

Appendix 2.13. Some famous Vietnamese garment brands
Company
Trademark | Consumer market | |
Scavi | Mailfix Paris Corele Paris Lys | Europe Nationwide |
An Phuoc Company | Pierre Cardin | Nationwide |
Oriental Company | F-house | Nationwide |
Viet Tien Garment Company | Vietien Vee Sendy TT- up San Sciaro Manhattan | Nationwide By order |
Company 28 | Agetex | Nationwide |
Viet Thang Company | Vietthang - fashion Three Camels | Nationwide and made to order |
Nguyen Tam Company | Focus | Nationwide |
Saigon 2 Garment Company | Sanding Double one | Nationwide |
Thanh Cong Company | TCM | Nationwide |
Son Kim Company | WOW Vera | Nationwide |
Vietnamese fashion company | Nino - Maxx | Vietnam , Singapore, USA, Cambodia |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Identifying and controlling factors affecting the quality of accounting information in the environment of applying enterprise resource planning system ERP in Vietnamese enterprises - 12 -
Building and protecting Vietnamese export brands - 2 -
Current status and solutions for developing ERP Enterprise resource planning system in Vietnamese textile and garment enterprises - 13 -
Joint stock company under the 2005 Vietnamese Enterprise Law in comparison with joint stock company under Japanese commercial law - 1 -
Lessons for Vietnamese Enterprises When Positioning and Repositioning Brands in the International Market

Source: Saigon Economic Times (2011)

Appendix 2.14. Human resource training costs of the textile industry
Year
2008 | 2009 | 2010 | |
Number of training courses | 45 | 47 | 43 |
Number of additional trained workers (people) | 202,678 | 229,168 | 209,514 |
Total training cost (million VND) | 3,500 | 4,200 | 4,000 |
Ratio of training costs /total investment capital (%) | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.23 |


Source: Compiled from some Vietnamese textile and garment enterprises
Table 2.15. New training needs for textile workers in the period 2008 - 2020
Unit : person
2008 - 2010 | 2011 - 2015 | 2016 - 2020 | ||||
Number quantity | Jar military/year | Quantity | Jar military/year | Number quantity | Jar military/year | |
Manage | 2,250 | 750 | 4,280 | 860 | 4,800 | 960 |
Economic block | 6,000 | 2,000 | 11,000 | 2,200 | 12,500 | 2,500 |
Technical block | 6,000 | 2,000 | 11,500 | 2,300 | 12,900 | 2,580 |
Technical worker | 202,500 | 67,500 | 357,800 | 71,600 | 430,000 | 86,000 |
technique | ||||||
Source: Ministry of Industry and Trade (2008), Human resource training program for the Textile and Garment industry
Vietnam to 2015, vision to 2020
Appendix 2.16. List of regions and provinces of Vietnam during the research period
Province Code Province Name Province Code Province Name
Region 1. Northwest Region Region 5. Southern Coastal Region | |||
11 | Dien Bien Province | 48 | Da Nang City |
12 | Lai Chau Province | 49 | Quang Nam Province |
14 | Son La Province | 51 | Quang Ngai Province |
17 | Hoa Binh Province | 52 | Binh Dinh Province |
Region 2. Region | Northeast | 54 | Phu Yen Province |
02 | Ha Giang Province | 56 | Khanh Hoa Province |
04 Cao Bang Province Region 6. Central Highlands Region | |||
06 | Bac Kan Province | 62 | Kon Tum Province |
08 | Tuyen Quang Province | 64 | Gia Lai Province |
10 | Lao Cai Province | 66 | Dak Lak Province |
15 | Yen Bai Province | 67 | Dak Nong Province |
19 | Thai Nguyen Province | 68 | Lam Dong Province |
20 Lang Son Province Region 7. Southeast Region | |||
22 | Quang Ninh Province | 58 | Ninh Thuan Province |
24 | Bac Giang Province | 60 | Binh Thuan Province |
25 | Phu Tho Province | 70 | Binh Phuoc Province |
Region 3. Red River Delta Region 72 Tay Ninh Province | |||
01 | Hanoi city | 74 | Binh Duong Province |
26 | Vinh Phuc Province | 75 | Dong Nai Province |
27 | Bac Ninh Province | 77 | Ba Ria - Vung Tau Province |
28 | Ha Tay Province | 79 | Ho Chi Minh City |
30 Hai Duong Province Region 8. Mekong Delta Region | |||
set
Long
31Hai Phong City | 80 | Long An Province | |
33 | Hung Yen Province | 82 | Tien Giang Province |
34 | Thai Binh Province | 83 | Ben Tre Province |
35 | Ha Nam Province | 84 | Tra Vinh Province |
36 | Nam Dinh Province | 86 | Vinh Long Province |
37 | Ninh Binh Province | 87 | Dong Thap Province |
Region 4. North Central Region 89 An Giang Province
38Thanh Hoa Province | 91 | Kien Giang Province | |
40 | Nghe An Province | 92 | Can Tho Province |
42 | Ha Tinh Province | 93 | Hau Giang Province |
44 | Quang Binh Province | 94 | Soc Trang Province |
45 | Quang Tri Province | 95 | Bac Lieu Province |
46 | Thua Thien - Hue Province | 96 | Ca Mau Province |
Appendix 2.17. Distribution of textile and garment enterprises by economic region over the years
Year
v1 | v2 | v3 | v4 | v5 | v6 | v7 | v8 | Total | |
2000 | 2 | 7 | 127 | 13 | 14 | 8 | 166 | 19 | 356 |
% | 0.56 | 1.97 | 35.67 | 3.65 | 3.93 | 2.25 | 46.63 | 5.34 | 100 |
2001 | 2 | 8 | 129 | 14 | 13 | 8 | 170 | 20 | 364 |
% | 0.55 | 2.20 | 35.44 | 3.85 | 3.57 | 29.20 | 46.70 | 5.49 | 100 |
2002 | 2 | 9 | 131 | 13 | 13 | 8 | 168 | 21 | 365 |
% | 0.55 | 2.47 | 35.89 | 3.56 | 3.56 | 2.19 | 46.03 | 5.75 | 100 |
2003 | 2 | 9 | 126 | 13 | 13 | 8 | 165 | 22 | 358 |
% | 0.56 | 2.51 | 35.20 | 3.63 | 3.63 | 2.23 | 46.09 | 6.15 | 100 |
2004 | 2 | 9 | 125 | 12 | 13 | 8 | 162 | 22 | 353 |
% | 0.57 | 2.55 | 35.41 | 3.40 | 3.68 | 2.27 | 45.89 | 6.23 | 100 |
2005 | 2 | 9 | 123 | 12 | 13 | 8 | 160 | 21 | 348 |
% | 0.57 | 2.59 | 35.34 | 3.45 | 3.74 | 2.30 | 45.98 | 6.03 | 100 |
2006 | 2 | 9 | 126 | 11 | 13 | 8 | 160 | 19 | 348 |
% | 0.57 | 2.59 | 36.21 | 3.16 | 3.74 | 2.30 | 45.98 | 5.46 | 100 |
2007 | 2 | 9 | 127 | 14 | 12 | 8 | 157 | 17 | 346 |
% | 0.58 | 2.60 | 36.71 | 4.05 | 3.47 | 2.31 | 45.38 | 4.91 | 100 |
2008 | 2 | 9 | 118 | 15 | 12 | 8 | 159 | 19 | 342 |
% | 0.58 | 2.63 | 34.50 | 4.39 | 3.51 | 2.34 | 46.49 | 5.56 | 100 |
Total | 18 | 78 | ,132 | 117 | 116 | 72 | 1,467 | 180 | 3,180 |
% | 0.57 | 2.45 | 35.60 | 3.68 | 3.65 | 2.26 | 46.13 | 5.66 | 100 |
Source: Author calculated from data source .
(In which v1: Northwest region; v2: Northeast region; v3: Red River Delta region; v4: North Central region; v5: South Central Coast region; v6: Central Highlands region; v7 Southeast region; v8: Mekong River Delta region).



