2.2.2.2 The capacity of domestic partners is still limited.
A capable investment partner who knows how to cooperate with foreign investors is an attractive factor for foreign investors. When investing in a country, foreign investors often encounter some difficulties such as: not being familiar with customs and laws, not being able to open up relationships with authorities at all levels, not understanding the market, etc.
In fact, the competitiveness of Vietnamese enterprises is assessed as low compared to other countries in the region and the world. According to the 2007-2008 Global Competitiveness Report of the World Economic Forum (WEF), Vietnam ranked 68th out of 131 countries and economies ranked in 2007, down 4 places compared to the same assessment last year. The 2007 WEF Competitiveness Report is based on a survey of 11,000 international businessmen, and considers economies on 12 criteria, including: Institutions, infrastructure, macroeconomic stability, primary health care and education, higher education and training, goods market efficiency, labor market efficiency, financial market development, technological readiness, market size, business community agility and innovation [29].
The weakness in the competitiveness of enterprises is manifested in a number of aspects such as: lack of capital, outdated technology, low labor productivity, poor management skills, lack of marketing skills, lack of understanding of the world market and international business laws.
Maybe you are interested!
-
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Factors affecting the decision to choose domestic tour programs of tourists researched at Lua Viet Tourism Company Limited - 15 -
Factors affecting tourists' decision to choose domestic tour programs researched at Lua Viet Tourism Company Limited - 1 -
Current Status of Direct Negotiation Activities Between Vietnamese Enterprises and Japanese Partners -
Research, Analysis and Forecasting Capacity of Domestic and Foreign Tourist Markets;
The reason for Vietnam's weak competitiveness is not only due to enterprises but also due to the many weaknesses in the domestic business environment. With a scale of 5 for decisive significance, Vietnam's government policies only achieved an average level of (2.6 points), tax regulations (2.9 points), capital incentives (2.9 points), product quality standards (3.1 points).

points)… in addition to a series of obstacles such as complicated and cumbersome investment licensing procedures containing negative factors, inappropriate incentive policies, and low management level.
The competitiveness of Vietnamese enterprises is low, so they cannot meet the domestic and export consumer markets. Even very simple products such as daily household items are imported from China, Thailand, etc. When Vietnam opens its market for foreign goods and services as committed in the WTO, the risk of domestic enterprises being encroached upon is inevitable. Foreign enterprises, especially TNCs from the United States, with their advantages and strengths in capital, technology, and management capacity, will easily defeat Vietnamese enterprises.
Therefore, in order for domestic enterprises to effectively carry out joint ventures and investment cooperation with US multinational corporations, enterprises need to make every effort to improve their competitiveness and become reliable partners of US investors.
2.2.2.3 The structure of US investment capital in Vietnam still has many shortcomings.
reasonable
* Investment structure by sector : Projects in the agriculture and forestry sector
Although the State has specially encouraged investment in the industry, in recent years the number of projects has been on a downward trend, the FDI rate in this area only accounts for a very small proportion of 1.8% of the total US investment capital in Vietnam. The total FDI capital and the rate of projects dissolved before the deadline, projects registered but unable to be implemented are higher than in other investment sectors.
The economic efficiency of many projects in this field is not high, especially fishing and aquaculture projects... The main reason is that these projects
Facing difficulties in supplying raw materials and consuming products, many projects have not found suitable methods to cooperate with partners who are farmers - who have long been accustomed to small-scale production, focusing on immediate and local benefits, and have limited awareness of complying with commitments.
In the industry and service sector, the investment capital structure is also not reasonable. In the industry, investment capital is only concentrated in the oil and gas and heavy industry sectors. The oil and gas sector has implemented capital of up to 1,545 billion USD, accounting for 20% of the total investment of the United States in Vietnam. In the service sector, the hotel and tourism sector alone has attracted 2,362 million USD of investment capital, accounting for 31% of the total investment capital. The trend of increasing investment in the industry and service sectors is good, but most of the US projects often focus on on-site services, targeting the domestic market, so the contribution of US enterprises to exports is still low. Finance and banking are the strengths of the United States, but in the past 20 years, it has only attracted 215 million USD of investment [4].
