education is 6.91 points; Singapore is second (6.81), but leads in English proficiency (8.33) and high-tech proficiency (7.83) (See table 2.6 on the previous page).
Foreign experts when studying the Vietnamese education system all have the same comment that " Vietnamese education is an education for the rich". Because in Switzerland, 70% of students after graduating from primary school go to vocational training, in China it is 60%, in Taiwan 66%, while in Vietnam it is only 10%.
Regarding the general development index, according to the 2009 Human Development Report of the United Nations, Vietnam's human development index (HDI) in 2009 was 0.742, ranking 116/182 countries. Table 2.7 below shows the increase in HDI index of Vietnam, some countries in the region and the world's leading countries.
Table 2.7 Human Development Index HDI of Vietnam and some countries
Nation
Year 1990 | Year 1995 | Year 2000 | Year 2005 | Year 2006 | Year 2007 | |
Norway | 0.924 | 0.948 | 0.961 | 0.968 | 0.970 | 0.971 |
Japan | 0.918 | 0.931 | 0.943 | 0.956 | 0.958 | 0.960 |
America | 0.923 | 0.939 | 0.949 | 0.955 | 0.955 | 0.956 |
Singapore | 0.851 | 0.884 | - | - | 0.942 | 0.944 |
Malaysia | 0.737 | 0.767 | 0.797 | 0.821 | 0.825 | 0.829 |
Thailand | 0.706 | 0.727 | 0.753 | 0.777 | 0.780 | 0.783 |
China | 0.608 | 0.657 | 0.719 | 0.756 | 0.763 | 0.772 |
Philippines | 0.697 | 0.713 | 0.726 | 0.744 | 0.747 | 0.751 |
Vietnam | 0.599 | 0.647 | 0.690 | 0.715 | 0.720 | 0.735 |
Indonesia | 0.624 | 0.658 | 0.673 | 0.729 | 0.729 | 0.734 |
India | 0.489 | 0.511 | 0.556 | 0.596 | 0.604 | 0.612 |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Human resource development strategy of Vietnam Pharmaceutical Corporation - 22 -
Research on theoretical and practical basis of developing high-quality human resources to form a knowledge-based economy in Vietnam - 27 -
Human resource development of Vietnam Electricity Group - 3 -
Human resource development of Vietnam Electricity Group - 13

Source: Compiled from: Human Development Report 2000 - 2009
Assessing the training sector from the perspective and criteria of the knowledge economy, according to the World Bank's data in 2009, we ranked 99th out of 145 countries. Table 2.8 (next page) shows the correlation between the training assessment index of Vietnam and some countries in 2009.
Regarding the scientific staff , by the end of 2009, Vietnam had more than 1,800,000 people with university and college degrees, 40,000 masters, more than 16,500 doctors and doctors of science, more than 8,200 professors and associate professors. The number of people with college and university degrees added annually is about 235,000 people. The distribution of the number of doctors is not
evenly between regions in the country. The Red River Delta and the Southeast region account for about 90% of the total number of PhDs in the country. In these two regions, the number of PhDs is mainly concentrated in the two cities of Hanoi (63.82%) and Ho Chi Minh City (19.33%). [7],[31]
Table 2.8 Training rankings of Vietnam and some countries and territories - 2009
Rating
Nation | KEI | Train | |||
2009 | 2000 | 2009 | 2000 | ||
x | G7 | 8.72 | 8.95 | 8.75 | 8.67 |
13 | America | 9.02 | 9.32 | 8.74 | 9.13 |
14 | Japan | 8.42 | 8.92 | 8.67 | 8.93 |
x | Western Europe | 8.76 | 8.97 | 8.29 | 8.51 |
28 | Korea | 7.82 | 8.23 | 8.09 | 8.35 |
31 | Taiwan | 8.45 | 8.63 | 7.97 | 7.92 |
x | High income countries | 8.23 | 8.23 | 7.47 | 7.52 |
64 | Thailand | 5.52 | 5.69 | 5.58 | 5.37 |
68 | Hong Kong | 8.32 | 8.08 | 5.37 | 5.84 |
70 | Singapore | 8.44 | 8.66 | 5.29 | 6.52 |
83 | Philippines | 4.12 | 4.62 | 4.69 | 5.47 |
93 | Malaysia | 6.07 | 6.17 | 4.21 | 4.58 |
94 | China | 4.47 | 3.92 | 4.20 | 3.71 |
99 | Vietnam | 3.51 | 2.90 | 3.66 | 3.73 |
101 | Indonesia | 3.29 | 3.22 | 3.59 | 3.59 |
x | Lower middle income group | 3.78 | 3.85 | 3.32 | 3.56 |
113 | India | 3.09 | 3.17 | 2.21 | 2.41 |
Source: Compiled from World Bank data 2010
