CONCLUDE
Sustainable development - the process of balanced and harmonious development of all three factors: economy, society, and environment - is the goal of most countries in the world today. Vietnam's socio-economic development strategy for 2001-2020 has determined the development perspective in this period as "Rapid development associated with sustainable development, sustainable development is a requirement throughout the Strategy" .
To evaluate the implementation results, the Government has introduced a system of statistical indicators to monitor and evaluate sustainable development. Therefore, it is necessary to have a comprehensive index to evaluate the sustainable development process based on this system of indicators. In order to contribute to the implementation of that requirement, the thesis has researched and solved some of the following basic issues:
- General overview of the concept, necessity and content of sustainable development. This is the theoretical basis for research and analysis of the system of statistical indicators of sustainable development.
- Synthesize some existing sustainable development statistical indicator systems in the world; overview and analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the sustainable development statistical indicator system in Vietnam. With the indicator system just issued by the Government, the thesis analyzes and proposes measures to improve, creating conditions for better assessment of the country's sustainable development status.
- Propose a comprehensive assessment process for sustainable development including formulas and methods for determining factors in calculating individual indicators, component indicators and the comprehensive index of sustainable development. This is the main content of the thesis. The results of this process will show an overview of Vietnam's development process over the research period.
- Collect data on indicators for the period 2001 - 2010 to calculate the proposed sustainable development index. This calculation proves the feasibility of the thesis research. In addition, the author analyzes the current status of sustainable development in Vietnam for the period 2001 - 2010 based on the calculated results.
- Present some recommendations and solutions to effectively implement the unification work.
Statistics on sustainable development in Vietnam, creating the best data conditions, contributing to accurately assessing sustainability in the country's development process.
The thesis proposes a basic methodology for calculating the composite index of sustainable development for Vietnam in each development stage. In particular, the determination of the limit values as well as the weights of each indicator in the indicator system needs to be further studied. In addition, based on the above methodology and the system of local sustainable development indicators, it is possible to calculate the composite index of sustainable development for regions and localities. From there, it creates conditions for comparison and assessment of the development level of each province and city in the country, drawing out the factors that need to be overcome to make the country develop more and more sustainably.
LIST OF AUTHOR'S PUBLISHED WORKS RELATED TO THE THESIS
1. (2010), “On “sustainable development”, Journal of Development Economics, No. 152(II), pp. 14-17.
2. (2010), “The system of statistical indicators for sustainable development in Vietnam – Current situation and solutions”, Journal of Development Economics, No. 161(II), pp. 3-5.
3. (2012), “Building a composite index to assess sustainable development in Vietnam”, Journal of Development Economics, No. 186(II), pp. 3-6.
4. (2012), “Assessment of sustainable development in Vietnam in the period 2001 – 2010”, Workshop “Stabilization and economic growth of Vietnam in the current period”, pp. 67-75.
REFERENCES
Vietnamese
1. Le Quy An (1998), “Sustainable development and some methods to evaluate sustainability in development”, 2nd Scientific Conference, KHCN.07.Hanoi program.
2. Department of Development Economics, National Economics University (1999), Development Economics Textbook , Statistical Publishing House, Hanoi.
3. Ministry of Finance (2007-2011), Foreign debt bulletin No. 1-7 , Hanoi.
4. Ministry of Information and Communications (2009-2011), White Book - Vietnam Information and Communications Technology , Information and Communications Publishing House, Hanoi.
5. Ministry of Health (2003-2010), Health Statistics Yearbook 2003 - 2010 , Medical Publishing House, Hanoi.
6. Nguyen The Chinh (2003), Textbook of Environmental Economics and Management , Statistical Publishing House, Hanoi.
7. Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (2004), Strategic orientation for sustainable development in Vietnam (Vietnam Agenda 21) , Hanoi.
8. Nguyen Dinh Cung (2010), "Urgent requirements of economic restructuring", workshop on Restructuring public investment in the context of growth model innovation and economic restructuring in Vietnam , Hue.
