Table 3.12. Average efficiency of organic matter treatment in leachate using Perozone
with the influence of reaction time 86
Table 3.13. O 3 content before and after treating organic substances in leachate with Perozon and the effect of reaction time 87
Table 3.14. Treatment efficiency of organic substances in leachate by single ozone and Perozo
..........................................................................................................................................87
Maybe you are interested!
-
Research on treatment of rotator cuff tears using modified Mason-Allen tendon endoscopic suturing technique and creating micro-damage at the attachment area - 2 -
Research on the treatment of seafood wastewater by electrocoagulation method combined with USBF - 19 tank -
Research on diagnosis and endoscopic surgical treatment of benign adrenal tumors at Viet Duc Hospital in the period 1998 - 2005 - 20 -
P. Results of Treatment of Organic Substances in Leachate by Perozone with the Effect of Ph in 60 Minute Reaction Time -
Research on biological filtration technology with submerged materials in wastewater treatment technology using microbial arrays - 2
Table 3.15 . Average efficiency of organic matter treatment in leachate by
Ozone/ceramic pad 90

Table 3.16. O3 content before and after treating organic substances in leachate with Ozone/ceramic pad 92
Table 3.17. O 3 consumption in the Ozone/ceramic pad experiment with a specific surface of 728 m 2 /m 392
Table 3.18 . Average efficiency of organic matter treatment in wastewater by
Perozon/ceramic cushion 94
Table 3.19. O3 content before and after treating organic substances in leachate with Perozon/ceramic pad 95
Table 3.20. O 3 and H 2 O 2 consumed in the Perozon/ceramic pad experiment with a specific surface of 728 m 2 /m 396
Table 3.21 . Average treatment efficiency of organic substances in leachate by
Ozone/manganese ore 100
Table 3.22. O3 content before and after treatment of organic substances in leachate with Ozone/manganese ore 104
Table 3.23. O 3 consumption in the Ozone/manganese ore experiment 500 mg/l 104
Table 3.24 . Average treatment efficiency of organic substances in leachate by
Perozone/manganese ore 106
Table 3.25. O3 content before and after treating organic substances in leachate with Perozon/manganese ore 109
Table 3.26. Average consumption of O 3 and H 2 O 2 after experiment with Perozon system/manganese ore 500 mg/l 109
Table 3.27. Summary of O 3 and H 2 O 2 consumption rates in the experiment combining Ozone and Perozon with ceramic pads and manganese ore 110
Table 3.28. Experimental conditions for studying the kinetics of COD treatment of leachate 111
Table 3.29. Summary of leachate treatment results 112
Table 3.30. Summary of results of calculating pseudo-first order reaction rate constant k* of COD treatment process in leachate by Ozone systems 114
Table 3.31. Pseudo-first-order reaction rate equation for COD treatment of leachate using ozone process 115
Table 3.32. Summary of results of calculating pseudo-first order reaction rate constant k* of COD treatment process of leachate of Perozon 116 systems
Table 3.33. Pseudo-first order reaction rate equation for COD treatment of leachate using Perozon 116 process
LIST OF IMAGES
Figure 1.1. Water balance components in landfill cell 6
Figure 1.2. Indirect and direct ozonation models 18
Figure 2.1. Experimental diagram of leachate coagulation 45
Figure 2.2. Lin 4.10L 46 ozone generator
Figure 2.3. Experimental diagram of leachate treatment using single Ozone or Perozone 47
Figure 2.4. Experimental diagram of leachate treatment using Ozone, Perozone, Ozone/ceramic pad, Perozone/ceramic pad, Ozone/manganese ore 48
Figure 2.5. Experimental pilot treatment of leachate using single Ozone and Perozone 49
Figure 2.6. Experimental diagram of leachate treatment using Ozone combined with ceramic pad 54
Figure 2.7. SEM image of manganese ore sample used in study 56
Figure 2.8. Experimental diagram of leachate treatment using catalytic ozone 57
Figure 3.1. Effect of PAC on COD of leachate after treatment 64
Figure 3.2. Effect of PAC on the color of leachate after treatment 65
Figure 3.3. Effect of PAC on suspended solids in leachate after treatment 65
Figure 3.4. Effect of pH on color after treatment with single ozone 67
Figure 3.5. Effect of pH on COD after treatment with single ozone 67
Figure 3.6. Effect of pH on TOC after treatment with single ozone 67
Figure 3.7. Effect of pH on BOD5 /COD ratio after treatment with single Ozone 69
Figure 3.8. Effect of reaction time on color after single Ozone treatment 73
Figure 3.9. Effect of reaction time on COD after single ozone treatment 73
Figure 3.10. Effect of reaction time on TOC after single ozone treatment 73
