In evaluation, analysts often use the method of collecting and obtaining expert opinions through direct interview surveys. Although this method has the disadvantage of being easily influenced by the subjective opinions of the interviewees and asking for opinions as well as the way of asking questions, it overcomes the disadvantages of quantitative methods when quantifying intangible service factors in hotels. The expert method is a qualitative evaluation method and provides analysis and evaluation based on the systematic processing of experts' assessments.
This method must address the following key issues:
a> Select and establish a team of expert assessors and a team of analysts.
The group of assessment experts will provide assessments of the competitiveness of the hotels to be assessed. These are experts with a relatively high level of general understanding, in-depth expertise in the domestic and international tourism and hotel business, with a scientific stance, comprehensive coverage of the activities of the tourism industry and the specific business activities of the hotel business.
b> Consultation with experts
Expert consultation is a stage of the expert method. Depending on the characteristics of information collection and processing, basic consultation methods are selected such as: group and individual consultation; absentee and present consultation; direct or indirect consultation.
c> Handling expert opinions
After collecting expert opinions, a series of measures must be taken to process these opinions. This is an important step in order to produce analytical and evaluation results. In general, there are two types of problems that need to be solved when processing expert opinions:
- Assessing competitiveness based on internal and external factors, the time of emergence of new economic processes in the hotel business sector such as the emergence of competitive accommodation business types in the business sector.
hotel accommodation
- Assess the relative importance of the factors that make up guest capacity, such as assessing the role of internal hotel capacity factors and input relationship capacity on the hotel's guest reception capacity and room occupancy rate.
1.3.3. Thomson-Stricland matrix evaluation method [99, p.52] evaluates and compares the overall competitiveness of hotels.
This is a method of evaluating business capacity by identifying groups of factors that make up a hotel's capacity and scoring the factors to compare the capacity of hotels with each other. This method includes 4 steps:
Step 1: Identify the list of factors and components that make up the hotel's competitiveness. In particular, it is necessary to identify which factors are important to competitiveness. For example, in the hotel business, the geographical location factor often accounts for a very large proportion, but in other physical businesses, it is not important.
Enterprise competitiveness only includes subjective factors, reflecting the internal strength of the enterprise, does not include objective factors, business environment factors (these factors are very important when quantifying national competitiveness) and also does not include foreign factors.
The competitive capacity of a hotel often includes the following system of capacities and factors.
1. Capacity to research, analyze and forecast domestic and foreign tourist markets;
2. Ability to find reliable customers and partners with the ability to effectively cooperate with the enterprise;
3. Ability to organize professional and international standard tourist services, with appropriate adjustments for different cultures
4. Relationship capacity with partners such as travel agencies and other hotels
5. Ability to apply information technology to global booking and distribution (GDS) and international payment systems;
6. Factors related to human resources: human resources with high professional qualifications and skills, standard service procedures and hotel interior designs..
7. Factors of adaptability and change management;
8. Financial factors;
9. Factors of image, reputation and geographical location
10. Competitiveness in price and cost.
Step 2: Qualitatively evaluate and score each factor and department capacity for each business. Usually score from 1 (weakest) to 10 (strongest). Depending on each specific factor, develop evaluation criteria to score objectively. However, there are some factors that must be based on observations and public opinion of customers and experts, and changes over time to evaluate.
Step 3: Calculate the total score for all the factors given in the matrix by adding the scores of the corresponding component factors of each hotel. This total score shows the absolute competitiveness of the hotel.
There are two methods: Simple average and weighted average.
- Simple average: In which: xi is the score of the i-th factor
- Weighted average: In which: fi is the weight, fi is often chosen so that fi = 1, then; fi is evaluated according to the importance and position of each factor.
Step 4: Compare the scores of hotels to determine the competitiveness of hotels to be able to compare and determine the position of businesses according to each factor, factor groups and all factors in total. If there is a time series of scores reflecting the competitiveness of hotels, it is possible to apply dynamic analysis and multidimensional factor analysis to evaluate the competitiveness of businesses.
