Figure 3.2 Summary of competitive advantages of green coffee products
Source: Author's description
Therefore, to create and nurture sustainable competitive advantages for green coffee products of economic organizations in Dak Lak province, it is necessary to comprehensively analyze the factors affecting competitive advantages, creating a basis for
Develop appropriate strategies and measures to enhance the advantages of green coffee.
Product competition
Competitive advantages of Dak Lak province's green coffee products are summarized.
in Diagram 3.2.
3.2 Factors affecting the competitive advantage of green coffee products
The competitive advantage of green coffee products is affected by the combined effects of
many factors, among which the fundamental factors of competitive advantage include
self condition
However, the capacity of organizations
economic organization
(household)
farmer, business
industry), micro and macro environmental quality (domestic demand conditions;
support industry
support
and investment
work; organization
industry management) and its policies
Government. The competitive advantage of green coffee products is created and maintained based on the continuous movement and development of the above fundamental factors.
3.2.1 Natural conditions
The natural conditions of the region have a great influence on the quality and efficiency of green coffee production, including the abundance and quality of land, climate,
irrigation water source... In the scope of the thesis, the author focuses on
Evaluate the impact of land factors on the efficiency of coffee bean production.
Dak Lak is the province with the largest coffee growing area in the country. The total coffee growing area of the province in 2009 was 181,960 hectares, accounting for 34%
coffee growing area of the whole country and 38% of the coffee area of the Western Region
Nguyen (Appendix 14). Coffee grown on basalt soil accounts for 91% of the total coffee cultivation area, compared to the entire Central Highlands and the whole country, this ratio is 74-75% respectively. This advantage has helped Dak Lak form and develop the largest concentrated and specialized coffee growing area in Vietnam.
The quality of coffee-producing land plays an important role in determining the productivity and efficiency of coffee production. Coffee grown on suitable and highly suitable land yields 1.3 to 1.6 times higher than that of less suitable land, while the cost is only 73 to 88% (Table 3.13). According to the results of land classification by the Institute of Agricultural Planning and Design (classifying coffee-growing land according to the level of suitability, based on 4 factors: soil type, slope, altitude and soil layer thickness), Dak Lak is the province with the highest proportion of very suitable and highly suitable land for coffee production in the Central Highlands, of which the area of very suitable land accounts for 60% of the total area of the Central Highlands (Table 3.12).
Thus, thanks to its fertile and good quality land resources, Dak Lak has become the most effective coffee growing region in Vietnam, creating a foundation to enhance its competitive advantage in the international market.
Table 3.12 Coffee growing soil quality in 2009
Very adaptable | Adapt | Less adaptable | ||||
Area area (ha) | Proportion (%) | Area area (ha) | Proportion (%) | Area area (ha) | Proportion (%) | |
Central Highlands | 130 217 | 27 | 156 518 | 32 | 195 072 | 41 |
Dak Lak Province | 78 640 | 43 | 54 844 | 30 | 48 476 | 27 |
Dak Lak compared to the West Original (%) | 60 | 35 | 25 | |||
Maybe you are interested!
-
Research on competitive advantage of green coffee products of economic organizations in Dak Lak province - 2 -
Research on competitive advantage of green coffee products of economic organizations in Dak Lak province - 26 -
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Cultivation and Production Process of Special Rare Weasel Coffee -
Competing Competitive Advantages of Convenient Air and Sea Access
Source: Institute of Agricultural Planning and Design
Box 3.3 Coffee production can be sustained on less suitable soils
The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) recommends that coffee should only be produced on suitable soil to ensure efficiency. Thus, the coffee area of the province
Dak Lak retains 133,844 hectares for intensive investment, accounting for 73% of the total coffee growing area of the province, while this rate of the entire Central Highlands region is 59%.
However, according to the research results of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, comparing the productivity, quality and efficiency of coffee production on less suitable areas of the Central Highlands provinces with other regions of the country, Dak Lak still has a competitive advantage if it grows coffee on this type of land. Therefore, in the perspective of planning the development of Vietnam's coffee industry until 2020 and vision to 2030, some of the province's less suitable coffee growing areas will still be maintained.
