Table 2.37: Number of accommodation establishments nationwide and in the Central region through the years 2011 - 2012
Year and quantity
CSLT
2011 | 2012 | Compare 2012/2011 | ||||
Quantity | Room number | Quantity | Room number | Increase Growth of CSLT (%) | Increase number of rooms (%) | |
Total country | 13,756 | 256,739 | 15,381 | 277,661 | 11.81 | 8.15 |
5 star hotel | 48 | 12.121 | 57 | 13,494 | 18.75 | 11.33 |
4 star hotel | 126 | 15,517 | 147 | 17,903 | 16.67 | 15.38 |
3 star hotel | 273 | 18,990 | 335 | 22,802 | 22.71 | 20.07 |
Central region | 3,403 | 72,763 | 3,618 | 78,138 | 6.31 | 7.39 |
5 star hotel | 16 | 3.168 | 18 | 3,581 | 12.5 | 13.03 |
4 star hotel | 49 | 4,733 | 50 | 4,883 | 2.04 | 3.17 |
3 star hotel | 98 | 6,186 | 106 | 6,721 | 8.16 | 8.65 |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Growing the Number of Production and Business Establishments -
Number of Years Single Mothers Worked in Binh Duong -
Forecast of Number of Rooms for the Period 2020 – 2030 (Unit: Room) -
Comparison of Distribution by Number of Cesarean Sections Between Studies

Source: General Department of Tourism, Department of Culture, Sports and Tourism of Central provinces
In 2012, the number of hotels in MT accounted for 23.52% of the whole country, the number of rooms accounted for 28.14%. Of these, 12.4% of accommodation establishments, 28.2% of rated rooms, and hotels with less than 20 rooms account for about 80% of the total number of accommodation establishments in the region [29]. In 2000, the whole country had only 3,267 accommodation establishments
72,200 rooms, compared to 2000, the number of accommodation establishments in 2012 increased 4.7 times, the number of rooms increased 3.8 times. In 2000, the number of accommodation establishments accounted for only 9% of the whole country.
Table 2.38: Percentage of accommodation establishments in the Central region compared to the whole country over the years 2011 - 2012
Unit: %
2011 | 2012 | |||
CSLT ratio vs with the whole country | Number of chambers ratio compared to the whole country | CSLT ratio vs with the whole country | Number of chambers ratio compared to the whole country | |
Central region | 24.7 | 27.5 | 23.5 | 28.1 |
5 star hotel | 33.3 | 26.1 | 31.6 | 26.5 |
4 star hotel | 38.9 | 30.5 | 34.0 | 27.3 |
3 star hotel | 35.9 | 32.7 | 31.6 | 29.5 |
Source: General Department of Tourism, Department of Culture, Sports and Tourism of Central provinces
The number of hotels from 3 to 5 stars accounts for 33.3% compared to the total number from 2011 to 2012, this rate was 31.6%. This rate has decreased because some investor projects have had capital difficulties and cannot be implemented, thereby affecting the number of facilities. The MT area is considered an ideal destination for all travelers, so suppliers in this area are always looking to bring their customers excellent value by offering Quality services, satisfying all visitors' needs.
2.5.6. Tourism promotion activities in the Central region
Tourism promotion activities aim to increase the destination's ability to attract visitors. Tourism promotion campaigns are carried out to motivate potential buyers towards the destination [7,22]. Propaganda and promotional activities are the core tool to carry out this campaign to introduce the unique values of World Cultural Heritage in localities to the world in order to position and create a brand for the destination. Successful brands increase customer awareness [28].
The Central region has an advantage in developing tourism when it owns 4 tangible World Cultural Heritages and 2 intangible World Cultural Heritages. World cultural heritages are a unique local element, a core tourism product that contributes to increasing the ability to attract tourists and are the main reason for tourists to choose a destination on their journey. Therefore, an effective propaganda program will stimulate tourist demand and create tourist expectations about the visit [21]. In recent times, a number of propaganda campaigns have been carried out such as the national tourism year program held in localities with different themes. In 2006, it was held in Quang Nam with the theme "One destination, two world cultural heritages", in 2011 it was held in Phu Yen and the South Central coastal provinces with the theme "Sea and island tourism". , 2012 was carried out in Thua Thien Hue and the North Central Coast provinces with the theme "Heritage Tourism". These programs are implemented to enhance promotion and exploitation of tourism resources related to the theme. However, the effectiveness of these programs in recent times has not been as effective as expected.
