Distribution of Ascaris Infection Intensity by Gender (N=261)


Table 3.18. Distribution of Ascaris infection intensity by gender (n=261)


Gender

Number of infections

Mild CDN

Average CDN

Severe CDN

SL

TL %

SL

TL %

SL

TL %

Male

131

101

77.1

24

18.3

6

4.6

Female

130

94

72.3

32

24.6

4

3.1

Total

261

195

74.7

56

21.5

10

3.8

p-value

p (1:2) = 0.668

p (1:2) =0.350

p (1:2) =0.754

Maybe you are interested!

Distribution of Ascaris Infection Intensity by Gender (N=261)

Comment :

The rate of roundworm infection at different intensity levels in the two sexes did not have a statistically significant difference (p>0.05).

Table 3.19. Intensity of worm infection in 3 districts


Conscious

Type of worm

Number of infections

Intensity

light

Intensity

medium

Intensity

heavy

SL

TL%

SL

TL%

SL

TL%

Week of Teaching

Roundworm

121

86

70.1

27

22.3

8

7.6

whipworm

34

34

100

0

0

0

0

Hookworm/Beakworm

3

3

100

0

0

0

0

Meo Vac

Roundworm

81

51

62.9

28

34.6

2

2.5

whipworm

25

24

96

1

4

0

0

Hookworm/Beakworm

4

4

100

0

0

0

0

Literature

Yen

Roundworm

59

58

98.3

1

1.7

0

0

whipworm

13

13

0

0

0

0

0


Total

Roundworm

261

195

74.7

56

21.4

10

3.9

whipworm

72

71

98.6

1

1.4

0

0

Hookworm/Beakworm

7

7

100

0

0

0

0


Comment:

- In Tuan Giao, 8/121 children were infected with severe roundworm, accounting for 7.6%;

- In Meo Vac, 2/81 children were infected with severe roundworm, accounting for 2.5%;

- Only 1 child infected with moderate intensity whipworm in Meo Vac

Table 3.20. Geometric mean worm egg intensity at study sites


District

Roundworm

whipworm

Hookworm/Beakworm

Week of Teaching

7.71 2.45

0.46 0.29

0.03

Meo Vac

4.08 ± 2.19

0.35 0.17

0.05

Van Yen

1.13 0.9

0.10 0.05

0

Comment:

The average intensity of Ascaris eggs in Tuan Giao was highest at 7.71 and lowest at Van Yen at 1.13.

The intensity of whipworm eggs is quite low (0.1-0.46), the intensity of hookworm eggs/beak is very low.

3.1.3. Prevalence and intensity of soil-transmitted helminth infections after 3 and 6 months

We performed stool examinations of all children at 3 and 6 months after the baseline survey. Due to the long follow-up period, the number of children followed at each time point was lower than at the baseline survey. Of the 1240 children, 925 had stool samples retested at both 3 and 6 months.

Table 3.21. Worm infection rate before and after treatment in 3 districts


District

Initial investigation

(n=1,240)

Investigation after 3

month (n=925)

Investigation after 6

month (n=925)

Number

XN

Number

(+)

TL

%

Number

XN

Number

(+)

TL

%

Number

XN

Number

(+)

TL

%

Week of Teaching

419

134

32.0

349

62

17.8

349

88

25.2

Meo Vac

389

91

23.4

151

30

19.9

151

50

33.1

Van Yen

432

69

16.0

361

7

1.9

361

12

3.3

Total

1,240

294

23.7

925

99

12.1

925

150

18.0


Comment:

- After 3 months, the infection rate in Meo Vac was 19.9%; After 6 months, the infection rate was up to 33.1%, higher than the initial infection rate.

- After 3 months, the infection rate in Tuan Giao was 17.8%; After 6 months, the infection rate was 25.2%,

- In Van Yen, the infection rate after 3 months and 6 months was very low, 1.9% and 3.3% respectively.

