+ Con Moong Cave is located near rivers and streams, an area with rich and diverse flora and fauna, so it was chosen by ancient people as a permanent residence. The cave is wide and long, with two connecting doors. Con Moong Cave has a fairly thick cultural stratum, a very complex structure, with successive interweaving of clay, mollusk shells and traces of coal ash.
+ The ancient tree is a 45m tall tree, up to 5m in diameter and has a root system above ground running about 20m long. From the gate, follow the car road, pass the Ancient People cave about 2km, on the left is the road leading to the ancient tree, 3km long. Passing 5 rocky slopes, with many plant communities. That is the seven-leaf one-flower tree (that diep nhat chi hoa); are woody vines with a diameter of 20-30cm, about 100m long, only found in Cuc Phuong. On the way to the tree, you can observe rare birds such as red-bellied goose, red-headed woodpecker, white pheasant or animals such as don, black squirrel, red-bellied squirrel, white-rumped langur... .
+ The thousand-year-old Chò tree is a giant tree 45m high, 5m in diameter and has a circumference of more than 20 people. From the center, follow a trail in the old forest to reach the Chò tree. Visitors will encounter giant Băm Băm vines with a base diameter of 0.5m, running 1km across the forest and the strangling Banyan tree. Banyan seeds germinate in other tree holes. When their roots have taken hold of the ground, they grow very quickly, gradually strangling the host tree. Visitors can also admire Chò trees up to 70m high, with straight, round trunks. The round trip for this route takes nearly 3 hours.
+ The ancient crocodile tree is a 45m tall giant tree, with a buttress root system that branches out from the trunk at a height of about 10m and then grows up to 20m long. On the way to the crocodile tree, visitors can also admire woody vines; ancient Banyan species; epiphytes such as mistletoe, kite nest, orchids; bird species such as red-headed woodpecker, striped-bellied pitta...
+ Muong village from the center through the old forest, valley, over the steep pass with a length of about 16 km, visitors will reach Muong village (Khanh village in Hoa Binh province). Khanh village is located on the Buoi river with stilt houses, terraced fields
Maybe you are interested!
-
Tourist Route Ho Chi Minh City – Da Lat – Yok Don National Park -
Solutions for tourism development in Tien Lang - 10
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism, tourism development
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
- District People's Committees and authorities of communes with tourist attractions should support, promote, and provide necessary information to people, helping them improve their knowledge about tourism. Raise tourism awareness for local people.
*
* *
Due to limited knowledge and research time, the thesis inevitably has shortcomings. Therefore, I look forward to receiving guidance from teachers, experts as well as your comments to make the thesis more complete.
Chapter III Conclusion
Through the issues presented in Chapter II, we can come to some conclusions:
Based on the strengths of available tourism resources, the types of tourism in Tien Lang that need to be promoted in the coming time are sightseeing and resort tourism, discovery tourism, weekend tourism. To improve the quality and diversify tourism products, Tien Lang district needs to combine with local cultural tourism resources, at the same time combine with surrounding areas, build rich tourism products. The strengths of Tien Lang tourism are eco-tourism and cultural tourism, so developing Tien Lang tourism must always go hand in hand with restoring and preserving types of cultural tourism resources. Some necessary measures to support and improve the efficiency of exploiting tourism resources in Tien Lang are: strengthening the construction of technical facilities and labor force serving tourism, actively promoting and advertising tourism, and expanding forms of capital mobilization for tourism development.
CONCLUDE
I Conclusion
1. Based on the results achieved within the framework of the thesis's needs, some basic conclusions can be drawn as follows:
Tien Lang is a locality with great potential for tourism development. The relatively abundant cultural tourism resources and ecological tourism resources have great appeal to tourists. Based on this potential, Tien Lang can build a unique tourism industry that is competitive enough with other localities within Hai Phong city and neighboring areas.
In recent years, the exploitation of the advantages of resources to develop tourism and build tourist routes in Tien Lang has not been commensurate with the available potential. In terms of quantity, many resource objects have not been brought into the purpose of tourism development. In terms of time, the regular service time has not been extended to attract more visitors. Infrastructure and technical facilities are still weak. The labor force is still thin and weak in terms of expertise. Tourism programs and routes have not been organized properly, the exploitation content is still monotonous, so it has not attracted many visitors. Although resources have not been mobilized much for tourism development, they are facing the risk of destruction and degradation.
2. Based on the results of investigation, analysis, synthesis, evaluation and selective absorption of research results of related topics, the thesis has proposed a number of necessary solutions to improve the efficiency of exploiting tourism resources in Tien Lang such as: promoting the restoration and conservation of tourism resources, focusing on investment and key exploitation of ecotourism resources, strengthening the construction of infrastructure and tourism workforce. Expanding forms of capital mobilization. In addition, the thesis has built a number of tourist routes of Hai Phong in which Tien Lang tourism resources play an important role.