In addition, a number of other promotional activities have been implemented such as: organizing roadshows, famtrips, tourism promotion programs, organizing familiarization tour programs for travel agencies and press to MT such as Thailand, Japan, China and Singapore; organize customer conferences in Ho Chi Minh City and Hanoi; publishes travel guides, travel maps, and travel films in many languages: Vietnamese, English, Chinese, Japanese, and Thai. The work of linking and cooperating in tourism development between the three localities of Thua Thien Hue - Da Nang - Quang Nam has been promoted through joint promotion and introduction: "Three localities - One destination" through promotional activities. form of organizing roadshows, participating in fairs and exhibitions at home and abroad. Furthermore, to carry out an effective communication program, many different methods can be used such as public relations, event organization, participation in international tourism fairs, leaflets, brochures, articles, etc. newspaper to promote World Cultural Heritage. However, due to limited funding, the promotion at MT is still fragmented and lackluster, the promotional content is unattractive and not enough to attract customers. In addition, MT tourism also participates in international tourism fairs but has not yet made an impression on potential tourists. If done well the activity works
Media promotion of World Cultural Heritage, providing full information about heritage for tourists to grasp will also contribute to exploiting these World Cultural Heritage in a reasonable way.
2.5.7. Tourism linkage activities in the Central region
Furthermore, although MT's tourism potential is rich and diverse, the provinces still do not have a proper linking solution to further develop tourism business activities in this area. The most obvious benefits of the link are convenience in exploiting customers, saving costs and enhancing the attractiveness of the area. With its own strengths and characteristics, each locality needs to coordinate with each other to effectively promote this potential, bringing significant revenue to the tourism industry and the country, contributing to economic development. social economy, improving people's living standards. Tourism only develops when there is a connection between localities with different tourism strengths.
Compared to other localities across the country, the MT area is a place with a lot of tourism potential with unique and extremely unique beauty that can exploit many different types of tourism. From Thanh Hoa to Ha Tinh, there are strengths in historical tourism, culture, and beach resort tourism such as Lam Kinh, World Cultural Heritage of Ho Dynasty Citadel, Kim Lien relic site, tomb of great poet Nguyen Du, and beach resorts. Cua Lo, Thien Cam, Sam Son. Besides, from Quang Binh to Quang Ngai, we focus on exploiting the strengths of cultural heritage, revolutionary historical relics, especially the connection between natural values and cultural values. Unique cultural values such as the architectural cultural heritage of Hue Citadel, Hoi An ancient town, My Son relics, Quang Tri Citadel - a famous revolutionary relic along with special natural values As beautiful as the world natural heritage Phong Nha - Ke Bang cave, the eco-tourism axis Lang Co - Bach Ma - Hai Van - Son Tra - Ba Na - Da Nang have created unique and attractive tourist routes. Furthermore, Da Nang beach is considered one of the most beautiful beaches in the world and is also the foundation for developing marine tourism and forming international-class marine tourist areas. This tourist area is also the gateway to Vietnam of the East-West corridor, so Canavan tourism is also focused on developing along the route from Thailand, Laos, Cambodia to Vietnam. Meanwhile, the Central Coastal tourism sub-region from Thua Thien Hue to Binh Thuan has the most outstanding strength in marine tourism, with modern, large-scale marine tourist areas meeting international standards such as Dai Lanh, Van Phong bay, Ninh Chu, Ca Na, Phan Thiet, Mui Ne. Unique identities and cultural values are strengths here. It can be seen that the tourism potential of the MT region is extremely large, however each locality has different strengths and characteristics. Therefore, if and only when there is coordination between localities, the potential
Only then will this function be effective, bringing significant revenue to the tourism industry and the country, contributing to socio-economic development and improving people's living standards. In fact, current linkage activities in the MT area are both lacking and weak, and between provinces have not yet seen their own strengths to diversify products and build tourist tours. The linkage work of the provinces has not been implemented synchronously, competing with each other rather than cooperating with each other. Although we pay attention to exploiting tourism resources and tourist attractions, we still follow the situation of everyone doing their own thing. This is a major obstacle for MT tourism development. Up to now, there have been a number of ideas put forward to implement the connection, but they are still not specific and have not been delved into, so they have not yet made a breakthrough to create conditions for businesses and localities to seek opportunities. business in the tourism sector. The project "Central Heritage Road" is a typical example. Although it has a clear purpose, the implementation is not synchronous, lacking rigor and is essentially just self-linking between businesses. but without the participation of the government and management levels. The Central Heritage Road is a tourism program implemented with the goal of connecting world heritage sites in the Central region, especially connecting World Cultural Heritages in Hue such as the Hue Imperial Citadel relic complex and the Royal Palace. Hue communal houses and World Cultural Heritages in Quang Nam such as My Son Sanctuary and Hoi An Ancient Town. The Central Heritage Road is organized to exploit World Cultural Heritage combined with exploiting the advantages of tourism in the Central region such as ecotourism, resort tourism, craft village tourism, and at the same time calling for the connection of regional provinces. Trung aims to promote tourism development, bringing benefits to localities and the community. However, over time, the implementation has not been as successful as expected, because the management work is still inadequate, loose, there is no unity in the connection, and the responsible entity has not been identified. Therefore, it is not possible to maximize the advantages of world heritage sites in the Central region. Furthermore, in the process of exploiting tourism today, localities are still localized, doing their own thing, with a local mindset, without mutual support between localities, making the Heritage Road useless. brings high efficiency. In addition, currently in the Central region, infrastructure is not modern and synchronous, technical facilities serving tourism do not meet tourist needs, service quality is poor, tourism products are poor, and tourism resources are poor. Human resources to serve tourism are lacking and weak, and there is not much investment in tourism promotion activities. These are factors that greatly influence the Central Heritage Road. Therefore, the problem here is to link, tourism only develops when there is a connection between localities with different tourism strengths. Therefore, to create an attractive brand, tourists need to pay close attention to the connection between localities to create synchronization in tourism development, contributing to exploiting the advantages of each locality and creating attractive products. leading to attracting more and more tourist attractions to MT.If the problem is the connection between localities, industries, and businesses
If resolved decisively, then the internal strength and potential will be strongly promoted, creating a common image for the whole area as well as creating attraction for tourists, contributing to accelerated development. tourism for the entire region.