9. Dang Ngoc Dinh (2005), topic "Methodology for building sustainable development models", Project AG-21, Ministry of Planning and Investment
10. Project VIE/01/021 (12/2004), Sustainable Development - Proceedings of the first national conference , Hanoi.
11. Pham Ngoc Dang (2004), "Environmentally sustainable urban development in Vietnam", Proceedings of the national conference on sustainable development, December 2004.
12. Pham Dai Dong (2011), "Building a synthetic index to assess population quality", Population and Development Journal , 2(119).
13. Le The Gioi, Nguyen Truong Son, Nguyen Thi Tram Anh (2010), "Building a multidimensional analysis framework and a system of indicators to assess sustainable development of the fisheries sector - the case of Khanh Hoa fisheries sector", Journal of Science and Technology, (40).
14. Tang Van Khien (2008), "Selecting characteristic indicators and determining the method
"Method of calculating the composite index of economic development", Economic Management , (18), p.3-12.
15. Pham Ngoc Kiem (2002), Textbook of Socio-economic Analysis and Programming, Labor - Social Publishing House, Hanoi.
16. Le Anh Son, Nguyen Cong My (2002), Building a database for monitoring sustainable development in Vietnam , Institute of Strategy and Development, Hanoi.
17. General Statistics Office (2002-2010), Results of the 2002-2010 population living standards survey , Statistical Publishing House, Hanoi.
18. General Statistics Office (2004), Some common statistical terms , Statistical Publishing House, Hanoi.
19. General Statistics Office (2003-2011), Statistical Yearbook 2003 - 2011 , Statistical Publishing House, Hanoi.
20. Tang Van Khien, Nguyen Van Trai (2012), "Method of constructing a synthetic index to evaluate the implementation results of different statistical indicators in Vietnam", Journal of Economic Management , (48).
21. General Department of Population and Family Planning, United Nations Population Fund (2011), Population and Development , Documents for training programs on population and family planning.
22. Vietnam Productivity Center (2011), Vietnam Productivity Report 2010 , Hanoi.
23. USAID (2005), Vietnam Provincial Competitiveness Index 2005 , Hanoi.
24. Institute of Development Strategy (2001), Scientific basis of some issues in Vietnam's socio-economic development strategy to 2010 and vision to 2020 , National Political Publishing House, Hanoi.
English
25. Department for International Development (2002), "Socially Sustainable Development: Concepts And Uses".
26. Jiawei Han, Micheline Kamber, Jian Pei (2012), Data mining – Concepts and Techniques , 3rd edition , Elsevier Inc, USA.
27. Robert W. Kates, Thomas M. Parris, and Anthony A. Leiserowitz (2005), "What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practices", Environment: Science and Policy for sustainable development , 47 (3), p. 8-21.
28. Sabina Alkire, José Manuel Roche, Maria Emma Santos and Suman Seth (2011), Multidimensional Poverty Index 2011: Brief Methodological Note , Queen Elizabeth House (QEH), University of Oxford.
29. Scottish Executive Social Research (2006), “Sustainable Development: A review of international Literature”.
30. Sharachchandra M.LéLé (1991), “Sustainable Development: A critical review”,
World Development , 19 (6), p. 607-621.
31. Sudhir Anand, Amartya K.Sen (1994), "Human development index: Methodology and measurement", Human development report , New York.
32. UN (2007), Indicators of Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies , 3rd edition , New York.
33. UNDP (1991), Human Development Report 1991 , Oxford University Press, USA.
34. UNDP (2011), Human Development Report 2011 , Oxford University Press, USA.
35. Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, Yale University and Center for International Earth Science Information Network, Columbia University (2006), 2005 Environmental Sustainability Index , IUCN/UNEP/WWF.
Website information page
36. Ministry of Information and Communications, Announcement of Vietnam Internet Development Data [Online]. Hanoi: Vietnam Internet Center. Address: http://www.thongkeinternet.vn [December 21, 2012].