Exploiting Tien Lang tourism resources for tourism development is currently facing many difficulties. The above measures, if applied synchronously, will likely bring new prospects for the local tourism industry, contributing to making Tien Lang tourism an important economic sector in the district's economic structure.
REFERENCES
1. Nhuan Ha, Trinh Minh Hien, Tran Phuong, Hai Phong - Historical and cultural relics, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1993
2. Hai Phong City History Council, Hai Phong Gazetteer, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1990.
3. Hai Phong City History Council, History of Tien Lang District Party Committee, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1990.
4. Hai Phong City History Council, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, VNU, Hai Phong Place Names Encyclopedia, Hai Phong Publishing House. 2001.
5. Law on Cultural Heritage and documents guiding its implementation, National Political Publishing House, Hanoi, 2003.
6. Tran Duc Thanh, Lecture on Tourism Geography, Faculty of Tourism, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, VNU, 2006
7. Hai Phong Center for Social Sciences and Humanities, Some typical cultural heritages of Hai Phong, Hai Phong Publishing House, 2001
8. Nguyen Ngoc Thao (editor-in-chief, Tourism Geography, Hai Phong Publishing House, two volumes (2001-2002)
9. Nguyen Minh Tue and group of authors, Hai Phong Tourism Geography, Ho Chi Minh City Publishing House, 1997.
10. Nguyen Thanh Son, Hai Phong Tourism Territory Organization, Associate Doctoral Thesis in Geological Geography, Hanoi, 1996.
11. Decision No. 2033/QD – UB on detailed planning of Tien Lang town, Hai Phong city until 2020.
12. Department of Culture, Information, Hai Phong Museum, Hai Phong relics
- National ranked scenic spot, Hai Phong Publishing House, 2005. 13. Tien Lang District People's Committee, Economic Development Planning -
Culture - Society of Tien Lang district to 2010.
14.Website www.HaiPhong.gov.vn
APPENDIX 1
List of national ranked monuments
STT
Name of the monument
Number, year of decisiondetermine
Location
1
Gam Temple
938 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Cam Khe Village- Toan Thang commune
2
Doc Hau Temple
9381 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Doc Hau Village –Toan Thang commune
3
Cuu Doi Communal House
3207 VH/QĐDecember 30, 1991
Zone II of townTien Lang
4
Ha Dai Temple
938 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Ha Dai Village –Tien Thanh commune
APPENDIX II
STT
Name of the monument
Number, year of decision
Location
1
Phu Ke Pagoda Temple
178/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Zone 1 - townTien Lang
2
Trung Lang Temple
178/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Zone 4 – townTien Lang
3
Bao Khanh Pagoda
1900/QD-UBAugust 24, 2006
Nam Tu Village -Kien Thiet commune
4
Bach Da Pagoda
1792/QD-UB11/11/2002
Hung Thang Commune
5
Ngoc Dong Temple
177/QD-UBNovember 27, 2005
Tien Thanh Commune
6
Tomb of Minister TSNhu Van Lan
2848/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2003
Nam Tu Village -Kien Thiet commune
7
Canh Son Stone Temple
2160/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2003
Van Doi Commune –Doan Lap
8
Meiji Temple
2259/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2002
Toan Thang Commune
9
Tien Doi Noi Temple
477/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2005
Doan Lap Commune
10
Tu Doi Temple
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Doan Lap Commune
11
Duyen Lao Temple
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Tien Minh Commune
12
Dinh Xuan Uc Pagoda
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Bac Hung Commune
13
Chu Khe Pagoda
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Hung Thang Commune
14
Dong Dinh
2848/QD-UBNovember 21, 2002
Vinh Quang Commune
15
President's Memorial HouseTon Duc Thang
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
NT Quy Cao
Ha Dai Temple
Ben Vua Temple
Tien Lang hot spring
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 16pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 6pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Bridge and road structure - Ho Chi Minh City College of Construction Part 2 - 9 -
Ho Chi Minh 1995: Complete Works. - National Political Publishing House, Hanoi, Volume 3. 10. Nguyen Thi Anh Thu, Psychological and Social Characteristics of Semi-Immigrants
The road to Muong village is long and has to go through many steep slopes, taking 6-8 hours. This route must have a tour guide from the Park.
+ Silver Cloud Peak is the highest mountain peak in Cuc Phuong forest with an altitude of 648m. From the center, go about 3km through many old forests with many rocky slopes. Up to the top of the mountain, among the clouds and sky, visitors can see the whole view of the forest and plains of 4 districts of 3 provinces: Ninh Binh, Hoa Binh and Thanh Hoa. The route to Silver Cloud Peak is long and has many rocky slopes. This route must be accompanied by a tour guide from the Park. The round trip time is about 4 hours.
