Chapter 1
OVERVIEW OF RESEARCH PROBLEM
1.1. Overview of the situation of reptile research in Laos
Research on reptiles in Laos is still limited and has only increased significantly in the last years of the 20th century. In 1999, Stuart published the first list of reptiles in Laos with 109 species recorded (Stuart et al., 1999). In 2004, Teynié et al. published an updated list with 29 more species recorded in Laos. Four years later, Stuart and Heatwole (2008) recorded 13 more species from the country. In 2010, 6 new species of reptiles were described from Laos, bringing the total number of species recorded in Laos to 157. From 2010 to present, many studies have been conducted in some provinces of Laos such as Luang Prabang, Vientiane, and Kham Muon, and 24 new species have been described, including: 2 new species described in 2011, 9 new species described in 2009, 6 new species described in 2015, 5 new species described in 2016, 1 new species described in 2017 and 1 new species described in 2018. In 2018, the total number of reptile species recorded and described in Laos was 181 species (Uetz et al. 2018), by 2020 the total number of reptile species in Laos increased to 212 species, and by May 2021 increased to 225 species (Uetz et al. 2021).
250
200
212
225
150 181
151
157
100
138
109
50
0
Stuart (1999)
Teynie Stuart et al Uetz et al Uetz et al Uetz et al Uetz et al (2004) (2008) (2010) (2018) (2020) (2021)
Figure 1.1. Total number of reptile species recorded in Laos by period
1.2. Classification and distribution system of the family Gekkonidae
The family Gekkonidae is a member of the Kingdom Animalia, Phylum Chordata, Class Reptilia, and Order Squamata. They are found mostly in warm climates around the world. Gekkonidae are unique in their vocalizations, which are used to communicate with each other. Most geckos do not have eyelids, but have transparent membranes that are cleaned by licking. Many geckos release odors or feces on their predators as a form of defense. Many species have suckers under their toes that allow them to cling to tree trunks, ceilings, and walls with ease. As of May 2021, the family Gekkonidae has 58 genera and 1,430 species worldwide (Table 1.1).
Table 1.1. Number of species in genera of the family Geckoidae (Uetz et al. 2021)
Status
Genus | Number of species | Status | Genus | Number of species | |
1 | Africa | 32 | 30 | Lakigecko | 1 |
2 | Afrogecko | 2 | 31 | Lepidodactylus | 41 |
3 | Agamura | 2 | 32 | Luperosaurus | 9 |
4 | Ailuronyx | 3 | 33 | Lygodactylus | 71 |
5 | Alsophylax | 6 | 34 | Matoatoa | 2 |
6 | Altiphylax | 5 | 35 | Mediodactylus | 17 |
7 | Blaesodactylus | 6 | 36 | Microgecko | 8 |
8 | Bunopus | 3 | 37 | Nactus | 35 |
9 | Calodactylodes | 2 | 38 | Narudasia | 1 |
10 | Chondrodactylus | 6 | 39 | Pachydactylus | 57 |
11 | Christinus | 3 | 40 | Paragehyra | 4 |
12 | Cnemaspis | 181 | 41 | Paroedura | 24 |
13 | Crossobamon | 2 | 42 | Parsigecko | 1 |
14 | Cryptactites | 1 | 43 | Perochirus | 3 |
15 | Cyrtodactylus | 314 | 44 | Phelsuma | 52 |
16 | Cyrtopodion | 24 | 45 | Pseudoceramodactylus | 1 |
17 | Dixonius | 13 | 46 | Pseudo | 11 |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Two Elements A And B Are In Two Consecutive Main Groups In The Periodic System. In Their Pure Substance State, A And B Do Not React With Each Other. Total Number Of Protons -
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Total Number of Organizations, Land Areas, Land Use Area of Economic Organizations in 2019 -
Total Number of Employees Recruited by Do Son Tourism Joint Stock Company in the Period 2011-2015 -
Total Number of Cases and Defendants Tried by Court for Illegal Racing in 10 Years (2001-2010)
Status
Genus | Number of species | Status | Genus | Number of species | |
18 | Dravidogecko | 7 | 47 | Ptenopus | 3 |
19 | Ebenavia | 6 | 48 | Ramigekko | 1 |
20 | Elasmodactylus | 2 | 49 | Rhinoceros | 2 |
21 | Gecko | 5 | 50 | Rhotropella | 1 |
22 | Gehyra | 67 | 51 | Rhizophora | 9 |
23 | Gekko | 83 | 52 | Stenodactylus | 10 |
24 | Goggia | 10 | 53 | Tenuidactylus | 8 |
25 | Hemidactylus | 173 | 54 | Trachydactylus | 2 |
26 | Hemiphyllodactylus | 49 | 55 | Trigonodactylus | 4 |
27 | Heteronotypic | 5 | 56 | Tropiocolotes | 12 |
28 | Homopholis | 4 | 57 | Urocotyledon | 5 |
29 | Colekanos | 1 | 58 | Uroplatus | 21 |

Figure 1.2. Global distribution map of the family Gekkonidae.
