ROCE | SIZE | CA | DP | LOAN | LQD | NPL | LLP | INF | GDP (%) | MC (%GDP) | RI | ||
Pearson Correlation | 0.032 | 0.364 ** | -0.122 | 0.308 ** | 0.044 | -0.223 ** | 0.325 ** | 1 | -0.064 | -0.263 ** | -0.095 | 0.037 | |
LLP | Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.651 | 0.000 | 0.088 | 0.000 | 0.538 | 0.002 | 0.000 | 0.371 | 0.000 | 0.185 | 0.609 | |
N | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 192 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 196 | 198 | |
Pearson Correlation | 0.031 | -0.120 | 0.098 | -0.131 | -0.055 | 0.102 | 0.032 | -0.064 | 1 | 0.056 | -0.251 ** | -0.959 ** | |
INF | Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.660 | 0.092 | 0.167 | 0.067 | 0.444 | 0.153 | 0.656 | 0.371 | 0.435 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
N | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 192 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 196 | 198 | |
GDP (%) | Pearson Correlation | 0.266 ** | -0.169 * | -0.026 | -0.324 ** | -0.091 | 0.249 ** | -0.381 ** | -0.263 ** | 0.056 | 1 | 0.398 ** | -0.063 |
Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.000 | 0.017 | 0.719 | 0.000 | 0.204 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.435 | 0.000 | 0.381 | ||
N | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 192 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 196 | 198 | |
MC (%GDP) | Pearson Correlation | 0.246 ** | -0.179 * | -0.012 | -0.241 ** | -0.019 | 0.232 ** | -0.194 ** | -0.095 | -0.251 ** | 0.398 ** | 1 | 0.334 ** |
Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.001 | 0.012 | 0.868 | 0.001 | 0.792 | 0.001 | 0.007 | 0.185 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
N | 196 | 196 | 196 | 196 | 196 | 196 | 190 | 196 | 196 | 196 | 196 | 196 | |
Pearson Correlation | 0.023 | 0.118 | -0.102 | 0.093 | 0.029 | -0.079 | -0.048 | 0.037 | -0.959 ** | -0.063 | 0.334 ** | 1 | |
RI | Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.745 | 0.097 | 0.153 | 0.193 | 0.688 | 0.266 | 0.508 | 0.609 | 0.000 | 0.381 | 0.000 | |
N | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 192 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 196 | 198 |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Correlation Analysis Results -
Summary Table of Exploratory Factor Analysis Results Efa -
Evaluation of Financial Analysis Results at Intech Technology Investment Group Joint Stock Company -
Results of Linear Regression Analysis on Factors Affecting Land Complaints in Vinh City -
Correlation Coefficient Results and Significance Level of Correlation Coefficient Test for Joint Stock Commercial Bank Group

**. Correlation is statistically significant at the 0.01 level.
*. Correlation is statistically significant at the 0.05 level
APPENDIX 7 - RESULTS OF CORRELATION ANALYSIS BETWEEN NIM AND INDEPENDENT VARIABLES
NIM | SIZE | CA | DP | LOAN | LQD | NPL | LLP | INF | GDP (%) | MC (%GDP) | RI | ||
Pearson Correlation | 1 | -0.214 ** | 0.408 ** | -0.145 * | 0.115 | -0.008 | -0.232 ** | -0.129 | 0.058 | 0.168 * | 0.125 | -0.038 | |
NIM | Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.002 | 0.000 | 0.041 | 0.107 | 0.906 | 0.001 | 0.070 | 0.420 | 0.018 | 0.081 | 0.591 | |
N | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 192 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 196 | 198 | |
Pearson Correlation | -0.214 ** | 1 | -0.663 ** | 0.421 ** | -0.058 | -0.113 | 0.067 | 0.364 ** | -0.120 | -0.169 * | -0.179 * | 0.118 | |
SIZE | Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.002 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.416 | 0.113 | 0.353 | 0.000 | 0.092 | 0.017 | 0.012 | 0.097 | |
N | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 192 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 196 | 198 | |
Pearson Correlation | 0.408 ** | -0.663 ** | 1 | -0.449 ** | 0.073 | 0.001 | -0.002 | -0.122 | 0.098 | -0.026 | -0.012 | -0.102 | |
CA | Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.310 | 0.988 | 0.977 | 0.088 | 0.167 | 0.719 | 0.868 | 0.153 | |
N | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 192 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 196 | 198 | |
Pearson Correlation | -0.145 * | 0.421 ** | -0.449 ** | 1 | 0.341 ** | -0.402 ** | 0.265 ** | 0.308 ** | -0.131 | -0.324 ** | -0.241 ** | 0.093 | |
DP | Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.041 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.067 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.193 | |
N | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 192 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 196 | 198 | |
Pearson Correlation | 0.115 | -0.058 | 0.073 | 0.341 ** | 1 | -0.720 ** | 0.050 | 0.044 | -0.055 | -0.091 | -0.019 | 0.029 | |
LOAN | Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.107 | 0.416 | 0.310 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.491 | 0.538 | 0.444 | 0.204 | 0.792 | 0.688 | |
N | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 192 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 196 | 198 | |
Pearson Correlation | -0.008 | -0.113 | 0.001 | -0.402 ** | -0.720 ** | 1 | -0.196 ** | -0.223 ** | 0.102 | 0.249 ** | 0.232 ** | -0.079 | |
LQD | Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.906 | 0.113 | 0.988 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.006 | 0.002 | 0.153 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.266 | |
N | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 192 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 196 | 198 | |
Pearson Correlation | -0.232 ** | 0.067 | -0.002 | 0.265 ** | 0.050 | -0.196 ** | 1 | 0.325 ** | 0.032 | -0.381 ** | -0.194 ** | -0.048 | |
NPL | Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.001 | 0.353 | 0.977 | 0.000 | 0.491 | 0.006 | 0.000 | 0.656 | 0.000 | 0.007 | 0.508 | |
N | 192 | 192 | 192 | 192 | 192 | 192 | 192 | 192 | 192 | 192 | 190 | 192 | |
LLP | Pearson Correlation | -0.129 | 0.364 ** | -0.122 | 0.308 ** | 0.044 | -0.223 ** | 0.325 ** | 1 | -0.064 | -0.263 ** | -0.095 | 0.037 |
NIM | SIZE | CA | DP | LOAN | LQD | NPL | LLP | INF | GDP (%) | MC (%GDP) | RI | ||
Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.070 | 0.000 | 0.088 | 0.000 | 0.538 | 0.002 | 0.000 | 0.371 | 0.000 | 0.185 | 0.609 | ||
N | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 192 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 196 | 198 | |
Pearson Correlation | 0.058 | -0.120 | 0.098 | -0.131 | -0.055 | 0.102 | 0.032 | -0.064 | 1 | 0.056 | -0.251 ** | -0.959 ** | |
INF | Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.420 | 0.092 | 0.167 | 0.067 | 0.444 | 0.153 | 0.656 | 0.371 | 0.435 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
N | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 192 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 196 | 198 | |
GDP (%) | Pearson Correlation | 0.168 * | -0.169 * | -0.026 | -0.324 ** | -0.091 | 0.249 ** | -0.381 ** | -0.263 ** | 0.056 | 1 | 0.398 ** | -0.063 |
Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.018 | 0.017 | 0.719 | 0.000 | 0.204 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.435 | 0.000 | 0.381 | ||
N | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 192 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 196 | 198 | |
MC (%GDP) | Pearson Correlation | 0.125 | -0.179 * | -0.012 | -0.241 ** | -0.019 | 0.232 ** | -0.194 ** | -0.095 | -0.251 ** | 0.398 ** | 1 | 0.334 ** |
Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.081 | 0.012 | 0.868 | 0.001 | 0.792 | 0.001 | 0.007 | 0.185 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
N | 196 | 196 | 196 | 196 | 196 | 196 | 190 | 196 | 196 | 196 | 196 | 196 | |
Pearson Correlation | -0.038 | 0.118 | -0.102 | 0.093 | 0.029 | -0.079 | -0.048 | 0.037 | -0.959 ** | -0.063 | 0.334 ** | 1 | |
RI | Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.591 | 0.097 | 0.153 | 0.193 | 0.688 | 0.266 | 0.508 | 0.609 | 0.000 | 0.381 | 0.000 | |
N | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 192 | 198 | 198 | 198 | 196 | 198 |