+ Yen Quang Lake - Pho Ma Cave , the lake has a small island, on which there is an ancient temple. The lake's surface is a gathering place for many species of water birds. The lake's surface reflects the cliffs and forests. The walking path to visit Pho Ma Cave from Lake No. 3 is about 2km long. Visitors must prepare hiking shoes, drinking water and must have a tour guide from the Park.
d. World Heritage Candidacy
Cuc Phuong National Park was one of the first four representatives of Vietnam to be nominated for world heritage status in 1991 (along with Ha Long Bay, Huong Pagoda and Hoa Lu Ancient Capital ). Currently, Ninh Binh province continues to complete the dossier to propose UNESCO to recognize Cuc Phuong forest as a world natural heritage. In the dossier to nominate Con Moong cave in Cuc Phuong forest as a world cultural heritage, chaired by Thanh Hoa province, scientists also proposed to consider expanding the scope of other nominations in the overall context of Cuc Phuong park.
e. Conservation issues
When it was established, Cuc Phuong had about 5,000 people living in the core area, and about 2,000 people still live along the banks of the Buoi River inside the park. About 50,000 people live in the buffer zone of the park, most of whom depend on the resources inside the park. The most heavily exploited forest products are wood and firewood. The harvesting of snails, mushrooms, and bamboo shoots for food as well as the collection of banana stems for food are also very common.
Livestock grazing occurs frequently. Hunting and selling of wild animals has seriously reduced the number of mammals, birds and reptiles in the park. Some large mammals such as tigers and white-cheeked gibbons have become extinct in Cuc Phuong due to pressure from hunting activities and the park's area is too small to meet the conservation requirements of these species. Regarding tourism exploitation, the large number of visitors to Cuc Phuong also creates difficulties in management. The park's activities are too focused on tourism development, which also reduces the effectiveness of biodiversity conservation. The construction of artificial lakes in the park also leads to some forest clearing and changes the hydrological regime of the area.
The Frankfurt Zoological Society and the Vietnamese Ministry of Forestry established the Endangered Primate Rescue Center (EPRC) in Cuc Phuong in 1993 to house, breed and conduct research on Vietnam's gibbons, lorises and langurs. The EPRC receives primates confiscated from illegal wildlife traders from government agencies for treatment and care at the center. Cuc Phuong is also home to the Carnivore and Pangolin Conservation Program (CPCP) and the Turtle Conservation Program. As of 2004, the Owston's Civet farm had 28 individuals, of which 20 were born on the farm. Six pairs of Owston's Civets have been sent to England to establish a breeding population and six more pairs will be sent to the United States for the same purpose.
The Cuc Phuong Conservation Project (CPCP) was implemented by Fauna & Flora International from 1996 to 2002. In collaboration with relevant organizations in Vietnam, FFI Vietnam program implemented a World Bank and GEF-funded project called "Pu Luong-Cuc Phuong Limestone Landscape Conservation Project" during 2002-2005 to protect the limestone mountains and wildlife through the establishment of a new protected area and capacity building for relevant agencies. The project also enhanced the conservation status of the Delacour's langur and mobilized and built community support for the conservation of the limestone mountains.
2.1.2. Some main features of the Ho Chi Minh road project in general, the section through Cuc Phuong National Park
a. Master plan of Ho Chi Minh road
The Ho Chi Minh Road project is one of the important national projects approved by the 11th National Assembly of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, 6th session, in Resolution No. 38/2004/QH11 dated December 3, 2004 on the investment policy for the construction of the Ho Chi Minh Road. On February 15, 2007, the Prime Minister signed Decision No. 242/QD-TTg approving the Master Plan of the Ho Chi Minh Road.
Ho Chi Minh Road passes through 30 provinces and cities: Cao Bang, Bac Kan, Thai Nguyen, Tuyen Quang, Phu Tho, Ha Tay, Hoa Binh, Thanh Hoa, Nghe An, Ha Tinh, Quang Binh, Quang Tri, Thua Thien Hue, Da Nang, Quang Nam, Kon Tum, Gia Lai, Dak Lak, Dak Nong, Binh Phuoc, Ho Chi Minh City, Binh Duong, Tay Ninh, Long An, Dong Thap, An Giang, Can Tho, Kien Giang, Bac Lieu and Ca Mau. The total length of the route is about 3,167 km.
