APPENDIX 1 SURVEY FORM
(For subjects who are cultural and social civil servants at commune level)
Dear Sir/Madam, I am currently working on my PhD thesis titled “IMPLEMENTING THE POLICY FOR DEVELOPING PERSONNEL RESEARCH IN VNHA -
SOCIAL RESOURCES IN THE SOUTHWEST REGION”. To complete this thesis, we hope that you will take a few moments to complete the survey below. The information you provide will be used anonymously and will only serve the research purposes of this thesis.
I. General information
Gender: ☐ Male ☐ Female
Age: ☐ Under 30 ☐ 31 to 40 ☐ 41 and above
II. Questions
1. In your opinion, does the current salary regime ensure:
☐ Very Unsure ☐ Unsure ☐ Guaranteed
☐ Very secure
2. Please mark (x) in the boxes of your choice.
Content
Totally agree | Agree | Disagree | Totally disagree | |
Public evaluation of civil servants | ||||
Evaluation of civil servants is still full of deference | ||||
Formal civil servant evaluation |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Implementing cultural heritage conservation policy at Cat Tien archaeological site - 1 -
Implementing cultural heritage conservation policy at Cat Tien archaeological site - 11 -
Implementing credit policy for students at Vietnam Bank for Social Policies - 2 -
Some Policy Implications for Developing Community Tourism in Con Son -
Developing cultural tourism from the potential of ethnic minorities in Ninh Thuan province, the case of the Raglai ethnic group in Bac Ai district - 17

The degree of conformity with reality of the policy content
Adequacy of compensation policy | ||||
The appropriateness of training and development policies |
3. Please select the appropriate answer by marking (x) in the corresponding boxes.
Very secure | Ensure | Not guaranteed | Very uncertain | |
Budget tools | ||||
Legal tools | ||||
Program and project tools |
4. Do you think political factors affect the development policy of Cultural and Social Civil Servants at the commune level?
☐ Yes ☐ No
5. Do you think socio-economic factors affect the development policy of communal-level cultural and social civil servants?
☐ Yes ☐ No
6. Do you think science and technology factors affect the development policy of cultural and social civil servants at the commune level?
☐ Yes ☐ No
7. Do the following factors of planning capacity and implementation capacity affect the policy of developing civil servants in culture and society?
Element
Have | Are not | |
Problem identification skills | ||
Ability to define goals |
Element
Have | Are not | |
Ability to identify options | ||
Ability to evaluate and compare options to choose the optimal option | ||
Ability to interact with relevant stakeholders | ||
Policy drafting capacity | ||
Capacity to develop implementation plan | ||
Capacity to disseminate policy propaganda | ||
Capacity for coordination and implementation | ||
Policy maintenance capacity | ||
Policy adjustment capacity | ||
Ability to monitor, urge and inspect implementation |
8. How does the management agency or unit receive and facilitate you during your work?
☐ Very secure ☐ Secure ☐ Not secure ☐ Very secure
9. What is your development potential?
☐ Very secure ☐ Secure ☐ Not secure ☐ Very secure
10. Current number of cultural and social civil servants
☐ Suitable ☐ No opinion ☐ Not suitable
11. Are you aware of the human resource plan and recruitment plan?
☐ Yes ☐ No
12. Is there a recruitment notice issued?
☐ Yes ☐ No
13. Suitability in job placement after being recruited?
☐ Yes ☐ No
14. In your opinion, is the recruitment process appropriate?
☐ Yes ☐ No
15. In your opinion, does the recruitment monitoring process ensure democracy and transparency?
☐ Yes ☐ No
16. You know about the recruitment notice through
☐ Civil servants
☐ Media
☐ Friends and relatives
Thank you very much for taking the time to help us complete the above survey.
Wish you always healthy and happy.
APPENDIX 2. DATA PROCESSING RESULTS
APPENDIX 2.1. Policy implementation capacity
Frequency Table
ability to create value
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | cumulative Percent | |
1 | .1 | .1 | .1 | |
0 | 472 | 47.4 | 47.4 | 47.5 |
Valid | ||||
1 | 523 | 52.5 | 52.5 | 100.0 |
Total | 996 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
popularstory
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | cumulative Percent | ||
1 | .1 | .1 | .1 | ||
] | 1 | .1 | .1 | .2 | |
Valid | 0 | 484 | 48.6 | 48.6 | 48.8 |
1 | 510 | 51.2 | 51.2 | 100.0 | |
Total | 996 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
respiratory support
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | cumulative Percent | |
1 | .1 | .1 | .1 | |
0 | 463 | 46.5 | 46.5 | 46.6 |
Valid | ||||
1 | 532 | 53.4 | 53.4 | 100.0 |
Total | 996 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
ability to maintain policies
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | cumulative Percent | |
1 | .1 | .1 | .1 | |
0 | 450 | 45.2 | 45.2 | 45.3 |
Valid | ||||
1 | 545 | 54.7 | 54.7 | 100.0 |
Total | 996 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
ability to accurately predict
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | cumulative Percent | ||
1 | .1 | .1 | .1 | ||
Valid | 0 | 467 | 46.9 | 46.9 | 47.0 |
1 | 528 | 53.0 | 53.0 | 100.0 | |
Total | 996 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
nanglucdondocktra
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | cumulative Percent | |
1 | .1 | .1 | .1 | |
0 | 486 | 48.8 | 48.8 | 48.9 |
Valid | ||||
1 | 509 | 51.1 | 51.1 | 100.0 |
Total | 996 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
APPENDIX 2.2. Budget tools
Frequency Table
S | |
supply | |
Valid | 995 |
N | |
Missing | 0 |
Mean | 2.4000 |
Median | 2.0000 |
Std. Deviation | 1.03306 |
supply
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | cumulative Percent | ||
Very proud | 238 | 23.9 | 23.9 | 23.9 | |
Guarantee | 294 | 29.5 | 29.5 | 53.5 | |
Valid | Not guaranteed | 290 | 29.1 | 29.1 | 82.6 |
Very unconvinced | 173 | 17.4 | 17.4 | 100.0 | |
Total | 995 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
APPENDIX 2.3. Assistance for civil servants
Frequency Table
S | |
Sugiupdo | |
Valid | 996 |
N | |
Missing | 0 |
Mean | 2.6546 |
Median | 3.0000 |
Std. Deviation | 1.07936 |
Sugiupdo
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | cumulative Percent | ||
very much | 199 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | |
Many | 214 | 21.5 | 21.5 | 41.5 | |
Valid | It | 315 | 31.6 | 31.6 | 73.1 |
Very good | 268 | 26.9 | 26.9 | 100.0 | |
Total | 996 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
APPENDIX 2.4. Promotion opportunities
Frequency Table
S | |
Cohoiphattrien | |
Valid | 996 |
N | |
Missing | 0 |
Mean | 2.3072 |
Median | 2.0000 |
Std. Deviation | 1.03990 |
Cohoiphattrien
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | cumulative Percent | ||
very low | 259 | 26.0 | 26.0 | 26.0 | |
Tower | 345 | 34.6 | 34.6 | 60.6 | |
Valid | High | 219 | 22.0 | 22.0 | 82.6 |
Very high | 173 | 17.4 | 17.4 | 100.0 | |
Total | 996 | 100.0 | 100.0 |





