SQUARES SQUARES LN
=========================================================================================== 1 CT 5 13.4050 2.68100 9.52 0.001 2
* RESIDUAL 12 3.37782 .281485
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 17 16.7828 .987224
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE SONU FILE 419 10/13/12 13:45
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 2
The influence of fertilizer on the quality of Cattleya orchids. VARIATE V004 SONU
LNSOURCE OF VARIATION | DF SUMS OF SQUARES | MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES LN | ||
=========================================================================================== | ||||
1 CT | 5 4.50000 .900000 | 5.46 0.008 2 | ||
* RESIDUAL | 12 1.97861 .164884 | |||
Maybe you are interested!
-
Evaluation of the effect of DH fertilizer on growth, yield and quality of some fruit trees at Thai Nguyen University of Agriculture and Forestry - 2 -
Evaluation of the effect of DH fertilizer on growth, yield and quality of some fruit trees at Thai Nguyen University of Agriculture and Forestry - 1 -
Investigation of the effect of adding starch, eggs and milk powder on the quality of soft tofu products - 2 -
Effect of Nitrogen Dosage and Planting Density on Corn Yield Component -
The effect of sowing density on the yield of rice variety OM4218 in the Summer-Autumn crop of 2012 in Vinh Thuan Tay commune, Vi Thuy district, Hau Giang province - 2
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 17 6.47861 .381094
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE SOHOA FILE 419 10/13/12 13:45
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 3
The effect of fertilizer on the quality of Cattleya orchids.
LN SOURCE OF VARIATION
VARIATE V005 SOHOADF SUMS OF SQUARES | MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES LN | ||
=========================================================================================== | |||
1 CT | 5 52.1050 10.4210 | 42.13 0.000 2 | |
* RESIDUAL | 12 2.96795 .247329 | ||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 17 55.0729 3.23959
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE 419 10/13/12 13:45
----------------------------------------------------------------- :PAGE 4
The effect of fertilizer on the quality of Cattleya orchids.
MEANS FOR EFFECT CT
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CTNOS | SOCANH | SONU | SOHOA | |
1 | 3 | 14.7000 | 13.7000 | 18.7000 |
2 | 3 | 15.3000 | 13.9000 | 19.3000 |
3 | 3 | 15.0000 | 14.0000 | 19.3000 |
4 | 3 | 16.2000 | 14.3000 | 21.7000 |
5 | 3 | 16.8000 | 14.8000 | 22.0000 |
6 | 3 | 16.9000 | 15.1000 | 23.3000 |
SE(N= 3) | 0.306314 | 0.234438 | 0.287129 | |
5%LSD 12DF | 0.943858 | 0.722384 | 0.884741 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE 419 10/13/12 1:45 PM
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 5
The effect of fertilizer on the quality of Cattleya orchids.
F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL. SECTION - 1
GRAND MEAN STANDARD DEVIATION C OF V |CT | | | |
(N= 18) -------------------- SD/MEAN | | | | |
NO. BASED ON BASED ON % | | | | |
OBS. TOTAL SS RESID SS | | | | |
SOCANH | 18 15,817 0.99359 0.53055 3.4 0.0008 | |
SONU | 18 14,300 0.61733 0.40606 2.8 0.0077 | |
SOHOA | 18 20,717 1.7999 0.49732 2.4 0.0000 |
Table 3.28: Effect of supplementary light quality on flowering ability of Den5 and On1 orchids.
BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE SOCIAL FILE 328 3/12/13 9:27
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 1
The influence of light quality on the flowering ability of orchids Den5. VARIATE V003 SOCANH
LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER
SQUARES SQUARES LN
=========================================================================================== 1 CT 4 .360000E-01 .900000E-02 74.38 0.000 2
* RESIDUAL 10 .121000E-02 .121000E-03
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 .372100E-01 .265786E-02
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE SONU FILE 328 3/12/13 9:27
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 2
The influence of light quality on the flowering ability of orchids Den5. VARIATE V004 SONU
LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER
SQUARES SQUARES LN
=========================================================================================== 1 CT 4 10.1760 2.54400 170.97 0.000 2
* RESIDUAL 10 .148802 .148802E-01
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 10.3248 .737486
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE SOHOA FILE 328 3/12/13 9:27
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 3
The influence of light quality on the flowering ability of orchids Den5. VARIATE V005 SOHOA
LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER
SQUARES SQUARES LN
=========================================================================================== 1 CT 4 18.2400 4.56000 401.96 0.000 2
* RESIDUAL 10 .113445 .113445E-01
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 18.3534 1.31096
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE 328 3/12/13 9:27
----------------------------------------------------------------- :PAGE 4
The effect of light quality on the flowering ability of orchids Black5.