**. Correlation is statistically significant at the 0.01 level.
*. Correlation is statistically significant at the 0.05 level
APPENDIX 8 - RESULTS OF REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF MODEL 1
Summary Results of Model 1
Model
R | R Square | Adjusted R Square | Std. Error of the Estimate | Change Statistics | Durbin-Watson | |||||
R Square Change | F Change | df1 | df2 | Sig. F Change | ||||||
1 | 0.518a | 0.268 | 0.223 | 0.769872 | 0.268 | 5,924 | 11 | 178 | 0.000 | 1,649 |
a. Independent variables: RI, CA, NPL, LOAN, LLP, MC (%GDP), RGDP (%), DP, SIZE, LQD, INF
b. Dependent variable: ROA
ANOVA analysis results of Model 1
Model
Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F | Sig. | ||
Regression | 38,622 | 11 | 3,511 | 5,924 | 0.000 b | |
1 | Residual | 105,501 | 178 | 0.593 | ||
Total | 144,123 | 189 |
a. Independent variables: RI, CA, NPL, LOAN, LLP, MC (%GDP), RGDP (%), DP, SIZE, LQD, INF
b. Dependent variable: ROA
Regression coefficients of Model 1
Model
Unstandardized Coefficients | Standardized Coefficients | t | Sig. | Correlations | Collinearity Statistics | ||||||
B | Std. Error | Beta | Zero-order | Partial | Part | Tolerance | VIF | ||||
(Constant) | -4,418 | 1,670 | -2,645 | 0.009 | |||||||
SIZE | 0.349 | 0.152 | 0.224 | 2,295 | 0.023 | -0.207 | 0.170 | 0.147 | 0.433 | 2,308 | |
CA | 6,134 | 0.964 | 0.618 | 6,363 | 0.000 | 0.402 | 0.431 | 0.408 | 0.436 | 2,293 | |
DP | 1,041 | 0.540 | 0.174 | 1,930 | 0.055 | -0.166 | 0.143 | 0.124 | 0.508 | 1,967 | |
LOAN | 0.376 | 0.605 | 0.061 | 0.621 | 0.535 | 0.077 | 0.046 | 0.040 | 0.426 | 2,345 | |
1 | LQD | 0.272 | 0.837 | 0.033 | 0.325 | 0.745 | 0.041 | 0.024 | 0.021 | 0.404 | 2,476 |
NPL | -10,566 | 4,250 | -0.182 | -2,486 | 0.014 | -0.217 | -0.183 | -0.159 | 0.764 | 1,308 | |
LLP | -10,271 | 10,597 | -0.074 | -0.969 | 0.334 | -0.135 | -0.072 | -0.062 | 0.701 | 1,427 | |
INF | 0.027 | 0.036 | 0.188 | 0.767 | 0.444 | 0.047 | 0.057 | 0.049 | 0.068 | 14,619 | |
GDP (%) | 0.185 | 0.112 | 0.132 | 1,647 | 0.101 | 0.158 | 0.123 | 0.106 | 0.636 | 1,573 | |
MC (%GDP) | 0.013 | 0.010 | 0.117 | 1,358 | 0.176 | 0.121 | 0.101 | 0.087 | 0.550 | 1,819 | |
RI | 0.032 | 0.064 | 0.127 | 0.497 | 0.620 | -0.034 | 0.037 | 0.032 | 0.063 | 15,854 | |
a. Dependent variable: ROA | |||||||||||
APPENDIX 9 - RESULTS OF REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF MODEL 2
Summary Results of Model 2
Model
R | R Square | Adjusted R Square | Std. Error of the Estimate | Change Statistics | Durbin-Watson | |||||
R Square Change | F Change | df1 | df2 | Sig. F Change | ||||||
2 | 0.672a | 0.452 | 0.418 | 4,392 | 0.452 | 13,353 | 11 | 178 | 0.000 | 1,375 |