Table 1.2: Hotel competitiveness assessment
(Simple average method)
TT
Factor | Score by hotel factor | ||||
Hotel A | Hotel B | Hotel C | Hotel D | Hotel D | |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Analysis of financial capacity and some solutions to improve financial capacity at Vietnam Telecommunications Technology Investment and Development Joint Stock Company - 5 -
Focus on Improving National Forecasting Capacity to Serve Management -
Research Approach and Bank Credit Analysis Framework for Coffee Producers -
Building Vinawind's Situation Analysis and Research Process

1
Image / reputation / geographic location | 9 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 4 | |
2 | Technology | 10 | 7 | 9 | 2 | 4 |
3 | Distribution network | 3 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 5 |
4 | Ability to grow and innovate | 9 | 9 | 10 | 3 | 6 |
service | ||||||
5 | Production and business costs | 10 | 3 | 9 | 5 | 6 |
6 | Customer service | 10 | 9 | 7 | 4 | 4 |
7 | Human resources | 10 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 4 |
8 | Financial situation | 7 | 10 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
9 | Advertising level | 9 | 10 | 9 | 5 | 5 |
10 | Ability to manage change | 8 | 10 | 8 | 5 | 4 |
Total | 85 | 78 | 84 | 44 | 48 | |
Average score | 8.5 | 7.8 | 8.4 | 4.4 | 4.8 | |
Position | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 4 |












Source: Author's description
According to the simple average calculation method, the competitiveness of hotel A is 8.5, taking the first position, hotel D is at the bottom with a score of 4.4. According to the image/reputation criterion, hotel C is at the top, in terms of technology factor, hotel A is at the top. Hotel A is also at the top in factors 5, 6 and 7...
When weighted, the factor scores remain the same, but the average score of each business changes. Hotel C has a competitiveness score of 9.2, ranking first. Hotel A drops to second place.
Table 1.3: Hotel competitiveness assessment

(Weighted average method)
TT
Factor | Weight | Score by hotel factor | |||||
Guest Hotel A | Hotel B | Hotel C | Hotel D | Hotel D | |||
1 | Image / reputation / Geographic location | 0.1 | 9 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 4 |
2
Technology | 0.1 | 10 | 7 | 9 | 2 | 4 | |
3 | Distribution network | 0.2 | 3 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 5 |
4 | Ability to grow and change | 0.3 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 3 | 6 |
new product service | |||||||
5 | Production cost | 0.05 | 10 | 3 | 9 | 5 | 6 |
6 | Customer service | 0.04 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 4 | 4 |
7 | Human resources | 0.05 | 10 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 4 |
8 | Financial situation | 0.05 | 7 | 10 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
9 | Advertising level | 0.06 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 5 | 5 |
10 | Ability to manage change | 0.05 | 8 | 10 | 8 | 5 | 4 |
Average score | 7.9 | 7.7 | 9.2 | 3.9 | 5.1 | ||
Position | 2 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 4 |











Source: Author's description
1.3.4. Customer survey method
An important source of information to evaluate the competitiveness of a hotel is the customers who have used the services of that hotel and are also customers of other hotels. This method requires compliance with certain rules for selecting evaluation objects and evaluation methods to create objective and accurate assessments of the hotel's competitiveness. Furthermore, building a common database of customers and selecting customers to collect opinions is very important. Building a set of customers to provide the basis for providing evaluation information. There are many methods to collect information such as: direct contact, distributing survey forms, websites, e-mail, telephone... The issue that needs to be emphasized here is to build a common database (DB) of customers (KH) who have used the hotel's services and many services of other hotels. In addition, selecting specific survey subjects to collect opinions often requires additional information from other data sources such as: information about
market, competitors, information from travel agencies and suppliers... If not selected correctly, it can lead to misleading and inaccurate assessments. Therefore, ensuring the right customers are selected to collect assessment information is very important to have accurate and objective assessments.