Table 3.22. Intensity of worm infection before and after 3 and 6 months


Type of worm

Total

infected

Mild CDN

Central College

jar

Severe CDN

(1)

(2)

(3)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(1)

(2)

(3)

Worms

chopsticks

SL

261

65

93

195

40

57

56

23

34

10

2

2

TL%

100

100

100

74.7

61.5

61.3

21.4

35.4

36.6

3.9

3.0

2.1

Worms

hair

SL

72

34

47

71

34

46

1

0

1

0

0

0

TL%

100

100

100

98.6

100

97.9

1.4


2.1




Worms

hook/beak

SL

7

4

7

7

4

7

0

0

0

0

0

0

TL%

100

100

100

100

100

100

0






Comment:

After 3 months and 6 months, the rates of infection intensity levels of GTQD types at the research sites were equivalent to those before the investigation.

Table 3.23. Rates of mono- and poly-infection with worms before and after 3 and 6 months


Time

XN

Number

infected

Monoinfection

2 types of infection

3 types of infection

SL

TL %

SL

TL %

SL

TL %

Before treatment

294

251

85.4

40

13.6

3

1.0

After 3 months

99

76

76.8

20

20.2

3

3.0

After 6 months

150

119

79.3

29

19.3

3

2.0

Comment:

- The rate of children infected with worms tends to decrease.

- The rate of infection with two and three types of worms increased compared to the initial survey.


Of the 925 children re-sampled at 3 and 6 months, 646 were free of soil-transmitted helminth infections at baseline and 189 were infected with at least one type of soil-transmitted helminth infection. Based on the infection rates of negative children, the incidence and cumulative incidence rates were calculated.

Table 3.24. Incidence of soil-transmitted helminth infections after 3 and 6 months (n=646)

Type

GTQD

After 3 months

From 3rd to 6th month

TLMMTL after 6 months

Number (+)

TL%

Number (+)

TL%

Number (+)

TL %

Chopsticks

27

4.2

23

3.6

50

7.7

Hair

11

1.7

13

2.0

24

3.7

Hook/beak

2

0.3

2

0.3

4

0.6

(Note: TLMMTL: Cumulative incidence rate)

Comment:

- The highest incidence of roundworm infection was 4.2% after 3 months and 7.7% after 6 months;

- The incidence of whipworm ranges from 1.7% to 3.7%;

- The incidence of hookworm/helminthiasis is very low.

3.1.4. Some factors related to soil-transmitted helminth infection in children 12-23 months old at the study site.

In this study, we conducted interviews with parents and caregivers to identify factors associated with STDs in children aged 12-23 months. 1,240 people participated in the interviews.

Table 3.25. Relationship between worm infection rate in children and age group (n=1240)


Age group

Have

infected

Are not

infected

Total

OR [95%CI]

p

From 12-17 months

117

480

597

1.55

[1.19-2.03]


0.01

From 18-23 months

177

466

643

Total

294

946

1,240


Comment: Children aged 18-23 months had a 1.55 times higher risk of worm infection than children aged 12-17 months (p<0.01).

Table 3.26. Association between worm infection rate in children and parental education (n=1240)

Education

Infected

Not infected

Total

OR [95%CI]

p

Illiteracy + primary school

158

390

548


OR= 1.66

[1:28-2:16]


0.01

From junior high school onwards

go up

177

466

692

Total

294

946

1,240

Comment: The risk of worm infection in children whose parents only attended primary school was 1.66 times higher than in the group of parents who attended junior high school or higher (p<0.01).

Table 3.27. Association between worm infection rate in children and parents' knowledge of soil-transmitted helminth infection prevention (n=1240)


Knowledge about

PC GTQD

Have

infected

Are not

infected

Total

OR

[95%CI]

p

Not achieved

244

699

943

OR= 1.72

[1:23-2:41]


0.01

Obtain

50

247

297

Total

294

946

1,240

Comment: The risk of worm infection in children in the group of parents with inadequate knowledge of preventing STDs was 1.72 times higher than in the group of parents with adequate knowledge. The difference was statistically significant with p<0.01.