In the eleven years from 1998 to 2009, 312 universities and colleges were established and upgraded nationwide. By September 2009, the country had 412 universities and colleges, of which 77 were non-public. With more than 1.7 million students, the training scale in 2008-2009 increased 13 times compared to 1987. Currently, 40/63 provinces and cities have universities, 60 localities have colleges. This establishment and upgrading has helped attract students from disadvantaged areas. On average, in 5 years (2004-2008), the rate of candidates passing regular university and college entrance exams has
The number of registered households in mountainous and economically disadvantaged areas is 26%, the number of rural and mountainous students is nearly 65% and the number of female students is nearly 52% compared to the total number of admitted students. [75]
In the period 2008-2009, the Government spent 2% of the state budget (equivalent to about 0.5% of GDP) investing in science and technology development, about 2.5 times higher than in 2001. This is a great effort. State budget expenditure; expenses of the production and business sector for science and technology reached less than 0.3% of GDP. Thus, by the end of 2008, the total social investment in science and technology reached about 0.8% of GDP, equivalent to 8.4 USD/person. Compared to other countries, in 2002 (6 years earlier), this figure in Korea was 212 USD (25 times higher), in Germany was 511 USD (61 times higher), in the United States was 794 USD (95 times higher).
With the rapid development in quantity, the quality is still not high, there is still a gap compared to advanced countries in the region and the world level, we need to try harder, invest better to quickly increase both the quality and quantity of human resources, scientific and technical staff for the country in the conditions of international integration.
2.1.2.3 Information and communication technology (ICT)
Information and communication technology (ICT) is a bright spot in the development of the knowledge economy with a high contribution to the criteria for the development of the knowledge economy in Vietnam. The growth of Vietnam's ICT is reflected not only in its ranking but also in the scale of the industry and market as well as the growth rate. The total value of Vietnam's information technology industry (excluding the consumer electronics and telecommunications industry) in 2006 was 1.74 billion USD , an increase of 22.1% compared to 2005, of which the growth rate of the software and service industry was 32%, higher than the growth rate of the hardware industry, partly due to the contribution of the digital content industry and software outsourcing services for foreign countries.
Vietnam's software and service industry achieved a turnover of 360 million USD in 2006, of which 255 million USD came from the domestic market (accounting for 70.1%) and 105 million USD from export processing (accounting for 29.9%), up 44% over the previous year. Software export processing increased by 50%, the domestic software/service market increased by 41.6%. The software industry's turnover in 2007 exceeded the threshold of 500 million USD - the target we expected to achieve in 2005. 2 years behind schedule, however, we hope that the following years will grow even higher (Table 2.9 on the next page).
Table 2.9 Value of Vietnam's information technology industry 2002-2006
Unit: Million USD
Year
Software/Services | Hardware | Total | |||
Serving the market local school | Processing export | Total | |||
2002 | 65 | 20 | 85 | 550 | 635 |
2003 | 90 | 30 | 120 | 700 | 820 |
2004 | 125 | 45 | 170 | 760 | 930 |
2005 | 180 | 70 | 250 | 1150 | 1400 |
2006 | 255 | 105 | 360 | 1380 | 1740 |
Source: Compiled from [71]
By 2008, the total revenue of the information technology industry reached 5.22 billion USD, of which hardware reached 4.1 billion USD, software reached 680 million USD, and digital content industry reached 440 million USD. The total workforce in the information technology industry is estimated at over 200,000 people, of which 110,000 are in the hardware sector, 57,000 are in the software sector, and 33,000 are in the digital content sector. [65]. Figure 2.7 below and Figure 2.8 (next page) give us an idea of the level of development of the Internet, telephones, and computers to households.