37. Socio-economic development strategy 2001 – 2010 [Online]. Hanoi: Central Executive Committee of the Party, 9th tenure. Address: http://www.chinhphu.vn/page
/portal / chinhphu/NuocCHXHCNVietNam/ThongTinTongHop/noidungvankiendaih oidang?categoryId=10000714&articleId=10038387 [Accessed: August 2, 2012].
38. Socio-economic development strategy 2011 – 2020 [Online]. Hanoi: Ban
Central Executive Committee of the 11th Party Congress. Address: http://www.chinhphu.vn/portal/ page/ portal/chinhphu/NuocCHXHCNVietNam/ThongTinTongHop/noidungvankien daihoidang?categoryId=10000716&articleId=10038368 [Accessed: August 2, 2012].
39. Database of food security statistics and information [Online]. Hanoi: Ministry of Agriculture. Address: http://www.mard.gov.vn/Pages/statistic_csdl.aspx?TabId
=thongke [Accessed: 27/2/2013].
40. Nguyen Trong Hau, General method for constructing composite indexes [Online]. Address: vienthongke.vn/attachments/article/669/Bai%202.doc [Accessed: November 7, 2011].
41. Truong Quang Hoc, Sustainable Development - Global Development Strategy for the 21st Century [Online]. Address: http://tainguyenso.vnu.edu.vn/jspui/handle/123456789/4668u [Accessed: October 19, 2012]
42. IUCN. 1980. World conservation strategy [Online]. Address: www.iucn.org/
dbtw-wpd/edocs/WCS-004.pdf[Accessed: 01/07/2013].
43. UN. 1987. Our common future [Online]. Address: conspect.nl/pdf/Our_Com mon_Future-Brundtland_Report_1987.pdf [22/8/2013].
44. UN. 1992 . Rio Declaration on Environment and Development 1992 [Online]. Address: www.unesco.org/education/information/.../RIO_E.PDF [22/8/2013].
45. Office of Sustainable Development, Research report, proposal for a set of indicators for monitoring and evaluating local sustainable development in the period 2011 - 2020 [Online]. Address: http://va21.gov.vn/Documents.aspx# [September 5, 2013]
46. Pham Thi Hong Van (2010), “Introducing some sustainability assessment indicators”, [Online]. Address: http://ipsard.gov.vn/dspr/news/newsdetail.asp?targetID=2497 [July 3, 2011]
APPENDIX
Appendix 1: Sustainable development indicator system recommended by the United Nations Council on Sustainable Development (UN CSD) in 2001
SOCIAL FIELD
Topic | Branch topic | Target |
Fair | Poverty | 1. Percentage of population living below the poverty line |
2. Gini index of income inequality | ||
3. Unemployment rate | ||
Fair about gender | 4. Average salary ratio of women to men | |
Nutritional status nourish | 5. Nutritional status of children | |
Mortality rate | 6. Under 5 mortality rate | |
7. Life Expectancy of Newborns | ||
Sanitary conditions | 8. Percentage of population with adequate sanitation facilities | |
Clean water | 9. Population with access to clean water | |
Access to health services | 10. Percentage of population with access to services primary health care | |
11. Vaccination for children | ||
12. Rate of contraceptive use | ||
Education | Education level | 13. Universal primary education for children |
14. Percentage of adults with education level II | ||
Literate | 15. Adult literacy rate | |
Housing | Living conditions | 16. Average housing area per capita |
Security | Criminal | 17. Number of crimes per 10,000 population |
Population | Population change | 18. Population growth rate |
19. Official urban population and unincorporated residence official |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Indicators for Assessing the Sustainable Development of Commercial Banks -
Evaluation Indicators of Some Levels in Provincial Tourism Territorial Organization from the Perspective of Sustainable Development -
Indicators Reflecting and Factors Affecting the Shift of Rural Economic Structure Towards Sustainable Development. -
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Model system to assess the suitability of Vietnam's population-economic development process - 21
