another person

.486

Continue


Symbol


Observation variable name

Cronbach's Alpha

Soy sauce

total variable


Result

CS2

I am not only concerned with my own interests.

.486

Continue

CS3

If I have a problem, there is always someone to help me.

.609

Continue

CS4

I will contribute my time to community projects.

copper

.432

Continue

CS5

I will donate money to community projects.

copper

.536

Continue

CS6

If I suddenly need to borrow a small amount of money I will have it.

relatives (outside the family) in the community

help provide this money to me


.483


Continue

Standard

CA = 0.635

CM1

People in our community respect each other.

rules and regulations in the community

.361

Continue

CM2

People in our community respect each other.

Principle of compensation and conservation

.456

Continue

CM3

The people in our community respect and

obey the law

.379

Continue

CM4

There are few conflicts in our community.

.363

Continue

CM5

People in our community have a good relationship.

get along

.376

Continue

Cooperation

CA = 0.688

HT1

I contribute to the community through participation in

events or initiatives to develop tourism

community (NP).


.482


Continue

HT2

I often attend meetings and discuss issues.

community problem

.499

Continue

HT3

I am happy to help people around me in

our community

.320

Continue

HT4

I have a good relationship with the local tourism development management board.

direction

.378

Continue

HT5

In our community, there have been situations where people have banded together to complain, seek redress, or petition authorities/governments/leaders about a

something that benefits the community


.032


Remove

HT6

Can I deed my unused house to a neighbor for a few days/delegation?

right to rent to tourists.


.380


Continue

Social Network

CA = 0.759

ML1

I often visit another locality to meet

my partner/friend

.607

Continue


Symbol


Observation variable name

Cronbach's Alpha

Soy sauce

total variable


Result

ML2

I have many local friends/relations to do

tourism

.610

Continue

ML3

I have connections and collaborations with surrounding communities.

around for tourism

.550

Continue

Participation in implementing QCQL in the National Park

CA = 0.682

QC1

I have priority to participate in tourism activities.

.492

Continue

QC2

I see the National Park as encouraging for individuals and organizations.

Forest environment leasing for tourism development

.481

Continue

QC3

I am involved in training and development activities.

human resource development for tourism

.226

Remove

Political interests

CA = 0.792

CT1

Working in tourism allows me to participate in the process.

decision making, management of local tourism development.


.441


Continue

CT2

Travel gives me access and use

local resources

.652

Continue

CT3

Travel gives me equal access to happiness.

material benefits (food, income, housing, health care…)

.688

Continue

CT4

Travel gives my voice and reputation to the community.

.618

Continue

Economic benefits

CA = 0.800

KT1

Tourism has helped improve basic infrastructure in

my community

.472

Continue

KT2

Tourism helps increase people's income

.692

Continue

KT3

Tourism promotes agricultural and commodity production in

local

.714

Continue

KT4

Tourism projects help people with loans to support

travel business

.470

Continue

KT5

Tourism creates more economic benefits for the community

mine.

.557

Continue

Social benefits

CA = 0.778

XH1

Tourism creates jobs for people

.519

Continue

XH2

Community tourism activities have helped to improve

standard of living for my family

.617

Continue

XH3

Travel helps improve family happiness.

my family

.521

Continue

XH4

Tourism creates social welfare funds for people

(support providing electricity, water, education, health care systems)

economic…)


.547


Continue

XH5

Traveling increases my learning and training opportunities.

high education and knowledge

.506

Continue

Comment


Agree Privacy Policy *