Appendix 2.18. Distribution of enterprises of different ownership types in the period 2000-2008
Year
Total Enterprise | State-owned enterprises | FDI enterprises | Other businesses with the above 2 types | % State-owned enterprises | % FDI enterprises | |
2000 | 356 | 73 | 82 | 201 | 20.51 | 23.03 |
2001 | 364 | 78 | 86 | 200 | 21.43 | 23.63 |
2002 | 365 | 77 | 83 | 205 | 21.10 | 22.74 |
2003 | 358 | 77 | 83 | 198 | 21.51 | 23.18 |
2004 | 353 | 73 | 82 | 198 | 20.68 | 23.23 |
2005 | 348 | 59 | 82 | 207 | 16.95 | 23.56 |
2006 | 348 | 45 | 85 | 218 | 12.93 | 24.43 |
2007 | 346 | 35 | 81 | 230 | 10.12 | 23.41 |
2008 | 342 | 28 | 81 | 233 | 8.19 | 23.68 |





Source: Author estimates from data sources


Appendix 2.19. Average growth rate of variables by year
Year
Growth rate ( % ) | |||||||
Labor | Investment capital | Business collect | HoriY_0 | BackY_0 | ForwY_0 | Real capital presently | |
2001 | 6.952615 | 11,28056 | 19,01582 | -10.7738 | 28,79074 | -14.3619 | 62.82796 |
2002 | 10,90698 | 19.80451 | 14,81876 | 11.12361 | -14.2383 | -9.35157 | 100,7059 |
2003 | 5.222005 | 14,95549 | 17,23536 | -28.6691 | -36,925 | 6,245453 | -54.9396 |
2004 | 2,173585 | 22,2991 | 20,16003 | -4.24379 | 49,21032 | -15.1307 | 28,12583 |
2005 | -0.53969 | 19,007 | 16.60455 | -10.1656 | -8.2546 | -17.8017 | 5,769413 |
2006 | 0.988898 | 25.73785 | 16.56482 | -8.94788 | -20.5242 | 31,69033 | 27,51518 |
2007 | -1.5694 | 52.5575 | 20,2548 | 28,11027 | -35.0143 | -6.3106 | 50.01064 |
2008 | -0.8199 | 18.85106 | 32.52698 | -3.34339 | 14.00108 | -6.1216 | 14,94747 |





