first of all, developing sustainable eco-tourism, creating skills for tour guides or planning to design eco-tourism for an eco-tourism area or tour.
With the desire to bring you a different approach to DLST and to provide a useful reference source for you, we boldly compiled this document.
Due to the “newness” of DLST not only in Vietnam but also in many countries around the world (including the leading countries in the field of DLST), some errors are inevitable and do not fully meet the requirements of readers. We look forward to receiving your comments so that the DLST book can be published in a complete way.
Maybe you are interested!
-
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Focus on Training to Improve the Quality of Human Resources -
Map and GIS Database on Density Distribution and Ecology of 5-Needle Pine -
High Quality Human Resource Development Solutions -
Recommendations to Shb Human Resource Development Board
Prof. Dr. Le Huy Ba
INTRODUCTION TO ECOTOURISM
As we know, since the time of Tomat Cook until now, tourism has changed a lot both in theory and practice. Tourism in this century is a phenomenon that has been and is strongly influencing the economy of all mankind and is the largest industry in the world (Pacific Asia Travel Association (PATA), World Travel and Tourism Council (WTTC), World Tourism Organization), proven by the following figures:
- The tourism economy attracts about 11 million workers in Southeast Asia (accounting for 7.9% of the total labor force in the world's tourism industry) and accounts for 9.9% of the total labor force in all industries.
- Tourism generates 10% of gross social product and 9% of GDP in Southeast Asia.
- Labor in travel and tourism activities in the world is growing 1.5 times faster than other sectors.
In the 1970s, mass tourism and undifferentiated tourism were still mainly focused on large animals, which damaged the habitat, disturbed the living behavior of wild animals, and destroyed nature and the environment. However, gradually tourists began to realize the ecological damage they caused, and moreover, local people also cared about the value of nature and the environment, so specialized tours such as bird hunting, camel riding, and nature trekking began to have strict guidance and management. Ecotourism gradually took shape from here (David Western).
Ecotourism is quite new and is gradually asserting its reason for existence; it is a fusion of nature tourism and outdoor tourism. In a narrow perspective, we can consider ecotourism as a meaningful combination of the two words “tourism” and “ecology”. However, the issue we are addressing in this document will have a broader meaning.
Ecotourism is still very new to tour guides, tour operators and even tourism researchers, so there is often confusion between ecotourism and other forms of tourism development. Some organizations have tried to clarify this confusion by using the concept of ecotourism as a tool to
implement conservation and sustainable development. Until 1993, the concept of ecotourism had a definition by Lindberg and Hawkins that quite fully reflected the content and function of ecotourism. Accordingly, " Ecotourism is responsible travel to natural areas, a tool to conserve the environment and improve the welfare of local people ".
However, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) also provides a more complete definition: “ Ecotourism is environmentally responsible travel and visitation to undisturbed natural areas in order to enjoy and appreciate nature and its existing or present cultural features, which promotes conservation, minimizes negative impacts caused by visitors, and provides benefits to actively participating local people” (Ceballos – Lascurain, 1996).
Today, the World Travel and Tourism Council considers tourism to be the world's largest industry, generating significant income and employment around the world. It is estimated that there were 650 million international tourists in 2000. Ecotourism is also a significant contributor to world tourism and is growing, generating large revenues for developing and underdeveloped countries. Ecotourism is the engine of the economies of many tropical islands in the Caribbean, the Pacific and the Indian Ocean. Ecotourism has played a role in putting Rwanda and Belize on the world map.
In VIETNAM, in the workshop on " Building a strategy for developing ecotourism in Vietnam " (September 1999), the definition of ecotourism was given as " Ecotourism is a type of tourism based on nature and indigenous culture, associated with environmental education, contributing to conservation efforts and sustainable development, with the active participation of the local community ".
In addition to the above concepts and definitions, there are some extended definitions of the content of DLST:
- “ Ecotourism is the creation and satisfaction of the desire for nature, the exploitation of tourism potential for conservation and development and the prevention of negative impacts on ecology, culture and aesthetics ”.
- “ Ecotourism is a type of tourism that takes specific, natural ecosystems as its target to serve tourists who love nature, travel, enjoy the landscapes or study ecosystems. It is also a form of closely and harmoniously combining economic development of tourism with the introduction of the country's beautiful landscapes as well as education and propaganda.
and protect and develop the environment and natural resources in a sustainable manner .”
