The salary is commensurate with the responsibility and effort they put in. In addition, up to 34% of the total number of employees assessed that the salary and bonus payment of the Corporation is not fair.
2.3.9.2 Communication information and working environment:
The working and coordination regulations between departments in the Corporation issued since 2009 are outdated and no longer suitable. The Departments have also given their opinions to the Board of Directors about issuing a new regulation, but so far they have not been able to agree on implementation. Instead of issuing a general regulation, based on newly issued circulars and decrees, the Corporation has issued small regulations such as: Regulations on debt management, Regulations on investment, Regulations on financial management, Regulations on recruitment... with somewhat overlapping contents. The issuance of such small regulations is causing many difficulties in the implementation and coordination of work between departments. Instead of working together to achieve the goal, the departments all think that they are following the correct procedures and turn to criticize and blame other departments.
Table 2.15 Survey results on communication information in the company
Question
Average value | Standard deviation | Small value best | Great value best | |
D1 I have all the correct and necessary information to complete the application. do a good job | 3.47 | 0.68 | 2 | 5 |
D2 My superiors always keep me informed about the changes in the company | 3.50 | 0.6 | 2 | 4 |
D3 My superiors consult with their subordinates before making decisions that affect work. their | 3.16 | 0.90 | 1 | 5 |
D4 Clear working process in the company | 3.08 | 0.74 | 2 | 5 |
D5 Employees can speak freely in meetings. meeting | 2.97 | 0.74 | 2 | 4 |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Survey Results on the Current Situation of Human Resources Training at Indochina Petroleum Transportation Joint Stock Company -
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Building a Policy for Developing Corporate Human Resources -
Results of Evaluating the Level of Dedication to Work of Human Resources at Tourism Enterprises in Da Nang City, 2017 -
Results of Training Tourism Human Resources in Thua Thien Hue Province

The survey results in questions 1 and 2 show that the majority of employees answered in agreement at level 4, indicating that when assigning work, employees will be provided with all necessary information. This reflects that information sharing in the Corporation is very limited, only those necessary for the job are provided with full relevant information.
When asked about the working process, most employees were still hesitant and the average survey result was only 3.08. Because the working regulations are not clear, it is easy for departments to overlap work and sometimes leads to abuse of power when a department is favored or trusted by the Board of Directors.
Table 2.16 Survey results on working environment and atmosphere
Question
Average value | Standard deviation | Small value best | Great value best | |
E1 Employees in the company have a good working style urgent, punctual | 2.74 | 0.71 | 2 | 4 |
E2 Employees are respected and trusted in their work job | 3.05 | 0.65 | 2 | 4 |
E3 People work together to achieve most effective | 3.05 | 0.79 | 2 | 5 |
E4 Leaders have polite and gentle manners with employees. pill | 3.79 | 0.69 | 2 | 5 |
E5 Very safe and fully equipped working environment suspect | 3.32 | 0.69 | 2 | 5 |
E6 Overall, employees are treated fairly, indiscriminate | 2.95 | 0.83 | 1 | 4 |
E7 Employees are given flexible working and creative freedom create | 3.00 | 0.73 | 2 | 4 |
When surveyed, up to 42% of employees said that compliance with labor regulations and working style at the Corporation was not strict. Employees did not comply with working hours, and in some cases, they came late and left early, and hung around at coffee shops. Although the Board of Directors had reminded them many times in weekly meetings and installed surveillance cameras at the entrance, the situation had not improved. Up to 58% of employees commented that the working environment at the Corporation was very safe and fully equipped, and 63% agreed that the leaders had a polite and gentle manner towards employees.
2.4 General assessment of human resource management at Saigon Tourist Corporation Limited
2.4.1 Evaluation of human resource management performance
Level of importance
High
FOCUS ON DEVELOPMENT
-High level of importance
- Low level of implementation
Includes elements of Salary; Job Analysis and Work Process
KEEP MAINTAINING
-High level of importance
- High level of implementation
Includes Rewards and Benefits elements
DEVELOPMENT RESTRICTIONS
-Low importance
- Low implementation level None
REDUCE INVESTMENT
-Low importance
- High level of implementation None
Short
Low Implementation Level High
Figure 2.2 Diagram showing the importance and implementation level in human resource management
To evaluate human resource management activities at Saigon Tourist Corporation, the author has synthesized the results collected from data collected through the survey results of officers and employees combined with discussions with experts with many years of experience in the field of human resource management, and drawn the following issues:
Issues that need to be focused on: These are tasks that experts consider to be of high importance and the current implementation of these tasks does not meet the requirements of workers, including:
First: Paying wages is causing a lot of dissatisfaction among employees. Employees cannot continue to suffer when receiving only 60% of their salary. If this issue is not thoroughly resolved, many skilled workers will leave.
Second: Job analysis without job description and job standards despite being reminded many times.
Third: Coordination between departments is not effective when there is no coordination process between departments.
Issues that need to be maintained: Compensation and benefits for employees are highly valued by experts and the current implementation of these tasks meets the requirements of employees. This is an issue that should be maintained and promoted.
Issues that need to limit development and reduce investment: Not present in the Corporation.
2.4.2 Advantages
Human resource planning: With the attention of the management.
Recruitment: The Corporation's human resources are experienced and have many years of working experience.