Source: Author estimates from data sources
Appendix 2.20. Average values of variables calculated from formulas (2)-(6)



based on the IO tables of the year 2000
Year
Backward | Forward | Horizontal | |
2000 | 0.010371 | 0.009297 | 0.016422 |
2001 | 0.013356 | 0.007962 | 0.014653 |
2002 | 0.011455 | 0.007217 | 0.016283 |
2003 | 0.007225 | 0.007668 | 0.011615 |
2005 | 0.01078 | 0.006508 | 0.011122 |
2006 | 0.009891 | 0.005349 | 0.009991 |
2007 | 0.007861 | 0.007045 | 0.009097 |
2008 | 0.005108 | 0.0066 | 0.011654 |




Source: Author's estimate from IO 2000 table









Appendix 2.21. First-difference regression for the entire sample
Dependent variable ∆Y
Coefficient | Standard error | P-value | ||||
Semi-parametric model | Number of observations: 3,078 Number of groups: 422 | |||||
∆l | 0.3433 | 0.0277 | 0.0000 | |||
∆hori | -1.6735 | 0.2987 | 0.0000 | |||
∆back | -1.6275 | 0.5402 | 0.0030 | |||
∆forw | 4.8947 | 1.4461 | 0.0010 | |||
∆region | - | - | - | |||
∆m | -0.2178 | 0.0286 | 0.0000 | |||
∆k | 0.3692 | 0.0344 | 0.0000 | |||
Fixed effects model | Number of observations: 3,078 Number of groups: 342 | |||||
∆l | 0.3579 | 0.0154 | 0.0000 | |||
∆m | -0.2209 | 0.0098 | 0.0000 | |||
∆hori | -1.7022 | 0.1969 | 0.0000 | |||
∆back | -1.5558 | 0.3655 | 0.0000 | |||
∆forw | 4.7880 | 0.8244 | 0.0000 | |||
∆k | 0.5556 | 0.0128 | 0.0000 | |||
∆region | - | - | - | |||
Constant | -0.21061 | 0.0135 | 0.0000 | |||
Random effect image model of course | Number of observations: 3,078 Number of groups: 342 | |||||
∆m | 0.3591 | 0.0154 | 0.0000 | |||
∆hori | -0.2213 | 0.0098 | 0.0000 | |||
∆back | -1.6716 | 0.1958 | 0.0000 | |||
∆forw | -1.5893 | 0.3637 | 0.0000 | |||
∆k | 4.8194 | 0.8203 | 0.0000 | |||
∆region | 0.5543 | 0.0127 | 0.0000 | |||
Constant | -0.2112 | 0.0136 | 0.0000 | |||
Hausman test | Chi2(4)=5.85 Prob>chi2 = 0.3215 | |||||










Source: Estimated from data sources





Appendix 2.22. First-difference regression for domestic firms
Independent variable
Model | Influence model | Influence model | |
( ∆ Y) | semi-parametric | random | permanent |
∆ L | 0.3812*** ( 0.3866 ) | 0.3858*** ( 0.707 ) | 0.3852*** ( 0.1710 ) |
∆ K | 0.4330*** ( 0.4110 ) | 0.5596*** ( 0.1430 ) | 0.56057*** ( 0.1433 ) |
∆Y_1 | -0.2257*** (0.0278) | -0.2438*** ( 0.1452 ) | -0.2282*** (0.0111) |
∆ Horizontal | -2.0690*** ( 0.5051 ) | -2.2582*** ( 0.2751 ) | -2.3038*** ( 0.2774 ) |
∆ Backward | -1.4362*** ( 0.0.939 ) | -1,9018*** (0 .4450 ) | -1.8668*** ( 0.4474 ) |
∆ Forward | 6,4518*** ( 1,9540 ) | 7,2587*** ( 0.9441 ) | 7,2075*** ( 0.9492 ) |
∆ Region | - | -0.2286 (0.01101) | - |
Constant | - | -0.2438 ( 0.1452 ) | -0.1994*** (0.1561) |
Number of observations | 2435 | 2435 | 2435 |
Number of groups | 331 | 261 | 261 |
Hausman test | Chi2(4)=2.82 Prob>chi2 = 0.8316 | ||





Source: estimated from data source Note:
1) ***/**/* these symbols indicate that the estimated parameters are statistically significant at
significance levels of 1%, 5% and 10% respectively. Standard errors are in parentheses below the coefficients.
2) Coefficients without the symbols ***/**/* are not statistically significant or
has statistical confidence greater than 10%.