Figure 3.11. Effect of reaction time on BOD5 / COD after treatment with single Ozone 75
Figure 3.12. Effect of pH on color after treatment with Perozon 76
Figure 3.13. Effect of pH on COD after treatment with Perozon 76
Figure 3.14. Effect of pH on TOC after treatment with Perozon 77
Figure 3.15. Effect of pH on BOD5/COD ratio after treatment with Perozon 78
Figure 3.16. Effect of H 2 O 2 on color after treatment with Perozon 81
Figure 3.17. Effect of H 2 O 2 on COD after treatment with Perozon 81
Figure 3.18. Effect of H 2 O 2 on TOC after treatment with Perozon 82
Figure 3.19. Effect of H 2 O 2 on BOD 5 /COD ratio after treatment with Perozon 83
Figure 3.20. Effect of reaction time on color after treatment with Perozon 84
Figure 3.21. Effect of reaction time on COD after treatment with Perozon 85
Figure 3.22. Effect of reaction time on TOC after treatment with Perozon 85
Figure 3.23. Effect of reaction time on BOD5/COD ratio after treatment with Perozon 86
Figure 3.24. Effect of ceramic pad on color after Ozone/ceramic pad treatment 89
Figure 3.25. Effect of ceramic pad on COD after treatment with Ozone/ceramic pad 89
Figure 3.26. Effect of ceramic pad on TOC after treatment with Ozone/ceramic pad 90
Figure 3.27. Effect of ceramic pad on BOD5/COD ratio of leachate after treatment with Ozone/ceramic pad 91
Figure 3.28. Effect of ceramic pad on color after treatment with Perozon/ceramic pad 93
Figure 3.29. Effect of ceramic pad on COD after treatment with Perozon/ceramic pad 93
Figure 3.30. Effect of ceramic pad on TOC after treatment with Perozon/ceramic pad 93
Figure 3.31. Effect of ceramic pad on BOD5/COD ratio of leachate after treatment with Perozon/ceramic pad 95
Figure 3.32. Effect of manganese ore on color after ozone treatment/manganese ore 98
Figure 3.33. Effect of manganese ore on COD after treatment with Ozone/manganese ore 99
Figure 3.34. Effect of manganese ore on TOC after ozone treatment/manganese ore 99
Figure 3.35. Effect of manganese ore on BOD5/COD ratio after treatment with Ozone/manganese ore 101
Figure 3.36. Oxidation pathway of organic substances when O 3 combines with catalyst 102
Figure 3.37. Mechanism of adsorption on catalyst and oxidation of organic substances adsorbed by O 3 and OH •102
Figure 3.38. Reaction mechanism for generating hydroxyl radicals (OH • ) or other radicals by the reaction
Reaction of O 3 with reduced metals of catalyst 103
Figure 3.39. Effect of manganese ore on color after treatment with Perozon/manganese ore 105
Figure 3.40. Effect of manganese ore on COD after treatment with Perozon/manganese ore 105
Figure 3.41. Effect of manganese ore on TOC after treatment with Perozon/manganese ore 106
Figure 3.42. Effect of manganese ore on BOD5/COD ratio after treatment with Perozon/manganese ore 107
Figure 3.43. Decomposition of H 2 O 2 on the surface of catalyst 108
Figure 3.44. Kinetic graph of COD treatment of leachate by Ozone systems 112
Figure 3.45. Kinetic graph of COD treatment of leachate of Perozon 113 systems
Figure 3.46. Graph for determining the pseudo-first-order reaction rate constant k* of the COD treatment process of leachate using Ozone 114
Figure 3.47. Graph for determining the pseudo-first-order reaction rate constant k* of the COD treatment process of leachate using Perozon 115 systems
Figure 3.48. Proposed technological flow chart for leachate treatment 124
Urgency of the topic:
INTRODUCTION
Leachate generated from solid waste landfills is one of the causes of serious environmental pollution around landfill areas.
In general , wastewater contains both dissolved organic matter and inorganic ions in small amounts .
high g
difficult to handle [ 61 ] . If the wastewater is discharged directly into the environment without being
leachate properties vary not only with the type of solid waste but also with the age of the landfill and with the season of the year .
Baig et al . (1999) [27]
at the age of the song
classify water into : water
fresh, medium and stable ( old) leachate.
In Vietnam, most provinces and cities collect and bury domestic solid waste. However, solid waste in many areas has not been classified, and landfilling has not really followed sanitary landfill techniques. The composition of buried solid waste is very diverse, containing both organic substances that are difficult to biodegrade and toxic. Therefore, the problem of leachate treatment is still a difficult problem to solve in many areas. The leachate treatment system in many landfills, although in operation, has not really brought about the desired results. Many systems have had to be renovated many times after a period of operation [5]. Therefore, finding new and effective treatment methods needs to be studied to overcome the disadvantages of old technologies.