Photo source: RepFocus.
1.2.1. Research on the Gecko family in neighboring countries
- In Vietnam: Vietnam is located in the East of Laos with a border stretching from North to South, so in terms of ecosystem and biogeography, it can be said that most of them are quite similar. Research works on reptiles in general, the family Gekkonidae
In particular, in Vietnam, it was carried out quite early since the beginning of the 19th century. Up to now, experts have discovered and published 94 species in 8 genera of the family Gekkonidae such as: Genus Cnemaspis has 6 species, Cyrtodactylus has 48 species, Dixonius has 6 species, Gehyra has 3 species, Gekko has 17 species, Hemidactylus has 7 species, Hemiphyllodactylus has 6 species, and Lepidodactylus has 1 species (Uetz et al. 2021). (Species details in Appendix 09).
- In Thailand: Thailand has a border with Laos to the west. Research on reptiles in this country has also been carried out quite strongly, up to now, showing the published results of the Gekkonidae family of 94 species in 7 genera: Cnemaspis has 19 species, Cyrtodactylus has 38 species, Dixonius has 7 species, Gehyra has 4 species, Gekko has 15 species, Hemidactylus has 5 species, Hemiphillodactylus has 6 species, and Ptychozoon has 5 species (Uetz et al. 2021). (Species details in Appendix 10).
- In Cambodia: Bordering Laos to the south. Research on reptiles in this country is still limited and only increased significantly in the late 20th century. And until 2018, a total of 187 species of reptiles were recorded (Uetz et al. 2018). Currently in Cambodia, there are 25 species of the family Gekkonidae in 7 genera: Cnemaspis with 3 species, Cyrtodactylus with 10 species, Dixonius with 2 species, Gehyra with 2 species, Gekko with 5 species, Hemidactylus with 2 species and Hemiphillodactylus with 1 species (Uetz et al. 2021). (Species details in Appendix 11).
- In Myanmar: There is a border to the northwest of Laos. Research by experts on reptiles in this country is also being conducted a lot, especially the Gekkonidae family. And up to now, a total of 77 species of Gekkonidae have been recorded and described in 6 genera: Cnemaspis with 3 species, Cyrtodactylus with 45 species, Gekko with 6 species, Hemidactylus with 10 species, Hemiphyllodactylus with 12 species and Lepidodactylus with 1 species (Uetz et al. 2021). (Species details in Appendix 12).
38 | 1 | 6 7 | 2 0 | 1 3 4 2 0 | 17 15 11 5 6 | 5 7 5 | 10 2 | 4 6 6 | 12 1 | 0 1 0 0 1 | |
19 | 22 | ||||||||||
1 | 6 3 3 | 10 | |||||||||
Laos
Vietnam
Thailand
Cambodia
Myanmar
48
45
Figure 1.3. Comparison of the number of Gecko species in neighboring countries
1.2.2. Studies on the Gekkonidae family in Laos
By 2018, Laos had 45 species belonging to 7 genera of the Gecko family such as:
- The genus Cnemaspis has one species described in 2010, Cnemaspis laoensis.
- The genus Cyrtodactylus is the genus with the largest number of species in Laos. In 1999, only 2 species of the genus Cyrtodactylus were recorded in Laos, including Cyrtodactylus interdigitalis and Cyrtodactylus jarujini . In 2004, David et al. described a new species, Cyrtodactylus buchardi . In 2010 and 2011, several surveys were conducted in many provinces of Laos, with 5 new species described and recorded, including: Cyrtodactylus roesleri ; Cyrtodactylus wayakonei ; Cyrtodactylus lomyenensis ; Cyrtodactylus teyniei and Cyrtodactylus pageli . In 2014, 6 new species of the genus Cyrtodactylus were discovered and described, including: Cyrtodactylus darevskii; Cyrtodactylus jaegeri; Cyrtodactylus khammouanensis; Cyrtodactylus multiporus; Cyrtodactylus spelaeus ; Cyrtodactylus vilaphongi . From 2015-2019, there were 8 new species of the genus Cyrtodactylus.
described and recorded, including: Cyrtodactylus soudthichaki; Cyrtodactylus bansocensis; Cyrtodactylus cryptus ; Cyrtodactylus calamei; Cyrtodactylus hinnamnoensis ; Cyrtodactylus rufford ; Cyrtodactylus sommerladi; Cyrtodactylus thathomensis . Thus, there are 22 species in total.
