Some Famous Vietnamese Clothing Brands


Appendix 2.13. Some famous Vietnamese garment brands


Company

Trademark

Consumer market


Scavi

Mailfix Paris Corele Paris

Lys

Europe


Nationwide

An Phuoc Company

Pierre Cardin

Nationwide

Oriental Company

F-house

Nationwide


Viet Tien Garment Company

Vietien Vee Sendy TT- up San Sciaro

Manhattan

Nationwide


By order

Company 28

Agetex

Nationwide

Viet Thang Company

Vietthang - fashion

Three Camels

Nationwide and

made to order

Nguyen Tam Company

Focus

Nationwide

Saigon 2 Garment Company

Sanding

Double one

Nationwide

Thanh Cong Company

TCM

Nationwide

Son Kim Company

WOW

Vera

Nationwide

Vietnamese fashion company

Nino - Maxx

Vietnam , Singapore, USA,

Cambodia

Maybe you are interested!

Some Famous Vietnamese Clothing Brands

Source: Saigon Economic Times (2011)


Appendix 2.14. Human resource training costs of the textile industry


Year

2008

2009

2010

Number of training courses

45

47

43

Number of additional trained workers (people)

202,678

229,168

209,514

Total training cost (million VND)

3,500

4,200

4,000

Ratio of training costs /total investment capital (%)

0.24

0.25

0.23

Source: Compiled from some Vietnamese textile and garment enterprises


Table 2.15. New training needs for textile workers in the period 2008 - 2020

Unit : person




2008 - 2010

2011 - 2015

2016 - 2020

Number

quantity

Jar

military/year

Quantity

Jar

military/year

Number

quantity

Jar

military/year

Manage

2,250

750

4,280

860

4,800

960

Economic block

6,000

2,000

11,000

2,200

12,500

2,500

Technical block

6,000

2,000

11,500

2,300

12,900

2,580

Technical worker

202,500

67,500

357,800

71,600

430,000

86,000

technique







Source: Ministry of Industry and Trade (2008), Human resource training program for the Textile and Garment industry

Vietnam to 2015, vision to 2020


Appendix 2.16. List of regions and provinces of Vietnam during the research period


Province Code Province Name Province Code Province Name

Region 1. Northwest Region Region 5. Southern Coastal Region

11

Dien Bien Province

48

Da Nang City

12

Lai Chau Province

49

Quang Nam Province

14

Son La Province

51

Quang Ngai Province

17

Hoa Binh Province

52

Binh Dinh Province

Region 2. Region

Northeast

54

Phu Yen Province

02

Ha Giang Province

56

Khanh Hoa Province

04 Cao Bang Province Region 6. Central Highlands Region

06

Bac Kan Province

62

Kon Tum Province

08

Tuyen Quang Province

64

Gia Lai Province

10

Lao Cai Province

66

Dak Lak Province

15

Yen Bai Province

67

Dak Nong Province

19

Thai Nguyen Province

68

Lam Dong Province

20 Lang Son Province Region 7. Southeast Region

22

Quang Ninh Province

58

Ninh Thuan Province

24

Bac Giang Province

60

Binh Thuan Province

25

Phu Tho Province

70

Binh Phuoc Province

Region 3. Red River Delta Region 72 Tay Ninh Province

01

Hanoi city

74

Binh Duong Province

26

Vinh Phuc Province

75

Dong Nai Province

27

Bac Ninh Province

77

Ba Ria - Vung Tau Province

28

Ha Tay Province

79

Ho Chi Minh City

30 Hai Duong Province Region 8. Mekong Delta Region

set



Long

31

Hai Phong City

80

Long An Province

33

Hung Yen Province

82

Tien Giang Province

34

Thai Binh Province

83

Ben Tre Province

35

Ha Nam Province

84

Tra Vinh Province

36

Nam Dinh Province

86

Vinh Long Province

37

Ninh Binh Province

87

Dong Thap Province

Region 4. North Central Region 89 An Giang Province

38

Thanh Hoa Province

91

Kien Giang Province

40

Nghe An Province

92

Can Tho Province

42

Ha Tinh Province

93

Hau Giang Province

44

Quang Binh Province

94

Soc Trang Province

45

Quang Tri Province

95

Bac Lieu Province

46

Thua Thien - Hue Province

96

Ca Mau Province


Appendix 2.17. Distribution of textile and garment enterprises by economic region over the years


Year

v1

v2

v3

v4

v5

v6

v7

v8

Total

2000

2

7

127

13

14

8

166

19

356

%

0.56

1.97

35.67

3.65

3.93

2.25

46.63

5.34

100

2001

2

8

129

14

13

8

170

20

364

%

0.55

2.20

35.44

3.85

3.57

29.20

46.70

5.49

100

2002

2

9

131

13

13

8

168

21

365

%

0.55

2.47

35.89

3.56

3.56

2.19

46.03

5.75

100

2003

2

9

126

13

13

8

165

22

358

%

0.56

2.51

35.20

3.63

3.63

2.23

46.09

6.15

100

2004

2

9

125

12

13

8

162

22

353

%

0.57

2.55

35.41

3.40

3.68

2.27

45.89

6.23

100

2005

2

9

123

12

13

8

160

21

348

%

0.57

2.59

35.34

3.45

3.74

2.30

45.98

6.03

100

2006

2

9

126

11

13

8

160

19

348

%

0.57

2.59

36.21

3.16

3.74

2.30

45.98

5.46

100

2007

2

9

127

14

12

8

157

17

346

%

0.58

2.60

36.71

4.05

3.47

2.31

45.38

4.91

100

2008

2

9

118

15

12

8

159

19

342

%

0.58

2.63

34.50

4.39

3.51

2.34

46.49

5.56

100

Total

18

78

,132

117

116

72

1,467

180

3,180

%

0.57

2.45

35.60

3.68

3.65

2.26

46.13

5.66

100

Source: Author calculated from data source .