Tourism integration is actually not a difficult problem, but the difficulty of finding a common voice between localities has affected this work. In recent times, when localities organize tourism events, there has been no mutual communication or cooperation, leading to the events taking place at the same time, causing tourists to come to this province to return. I don't know what's going on in the other province. For example, while Thua Thien Hue is holding the "Lang Co Legend of the Sea" festival, Da Nang is also holding the "Da Nang Cultural Festival", and in this province there is not a single advertising banner. Letting tourists know about events in the other province will greatly reduce the effectiveness. If there is a close connection between localities, that situation will not happen, the festivals organized will be more effective and the number of visitors will be attracted.
2.6. EVALUATION OF EXPLOITATION ACTIVITIES OF WORLD CULTURAL HERITAGES FOR TOURISM DEVELOPMENT
2.6.1. Summary of indicators to evaluate tourism development in the Central region
World Cultural Heritages are important resources that create unique tourism products, attracting domestic and foreign tourists. The existing World Cultural Heritage in the Central region has made this place a stopping place for many tourists. Tourism exploitation activities at World Cultural Heritages have increased the number of visitors, and the services provided to help guests satisfy their tourism needs have encouraged their spending, thereby contributing to the development of environmental tourism. This result is inevitable thanks to the efforts of tourism managers in the process of exploiting resources. However, the average growth rate over the periods is not high and not commensurate with the inherent potential.
Table 2.39: Summary of indicators to evaluate tourism development in the Central region
Unit: %/year
Targets for tourism development in the Central region
Period 2000 - 2012 | |
Growth rate of number of visitors | 9.7 |
The speed of increasing the number of QT results | 16.4 |
Speed of increase in kills | 17.3 |
Growth rate of income from tourism activities | 17.2 |
The growth rate of the number of workers in the tourism industry | 11.3 |
Source: Processed according to data from the Representative Office of the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism in the Central region
The average growth rate of the total number of visitors to MT in the period 2000 - 2012 only reached 9.7%/year, of which the average growth rate of the number of visitors was 16.4%/year and the average growth rate was 16.4%/year. The number of QT results is 17.3%/year. Besides, the growth rate of income from tourism activities is still low, showing that this place does not have breakthrough products for customers to increase their spending. Accordingly, technical facilities serving tourism have also increased to meet the needs of tourists and travel businesses have also increased. Compared to 2000, the number of accommodation establishments in MT in 2012 increased 12.3 times, and travel businesses increased 2.6 times. The growth has increased in quantity, but according to the assessment of the General Department of Tourism, the quality is not guaranteed. Furthermore, to evaluate tourism development, it is also based on the contribution rate of tourism and GDP. The tourism industry contributes a high proportion to the GDP of the environment, in 2009 it accounted for 9.5%, then in 2012, the proportion reached 13%. .5%. Compared to the country's GDP, the contribution of environmental tourism is still very small. The labor force in the tourism industry increases by an average of 11.3% per year but is still not enough to serve tourists.
2.6.2. General assessment of exploitation of world cultural heritages for tourism development
In general, in recent years, local governments where heritage sites are located have paid much attention to the reasonable exploitation of World Cultural Heritages, especially paying a lot of attention to promoting the value of World Cultural Heritages. preserve, protect, restore and embellish monuments, ensure mining activities bring benefits to the community and pay attention to environmental protection. Tourism promotion activities at heritage sites to promote tourism in recent times have achieved the following achievements:
Firstly, in terms of enhancing the value of World Cultural Heritage, exploitation activities in recent times have focused on promoting the unique and unique values of World Cultural Heritage, with appropriate exploitation methods for each type of World Cultural Heritage. In addition, the work of preserving and promoting the value of tangible and intangible cultural heritage is given top priority, and the funding used for this work is mobilized from many different sources. Although this is not a small amount of money, the local government always tries its best to complete the mission assigned by the Government and people.