The starting point of the route is at Pac Bo (Cao Bang province) and the end point is at Dat Mui (Ca Mau province). Main route (2667 km long) through the following points: Pac Bo, Cao Bang town, Bac Kan town, Cho Moi, Cho Chu, Muong pass, Trung Son intersection, Phu Thinh intersection, Binh Ca bridge (Lo river), Km 124+500 QL2, Phu Ho intersection, Phu Tho town, Ngoc Thap bridge (Red river), Co Tiet, Trung Ha bridge, Son Tay town, Hoa Lac, Xuan Mai, Cho Ben, Xom Kho, Ngoc Lac, Lam La, Tan Ky, Khe Co, Tan Ap, Khe Gat, Bung, Cam Lo, Tuan bridge, Khe Tre, De Bay pass, Mui Trau pass, Tuy Loan, Hoa Khuong, Thanh My, Lo Xo pass, Ngoc Hoi, Kon Tum, PleiKu, Buon Ma Thuot, Gia Nghia, Chon Thanh, Binh Phuoc intersection, Tan Thanh, My An, Cao Lanh town, Cao Lanh bridge (Tien river), Vam Cong bridge (Hau river), Rach Soi, Minh Luong, Go Quao, Vinh Thuan, Ca Mau city, Dam Cung bridge, Nam Can, Dat Mui.
The Western branch (500 km long) passes through the following points: Khe Gat, Ubo Pass, Tang Ky, Sen But, Khe Sanh, Dak Rong, Pe Ke Pass, A Luoi, A Dot, A Tep, Hien, Thanh My.
The investment in the construction of Ho Chi Minh road is completed according to the Master Plan, divided into 3 phases:
- Phase 1 (from 2000 to 2007): Complete investment with a scale of 2 lanes, including solidification and landslide prevention from Hoa Lac (Ha Tay) to Tan Canh (Kon Tum). The total estimated investment for the period from 2000 to 2010 with a cross-section scale of 2 lanes is 41,020 billion VND.
- Phase 2 (from 2007 - 2010): Connecting the entire route from Pac Bo (Cao Bang) to Dat Mui (Ca Mau).
- Phase 3 (from 2010 - 2020): Complete the entire route and gradually build sections according to expressway standards in accordance with approved planning and capital capacity, paying attention to connecting with the planning of the railway system, level crossings and other related planning.
b. The route through Cuc Phuong National Park
The route through the western buffer zone of Cuc Phuong National Park (NP) from Km92+424 to Km99+907 has a total length of 7.5km, of which the length of the section within the NP planning area is 6.5km, with the route following provincial road 437 running along the Buoi River valley in the territory of Hoa Binh and Thanh Hoa provinces. The terrain of this area is low, and during the flood season, it is severely flooded due to the Buoi River's overflowing water with an average flooding depth of 6 -:- 6.5m compared to the natural elevation.
In the project area within the National Park, the Muong ethnic group has lived for over 5 generations. Here, forest resources have been strongly impacted, leaving behind cultivated habitats, interspersed with barren land and some areas of depleted secondary forests, with low biodiversity. Therefore, proposing a reasonable construction method that takes into account the interactions of floods and the impacts on the biodiversity of the National Park is an important requirement.

Figure 2.1. Map of Ho Chi Minh route planning
2.1.3. Scope of research
As presented in the previous sections, this thesis studies the decision-making process (steps in the decision-making process) of a development activity and considers the Ho Chi Minh road project within the Cuc Phuong National Park as a case study. The research issues include the following main contents:
- Overview of research on decision making process;
- Institutions and laws;
- How is the decision-making process carried out? The participation and influence of stakeholders in the decision-making process;
- Environmental impact assessment of the project;
- Solutions to improve efficiency and feasibility in choosing development and conservation activities (appropriate consideration of trade-offs).
2.2. Methodology, research methods
There are a number of methodologies commonly used to study the relationship between conservation and development, between environment and development. These methodologies are: the integrated approach to studying decision-making processes,
Ecosystem Approach, Ecosystem Approach
In this study, stakeholder analysis and in-depth interview methods were used.
2.2.1. Integrated approach
Within the framework of the project Advancing Conservation in Social Context (ACSC), Paul Hirsch (2009) in exploring the decision-making process on trade-offs, the author proposed a comprehensive analytical framework, which presented a view of trade-offs through different lenses.
Valuation : focuses on values related to the environment, natural resources, biodiversity, human development, equity…. and the possibilities and limitations of measuring, calculating, comparing levels and types of values.
Process : focuses on the institutional processes and relationships through which trade-offs are discovered and negotiated and decisions are implemented.
Inadequate
Hypotheses and principles
Industry Research
Power : focuses on the influence of strategic action, overt coercion, covert manipulation, and the power to define the terms and methods of negotiating trade-offs.
Composite prism
Evaluating the Power Process
Narrowing the gap
Stories and perspectives
Connecting the dots
Note the shortcomings
Figure 2.2: Decision making process according to the integrated approach
a. Evaluation
There are many methods and mechanisms for resource valuation and many mechanisms for sharing benefits and costs. However, their application is still limited, leading to inequity in benefit sharing among different parties and at different levels.
The decisions made have varying degrees of impact. Often local people are disproportionately affected by trade-offs and compensation mechanisms do not adequately compensate. Not to mention the mechanisms for





