Employee Assessment of Factors Affecting Job Satisfaction


24

.272

1,009

97,372




25

.260

.963

98,335

26

.238

.880

99,215

27

.212

.785

100,000

Maybe you are interested!

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.


Rotated Component Matrix a


Component

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

DTTT4

.862







DTTT3

.796







DTTT2

.790







DTTT1

.721







SALARY2


.824






SALARY 1


.767






SALARY3


.739






SALARY4


.737






DIEUUKIEN4



.797





DIEUUKIEN1



.790





DIEUKIEN3



.784





DIEUUKIEN2



.682





LANHDAO1




.841




LANHDAO2




.780




LANHDAO3




.735




LANHDAO4




.686




PHUCLOI2





.805



PHUCLOI1





.804



PHUCLOI3





.731



PHUCLOI4





.614



DONGNGHIEP4






.782


DONGNGHIEP3






.721


DONGNGHIEP2






.705


DONGNGHIEP1






.675


BCCV1







.795

BCCV4







.744

BCCV2







.678

BCCV3







.609

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.

a. Rotation converged in 6 iterations.

KMO Test and Bartlett's Test of Dependent Variable


KMO and Bartlett's Test

.684

103,622

3

.000

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy.

Approx. Chi-Square

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Df Sig.


Total Variance Explained

Component

Initial Eigenvalues

Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings

Total

% of Variance

Cumulative %

Total

% of Variance

Cumulative %

1

1,998

66,608

66,608

1,998

66,608

66,608

2

.559

18,637

85,245




3

.443

14,755

100,000




Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

1. Correlation and regression analysis

Correlation analysis


Correlations


LANHDAO

BCCV

DIEUKIEN

DONGNGHIEP

SALARY


LANHDAO


BCCV


DIEUKIEN


DONGNGHIEP


SALARY


DTTT RETURN

HLCV

Pearson Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed) N

Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)

N

Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)

N

Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)

N

Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)

N

Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)

N

Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)

N

Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)

N

1

.050

.003

.103

.164 *


.542

.975

.210

.045

150

.050

150

1

150

.002

150

.272 **

150

-.006

.542


.984

.001

.938

150

150

150

150

150

.003

.002

1

.036

-.034

.975

.984


.663

.683

150

.103

150

.272 **

150

.036

150

1

150

.010

.210

.001

.663


.902

150

.164 *

150

-.006

150

-.034

150

.010

150

1

.045

.938

.683

.902


150

.023

150

.084

150

.119

150

.052

150

.213 **

.778

.306

.147

.525

.009

150

.014

150

.048

150

.275 **

150

.004

150

.025

.862

.562

.001

.966

.763

150

.337 **

150

.376 **

150

.100

150

.386 **

150

.506 **

.000

.000

.226

.000

.000

150

150

150

150

150


Correlations


PHUCLOI

DTTT

HLCV


LANHDAO


BCCV DIEUKIEN DONGNGHIEP LUONG

PHUCLOI


DTTT


HLCV

Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)

N

Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)

N

Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)

N

Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)

N

Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)

N

Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)

N

Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)

N

Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)

N

.023

.014

.337

.778

.862

.000

150

150

150

.084

.048

.376

.306

.562

.000

150

150

150

.119

.275

.100

.147

.001

.226

150

.052

150

.004 **

150

.386

.525

.966

.000

150

.213 *

150

.025

150

.506

.009

.763

.000

150

150

150

1

.015

.457


.853

.000

150

.015

150

1

150

.099 **

.853


.229

150

.457 **

150

.099 **

150

1

.000

.229


150

150

150


Regression analysis



Correlations


HLCV

LANHDAO

BCCV

DIEUKIEN

DONGNGHIEP


Pearson Correlation


Sig. (1-tailed)


N

HLCV LANHDAO BCCV DIEUKIEN DONGNGHIEP LUONG PHUCLOI DTTT

HLCV

LANHDAO BCCV DIEUKIEN DONGNGINDEP LUONG PHUCLOI DTTT

HLCV LANHDAO BCCV DIEUKIEN DONGNGHIEP LUONG PHUCLOI

DTTT

1,000

.337

.376

.100

.386

.337

1,000

.050

.003

.103

.376

.050

1,000

.002

.272

.100

.003

.002

1,000

.036

.386

.103

.272

.036

1,000

.506

.164

-.006

-.034

.010

.457

.023

.084

.119

.052

.099

.014

.048

.275

.004

.