According to Tran Manh Tri ( 2007) [13], to successfully treat leachate, it is necessary to focus on solutions to treat two basic components: 1) Organic pollutants in leachate, especially organic substances that are difficult to decompose, humic compounds such as fulvic acid
and humic acid . 2) Inorganic pollutants in leachate, mainly ammonia (NH 3 )
in the form of ammonium ions (NH 4 + ) in leachate has a very high content. This is the "key" to determining the efficiency of leachate treatment.
In recent years, to treat difficult organic pollutants, people have
Advanced oxidation processes have been applied, in which ozone is one of the oxidants .
(major oxidant) is widely used. This method is considered a new scientific achievement in the field of water and wastewater treatment in the last two decades.
in the world [12]. Ozone agent is
used to oxidize organic compounds in
wastewater treatment . Many previous studies have used ozone or
oxidizing agents
Other advanced chemistry studies have demonstrated effective COD or TOC removal in leachate [27,
61, 77, 78, 82, 92, 100, 103]. Ozone oxidation processes of organic substances have great prospects in water and wastewater treatment technology in the 21st century [12, 70, 94].
In our country, initial research on the application of Ozone or Perozone has been carried out.
Research and application of leachate treatment. The efficiency of leachate treatment by Ozone and Perozone can be improved if combined with catalysts or treated in a reactor containing buffer materials. In particular, materials of natural origin containing many metal oxide radicals are quite common in Vietnam and act as catalysts for the ozone reaction. These materials promise to significantly improve the efficiency of treating organic substances in leachate by the catalytic ozonation process. However, studies on its application as a catalyst for the ozone process in leachate treatment are still very limited. Therefore, in
In this thesis , catalytic ozone processes are applied to improve the efficiency of treating difficult - to - decompose organic substances in wastewater treatment .
Research objectives:
Through research, the thesis hopes to achieve the following objectives:
1. Determine the conditions
optimized for the treatment of organic matter in wastewater
Single ozone (O 3 ) and Perozone (O 3 /H 2 O 2 ).
2. Improve the efficiency of treating organic substances in discharged water with Ozone and Perozone combined with ceramic pads .
3. Improve the efficiency of treating organic substances in wastewater using Ozone and Perozone combined with manganese ore .
Research content :
Content 1 : Pre-treatment stage, experiment on leachate flocculation using PAC and selection of suitable conditions.
Content 2 : Experimental effects of parameters , including: pH, H 2 O 2 contentand the reaction time for treating organic substances in wastewater after coagulation with single Ozone and Perozone .
Content 3 : Experiment on treating organic substances in leachate after coagulation using Ozone/ceramic pad, Perozon/ceramic pad.
Content 4 : Experiment on treating organic substances in leachate after coagulation using Ozone/manganese ore, Perozon/manganese ore.
New scientific and technological contributions of the thesis:
1) Research on combining Ozone and Perozone with ceramic pads (Ozone/ceramic pads and Perozone/ceramic pads) to treat organic substances in leachate.
2) Research on combining Ozone and Perozone with manganese ore to treat organic substances in leachate (Ozone/manganese ore and Perozone/manganese ore).
Practical value and application of the thesis results:
1) Determine the effectiveness of color, COD, TOC treatment and improve the BOD5 / COD ratio of leachate using single Ozone, Perozone, Ozone/ceramic pad, Perozone/ceramic pad; Ozone/manganese ore, Perozone/manganese ore.
2) Determine the optimal parameters: pH, reaction time, H 2 O 2 content , specific surface area of ceramic pad and manganese ore content during treatment.
3) Determine the amount of Ozone consumed (kg O 3 /kg COD) and the amount of H 2 O 2 consumed (kg O 3 /kg COD) of leachate in the treatment processes using Ozone and Perozon combined with ceramic pads and manganese ore.
4) Part of the research results of the thesis have been applied in the leachate treatment system at Nam Son landfill.
The research results of the thesis can be used as a basis for research on improving ozone technology in leachate treatment. At the same time, this research result can be used to study the application of ozone technology in leachate treatment in practice.
Main points defended in the thesis:
1) Research results determine the optimal pH, reaction time and H 2 O 2 content in the treatment of leachate using single Ozone and Perozon. The results determined that the optimal pH for both single Ozone and Perozon systems is 8 - 9; the optimal reaction time (Ozone system is 100 minutes, Perozon system is 80 minutes); the optimal H 2 O 2 content is 2,000 mg/l.
2) Research results on improving the efficiency of leachate treatment using Ozone/buffer system
ceramic and Perozone/ceramic pad when combined with ceramic pad. The results showed that about 15% improvement in COD treatment efficiency was achieved if the experimental system contained a ceramic pad with a specific surface of 728 m 2 /m 3 compared to the single Ozone and Perozone system.
3) The research results using manganese ore with a content of 500 mg/l as a catalyst for Ozone and Perozon improved 20% of the efficiency of COD treatment of leachate.