- The genus Dixonius has one recorded species.
Dixonius siamensis.
- The genus Gehyra has one species, Gehyra mutilata.
- The Gecko genus ( Gekko ) has recorded 11 species in the Gekko genus up to now in Laos since the discovery of the Gekko gecko species in 1758. After a long time, the Gekko petricolus species was discovered . Next are the Gekko lionotum species; Gekko scientiadventura; Gekko thakhekensis . In 2015, a series of 4 species were discovered: Gekko sengchanthavongi ; Gekko bonkowskii ; Gecko boehmei and Gekko aaronbauri . And in 2017, the Gekko nadenensis species was discovered . In 2019, there was 1 more species, Gekko kabkaebin.
- The genus Hemidactylus has 5 species which are common species with wide distribution such as: Hemidactylus aquilonius, Hemidactylus bowringii, Hemidactylus frenatus, Hemidactylus ganotii and Hemidactylus platyurus .
- The genus Hemiphyllodactylus has 4 species recorded in Laos such as: Hemiphyllodactylus yunnanensis ; Hemiphyllodactylus kiziriani; Hemiphyllodactylus indosobrinus and Hemiphyllodactylus serpispecus.
Research by Luu et al. (2016) on Reptiles in Laos within 6 years from 2010 to 2016 discovered up to 21 new reptile species in Laos, including 16 species belonging to the family Gekkonidae such as: Genus Gekko 4 species, Genus Cyrtodactylus 11 species and Genus Hemiphyllodactylus 1 species.

Figure 1.4. Map showing species described in Laos from 2010 to 2016.
(Luu et al. 2016)
Table 1.2. Gecko species recorded and distributed in Laos
Species
Author | |
Cnemaspis laoensis | Grismer 2010 |
Cyrtodactylus bansocensis | Luu, Nguyen, Le, Bonkowski & Ziegler 2016 |
Cyrtodactylus buchardi | David, Teynié & Ohler 2004 |
Cyrtodactylus calamei | Luu, Bonkowski, Nguyen, Le, Schneider, Ngo & |
Ziegler 2016 | |
Cyrtodactylus cryptus | Heidrich, Rösler, Thanh, Böhme & Ziegler 2007 |
Cyrtodactylus darevskii | Nazarov, Poyarkov, Orlov, Nguyen, Milto, Martynov, |
Konstantinov & Chulisov 2014 | |
Cyrtodactylus hinnamnoensis | Luu, Bonkowski, Nguyen, Le, Schneider, Ngo & |
Ziegler 2016 | |
Cyrtodactylus interdigitalis | Ulber 1993 |
Cyrtodactylus jaegeri | Luu, Calame, Bonkowski, Nguyen & Ziegler 2014 |
Cyrtodactylus jarujini | Ulber 1993 |
Cyrtodactylus khammouanensis | Nazarov, Poyarkov, Orlov, Nguyen, Milto, Martynov, |
Konstantinov & Chulisov 2014 | |
Cyrtodactylus lomyenensis | Ngo Van Tri & Pauwels 2010 |
Cyrtodactylus multiporus | Nazarov, Poyarkov, Orlov, Nguyen, Milto, Martynov, |
Konstantinov & Chulisov 2014 | |
Cyrtodactylus pageli | Schneider, Nguyen, Schmitz, Kingsada, Auer & |
Ziegler 2011 | |
Cyrtodactylus roesleri | Ziegler, Nazarov, Orlov, Nguyen, Vu, Dang, Dinh & |
Schmitz 2010 | |
Cyrtodactylus rufford | Luu, Calame, Nguyen, Le, Bonkowski & Ziegler 2016 |
Cyrtodactylus sommerladi | Luu, Bonkowski, Nguyen, Le, Schneider, Ngo & |
Ziegler 2016 | |
Cyrtodactylus soudthichaki | Luu, Calame, Nguyen, Bonkowski & Ziegler 2015 |
Cyrtodactylus spelaeus | Nazarov, Poyarkov, Orlov, Nguyen, Milto, Martynov, |
Konstantinov & Chulisov 2014 | |
Cyrtodactylus teyniei | David, Nguyen, Schneider & Ziegler 2011 |
Cyrtodactylus thathomensis | Nazarov, Pauwels, Konstantinov, Chulisov, Orlov & |