.000

.000

.113

.000

.000

.

.271

.487

.105

.000

.271

.

.492

.000

.113

.487

.492

.

.332

.000

.105

.000

.332

.

.000

.022

.469

.342

.451

.000

.389

.153

.073

.263

.115

.431

.281

.000

.483

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150

150


Correlations


SALARY

PHUCLOI

DTTT


HLCV

.506

.457

.099


LANHDAO

.164

.023

.014


BCCV

-.006

.084

.048

Pearson Correlation

DIEUKIEN

DONGNGHIEP

-.034

.010

.119

.052

.275

.004


SALARY

1,000

.213

.025


PHUCLOI

.213

1,000

.015


DTTT

.025

.015

1,000


HLCV

.000

.000

.115


LANHDAO

.022

.389

.431


BCCV

.469

.153

.281

Sig. (1-tailed)

DIEUKIEN

DONGNGHIEP

.342

.451

.073

.263

.000

.483


SALARY

.

.004

.382


PHUCLOI

.004

.

.427


DTTT

.382

.427

.


HLCV

150

150

150


LANHDAO

150

150

150

N

BCCV

DIEUKIEN

150

150

150

150

150

150


DONGNGHIEP

150

150

150


SALARY

150

150

150


PHUCLOI

DTTT

150

150

150

150

150

150


Coefficients a

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized

Coefficients

t

Sig.

B

Std. Error

Beta


(Constant)

-.167

.280


-.595

.553


LANHDAO

.144

.033

.223

4,323

.000


BCCV

.167

.033

.264

5.013

.000

1

DIEUKIEN

DONGNGHIEP

.036

.200

.039

.039

.049

.269

.924

5,092

.357

.000


SALARY

.242

.032

.400

7,606

.000


PHUCLOI

.216

.035

.323

6,178

.000


DTTT

.032

.032

.054

1,021

.309


Coefficients a

Model

Correlations

Collinearity Statistics

Zero-order

Partial

Part

Tolerance

VIF


(Constant)







LANHDAO

.337

.341

.218

.962

1,040


BCCV

.376

.388

.253

.917

1,091

1

DIEUKIEN

DONGNGHIEP

.100

.386

.077

.393

.047

.257

.905

.916

1.105

1,092


SALARY

.506

.538

.384

.923

1,083


PHUCLOI

.457

.460

.312

.930

1,076


DTTT

.099

.085

.052

.920

1,087


Model Fit Assessment



order

R

R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

Change Statistics

R Square Change

F Change

df1

1

.799a

.638

.620

.342

.638

35,789

7


Model Summary b

Model

Change Statistics

Durbin-Watson

df2

Sig. F Change

1

142a

.000

1,867

a. Predictors: (Constant), DTTT, DONGNGHIEP, LUONG, LANHDAO, PHUCLOI, BCCV, DIEUKIEN

b. Dependent Variable: HLCV


ANOVA a

Model

Sum of Squares

Df

Mean Square

F

Sig.


1

Regression

Residual

Total

29,272

7

4,182

35,789

.000 b

16,592

142

.117



45,864

149





a. Dependent Variable: HLCV

b. Predictors: (Constant), DTTT, DONGNGHIEP, LUONG, LANHDAO, PHUCLOI, BCCV, DIEUKIEN