Figure 2.7 Number of computers and color televisions per 100 people
Source: [65] - Vietnam Information and Communication Technology 2009
The Internet alone increased by 25%, ranking 17th in the world in terms of number of users, but 93rd in the world in terms of user rate. After 12 months (May 2006 to May 2007), the number of converted Internet subscribers increased by 27%, the number of Internet users increased by 25%. This is not a high growth rate, previous years usually maintained a growth rate of double each year. Last year also maintained a growth rate of over 80%.
Figure 2.8 Number of fixed telephone subscribers/100 people
Source: [65] - Vietnam Information and Communication Technology 2009
The current rate of Internet users in Vietnam is nearly 20%, an increase of 4% after 1 year. During the same period, the rate of Internet users in the world increased by only 1.5%. If this growth rate is maintained, in 2008, the target of 25% set out in the Vietnam Telecommunications and Internet Development Plan to 2010 will be achieved 2 years earlier. With over 16 million Internet users, Vietnam has become the country with the 17th highest number of Internet users in the world, and the 6th in Asia (after China, India, Japan, Korea and Indonesia). Data up to May 2009 on the situation of Internet usage in Vietnam is shown in Table 2.10 below.
Table 2.10 Internet usage situation in Vietnam as of May 2009
Source: [65] - Vietnam Information and Communication Technology 2009
However, if calculated by the rate of Internet access, Vietnam is currently at a rather modest ranking: 9th in Asia and 93rd in the world.
Regarding the state of piracy, in May 2008, as usual, the Business Software Alliance (BSA) and IDC released the 2008 software piracy report.
This is a year that is considered to have a significant decrease in the overall rate of infringement. Of the 108 countries on the list, 77 countries decreased and only 8 countries increased. However, due to the fact that in countries with high rates of copyright infringement, the number of computers used increased rapidly, so globally, the infringement rate increased by 3% to 38% (3 years ago this figure was at 35%), and the value of pirated software increased by 8 billion USD - to 48 billion USD. Russia is considered to have made remarkable progress when it reduced the copyright infringement rate from 80% to 73%. China remained at 82%. Vietnam's infringement rate last year was 85%, a decrease of 3% compared to the previous year. Thus, after 3 years, Vietnam has reduced by 7%, and from being the country at the top of the list, Vietnam is now out of the top 9 countries. Iraq and Vietnam are ranked 10th and 11th. BSA estimates that Vietnam’s violation rate would have dropped to 81% if the Vietnamese computer market had not grown as rapidly as last year. Although the violation rate has decreased, the value of Vietnam’s violations has reached 200 million USD, more than double the previous year.
Regarding the Networked Readiness Index (NRI), according to the definition of the World Economic Forum (WEF), NRI is "the level of preparation of a country or community to participate in and benefit from developments in information technology" . This index is published by WEF in the Global Information Technology Report annually (since 2001) and is calculated from three factors: the coordination and macroeconomic environment for information technology, the readiness of individuals, businesses and governments to use and benefit from information technology, and the level of information technology use. In 2002, there were only 75 countries in the ranking, in 2003 there were 82 countries, in 2004 there were 102 countries, in 2005 there were 104 countries, in 2006 there were 115 countries, in 2007 there were 122 countries and in 2008 there were up to 127 countries. The Global IT Report (2007-2008) was published in April 2008, Vietnam ranked 73rd with 3.67 points. Thus, compared to position 82/122, this year Vietnam increased its ranking by 9 places, the score increased from 3.40 to 3.67. This is a high achievement for Vietnam, after 2 years of falling. Topping the list is still Denmark. In the top 10, Korea is in 9th place - a full 10 places increase compared to 2007.
Regarding the E-Readiness Index (EIU), this is the annual ranking of the Economist Intelligence Unit (under The Economist magazine – UK) in collaboration with the IBM Institute for Business Value and published in a report called “EreadinessRanking 2008: Maintaining Momentum ”. In 2008, the index of all countries increased and the digital divide between countries continued to narrow. Vietnam ranked 65th - maintaining the same ranking as in 2007. out of 70 countries (4.03 points - increased compared to the score
3.73 of 2007). Vietnam's position in the list in 2003 and 2002 was 56/60, 2004 was 60/65, 2005 was 61/65, 2006 was 66/68 and 2007 was 65/69.