* Investment structure by locality: The structure of FDI capital distribution and use by locality has not yet met the requirements and strategic orientations for socio-economic development. US investment is only concentrated in a number of large provinces and cities such as Ho Chi Minh City, Ba Ria - Vung Tau, Binh Duong, Binh Dinh, Hanoi. These 5 provinces and cities account for 70% of total investment capital from the US in Vietnam. US FDI capital is often concentrated in the southern provinces, where there are open policies. This large amount of investment capital has helped these economic regions have high growth rates, but also makes the gap between these regions and the northern mountainous regions, some central provinces, the Central Highlands, and the Mekong Delta even larger.
The reason for these limitations is that in investment decisions, TNCs always have to consider the investment rate and costs as well as expected profits.
The expectation of the projects, so the decision to invest in areas with high level of infrastructure development and especially with high-tech labor market is understandable. Therefore, most of the current projects are established in big cities.
2.2.2.4 Forms of attracting investment capital are not yet diverse.
This is a common limitation of foreign investment in Vietnam. In the past, foreign investment in Vietnam was mainly carried out in 4 basic forms: 100% foreign investment, joint venture, business cooperation contract, and shares.
2.2.2.5 Investment environment still has many limitations
The legal and policy system is still in the process of being perfected, so it is still inconsistent and unstable, and does not ensure clarity and predictability. Some laws and policies have changed but have not taken into account the legitimate interests of investors, causing business plans to be disrupted. Legal documents have many unclear and contradictory points, leading to delays in implementation by law enforcement agencies, or inappropriate understanding and application. Obstacles in the implementation process are slower than regulations. Some documents of ministries, branches and localities have overlaps and lack of consistency, causing difficulties for business operations. Laws and policies have not really created a level playing field for domestic and foreign investment activities.
Management work still has many weaknesses. State management focuses too much on investment licensing without paying due attention to the post-licensing stage.
2.2.2.6 Transfer pricing issues
Currently, transfer pricing is a common problem with multinational companies. In Vietnam, the phenomenon of transfer pricing appears and is becoming more and more popular.
FDI enterprises in general and US FDI enterprises in particular. Some enterprises belonging to branches of multinational companies have taken advantage of loopholes in state management to transfer pricing by "subsidiary company's loss, parent company's profit" by raising input prices, lowering output prices to take advantage of the difference from the outside, committing trade fraud, tax evasion, and taking advantage of monopoly to raise product prices higher than the prices of similar imported goods. Specifically as follows:
- Declaring increased value of contributed capital assets. When contributing capital to join a joint venture, foreign parties often declare increased value of contributed capital in the form of machinery, equipment, and technology values many times higher than the actual price.
- Purchase of raw materials and other inputs. Subsidiaries in the multinational corporation system must purchase raw materials and input production factors at prices much higher than actual prices and are priced by the parent company. Therefore, in each case, if the subsidiary makes a loss, the parent company will not be affected much.
- Management and use of production costs. FDI enterprises have not had a plan, and have not based on business results to calculate the use of production costs, especially costs for foreign workers. Joint venture enterprises under the management of foreign investors have spent a lot on advertising and marketing compared to actual requirements. The amount of salary that Coca Cola joint venture company spent on advertising, promotion, product distribution, and administrative management of the joint venture accounted for 41.77% of revenue compared to the figure of 20.01% of revenue approved in the initial economic thesis.
- Tax evasion: FDI enterprises have taken advantage of loopholes in state management, using fraudulent trade and accounting tricks to make enterprises lose money on accounting books and make profits in reality. This is the phenomenon of "losses"
"Virtual" is exploited by foreign investors in general and US investors in particular to evade taxes for the purpose of illegal profit in Vietnam.