MEANS FOR EFFECT CT
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CT | NOS | SOCANH | SONU | SOHOA | |
1 | 3 | 1.30000 | 10.7000 | 9.50000 | |
2 | 3 | 1.30000 | 11.3000 | 10.3000 | |
3 | 3 | 1.30000 | 11.7000 | 10.7000 | |
4 | 3 | 1.40000 | 12.5000 | 12.0000 | |
5 | 3 | 1.40000 | 13.0000 | 12.5000 |
SE(N= 3) 0.635085E-02 0.704278E-01 0.614939E-01
5%LSD 10DF 0.200117E-01 0.221920 0.193770
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE 328 3/12/13 9:27
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 5
VARIATE | GRAND MEAN STANDARD DEVIATION C OF V |CT | | |
(N= 15) -------------------- SD/MEAN | | | | |
NO. BASED ON BASED ON % | | | | |
OBS. TOTAL SS RESID SS | | | | |
SOCANH | 15 1.3400 0.51554E-010.11000E-01 0.8 0.0000 | |
SONU | 15 11,840 0.85877 0.12198 1.0 0.0000 | |
SOHOA | 15 11,000 1.1450 0.10651 1.0 0.0000 |
Effect of light quality on orchid flowering ability Den5. F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL. SECTION - 1
BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE SOCIETY FILE 328O 3/12/13 10:1
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 1
The influence of supplementary light quality on the flowering ability of On1 orchids. VARIATE V003 SOCANH
LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER
SQUARES SQUARES LN
=========================================================================================== 1 CT 4 .804000 .201000 176.83 0.000 2
* RESIDUAL 10 .113667E-01 .113667E-02
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 .815367 .582405E-01
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE SONU FILE 328O 3/12/13 10:1
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 2
The influence of supplementary light quality on the flowering ability of On1 orchids. VARIATE V004 SONU
LNSOURCE OF VARIATION | DF SUMS OF | MEAN F RATIO PROB ER | |
SQUARES | SQUARES LN |
=========================================================================================== 1 CT 4 2061.70 515,424 16.12 0.000 2
* RESIDUAL 10 319.719 31.9719
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 2381.42 170.101
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE SOHOA FILE 328O 3/12/13 10:1
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 3
LN | SOURCE OF VARIATION | DF SUMS OF SQUARES | MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES LN | |
=========================================================================================== | ||||
1 CT | 4 1907.02 476.754 | 22.71 0.000 2 | ||
* RESIDUAL | 10 209.962 20.9962 | |||
The influence of supplementary light quality on the flowering ability of On1 orchids. VARIATE V005 SOHOA
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 2116.98 151,213
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE 328O 12/3/13 10:1
----------------------------------------------------------------- :PAGE 4
The effect of supplementary light quality on the flowering ability of On1 orchids.
MEANS FOR EFFECT CT
1 | CT | NOS 3 | SOCANH 3.80000 | SONU 136,000 | SOHOA 119,500 |
2 | 3 | 3.90000 | 140,700 | 129,300 | |
3 | 3 | 4.00000 | 151,700 | 136,300 | |
4 | 3 | 4.30000 | 160,500 | 145,700 | |
5 | 3 | 4.40000 | 167,300 | 151,000 | |
SE(N= 3) | 0.194651E-01 | 3.26455 | 2.64551 | ||
5%LSD 10DF | 0.613352E-01 | 10.2867 | 8.33611 | ||
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE 328O 3/12/13 10:1
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 5
VARIATE | GRAND MEAN | STANDARD DEVIATION C OF V |CT | | |
(N= 15) | -------------------- SD/MEAN | | | | |
NO. | BASED ON BASED ON % | | | | |
OBS. | TOTAL SS RESID SS | | | | |
SOCANH | 15 4.0800 | 0.24133 0.33715E-01 0.8 0.0000 | |
SONU | 15 151.24 | 13.042 5.6544 3.7 0.0003 | |
SOHOA | 15 136.36 | 12.297 4.5822 3.4 0.0001 |
Effect of light quality on flowering ability of On1 orchid. F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL. SECTION - 1
Table 3.29: Effect of supplementary light quality on flower quality of Den5 and On1 orchids.
BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE DAICANH FILE 329D 3/12/13 10:47
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 1
The influence of supplementary light quality on the flowering ability of orchids On1. Den5. VARIATE V003 DAICANH
LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER
SQUARES SQUARES LN
=========================================================================================== 1 CT 4 45.5400 11.3850 386.20 0.000 2
* RESIDUAL 10 .294797 .294797E-01
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 45.8348 3.27392
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE DKHOA FILE 329D 3/12/13 10:47
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 2
The influence of light quality on the quality of orchids Den5. VARIATE V004 DKHOA
LNSOURCE OF VARIATION | DF SUMS OF SQUARES | MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES LN | ||
=========================================================================================== | ||||
1 CT | 4 .156000 .390000E-01 | 7.59 0.005 2 | ||
* RESIDUAL | 10 .514086E-01 .514086E-02 | |||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ||||
* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 .207409 .148149E-01
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE DBTN FILE 329D 3/12/13 10:47
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 3
The influence of light quality on the quality of orchids Den5. VARIATE V005 DBTN
LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER
SQUARES SQUARES LN
=========================================================================================== 1 CT 4 76.3560 19.0890 314.91 0.000 2
* RESIDUAL 10 .606172 .606172E-01
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 76.9622 5.49730
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE DBHC FILE 329D 3/12/13 10:47
----------------------------------------------------------------- :PAGE 4
The influence of light quality on the quality of orchids Den5. VARIATE V006 DBHC
LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER
SQUARES SQUARES LN
=========================================================================================== 1 CT 4 11.4240 2.85600 ****** 0.000 2
* RESIDUAL 10 .552877E-02 .552877E-03
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 11.4295 .816395
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE 329D 3/12/13 10:47
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 5
The influence of light quality on orchid quality Black5.
MEANS FOR EFFECT CT
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1
CT | NOS 3 | DAICANH 31.0000 | DKHOA 8.10000 | DBTN 42.0000 | DBHC 15.3000 | |
2 | 3 | 31.7000 | 8.20000 | 43.7000 | 16.0000 | |
3 | 3 | 32.5000 | 8.20000 | 44.3000 | 16.3000 | |
4 | 3 | 35.0000 | 8.40000 | 47.3000 | 17.3000 | |
5 | 3 | 35.3000 | 8.30000 | 48.0000 | 17.7000 | |
SE(N= 3) | 0.991291E-01 0.413959E-01 0.142147 | 0.135754E-01 | ||||
5%LSD 10DF | 0.312359 0.130440 0.447910 | 0.427767E-01 | ||||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE 329D 3/12/13 10:47
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 6
VARIATE | GRAND MEAN | STANDARD DEVIATION C OF V |CT | | |
(N= 15) | -------------------- SD/MEAN | | | | |
NO. | BASED ON BASED ON % | | | | |
OBS. | TOTAL SS RESID SS | | | | |
DAICANH | 15 33,100 | 1.8094 0.17170 0.5 0.0000 | |
DKHOA | 15 8.2400 | 0.12172 0.71700E-01 0.9 0.0047 | |
DBTN | 15 45,060 | 2.3446 0.24621 0.5 0.0000 | |
DBHC | 15 16,520 | 0.90355 0.23513E-01 0.1 0.0000 |
Effect of light quality on orchid quality Den5. F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL. SECTION - 1
BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE DAICANH FILE 329O 3/12/13 13:20
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 1
The influence of light quality on orchid quality On1. VARIATE V003 DAICANH
LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER
SQUARES SQUARES LN
=========================================================================================== 1 CT 4 90.8160 22.7040 194.05 0.000 2
* RESIDUAL 10 1.17001 .117001
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 91.9860 6.57043
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE DKHOA FILE 329O 3/12/13 13:20
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 2
The influence of light quality on orchid quality On1. VARIATE V004 DKHOA
LNSOURCE OF VARIATION | DF SUMS OF | MEAN F RATIO PROB ER | |
SQUARES | SQUARES LN |
=========================================================================================== 1 CT 4 .216000 .540000E-01 ****** 0.000 2
* RESIDUAL 10 .418787E-04 .418787E-05
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 .216042 .154316E-01
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE DBTN FILE 329O 3/12/13 13:20
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 3
The influence of light quality on orchid quality On1. VARIATE V005 DBTN
LNSOURCE OF VARIATION | DF SUMS OF SQUARES | MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES LN | ||
=========================================================================================== | ||||
1 CT | 4 30.2040 7.55100 | 53.52 0.000 2 | ||
* RESIDUAL | 10 1.41085 .141085 | |||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 31.6149 2.25820
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE DBHC FILE 329O 3/12/13 13:20
----------------------------------------------------------------- :PAGE 4
The influence of light quality on orchid quality On1. VARIATE V006 DBHC
LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER
SQUARES SQUARES LN
=========================================================================================== 1 CT 4 18.5040 4.62600 ****** 0.000 2
* RESIDUAL 10 .461092E-02 .461092E-03
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 18.5086 1.32204
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE 329O 3/12/13 13:20
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 5
The influence of light quality on orchid quality On1.
MEANS FOR EFFECT CT
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1
CT | NOS 3 | DAICANH 34.7000 | DKHOA 3.60000 | DBTN 35.0000 | DBHC 14.3000 | |
2 | 3 | 36.5000 | 3.70000 | 35.7000 | 15.0000 | |
3 | 3 | 37.7000 | 3.70000 | 36.0000 | 15.3000 | |
4 | 3 | 40.5000 | 3.90000 | 38.0000 | 16.7000 | |
5 | 3 | 41.3000 | 3.90000 | 38.7000 | 17.3000 | |
SE(N= 3) | 0.197485 | 0.118151E-02 0.216860 | 0.123975E-01 | |||
5%LSD 10DF | 0.622283 | 0.372297E-02 0.683334 | 0.390649E-01 | |||
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE 329O 3/12/13 13:20
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 6
Effect of light quality on orchid quality On1. F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL. SECTION - 1
VARIATEGRAND MEAN | STANDARD DEVIATION C OF V |CT | | | |
(N= 15) | -------------------- SD/MEAN | | | | |
NO. | BASED ON BASED ON % | | | | |
OBS. | TOTAL SS RESID SS | | | | |
DAICANH | 15 38,140 | 2.5633 0.34205 0.9 0.0000 | |
DKHOA | 15 3.7600 | 0.12422 0.20464E-02 0.1 0.0000 | |
DBTN | 15 36,680 | 1.5027 0.37561 1.0 0.0000 | |
DBHC | 15 15,720 | 1.1498 0.21473E-01 0.1 0.0000 |
Table 3.30: Effect of supplementary light treatment time on growth of Den5 and On1 orchids.
BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE CCCAY FILE 330D 5/20/13 14:51
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 1
Effect of additional light treatment time on growth of Den5. VARIATE V003 CCCAY
LNSOURCE OF VARIATION | DF SUMS OF SQUARES | MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES LN | ||
=========================================================================================== | ||||
1 CT | 3 57.0000 19.0000 | 8.46 0.008 2 | ||
* RESIDUAL | 8 17.9636 2.24545 | |||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ||||
* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 11 74.9636 6.81487
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE DKTHAN FILE 330D 5/20/13 14:51
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 2
Effect of additional light treatment time on growth Den5. VARIATE V004 DKTHAN
LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER
SQUARES SQUARES LN
=========================================================================================== 1 CT 3 .120000 .400000E-01 6.17 0.018 2
* RESIDUAL 8 .518620E-01 .648275E-02
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 11 .171862 .156238E-01
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE SONHANH FILE 330D 5/20/13 14:51
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 3
Effect of additional light treatment time on growth of Den5. VARIATE V005 SONHANH
LNSOURCE OF VARIATION | DF SUMS OF SQUARES | MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES LN | ||
=========================================================================================== | ||||
1 CT | 3 1.14000 .380000 | 3.18 0.085 2 | ||
* RESIDUAL | 8 .956610 .119576 | |||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 11 2.09661 .190601
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE SOLA FILE 330D 5/20/13 14:51
----------------------------------------------------------------- :PAGE 4
Effect of additional light treatment time on growth Den5. VARIATE V006 SOLA
LNSOURCE OF VARIATION | DF SUMS OF SQUARES | MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES LN | ||
=========================================================================================== | ||||
1 CT | 3 33.7425 | 11.2475 | 7.96 0.009 2 | |
* RESIDUAL | 8 11.2998 | 1.41247 | ||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 11 45.0423 4.09475
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE DAILA FILE 330D 5/20/13 14:51
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 5
Effect of additional light treatment time on growth of Den5. VARIATE V007 DAILA
LNSOURCE OF VARIATION | DF SUMS OF SQUARES | MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES LN | ||
=========================================================================================== | ||||
1 CT | 3 1.29000 .430000 | 0.57 0.655 2 | ||
* RESIDUAL | 8 6.07011 .758764 | |||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 11 7.36011 .669101
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE RONGLA FILE 330D 5/20/13 14:51
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 6
Effect of additional light treatment time on growth Den5. VARIATE V008 RONGLA
LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER
SQUARES SQUARES LN
=========================================================================================== 1 CT 3 .225000E-01 .750000E-02 0.18 0.909 2
* RESIDUAL 8 .3330D18 .426773E-01
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 11 .363918 .330835E-01
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE 330D 5/20/13 14:51
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 7
Effect of supplementary light treatment time on growth of Den5.
MEANS FOR EFFECT CT
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CT | NOS | CCCAY | DKTHAN | SONHANH | SOLA | |
1 | 3 | 42.9000 | 1.90000 | 6.30000 | 29.3000 | |
2 | 3 | 47.7000 | 1.90000 | 6.80000 | 32.7000 | |
3 | 3 | 47.3000 | 2.10000 | 7.00000 | 33.8000 | |
4 | 3 | 48.5000 | 2.10000 | 7.10000 | 32.5000 |
3) | 0.865150 | 0.464856E-01 0.199647 | 0.686167 | ||
5%LSD | 8DF | 2.82117 | 0.151585 0.651027 | 2.23752 | |
1 | CT | NOS 3 | DAILY 16.9000 | RONGLA 3.90000 | |
2 | 3 | 17.5000 | 4.00000 | ||
3 | 3 | 17.7000 | 4.00000 | ||
4 | 3 | 17.7000 | 4.00000 | ||
SE(N= | 3) | 0.502913 | 0.119272 | ||
5%LSD | 8DF | 1.63995 | 0.388933 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE 330D 5/20/13 14:51
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 8
Effect of supplementary light treatment time on growth of Den5.
F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL. SECTION - 1
GRAND MEAN | STANDARD DEVIATION C OF V |CT | | | |
(N= 12) | -------------------- SD/MEAN | | | | |
NO. | BASED ON BASED ON % | | | | |
OBS. | TOTAL SS RESID SS | | | | |
CCCAY | 12 46,600 | 2.6105 1.4985 3.2 0.0077 | |
DKTHAN | 12 2.0000 | 0.12500 0.80515E-01 4.0 0.0181 | |
SONHANH | 12 6.8000 | 0.43658 0.34580 5.1 0.0846 | |