Source: Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development [3]
Table 3.13 Robusta coffee production efficiency according to soil quality
Unit | Very adaptable | Adapt | Less adaptable | |
Productivity | tons/ha | 2.56 | 2.04 | 1.59 |
Production cost 1 hectare | 1000 dong | 48 814 | 45 939 | 40 550 |
Price of 1 ton of green coffee | 1000 dong | 19 068 | 22 519 | 25 503 |
Profit 1 hectare | 1000 dong | 15 186 | 5 061 | 800 |
Source: Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development and author's calculations
3.2.2 Capacity of economic organizations producing and trading coffee
3.2.2.1 Capacity of coffee producing households
* Labor
On average, each coffee-producing household has 2 to 3 workers. They participate in all stages of the coffee production process, but the role of family labor is mainly to make decisions on the quantity and structure of investment; on innovation in cultivation techniques, harvesting, processing technology; the level of participation in support services and deciding on the time of product consumption. Most households have to hire additional outside labor, especially households with large production scale. In the group of households with an area of over 2 hectares/household, more than 96% of households have to hire seasonal labor and nearly 47% of households have to hire regular labor, each household hires from 1 to 2.
regular workers, Table 3.14).
Table 3.14 Labor for coffee production of farming households
Target
Unit | According to the scale of coffee area | |||
Below 1 hectare | From 1 up to 2 hectares | Above 2 hectares | ||
Average labor/household | labor | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.5 |
Average labor/ha of coffee | labor | 3.3 | 1.9 | 1.0 |
Labor cost per household | labour | 48 | 115 | 217 |
Labor cost per hectare of coffee | labour | 73 | 97 | 84 |
% of households hiring seasonal workers | % | 60 | 94 | 96 |
% of households hiring regular workers | % | 0 | 14 | 47 |
Source: Farm household survey results March 2011
The results of a survey of farming households (Figure 3.7) show that 22% of agricultural workers are illiterate. In terms of professional qualifications, 89% of workers have not attended any training courses, while only 11% of workers have attended short-term or intermediate vocational agricultural training courses. Limited labor qualifications are a factor that hinders the ability to access knowledge sources and make production decisions.

Figure 3.7 (a and b) Labor structure of coffee producing households according to educational level and professional level
Source: Farm household survey results March 2011
* Coffee growing land of farmers
Although it is the largest coffee growing region in Vietnam, Dak Lak's coffee production is mainly distributed among small-scale farming households, averaging more than 1 ha/household and more than 1/3 of households have an area of less than 0.5 ha (Appendix 15). Meanwhile, Indonesia's coffee production is distributed among large-scale farms and households with an average area of 2 to 3 ha, more than twice that of Vietnam (Dak Lak). The fragmented and dispersed coffee production area is a fundamental factor that limits the ability to improve technology and coffee production efficiency. According to the survey results of farmers, the area size has a significant impact on the efficiency of coffee production. Households with large cultivation areas have quite good production conditions (machinery, assets, linkages in production, consumption and access to information and knowledge), thereby the production and business efficiency is more stable (Table 3.15). Thus, to improve the efficiency of coffee bean production, create a foundation to enhance competitive advantage, it is necessary to effectively carry out land accumulation and concentration, first of all through linkages to improve the capacity of coffee producers.