In addition, the analysis also shows that attracting US FDI capital is not commensurate with its potential. US FDI in Vietnam only accounts for a small part of the total US foreign direct investment capital and compared to other countries in the region, this number is still limited. US FDI capital is also uneven in industries and localities. There are not many large US TNCs investing in Vietnam...
In the coming time, to attract more FDI capital from the United States to Vietnam, we need to solve all the above mentioned difficulties and obstacles. The analysis in chapter 2 will be the practical basis for us to have practical solutions to improve the investment situation in chapter 3.
In summary, the above statistics and analysis show that the United States is currently the leading country in foreign direct investment in Vietnam, including investment through third countries. US FDI has contributed to the industrialization and modernization of the country. US companies have contributed to improving management capacity, creating jobs for millions of workers, creating many new industries, and promoting the competitive environment of Vietnamese enterprises. Through US FDI capital, Vietnam has also expanded its foreign economic relations, creating trust with new partners.
CHAPTER 3
PROSPECTS AND MAIN SOLUTIONS TO PROMOTE FDI ATTRACTION FROM THE UNITED STATES TO VIETNAM IN THE COMING TIME
3.1 PROSPECTS OF ATTRACTING FDI FROM THE UNITED STATES TO VIETNAM
3.1.1 International and domestic situation
3.1.1.1 Domestic context
Over the past years, our Party has consistently implemented a foreign policy of independence, self-reliance, peace, cooperation and development; an open foreign policy, multilateralization and diversification of international relations. We have been proactively and actively integrating into the international economy, while expanding international cooperation in all fields. Vietnam is a friend and reliable partner of countries in the international community, actively participating in the process of international and regional cooperation.
The socio-political situation of our country continues to be stable. The success of the 10th National Party Congress with the affirmation of continuing to consistently implement the renovation policy, which sets out the task: "Strengthening the attraction of foreign investment capital, striving to reach over 1/3 of the total development investment capital of the whole society in 5 years. Expanding the fields, locations and forms of attracting FDI capital, targeting potential markets and the world's leading economic groups, creating a strong change in the quantity, quality and efficiency of FDI capital" [6] continues to strengthen the confidence of the international investment community, promoting the increase of FDI capital flows into our country.
The economy continued to grow rapidly with GDP growth rate in the period 2001-2005 being 8.17%/year, in 2006 it was 8.17%, in 2007 it was 8.48%. The macro economy was relatively stable, the main relations and balances in the economy (accumulation - consumption, budget revenue - expenditure...) were improved; Capital mobilization
Resources for development have changed positively, the rate of GDP mobilization into the state budget exceeded expectations. The rapid increase in total investment capital in the economy has significantly increased production and business capacity, created many highly competitive products, completed and put into use many large projects on economic and social infrastructure, and strengthened the potential and material and technical facilities of the economy.
Vietnam's investment and business environment continues to improve. In addition to the implementation of the Investment Law, Enterprise Law and a number of other laws, along with the issuance of decrees guiding their implementation, which have created a more favorable legal environment for investment activities, many measures have been taken to limit and overcome the weaknesses of the infrastructure system, improve the quality of human resources, etc.
In fact, since realizing that the general business environment and measures to encourage foreign investment in Vietnam are lagging behind other countries in the region, the State has continuously introduced measures to improve the domestic investment environment. In January 2000, after the National Assembly passed the Law amending and supplementing a number of articles of the Law on Foreign Investment in Vietnam, on July 31, 2000, the Government issued Decree No. 24/2000/ND-CP detailing the implementation of the Law on Foreign Investment in Vietnam. Next, Decree No. 27/2003/ND - Government dated March 19, 2003, expanded the fields of foreign investment incentives, eliminated the mandatory export ratio for some industrial products, limited the capital contribution ratio by technology, etc. Decree No. 38/2003/ND - Government dated April 15, 2003, diversified the forms of foreign investment. In addition, the system of documents related to foreign investment activities continued to be supplemented and completed with the National Assembly passing the Land Law (amended), Construction Law, Fisheries Law, Corporate Income Tax Law, etc., along with guiding documents.