Human resource training and development: highly supported and facilitated by all levels. Strategic human resource training and development program
clear objectives. Some training programs of the City Party Committee such as: K300, management class 3+... all give preferential treatment to the Corporation for some study places. The staff in charge of training and development have many years of experience, the training department has professional qualifications.
Salary and welfare work: The policy on paying labor wages is always implemented in accordance with the law, always paying wages on time and there is no situation of unpaid wages. Reward policy according to national holidays. Welfare programs are very diverse and have clear regulations.
Performance evaluation: Annual performance evaluation at the Corporation is carried out very seriously.
Staffing, transfers and promotions: Staff are being placed in positions that are appropriate to their qualifications and skills. Staff rarely have to work overtime. Transfers and promotions have specific procedures.
Communication and working environment: Comfortable working environment, information in the company is strictly and scientifically managed. Leaders have a gentle and friendly attitude towards staff. Information on policies and procedures related to work is always updated and widely disseminated to staff.
The annual assessment of human resource management performance at Saigon Tourist Corporation Limited is still carried out quite seriously through meetings and conferences to directly collect opinions from employees, from suggestion letters and from Party and Union activities at the company.
2.4.3 Limitations
Human resource planning: There is no specific process. Human resource planning is not linked to the specific strategy of the Corporation. It has not attracted the attention of staff, most of them are indifferent to whether the Corporation has a human resource plan for the coming years or not. Human resource planning is not done by the human resource department but is left to the Party Committee Office to decide.
Recruitment: The recruitment process at the Corporation is relatively simple in the traditional way, not really focusing on selecting the right people with the right capacity, mainly recruiting people according to the task performance criteria. There are no specific and clear recruitment standards. The main recruitment sources are internal sources and external recruitment sources are mainly referrals from relatives, friends, colleagues, not exploiting external recruitment sources to attract new, dynamic factors for the Corporation.
Training: Although the Corporation pays attention, the budget for training is still limited and the training subjects are not really fair. The English proficiency of some managers at all levels is not up to standard, so they are afraid to communicate with foreign guests. There is no consistent training policy throughout the Corporation. There is no integration training program for new employees. After each training program, there is no investigation to see if the employees are satisfied with the training program in terms of content, methods, training facilities, etc. The training quality is mainly assessed based on test results. Surveys are not regularly created to collect employees' opinions on training programs or the tasks that employees want to participate in. Post-training evaluation has not received due attention, the evaluation method is relatively simple and traditional.
Salary and benefits: Average salary is relatively low compared to the general level, the salary is not really competitive and worthy of the Saigontourist brand. The reward and salary increase policy is considered unfair and subjective.
Performance appraisal: The method of evaluating the performance of staff is not profound, not objective and democratic, but also focuses on formality and subjectivity. The evaluation of human resource management activities at the Corporation is still limited in terms of unscientific evaluation methods, only carried out in the traditional way through meetings and conferences of employees to collect opinions.
Staffing, transfers and promotions: There is no job description for each specific position, making staffing difficult. Promotion opportunities for ordinary employees are not high, and staff are mainly promoted based on acquaintances and background without considering ability.
Communication and working environment: Employees are not free to express their opinions in meetings. Although working regulations have been issued, compliance with working hours and working attitudes are not high, depending largely on the level of employee self-awareness. Cooperation between departments is not high, mostly pushing responsibility to each other.
2.4.4 Causes of limitations in human resource management at Saigon Tourist Corporation
Through analyzing the current situation, it can be seen that the limitations in human resource management are due to the following basic reasons:
One is that the awareness of the role and importance of human resource management by some leaders is still limited, they still do not see the need for a complete and comprehensive human resource management system. Human resource officers are mostly not properly trained in management science and do not know how to apply human resource management software, so they mainly solve problems based on habit and experience, according to the nature of the work. The evaluation of human resource management results is still limited, simple and unscientific, only implemented according to traditional methods. Evaluation has not been carried out for each content of human resource management such as human resource planning, recruitment, performance evaluation, labor compensation, training and development of human resources. There is no tool to evaluate the results of human resource management activities.
Second, in the work of attracting human resources, a systematic and scientific recruitment process has not yet been established, leading to the practice of entrusting children of cadres to work, causing dissatisfaction at work as well as difficulties in arranging and assigning work.
Third , there is not enough investment in job analysis, organization and clear job description. This makes employees not understand their responsibilities and roles in the organization and makes it difficult for new employees to integrate.
Fourth, there is not really enough attention paid to the training and development of human resources. There is no long-term training plan, so the scale and quality of training is still limited. In the training and development of human resources, there is still unfairness, not paying attention to potential employees but only focusing on planned staff, leading to gaps in finding successors.
CHAPTER 2 SUMMARY
Chapter 2 analyzed the current status of human resource management at Saigon Tourist Corporation Limited, this chapter also evaluated and analyzed the factors affecting the human resource management of the Corporation. At the same time, based on the results of the survey of staff and interviews with a number of experts, the author identified the existing problems and the causes of those problems.
The next chapter will be based on the general orientation and goals of the Corporation combined with the limitations and shortcomings mentioned in chapter 2 to propose solutions to improve human resource management at the Corporation.
These solutions will improve and overcome the current limitations of human resource management at the Corporation.