In terms of e-government, the e-Government index measures the capacity and readiness of each country in building e-Government based on ICT platform for national development. Capacity is assessed through the level of financial investment, infrastructure, human resources, policies, and management organization; while readiness is assessed through the ability to provide information and knowledge to the people and businesses. This index is calculated based on 3 basic factors: the presence of websites built by the government; ICT infrastructure and education and training; These factors are calculated and expressed through 3 indicators: Web Measure Index; Telecommunication Infrastructure Index; Human Capital Index.
The report of UNPAN - the United Nations' online network on public administration and finance - published in March 2008 (the most recent report published in December 2005) shows that Vietnam's e-Government Index has increased significantly: from 0.364 points in 2005 to 0.4558 points in 2008. Vietnam is ranked 91st, continuing to increase 16 places compared to previous years (2005: ranked 105th, 2004: ranked 112th).
The score for Vietnam's Web index in 2008 was 0.4448 (a large increase compared to 2005's 0.2231 and a large increase compared to 2004's 0.143), the telecommunications infrastructure index was 0.1081 (2005's 0.0489, 2004's 0.040), and the human resources index was 0.815 (2005's 0.82, 2004's 0.83). The e-Government index is calculated by the average value of these three indexes, and the 16-rank increase of Vietnam's e-Government is due to the increase in the Web index and the telecommunications infrastructure index, while the human resources index increased insignificantly. In the region, Vietnam ranked 6th after Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, the Philippines and Brunei. Indonesia's ranking dropped behind Vietnam.
Overall, Vietnam's ICT picture is bright compared to other regions, however, Vietnam's overall ICT index remains at a weak average level, ranking 78/146 countries in 2009 (Table 2.11 on the next page).
In recent times, Vietnam's position on the world information technology map has become brighter, many rankings have been improved and the market has also been constantly developing. However, when the development of information technology is closely linked to the economic development of each country and many factors related to growth quality are added for evaluation, Vietnam is facing many challenges in its efforts to significantly improve the position of national information technology as well as expand the country's information technology market on the global map.
Table 2.11: ICT ranking of Vietnam and some countries and territories - 2009
Rating
Nation | KEI | ICT | |||
2009 | 2000 | 2009 | 2000 | ||
7 | Hong Kong | 8.32 | 8.08 | 9.33 | 9.37 |
8 | Singapore | 8.44 | 8.66 | 9.22 | 9.29 |
10 | Taiwan | 8.45 | 8.63 | 9.13 | 9.11 |
14 | America | 9.02 | 9.32 | 8.83 | 9.52 |
x | G7 | 8.72 | 8.95 | 8.80 | 8.97 |
x | Western Europe | 8.76 | 8.97 | 8.78 | 9.00 |
19 | Korea | 7.82 | 8.23 | 8.60 | 9.28 |
x | High income countries | 8.23 | 8.23 | 8.42 | 8.35 |
28 | Japan | 8.42 | 8.92 | 8.00 | 8.72 |
41 | Malaysia | 6.07 | 6.17 | 7.14 | 7.33 |
64 | Thailand | 5.52 | 5.69 | 5.64 | 5.04 |
78 | Vietnam | 3.51 | 2.90 | 4.85 | 2.95 |
87 | China | 4.47 | 3.92 | 4.33 | 4.80 |
x | Lower middle income group | 3.78 | 3.85 | 3.85 | 4.13 |
96 | Philippines | 4.12 | 4.62 | 3.60 | 4.41 |
110 | Indonesia | 3.29 | 3.22 | 2.72 | 3.55 |
115 | India | 3.09 | 3.17 | 2.49 | 2.87 |
Source: Compiled from World Bank data 2010
2.1.2.4 Innovation system
In terms of indicators related to the national innovation system, compared with the G7 countries, South Korea, China, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, the growth quality of Vietnam's economy is still very low, and in general, is lagging far behind many other countries. Many statistics, Vietnam has not collected, some available data, such as the ratio of foreign investment/GDP; the structure of trade and processing industries in GDP; the number of R&D staff per 10,000 people; total spending on R&D in GDP..., show that these figures are lower than many countries in the region. Table 2.12 (next page) gives us the criteria for forming an assessment of Vietnam's innovation system compared with some countries in 2009, accordingly, the ranking of our country's innovation system is ranked 115/146 countries, lower than Indonesia, the Philippines and far below Thailand, Malaysia.