SOLA | 12 32,075 | 2.0236 1.1885 3.7 0.0091 | |
DAILA | 12 17,450 | 0.81799 0.87107 5.0 0.6546 | |
RONGLA | 12 3.9750 | 0.18189 0.20658 5.2 0.9095 |
BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE CCCAY FILE 330O 5/20/13 14:56
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 1
Effect of additional light treatment time on On1 growth. VARIATE V003 CCCAY
LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER
SQUARES SQUARES LN
=========================================================================================== 1 CT 3 18.5025 6.16750 3.13 0.087 2
* RESIDUAL 8 15.7576 1.96970
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 11 34.2601 3.11456
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE DKTHAN FILE 330O 5/20/13 14:56
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 2
Effect of additional light treatment time on growth On1. VARIATE V004 DKTHAN
LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER
SQUARES SQUARES LN
=========================================================================================== 1 CT 3 .180000 .600000E-01 0.97 0.452 2
* RESIDUAL 8 .492378 .615473E-01
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 11 .672378 .611253E-01
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE SONHANH FILE 330O 5/20/13 14:56
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 3
Effect of additional light treatment time on On1 growth. VARIATE V005 SONHANH
LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER
SQUARES SQUARES LN
=========================================================================================== 1 CT 3 .825000E-01 .275000E-01 0.23 0.871 2
* RESIDUAL 8 .943578 .117947
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 11 1.02608 .932798E-01
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE SOLA FILE 330O 5/20/13 14:56
----------------------------------------------------------------- :PAGE 4
Effect of additional light treatment time on On1 growth. VARIATE V006 SOLA
LNSOURCE OF VARIATION | DF SUMS OF | MEAN F RATIO PROB ER | |
SQUARES | SQUARES LN |
=========================================================================================== 1 CT 3 2.67000 .890001 1.04 0.429 2
* RESIDUAL 8 6.87764 .859705
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 11 9.54764 .867967
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE DAILA FILE 330O 5/20/13 14:56
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 5
Effect of additional light treatment time on On1 growth. VARIATE V007 DAILA
LNSOURCE OF VARIATION | DF SUMS OF SQUARES | MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES LN | ||
=========================================================================================== | ||||
1 CT | 3 15.4200 5.14000 | 3.62 0.065 2 | ||
* RESIDUAL | 8 11.3656 1.42070 | |||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 11 26.7856 2.43505
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE RONGLA FILE 330O 5/20/13 14:56
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 6
Effect of additional light treatment time on On1 growth. VARIATE V008 RONGLA
LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER
SQUARES SQUARES LN
=========================================================================================== 1 CT 3 .300000E-01 .100000E-01 0.44 0.735 2
* RESIDUAL 8 .183216 .229020E-01
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 11 .213216 .193833E-01
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE 330O 5/20/13 14:56
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 7
Effect of supplementary light treatment time on On1 growth.
MEANS FOR EFFECT CT
1 | CT | NOS 3 | CCCAY 41.8000 | DKTHAN 3.60000 | SONHANH 6.70000 | SOLA 16.6000 |
2 | 3 | 43.2000 | 3.80000 | 6.80000 | 17.1000 | |
3 | 3 | 44.5000 | 3.90000 | 6.90000 | 17.4000 | |
4 | 3 | 45.0000 | 3.90000 | 6.90000 | 17.9000 | |
SE(N= | 3) | 0.810288 | 0.143233 | 0.198282 | 0.535321 | |
5%LSD | 8DF | 2.64227 | 0.467069 | 0.646578 | 1.74563 | |
1 | CT | NOS 3 | DAILY 33.6000 | RONGLA 2.80000 | ||
2 | 3 | 31.5000 | 2.70000 | |||
3 | 3 | 30.7000 | 2.70000 | |||
4 | 3 | 31.0000 | 2.80000 | |||
SE(N= | 3) | 0.688162 | 0.873728E-01 | |||
5%LSD | 8DF | 2.24402 | 0.284914 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE 330O 5/20/13 14:56
------------------------------------------------------------------ :PAGE 8
Effect of supplementary light treatment time on On1 growth.
F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL. SECTION - 1
GRAND MEAN | STANDARD DEVIATION | C OF V |CT | | | |
(N= 12) | -------------------- | SD/MEAN | | | | |
NO. | BASED ON BASED ON | % | | | | |
OBS. | TOTAL SS RESID SS | | | | | |
CCCAY | 12 43,625 | 1.7648 1.4035 | 3.2 0.0872 | |
DKTHAN | 12 3.8000 | 0.24724 0.24809 | 6.5 0.4524 | |
SONHANH | 12 6.8250 | 0.30542 0.34343 | 5.0 0.8711 | |
SOLA | 12 17,250 | 0.93165 0.92720 | 5.4 0.4286 | |
DAILA | 12 31,700 | 1.5605 1.1919 | 3.8 0.0647 | |
RONGLA | 12 2.7500 | 0.13922 0.15133 | 5.5 0.7350 |