Table 3.15 Coffee production efficiency by area scale
Target
Unit | Under 1 hectare | 1 to under 3 hectares | 3 to under 5 hectares | Over 5 hectares | |
Productivity | kg/ha | 2 273 | 2 681 | 2 923 | 2 955 |
Output value | thousand dong/ha | 56 023 | 66 079 | 72 054 | 72 830 |
Total cost | thousand dong/ha | 59 018 | 54 500 | 52 818 | 48 515 |
Price | thousand VND/ton | 25 968 | 20 331 | 18 069 | 16 421 |
Profit | thousand dong/ha | 2 995 | 11 579 | 19 235 | 24 314 |
Source: Farm household survey results March 2011
* Coffee production capital of farmers
Table 3.16 Coffee production capital of farming households
Target
Quantity
Unit
1. Average production capital
thousand dong | 59 576 | |
In which + Equity | % | 66 |
+ Loan capital | % | 34 |
2. Percentage of households buying materials and fertilizers on credit | % of households | 37 |
Amount of credit purchase | thousand dong | 7 722 |
3. Repayment period | ||
+ In 1 month | % of households | 0 |
+ After harvesting coffee | % of households | 97 |
+ Anytime | % of households | 3 |
4. Credit purchase terms | ||
+ Pay interest by bank | % of households | 51 |
+ Pay higher interest than banks | % of households | 41 |
+ Pay with coffee (*) | % of households | 8 |
Source: Farm household survey results March 2011
Note: (*) Rate is calculated based on coffee price (time of debt repayment) and fertilizer price (time of purchase, plus interest, interest rate is decided by fertilizer supplier)
The characteristics of coffee production require a large amount of investment capital compared to other types of production. On average, each household needs about 60 million VND to invest in coffee production per crop, mainly to cover expenses such as buying fertilizers, irrigation fuel (concentrated from February to June of the year) and hiring workers (concentrated from the harvest from October to December). However, the savings of households for self-sufficiency only meet 1/3 to 2/3. The remaining households borrow from banks and buy materials and fertilizers on credit. 37% of coffee-producing households have to buy fertilizers on credit from agents and stores (Table 3.16). In 2010, the average value of materials purchased on credit per household was 7.7 million VND, the repayment period was immediately after the coffee harvest (97%), of which more than 40% of households had to pay interest higher than the bank interest rate.
Due to lack of investment capital, most households sell their products at unfavorable price times, which is right after harvesting or at the beginning of the season.
time to need money
cover living expenses, even some households
still for sale
young coffee to agents to get money in advance (Chart 3.8). The contract to sell young coffee from farmers to agents in August 2010 (delivery in December 2010) had a price ranging from 26 to 27.5 thousand VND/kg, while the average selling price in December 2010 was more than 34 thousand VND/kg (28% higher).

Chart 3.8 Coffee selling time of farming households (% of households)
Source: Farm household survey results March 2011
Box 3.4 Capital difficulties of farming households
Mr. Tran Van Dung's household (33 years old in Cu M'gar district) has more than 1 hectare of coffee. In the 2010-2011 crop year, his family harvested 3.1 tons of coffee beans and sold them immediately in December 2010, earning more than 90 million VND. He paid for the hired laborers 3 million VND, paid off the bank loan of more than 30 million VND, paid for fertilizer on credit of more than 10 million VND, and the rest was used to cover family expenses before Tet. By March 2011, his family needed capital to buy fertilizer and gasoline to water the coffee for more than 10 million VND, but they could not borrow from the bank due to complicated procedures, so his family continued to go to the dealer to register to buy fertilizer on credit. He said that in previous years, due to low coffee prices (more than 20,000 VND/kg), his family had even more difficulties, sometimes after selling coffee, they paid off all the debt, and had no money left to cover family expenses...
Source: Farm household survey results March 2011
3.2.2.2 Capacity of coffee bean processing and exporting companies
Company capacity includes financial capacity, technological capacity, human resources, research and development capacity (market research, research on transfer of technical advances, investment in human resource development, etc.). The capacity of coffee processing and exporting companies is considered a central factor in creating and enhancing the competitive advantage of green coffee products. These factors are always highly appreciated by companies, from quite important to very important (Appendix 21).

Chart 3.9 Total capacity of coffee processing and exporting enterprises in Dak Lak province (points, maximum 100 points)
Source: Business survey results
In fact, the competitiveness score of coffee processing and exporting companies in Dak Lak province is only above average (from 58 to 68/100 points, Chart 3.9) compared to the general capacity of the whole industry (the whole country). However, compared to the capacity of foreign companies, it is clear to see the weaknesses of companies in the province, especially in terms of financial capacity.
Table 3.17 Financial capacity of companies (million VND)
Average 1 company | Highest level | Lowest level | |
Registered capital | 58 543 | 110 000 | 7 500 |
Working capital | 75 814 | 200 000 | 22,000 |
Sales | 1 213 321 | 3 056 000 | 70 000 |