Second, the conservation of tourism at World Cultural Heritages has partly brought economic benefits to the community, local people have gained jobs thanks to tourism development, and people's lives have improved and stabilized. Particularly, people in Hoi An and Hue have benefited directly from the heritage.
Third, the political environment, social order and safety where heritage sites are located are always good, this is a huge advantage for localities in the process of exploitation and tourism development, contributing to the development process. sustainable tourism.
Besides, tourism exploitation at world heritage sites has the following limitations:
Firstly, due to the diverse and complex characteristics of the world heritage system, each heritage has different characteristics that make exploitation difficult and promote heritage value to serve tourism development. There are still many shortcomings, moreover, the situation of promoting heritage values, exploiting tourism potential in heritage areas for the wrong purpose, commercializing values, and over-exploiting heritage values.
Second, investment in conservation, development of tourism resources, and heritage conservation to serve tourism is still fragmented, scattered, and lacking in synchronization; Investment and development management and tourism service business still lack professionalism.
Third, there is a lack of mechanisms to create favorable conditions for communities in heritage areas to participate in investment in tourism development, as well as exploit culture, folk arts, industries, and traditional crafts to serve tourism and economic benefits. Benefits to the community from tourism are still limited.
Fourth, state management in tourism development in heritage areas also has many shortcomings. The subjects of tourism management are not clear, mainly the local government where the heritage is located, other subjects have not been given proper attention during the exploitation process.
Fifth, the environment in heritage sites is still not guaranteed, environmental pollution has a negative impact on society and tourists.
Sixth, communication activities for heritage sites are still not given much attention. Localities have not really cooperated with each other in promoting heritage sites. Organizing campaigns and events to attract customers is not very effective. It has not yet created a truly impressive impression on tourists to attract more visitors. The role of tour guides has not really been promoted.
The issue of developing tourism on the basis of promoting the values of tourism resources, including world heritage sites, is an urgent and complex task. Therefore, there needs to be some solutions to find models and coordination mechanisms of all sectors, all levels of state management, residential communities and businesses in development management and tourism with the goal of preserving preserve heritage for future generations, sustainably develop heritage while promoting the value of humanity's cultural heritage.
Table 2.40: Summary and assessment of tourism exploitation activities at World Cultural Heritages ( Appendix 27)
Table 2.41: Summary of criteria for evaluating tourism exploitation activities at World Cultural Heritages
( Appendix 28)
2.6.3. Results of surveys and research on tourists' assessments of world cultural heritages
2.6.3.1. Research purpose
The purpose of the survey conducted by the author is to collect more in-depth information about tourism at World Cultural Heritages, to have the opportunity to access and understand more deeply the feelings and assessments of visitors towards World Cultural Heritages in the area. Central region with the purpose of knowing how tourists evaluate world cultural heritages in the Central region, from which we can better understand tourists as a basis to help the author analyze and evaluate the current status. of heritage tourism in localities, to propose solutions to develop tourism at these world cultural heritage sites.
2.6.3.2. Survey methods and approaches
- Participate in the survey: the author, along with a group of collaborators who are students of the Faculty of Tourism, University of Economics - University of Da Nang, conducted a survey of domestic and foreign tourists at World Cultural Heritages in the area. discussed in the provinces of Quang Nam, Da Nang, and Thua Thien Hue, implemented in 2013.
- Survey content: The survey consists of 2 parts with the following contents:
+ Part 1: General information with 5 questions to clarify package tour guests, the number of times they visit the heritage, sources of information about the heritage, purpose of the trip, and heritage characteristics that decide to visit.
+ Part 2: Evaluation and comments of visitors with 7 questions about the level of satisfaction and assessment of heritage including heritage value, environment, services, security and order, and people's attitudes local people, tourist concentration, evaluation of interpretation activities, and other activities attended at the heritage site.
- Reliability of data: To ensure the reliability of the collected data, the author conducted a Cronbach Alfa test for the multi-indicator scales used in the questionnaire. Test results (see Appendix 9 ) show that the scales are both reliable and highly valid, both greater than 0.6 and less than 0.9 (Nunnally & Brunnstein, 1994); Can be used to collect information to serve the research goals in this topic.
2.6.3.3. Results of the survey on tourists' assessments of world cultural heritages (Appendix 10)
Investigation method: Through the compiled questionnaire, the investigators conducted direct interviews with tourist attractions using the method of randomly selecting tourist attractions in Hoi An City, My Son and at some relics in Hoi An. Hue such as Ngo Mon, Khai Dinh Tomb, Tu Duc Tomb. To ensure objectivity and randomness of the sample, in