PART 1: BASIC ENVIRONMENTAL ECOLOGY
CHAPTER 1
GENERAL INTRODUCTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECOLOGY
1.1 DEFINITION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECOLOGY
“Environmental ecology” is in the field of environmental science, studying the interactions not only between individual organisms but also between groups, between communities and the natural environmental conditions surrounding it. Depending on each moment, each place and each object, the interaction of each individual changes and is expressed through two criteria for evaluation: the dominance and uniformity of the biological population in an environmental ecosystem.
1.2 BRIEF HISTORY OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECOLOGY
The basic concept of ecology was mentioned by the Greek scientist Phrastus in the 3rd century BC. Phrastus was interested in the relationship between living and non-living matter. However, the term “ ecology ” was only really born in 1869 by the German biologist Ernst Haeckel. Haeckel was the first to lay the foundation for the science of ecology on the relationship between animals (as biotic environmental components) and abiotic environmental conditions and components.
In the mid-13th century, a group of European and American scientists conducted research on plants at the community level; the arrangement, structure and distribution of plant communities were also raised in the research. In addition, a group of American scientists also studied the development of plant communities and put forward their views on the organic relationships between animal and plant communities... That was the beginning of the research process on ecology. Today, ecology not only exists in biology but it is also a science of many fields such as agriculture, forestry, medicine, sociology and even economics and tourism.
In 1971, the book “Fundamentals of ecology” by Professor Eugene P. Odum, from Georgia University – USA, was published, which was an important event in the study of ecology. The author developed the theory
about ecology at a higher level and also in the 70s of this century, when the environmental science industry had determined its official position, environmental ecology was shaped and developed.
Nowadays, people have realized that not only the natural environment of animals and plants but also of humans has been seriously degraded and destroyed, and humans are the culprits causing such losses. Environmental ecology, in addition to the tasks of classical environmental ecology, also focuses on studying the relationships between humans and nature and the living environment through industrial and agricultural activities, resource exploitation, etc. Thus, environmental ecology must be the link between classical ecology and environmental science.
1.2.1 Premises of the formation of sub-disciplines of environmental ecology
The statement " When the structure becomes complex, the combined function is immediately supplemented with new characteristics" by Feiblemen (1954) is one of the theoretical premises for the formation of sub-disciplines of ecology.
1.2.2 Sub-disciplines of environmental ecology
- Based on the level of organization of living systems, there are:
Individual environmental ecology;
Population environmental ecology;
Community ecology;
Environmental ecosystem;
Biosphere.
- Based on the research purpose:
Basic Environmental Ecology: Study aspects of environmental ecology and develop environmental theories.
Applied environmental ecology: Applying theoretical knowledge into practice to manage and improve the environment.
- Based on the nature of the environment:
Soil ecology,
Aquatic ecology,
Air environment ecology.
- Based on the nature of the environment but according to a different frame of reference:
Forest ecology,
Marine environmental ecology,
River ecology,
Coastal ecology,
Rural environmental ecology,
Urban environmental ecology.
- According to another reference system of environmental properties:
Natural environmental ecology,
Artificial environmental ecology.
There are also many bases for distinguishing different types of environmental ecology such as the nature of the environment, each type of environment, environmental unit...
1.3 METHODS OF ECOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH
1.3.1 Methodology
Ecological environment research is the study of the interaction between environmental components . The ecological environment is made up of components that are closely related to each other. A component of the environment is a complete environment called a component environment. When a component environment or a link in the food chain is affected or broken, it will lead to the disruption of energy release activities and then the activities of the entire ecosystem will also be disrupted (refer to the document "Basic Environmental Ecology - Le Huy Ba, VNU-HCM Publishing House 2002)

Figure 1.1 : Human focus in the ecological environment
The exchange of matter and energy in the ecological environment is always in a state of “dynamic” equilibrium, in which the components of the environment are interrelated and mutually bound. Therefore, it is necessary to have a detailed study of the mutual correlations and interactions between the components and environmental factors.
Environmental ecology research should not ignore any component of the environmental ecosystem . Because most pollutants appearing in one component environment can spread to other components environment easily.
Water
Creatures and humans
land
MT
Air quality Climate
Figure 1.2: Correlation between components in MTST
Studying the ecological environment is also to find the dominant and main factors in the environmental interaction system . Determining the homogeneity and dominance can determine the





