Results of Data Analysis of Interviews with Managers and Experts in the Field of Marine Resources and Environment Management in Korea

Criterion 19: Use of foreign languages

Read and understand foreign documents; have the ability to exchange expertise and work directly with foreign experts and scholars in specialized fields.

Criterion 20: Information technology

Using IT for career development activities: Using software in specialized fields and software for comprehensive management of resources and protection of marine and island environments.

Standard 6: Personal capacity (05 criteria)

Criterion 21: Understand and master the Party's guidelines and policies and laws; fulfill professional ethics and office culture responsibilities;

Criterion 22: Proactively study and research to grasp the Party's viewpoints and guidelines; have faith in the Party's guidelines and policies, and the State's laws and policies; have a sense of responsibility for managing, exploiting, and sustainably using marine and island natural resources and environment, and protecting the marine environment in association with maritime sovereignty and security.

Criterion 23: Be humble in learning to improve professional capacity; develop creative self-study capacity, lifelong self-study to meet the requirements on qualities and capacities of civil servants in state management of seas and islands.

Criterion 24: Have professional cultural communication skills.

Criterion 25: Ability to coordinate, collaborate and work with colleagues inside and outside the unit to perform assigned tasks.

Caring for and protecting the legitimate rights and interests of state management personnel on seas and islands: Promoting the activities of trade union organizations to care for and protect the legitimate rights and interests of state management personnel, building, perfecting and strictly implementing regulations on rewards, handling violations, complaints and resolving complaints related to the rights and obligations of state management personnel on seas and islands, ensuring accuracy, objectivity, fairness and transparency.

Appendix 10.1. Results of analysis of interview data with managers and experts on human resources in the field of marine resources and environment management in Korea

(SPSS 16.0 software)


Question 1. Comments on the current status of human resource development in the field of marine resource and environment management in Korea

Assessment table on the level of meeting the organization's NNL quantity requirements

Content

Manager/Employer

Expert

Number of respondents

Percentage

Number of respondents

Percentage

Least

0

0

0

0

Weak

0

0

0

0

Medium

3

25

3

15.8

Rather

5

41.7

8

42.1

Good

4

33.3

8

42.1

Total

12

100%

19

100%

Maybe you are interested!

Results of Data Analysis of Interviews with Managers and Experts in the Field of Marine Resources and Environment Management in Korea


Assessment table on the level of meeting the organization's NNL quality requirements

Content

Manager/Employer

Expert

Number of respondents

Percentage

Number of respondents

Percentage

Least

0

0

0

0

Weak

0

0

0

0

Medium

0

0

0

0

Rather

8

66.7

11

57.9

Good

4

33.3

8

42.1

Total

12

100%

19

100%


Assessment table on the level of meeting the organization's human resource structure requirements

Content

Manager/Employer

Expert

Number of respondents

Percentage

Number of respondents

Percentage

Least

0

0

0

0

Weak

0

0

0

0

Medium

0

0

0

0

Rather

8

66.7

12

63.2

Good

4

33.3

7

36.8

Total

12

100%

19

100%

Question 2. Comments on the work of attracting, recruiting and using human resources in the field of marine resources and environment management in Korea.

Assessment table of the organization's open recruitment policy

Content

Manager/Employer

Expert

Number of respondents

Percentage

Number of respondents

Percentage

Least

0

0

0

0

Weak

0

0

0

0

Medium

1

8.3

2

10.5

Rather

7

58.3

9

47.4

Good

4

33.3

8

42.1

Total

12

100%

19

100%


Evaluation table of the organization's human resource treatment policy

Content

Manager/Employer

Expert

Number of respondents

Percentage

Number of respondents

Percentage

Least

0

0

0

0

Weak

0

0

0

0

Medium

2

16.7

1

5.3

Rather

5

41.7

11

57.9

Good

4

41.7

7

36.8

Total

12

100%

19

100%


Assessment table of the organization's own NNL working environment

Content

Manager/Employer

Expert

Number of respondents

Percentage

Number of respondents

Percentage

Least

0

0

0

0

Weak

0

0

0

0

Medium

0

0

0

0

Rather

5

41.7

7

36.8

Good

7

58.3

12

63.2

Total

12

100%

19

100%

Assessment table on the organization's NNL job arrangement

Content

Manager/Employer

Expert

Number of respondents

Percentage

Number of respondents

Percentage

Least

0

0

0

0

Weak

0

0

0

0

Medium

4

33.3

3

15.8

Rather

6

50

13

68.4

Good

2

16.7

3

15.8

Total

12

100%

19

100%


Assessment table on appropriate assignment of work to the organization's human resources

Content

Manager/Employer

Expert

Number of respondents

Percentage

Number of respondents

Percentage

Least

0

0

0

0

Weak

0

0

0

0

Medium

2

16.7

1

5.3

Rather

8

66.7

14

73.7

Good

2

16.7

4

21.3

Total

12

100%

19

100%


Assessment table on the opportunity policy to demonstrate the organization's human resource capacity

Content

Manager/Employer

Expert

Number of respondents

Percentage

Number of respondents

Percentage

Least

0

0

0

0

Weak

0

0

0

0

Medium

1

8.3

1

5.3

Rather

10

83.3

14

73.7

Good

1

8.3

4

21.1

Total

12

100%

19

100%


Assessment of increasing access to important NNL tasks of the organization

Content

Manager/Employer

Expert

Number of respondents

Percentage

Number of respondents

Percentage

Least

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Medium

0

0

0

0

Rather

11

91.7

17

89.5

Good

1

8.3

2

10.5

Total

12

100%

19

100%

Weak


Question 3: Opinions on training and promotion of human resources in the field of marine resources and environment management in Korea