1.4. Experience in improving the competitiveness of some international hotel groups
1.4.1. Ritz-Carlton Singapore Hotel
Ritz-Carlton, Millenia Singapore Hotel belongs to the famous Ritz Carlton Group which owns and manages 70 hotels with a total of 18,475 rooms in 23 countries around the world with over 32,000 employees. Ritz-Carlton, Millenia Singapore Hotel is located in the center of Marina Center of Singapore, opened in 1996, 32 floors high with 608 rooms including 19 luxury rooms and 03 presidential rooms overlooking Singapore Bay, the hotel was designed by famous American architect Kevin Roche. The hotel uses 4,200 famous paintings in the collection of artists Frank Stella, Andy Warhol and Dale Chihuly to decorate the hotel. Ritz-Carlton, Millenia Singapore Hotel is ranked as the best business hotel in Asia. The hotel group is the only group to have twice received the United States' most prestigious quality award, the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award, in the service business.
Activities to enhance the hotel's competitiveness; The target market of The Ritz-Carlton, Millenia Singapore is business travelers coming to work and do business in Singapore, so the hotel has focused on providing the best services for this group of guests. Specifically:
THE RITZ-CARLTON CLUB: In addition to the services and large conference room of 1000 square meters, the hotel has established The Ritz-Carlton Club Hotel, which includes 128 special rooms located on the highest floors of the hotel with services providing information and assistance for special business guests. Club
There is a separate lobby to serve all dining and business negotiation needs during guests' stay here.
24-hour mobile communication service: The hotel has provided a 24-hour call forwarding service for guests by forwarding any calls to the guest room to the guest mobile phone anywhere in Singapore if the guest is not in the room. In addition, any information messages that need to be sent to the guest are sent to the guest via mobile message (SMS). The mobile phone is also provided free of charge to the guest during the guest's stay at the hotel. If the guest does not answer the call, the message content will be saved by the switchboard to notify the guest later. The Ritz-Carlton, Millenia Singapore has applied this free service first in the Asia Pacific region.
Mobile Office Services: The Ritz-Carlton, Millenia Singapore provides in-room services and amenities for guests to work in an environment similar to their own mobile office at the hotel. The hotel provides stationery, printers, shredders, etc. to serve the guests' work during their stay. Guest bedrooms are also equipped with the latest audio and video equipment (Bose speakers, 37-inch LCD screens, high-speed internet) to serve remote conferences.
Quality Management Policy: Top Quality
In a recent customer satisfaction survey by the Ritz-Carlton Group, 99% of customers said they were satisfied with all aspects of the hotel's service, and more than 80% said they were extremely satisfied with the hotel's service. In order to serve the top quality improvement policy, the hotel allows any employee in any department to immediately decide on compensation for guests or resolve complaints for guests with a maximum limit of $2,000. The hotel has a policy requiring all service staff and managers to participate in 250-300 hours of service quality training in their first year of employment. In particular, all employees who have direct contact with guests will have skills training courses.
specializes in communication and handling guest complaints and the hotel always has a promotion policy for all positions to keep employees motivated to work. Many of the positions are held by former employees who were in direct contact with guests.
The Ritz-Carlton, Millenia Singapore applies a total quality management policy and a policy of continuous quality improvement as the biggest policy to enhance its competitiveness to achieve the title of the best business hotel in the world. The hotel has applied the “Pyramid” management model to manage its quality. All employees are given a pocket-sized guide to achieving the gold quality standard including vision, strategy, business culture, commitment of the business and employees and the three steps to providing perfect service of the group. Usually these steps list the hotel’s expectations for each employee and the rules of dealing with customers. These quality standards are always remembered by each shift, the employees discuss and commit to implementing the rules.
In addition, the hotel has established mentoring and guest service teams. These mentoring team members are responsible for training, assisting and mentoring employees in their daily work so that they have the skills and attitudes to be proficient in all tasks. In addition, mentoring team members work closely with new employees and guest-facing employees to assist in handling any necessary situations. Hotel employees are equipped with a team spirit and a responsibility to actively participate in all activities of different departments as needed to improve service quality and resolve guest complaints. The hotel also honors the “Ritz-Carlton Group Model Employee” title and provides employees who receive this title with specialized training courses and career advancement opportunities.
The hotel has a policy of “personalizing all service activities” to meet all the unique and diverse needs of guests. In order to create and maintain customers.