Test for normal distribution of residuals


2. Employee assessment of factors affecting job satisfaction

working at 207 Joint Stock Company

Leader



LANHDAO1

LANHDAO2

LANHDAO3

LANHDAO4

LANHDAO

N

Valid Missing

Mean

Mode

150

150

150

150

150

0

0

0

0

0

4.13

4.03

3.79

3.83

3.94

5

5

5

4

4

LANHDAO1


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent


Totally disagree

2

1.3

1.3

1.3


Disagree

15

10.0

10.0

11.3

Valid

Central

Agree

22

14.7

14.7

26.0

33

22.0

22.0

48.0


Totally agree

78

52.0

52.0

100.0


Total

150

100.0

100.0



LANHDAO2


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent


Totally disagree

2

1.3

1.3

1.3


Disagree

15

10.0

10.0

11.3

Valid

Central

Agree

25

16.7

16.7

28.0

43

28.7

28.7

56.7


Totally agree

65

43.3

43.3

100.0


Total

150

100.0

100.0



LANHDAO3


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent


Totally disagree

12

8.0

8.0

8.0


Disagree

10

6.7

6.7

14.7

Valid

Central

Agree

27

18.0

18.0

32.7

50

33.3

33.3

66.0


Totally agree

51

34.0

34.0

100.0


Total

150

100.0

100.0



LANHDAO4


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

cumulative

Percent


Totally disagree

5

3.3

3.3

3.3


Disagree

14

9.3

9.3

12.7

Valid

Central

Agree

32

21.3

21.3

34.0

50

33.3

33.3

67.3


Totally agree

49

32.7

32.7

100.0


Total

150

100.0

100.0



Nature of work



Statistics


BCCV1

BCCV2

BCCV3

BCCV4

BCCV

N

Valid Missing

Mean

Mode

150

150

150

150

150

0

0

0

0

0

3.75

3.07

3.38

3.53

3.44

5

2

2

4

4


BCCV1


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent


Totally disagree

8

5.3

5.3

5.3


Disagree

16

10.7

10.7

16.0

Valid

Central

Agree

38

25.3

25.3

41.3

31

20.7

20.7

62.0


Totally agree

57

38.0

38.0

100.0


Total

150

100.0

100.0



BCCV2


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent


Totally disagree

9

6.0

6.0

6.0


Disagree

53

35.3

35.3

41.3

Valid

Central

Agree

34

22.7

22.7

64.0

26

17.3

17.3

81.3


Totally agree

28

18.7

18.7

100.0


Total

150

100.0

100.0



BCCV3


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent


Totally disagree

3

2.0

2.0

2.0


Disagree

42

28.0

28.0

30.0

Valid

Central

Agree

35

23.3

23.3

53.3

35

23.3

23.3

76.7


Totally agree

35

23.3

23.3

100.0


Total

150

100.0

100.0



BCCV4


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent


Totally disagree

8

5.3

5.3

5.3

Valid

Disagree

Central

25

36

16.7

24.0

16.7

24.0

22.0

46.0


Agree

41

27.3

27.3

73.3


Totally agree

Total

40

150

26.7

100.0

26.7

100.0

100.0

Working conditions

Statistics


DIEUUKIEN1

DIEUUKIEN2

DIEUKIEN3

DIEUUKIEN4

DIEUKIEN

N

Valid Missing

Mean

Mode

150

150

150

150

150

0

0

0

0

0

3.66

3.92

3.66

3.67

3.73

3

4

4

4

4


DIEUUKIEN1


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent


Totally disagree

4

2.7

2.7

2.7


Disagree

6

4.0

4.0

6.7

Valid

Central

Agree

58

38.7

38.7

45.3

51

34.0

34.0

79.3


Totally agree

31

20.7

20.7

100.0


Total

150

100.0

100.0



DIEUUKIEN2


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

cumulative

Percent


Totally disagree

1

.7

.7

.7


Disagree

12

8.0

8.0

8.7

Valid

Central

Agree

34

22.7

22.7

31.3

54

36.0

36.0

67.3


Totally agree

49

32.7

32.7

100.0


Total

150

100.0

100.0



DIEUKIEN3


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent


Totally disagree

5

3.3

3.3

3.3


Disagree

9

6.0

6.0

9.3

Valid

Central

Agree

51

34.0

34.0

43.3

52

34.7

34.7

78.0


Totally agree

33

22.0

22.0

100.0


Total

150

100.0

100.0



DIEUUKIEN4


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent


Totally disagree

5

3.3

3.3

3.3


Disagree

16

10.7

10.7

14.0

Valid

Central

30

20.0

20.0

34.0


Agree

71

47.3

47.3

81.3


Totally agree

28

18.7

18.7

100.0

Comment


Agree Privacy Policy *