Evaluation table on training and development of human resources of the organization

Content

Manager/Employer

Expert

Number of respondents

Percentage

Number of respondents

Percentage

Least

0

0

0

0

Weak

0

0

0

0

Medium

1

8.3

1

5.3

Rather

4

33.3

5

26.3

Good

7

58.3

13

68.4

Total

12

100%

19

100%

Evaluation table of NNL organization's overseas advanced training study

Content

Manager/Employer

Expert

Number of respondents

Percentage

Number of respondents

Percentage

Least

0

0

0

0

Weak

0

0

0

0

Medium

1

8.3

1

5.3

Rather

5

41.7

8

42.1

Good

6

50

10

52.6

Total

12

100%

19

100%


Question 4: Comments on the assessment of human resources in the field of marine resources and environment management in Korea

Assessment table on the level of regular assessment of the organization's human resources

Content

Manager/Employer

Expert

Number of respondents

Percentage

Number of respondents

Proportion

%

Least

0

0

0

0

Weak

0

0

0

0

Medium

2

16.7

3

15.8

Rather

8

66.7

10

52.6

2

16.7

6

31.6

Total

12

100%

19

100%

Good


Assessment table of the level of democracy and objectivity in evaluating the organization's human resources

Content

Manager/Employer

Expert

Number of respondents

Percentage

Number of respondents

Percentage

Least

0

0

0

0

Weak

0

0

0

0

Medium

0

0

1

5.3

Rather

9

75

14

73.7

Good

3

25

4

21.1

Total

12

100%

19

100%


Assessment is used for rewards, planning, training

Content

Manager/Employer

Expert

Number of respondents

Percentage

Number of respondents

Percentage

Least

0

0

0

0

Weak

1

8.3

1

5.3

Medium

0

0

1

5.3

Rather

10

83.3

15

78.9

Good

1

8.3

2

10.5

Total

12

100%

19

100%


Assessment helps individuals improve their professional capacity of the organization's human resources.

Content

Manager/Employer

Expert

Number of respondents

Percentage

Number of respondents

Percentage

Least

0

0

0

0

Weak

0

0

0

0

Medium

1

8.3

3

15.8

Rather

11

91.7

14

73.7

Good

0

0

2

10.5

Total

12

100%

19

100%


Evaluate closely the tasks and results of the organization's NNL work

Content

Manager/Employer

Expert

Number of respondents

Percentage

Number of respondents

Percentage

Least

0

0

0

0

Weak

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Rather

10

83.3

15

78.9

Good

2

16.7

4

21.1

Total

12

100%

19

100%

Medium


Question 5: Your opinion on the working conditions of NNL in the field of marine resources and environment management in Korea

Clean, tidy and hygienic working environment

Content

Manager/Employer

Expert

Number of respondents

Percentage

Number of respondents

Percentage

Least

0

0

0

0

Weak

0

0

0

0

Medium

1

8.3

2

10.5

Rather

5

41.7

5

26.3

Good

6

50

12

63.2

Total

12

100%

19

100%


Workers are provided with full equipment for work.

Content

Manager/Employer

Expert

Number of respondents

Percentage

Number of respondents

Percentage

Least

0

0

0

0

Weak

0

0

0

0

Medium

0

0

1

5.3

Rather

3

25

4

21.1

Good

9

75

14

73.7

Total

12

100%

19

100%


Safe working conditions

Content

Manager/Employer

Expert

Number of respondents

Percentage

Number of respondents

Percentage

Least

0

0

0

0

Weak

0

0

0

0

Medium

1

8.3

2

10.5

Rather

4

33.3

8

42.1

Good

7

58.3

9

47.4

Total

12

100%

19

100%

Employees are arranged reasonable working and resting time.

Content

Manager/Employer

Expert

Number of respondents

Percentage

Number of respondents

Percentage

Least

0

0

0

0

Weak

0

0

0

0

Medium

3

25.0

6

31.6

Rather

8

66.7

9

47.4

Good

1

8.3

4

21.1

Total

12

100%

19

100%


Question 6: Your opinion on salary, bonus, and benefits for employees in the field of marine resource and environment management in Korea

Salary commensurate with qualifications and contributions

Content

Manager/Employer

Expert

Number of respondents

Percentage

Number of respondents

Percentage

Least

0

0

0

0

Weak

0

0

0

0

Medium

1

8.3

3

15.8

Rather

8

66.7

10

52.6

Good

3

25

6

31.6

Total

12

100%

19

100%

Fair and reasonable salary, bonus and allowance policy

Content

Manager/Employer

Expert

Number of respondents

Percentage

Number of respondents

Percentage

Least

0

0

0

0

Weak

0

0

0

0

Medium

4

33.7

7

36.8

Rather

5

41.7

6

31.6

Good

3

25

6

31.6

Total

12

100%

19

100%

Reward policy recognizes and promotes individual contributions

Content

Manager/Employer

Expert

Number of respondents

Percentage

Number of respondents

Percentage

Least

0

0

0

0

Weak

0

0

0

0

Medium

3

25

6

31.6

Rather

7

58.3

9

47.4

Good

2

16.7

4

21.1

12

100%

19

100%

Comment


Agree Privacy Policy *