Cost Efficiency Of Vietnamese Commercial Banks


LIST OF APPENDIXES


Appendix 1. Banks in the research sample


STT

Symbol

Full name

Stage

Note

1

ABB

An Binh Commercial Joint Stock Bank

2005-2015


2

ACB

Asia Commercial Joint Stock Bank

2005-2015


3

AGR

Vietnam Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development

2005-2015


4

BOARD

Joint Stock Commercial Bank for Industry and Trade

2005-2015


5

BID

Joint Stock Commercial Bank for Investment and Development of Vietnam

2005-2015


6

CTG

Vietnam Joint Stock Commercial Bank for Industry and Trade

2005-2015


7

EAB

Dong A Commercial Joint Stock Bank

2005-2014


8

EIB

Vietnam Export Import Commercial Joint Stock Bank

2005-2015


9

HDB

Ho Chi Minh City Housing Development Joint Stock Commercial Bank

2005-2015


10

KLB

Kien Long Commercial Joint Stock Bank

2005-2015


11

LVP

Lien Viet Post Joint Stock Commercial Bank

2008-2015


12

MBB

Military Commercial Joint Stock Bank

2005-2015


13

MDB

Mekong Development Joint Stock Commercial Bank

2005-2014


14

MHB

Mekong Delta Housing Bank

2005-2014

Merger in 2015

15

MSB

Maritime Commercial Joint Stock Bank

2005-2015


16

NAB

Nam A Commercial Joint Stock Bank

2005-2015


17

NSB

North Asia Commercial Joint Stock Bank

2005-2015


18

OCB

Orient Commercial Joint Stock Bank

2005-2015


19

OEB

Ocean Commercial Joint Stock Bank

2005-2013

Renamed to Ocean Commercial Joint Stock Bank

20

PGB

Petrolimex Petroleum Joint Stock Commercial Bank

2005-2015


21

PVB

Vietnam Public Joint Stock Commercial Bank

2005-2014

Previously, NHTMCP

West

22

PNB

Southern Commercial Joint Stock Bank

2005-2013

Merged into Saigon Thuong Tin Commercial Joint Stock Bank 2015

Maybe you are interested!


23

SCB

Saigon Commercial Joint Stock Bank

2005-2015


24

SEA

Southeast Asia Commercial Joint Stock Bank

2005-2015


25

SGB

Saigon Joint Stock Commercial Bank for Industry and Trade

2005-2015


26

SHB

Saigon Hanoi Commercial Joint Stock Bank

2005-2015


27

STB

Saigon Thuong Tin Commercial Joint Stock Bank

2005-2015

Merger of Phuong Nam Commercial Joint Stock Bank in 2015

28

TCB

Techcombank

2005-2015


29

TPB

Tien Phong Commercial Joint Stock Bank

2008-2015


30

NCB

National Commercial Joint Stock Bank

2005-2015

Formerly South Vietnam

31

VAB

Viet A Commercial Joint Stock Bank

2005-2015


32

VCB

Joint Stock Commercial Bank for Foreign Trade of Vietnam

2005-2015


33

VIB

International Commercial Joint Stock Bank

2005-2015


34

VPB

Vietnam Prosperity Joint Stock Commercial Bank

2005-2015


Source: Author's synthesis Typical events related to mergers, consolidations and renaming of commercial banks during the research period include:

On July 27, 2010, the Joint Stock Commercial Bank for Non-State Enterprises changed its name to Vietnam Prosperity Joint Stock Commercial Bank.

On December 15, 2011, 3 joint stock commercial banks: Saigon Commercial Joint Stock Bank, Vietnam Tin Nghia Commercial Joint Stock Bank and De Nhat Commercial Joint Stock Bank merged into Saigon Commercial Joint Stock Bank and officially operated from January 1, 2012.

On October 4, 2013, Western Commercial Joint Stock Bank merged with Vietnam Oil and Gas Finance Joint Stock Corporation to form Vietnam Public Commercial Joint Stock Bank.

On November 23, 2013, Dai A Commercial Joint Stock Bank merged into Ho Chi Minh City Development Commercial Joint Stock Bank.


On January 23, 2014, Nam Viet Commercial Joint Stock Bank officially changed its name to National Commercial Joint Stock Bank.

On March 5, 2015, the State Bank issued Decision 250/QD-NHNN to purchase Construction Joint Stock Commercial Bank for VND0.


On May 6, 2015, the State Bank issued Decision No. 663/QD-NHNN to purchase Ocean Commercial Joint Stock Bank at a price of 0 VND. On May 8, 2015, Ocean Commercial Joint Stock Bank became a one-member limited liability bank and the Vietnam Joint Stock Commercial Bank for Industry and Trade was appointed by the State Bank to manage and operate Ocean Commercial Joint Stock Bank.

On May 25, 2015, MHB merged into BID (after the State Bank issued Document No. 2833/NHNN-TTGSNH dated April 23 on approving in principle and approving the merger in Decision No. 589/QD-NHNN).

On August 12, 2015, Mekong Development Joint Stock Commercial Bank merged into Maritime Commercial Joint Stock Bank (Decision 1391/QD-NHNN of the State Bank dated July 21, 2015, effective from August 12, 2015).