a. Independent variables: RI, CA, NPL, LOAN, LLP, MC (%GDP), RGDP (%), DP, SIZE, LQD, INF
b. Dependent variable: ROE
ANOVA analysis results of Model 2
Model
Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F | Sig. | ||
Regression | 2833,673 | 11 | 257,607 | 13,353 | 0.000 b | |
2 | Residual | 3434,030 | 178 | 19,292 | ||
Total | 6267,703 | 189 |
a. Independent variables: RI, CA, NPL, LOAN, LLP, MC (%GDP), RGDP (%), DP, SIZE, LQD, INF
b. Dependent variable: ROE
Regression coefficients of Model 2
Model
Unstandardized Coefficients | Standardized Coefficients | t | Sig. | Correlations | Collinearity Statistics | ||||||
B | Std. Error | Beta | Zero-order | Partial | Part | Tolerance | VIF | ||||
(Constant) | -57,718 | 9,533 | -6,054 | 0.000 | |||||||
SIZE | 5,894 | 0.868 | 0.573 | 6,794 | 0.000 | 0.452 | 0.454 | 0.377 | 0.433 | 2,308 | |
CA | 1,575 | 5,502 | 0.024 | 0.286 | 0.775 | -0.372 | 0.021 | 0.016 | 0.436 | 2,293 | |
DP | 2,857 | 3,079 | 0.072 | 0.928 | 0.355 | 0.078 | 0.069 | 0.051 | 0.508 | 1,967 | |
LOAN | 5,231 | 3,455 | 0.129 | 1,514 | 0.132 | -0.076 | 0.113 | 0.084 | 0.426 | 2,345 | |
2 | LQD | 11,464 | 4,774 | 0.210 | 2,401 | 0.017 | 0.184 | 0.177 | 0.133 | 0.404 | 2,476 |
NPL | -72,906 | 24,258 | -0.191 | -3,005 | 0.003 | -0.275 | -0.220 | -0.167 | 0.764 | 1,308 | |
LLP | -13,587 | 60,478 | -0.015 | -0.225 | 0.823 | 0.027 | -0.017 | -0.012 | 0.701 | 1,427 | |
INF | 0.448 | 0.203 | 0.468 | 2,208 | 0.028 | 0.024 | 0.163 | 0.123 | 0.068 | 14,619 | |
GDP (%) | 1,587 | 0.614 | 0.172 | 2,476 | 0.014 | 0.257 | 0.182 | 0.137 | 0.636 | 1,573 | |
MC (%GDP) | 0.161 | 0.057 | 0.213 | 2,843 | 0.005 | 0.245 | 0.208 | 0.158 | 0.550 | 1,819 | |
RI | 0.566 | 0.367 | 0.341 | 1,542 | 0.024 | -0.024 | 1,115 | 0.086 | 0.063 | 15,854 | |
a. Dependent variable: ROE
APPENDIX 10 - RESULTS OF REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF MODEL 3
Summary Results of Model 3
Model
R | R Square | Adjusted R Square | Std. Error of the Estimate | Change Statistics | Durbin-Watson | |||||
R Square Change | F Change | df1 | df2 | Sig. F Change | ||||||
3 | 0.672a | 0.452 | 0.418 | 4,392 | 0.452 | 13,353 | 11 | 178 | 0.000 | 1,375 |
a. Independent variables: RI, CA, NPL, LOAN, LLP, MC (%GDP), RGDP (%), DP, SIZE, LQD, INF
b. Dependent variable: ROCE
ANOVA analysis results of Model 3
Model
Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F | Sig. | ||
Regression | 2833,695 | 11 | 257,609 | 13,353 | 0.000 b | |
3 | Residual | 3434,033 | 178 | 19,292 | ||
Total | 6267,727 | 189 |
a. Independent variables: RI, CA, NPL, LOAN, LLP, MC (%GDP), RGDP (%), DP, SIZE, LQD, INF
b. Dependent variable: ROCE