Table 3.28. Association between worm infection and number of children in the family (n=1240)


Number of children

Have

infected

Are not

infected

Total

OR [95%CI]

p

3 or more

77

124

201

OR= 2.35

[1.70-3.24]


0.00

1-2 children

217

822

946

Total

294

946

1,240


Comment:

Children living in families with 3 or more children have a 2.35 times higher risk of worm infection than children living in families with 1-2 children. The difference is statistically significant with p<0.01.

Table 3.29. Association between worm infection and hand washing with soap

for children (n=1,240)


Wash hands with soap

room

Have

infected

Are not

infected

Total

OR

[95%CI]

p

Are not

155

438

593

OR= 1.29

[0.99-1.6]


0.054

Have

139

508

647

Total

294

946

1,240


Comment:

There was no difference in the rate of worm infection between the group whose parents washed their hands with soap and the group who did not wash their hands regularly. The difference was statistically significant with p>0.05.

Table 3.30. Association between worm infection and nail clipping in children

(n = 1,240)


Nail clipping

hands for children

Have

infected

Are not

infected

Total

OR

[95%CI]

p

Are not

214

709

923

1.11

[0.83-1.50]


0.459

Have

80

237

317

Total

294

946

1,240


Comment:

There was no difference in infection rate between the group that did not have their nails trimmed regularly and the group that had their nails trimmed regularly (p>0.05).


Table 3.31. Association between worm infection and soil playing habits in children (n=1,240)

Dirt

Infected

Not infected

Total

OR [95%CI]

p

Have

216

632

848

1.38

[1.03-1.84]


0.032

Are not

78

314

278

Total

294

946

1,240

Comment:

There is a correlation between the habit of playing in the soil and the rate of soil-transmitted helminth infection in children. The difference is statistically significant (p<0.05).

Table 3.32. Association between worm infection and use of unsanitary latrines (n=1,231)

Toilet

Infected

Are not

infected

Total

OR

[95%CI]

p

No HVS

245

708

953

2.0

[1.39-2.87]


0.00

VS

41

237

278

Total

286

945

1,231

(Note: There were 1231 respondents to this question)

Comment: Households using unsanitary latrines have a 2.0 times higher risk of worm infection than households with hygienic latrines. The difference is statistically significant (p<0.01).

Table 3.33. Association between worm infection and family habit of using fresh manure to fertilize fields (n=1,240)

SD division

fresh

Infected

Are not

infected

Total

OR

[95%CI]

p-value

Have

188

599

787

1.03

[0.78-1.35]


>0.549

Are not

106

347

453

Total

294

946

1,240


Comment:

There was no difference in the rate of worm infection between children in families using fresh manure and children in families not using fresh manure (p>0.05).

In univariate analysis, we identified 6 factors related to soil-transmitted helminth infection. However, education and knowledge are two factors related to each other, so we chose knowledge to include in the model. Multivariate regression analysis to eliminate confounding factors.

Table 3.34. Logistic regression analysis of risk factors associated with worm infection in children 12-23 months old

Related factors

Grouping

OR [95% CI]

p-value

Age group

18-23 months

1.65 [ 1.25-2.17]

0.01

12-17 months


naughty habits

land of children

Have

1.20 [0.88-1.65]

0.331

Are not


Number of children

3 children

2.28 [ 1.64-3.18]

0.00

1-2 children


Toilet

No HVS

1.71 [ 1.16-2.49]

0.015

Hygienic


Parents' knowledge about PC worms

Not achieved

1.28 [0.89-1.86]

0.139

Obtain


Comment :

- The 18-23 month age group has a 1.65 times higher risk of worm infection than the 12-17 month age group.

- Children living in families with 3 or more children have a 2.28 times higher risk of worm infection than those in families with only 1-2 children.

- Children in families with unsanitary latrines are 1.71 times more likely to be infected with worms than those in families with hygienic latrines.

Comment


Agree Privacy Policy *