On October 1, 2015, Phuong Nam Commercial Joint Stock Bank merged into Saigon Thuong Tin Commercial Joint Stock Bank.


Appendix 2. Summary of data collection sources of variables


Variable

Data collection sources

Bad debt

NPL

Debt groups 3, 4, 5 are taken from financial statement notes and annual reports. Total outstanding debt is from financial statements.

Profitability

ROA

Net income from income statement, Total assets from balance sheet

Cost effective

CE

Calculated from data from financial statements of each bank

Total assets

TA

Balance sheet of financial statements

Credit growth rate

LGR

Balance sheet of financial statements

Equity

ETA

Balance sheet of financial statements

Outstanding loans/mobilized capital

LDR

Balance sheet of financial statements

Credit loss provision ratio

LLR

Balance sheet of financial statements

Share ownership ratio

OWN

Board of Directors Report

Concentration index of the 4 largest commercial banks

CR4

Calculated from Total Assets taken from the balance sheet of the financial statement

Herfindahl-Hirschman index

HHI

Calculated from Total Assets taken from the balance sheet of the financial statement

Economic growth rate

GDP

International Monetary Fund IFS Database

Inflationary

INF

International Monetary Fund IFS Database

Loan interest rate

IR

International Monetary Fund IFS Database

Exchange rate

EXI

International Monetary Fund IFS Database

House price growth

ESI

General Statistics Office


Source: Author's synthesis


Appendix 3. Cost efficiency of Vietnamese commercial banks


1. Concept and classification of efficiency


According to Coelli (2005), an economic unit is said to be more efficient than another unit if it can provide more goods and services to society without using more resources than another unit. In other words, a unit is efficient if it achieves the maximum level of output under the optimal use of given inputs. Technical efficiency is the ability to use the least input to produce a given unit of output or the ability to obtain the greatest output from a given unit of input and the goal of achieving a high level of efficiency is the goal of avoiding waste of the producer.

Coelli (2005) uses different terms for efficiency as follows: Productivity; Technical efficiency; Allocative efficiency; Production frontier; Technical change; Cost efficiency; Scale economies; Total factor productivity and productivity.

- Productivity is measured by the ratio of the output (s) a bank produces to the input (s) it uses. In previous years, the terms productivity and efficiency were often used interchangeably, but they are not exactly the same. To describe the difference between the two terms, consider a simple production process with an input x producing an output y. The OF' curve (Figure 1) is the production frontier that defines the relationship between inputs and outputs, or the line that maximizes the output obtained from using an input. Therefore, it reflects the current technical state of the industry. A firm or bank is technically efficient if it lies above the production frontier, and if it lies below the production frontier, the bank is not technically efficient. Point A is technically inefficient while points B and C are technically efficient.


Point A is not technically efficient because it is technically possible to increase output to the same level as point B without increasing inputs.

- Technical efficiency is the ability to minimize the use of inputs to produce a given output, or the ability to obtain maximum output from a given input, and the goal of avoiding waste of producers becomes the goal of achieving high level of technical efficiency.

- The production frontier is the OF' curve in figure 1.1 used to define the relationship between input and output, or this curve represents the maximization of output obtained from using an input.

Figure 1. Production frontier and technical efficiency




Source: Coelli, T. (2005)


To distinguish between technical efficiency and productivity, we use Figure 1.2. In this figure, we use a line to measure productivity at a particular data point. The slope of this line is y/x, which measures productivity. If the bank operating at point A moves to point B (achieving technical efficiency), the slope of this line will be larger, indicating that point B is more productive. However, if it moves to point C, the line will be tangent to the production frontier, so point C is the maximum production possibility point. The move to point C is an example of scale economies. Point C is


technically optimal scale. Operating at any other point on the production frontier will result in lower productivity.

- Scale economies: From the above analysis, it can be concluded that banks achieve technical efficiency but can still improve productivity by exploiting economies of scale. Changes in the scale of bank operations can be difficult to achieve quickly, technical efficiency and productivity are used to explain in some long-term and short-term cases.

Figure 2. Productivity, technical efficiency and economies of scale



Optimal scale

Source: Coelli (2005)


- Technical change: used to compare productivity over time. In Figure 3, the shift of the production frontier from OF' 0 period 0 to OF' 1 period 1 depicts the change in technical efficiency. At period 1, all banks can produce more output per unit of input than at period 0.


Figure 3. Change in technical efficiency between two periods



Source: Coelli (2005)


When we observe a bank increasing its productivity over the years, it could be due to improvements in technical efficiency alone, or to improvements in technical efficiency change, or to exploiting economies of scale, or a combination of all three.

- Allocative efficiency: In the previous sections, we did not discuss costs or profits. In addition to technical efficiency, we need to consider allocative efficiency in the case of additional cost information and behavioral assumptions, such as profit maximization and cost minimization. Allocative efficiency is concerned with the choice of inputs (e.g., labor and capital) that produce output at the lowest cost.

- Cost efficiency: Technical efficiency and allocative efficiency combine to create cost efficiency, also known as overall economic efficiency.

- Total factor productivity: used to measure productivity related to all factors of production. Traditional productivity measures are labor productivity in a factory, fuel productivity in a power station, land productivity in a farm, often called individual productivity measures. This measure can lead to incorrect results in overall productivity when only considering separate factors.

Comment


Agree Privacy Policy *