(In which v1: Northwest region; v2: Northeast region; v3: Red River Delta region; v4: North Central region; v5: South Central Coast region; v6: Central Highlands region; v7 Southeast region; v8: Mekong River Delta region).


Appendix 2.18. Distribution of enterprises of different ownership types in the period 2000-2008


Year


Total Enterprise


State-owned enterprises


FDI enterprises

Other businesses with the above 2 types


% State-owned enterprises


% FDI enterprises

2000

356

73

82

201

20.51

23.03

2001

364

78

86

200

21.43

23.63

2002

365

77

83

205

21.10

22.74

2003

358

77

83

198

21.51

23.18

2004

353

73

82

198

20.68

23.23

2005

348

59

82

207

16.95

23.56

2006

348

45

85

218

12.93

24.43

2007

346

35

81

230

10.12

23.41

2008

342

28

81

233

8.19

23.68

Source: Author estimates from data sources


Appendix 2.19. Average growth rate of variables by year



Year

Growth rate ( % )

Labor

Investment capital

Business

collect

HoriY_0

BackY_0

ForwY_0

Real capital

presently

2001

6.952615

11,28056

19,01582

-10.7738

28,79074

-14.3619

62.82796

2002

10,90698

19.80451

14,81876

11.12361

-14.2383

-9.35157

100,7059

2003

5.222005

14,95549

17,23536

-28.6691

-36,925

6,245453

-54.9396

2004

2,173585

22,2991

20,16003

-4.24379

49,21032

-15.1307

28,12583

2005

-0.53969

19,007

16.60455

-10.1656

-8.2546

-17.8017

5,769413

2006

0.988898

25.73785

16.56482

-8.94788

-20.5242

31,69033

27,51518

2007

-1.5694

52.5575

20,2548

28,11027

-35.0143

-6.3106

50.01064

2008

-0.8199

18.85106

32.52698

-3.34339

14.00108

-6.1216

14,94747

Source: Author estimates from data sources


Appendix 2.20. Average values ​​of variables calculated from formulas (2)-(6)

based on the IO tables of the year 2000


Year

Backward

Forward

Horizontal

2000

0.010371

0.009297

0.016422

2001

0.013356

0.007962

0.014653

2002

0.011455

0.007217

0.016283

2003

0.007225

0.007668

0.011615

2005

0.01078

0.006508

0.011122

2006

0.009891

0.005349

0.009991

2007

0.007861

0.007045

0.009097

2008

0.005108

0.0066

0.011654

Source: Author's estimate from IO 2000 table


Appendix 2.21. First-difference regression for the entire sample


Dependent variable ∆Y

Coefficient

Standard error

P-value

Semi-parametric model

Number of observations: 3,078

Number of groups: 422

∆l

0.3433

0.0277

0.0000

∆hori

-1.6735

0.2987

0.0000

∆back

-1.6275

0.5402

0.0030

∆forw

4.8947

1.4461

0.0010

∆region

-

-

-

∆m

-0.2178

0.0286

0.0000

∆k

0.3692

0.0344

0.0000

Fixed effects model

Number of observations: 3,078

Number of groups: 342

∆l


0.3579


0.0154


0.0000

∆m


-0.2209


0.0098


0.0000

∆hori


-1.7022


0.1969


0.0000

∆back


-1.5558


0.3655


0.0000

∆forw


4.7880


0.8244


0.0000

∆k


0.5556


0.0128


0.0000

∆region

-


-


-


Constant


-0.21061


0.0135


0.0000

Random effect image model

of course

Number of observations: 3,078

Number of groups: 342

∆m

0.3591

0.0154

0.0000

∆hori

-0.2213

0.0098

0.0000

∆back

-1.6716

0.1958

0.0000

∆forw

-1.5893

0.3637

0.0000

∆k

4.8194

0.8203

0.0000

∆region

0.5543

0.0127

0.0000

Constant

-0.2112

0.0136

0.0000

Hausman test

Chi2(4)=5.85

Prob>chi2 = 0.3215

Source: Estimated from data sources


Appendix 2.22. First-difference regression for domestic firms


Independent variable

Model

Influence model

Influence model

( Y)

semi-parametric

random

permanent


L

0.3812***

( 0.3866 )

0.3858***

( 0.707 )

0.3852***

( 0.1710 )


K

0.4330***

( 0.4110 )

0.5596***

( 0.1430 )

0.56057***

( 0.1433 )


∆Y_1

-0.2257***

(0.0278)

-0.2438***

( 0.1452 )

-0.2282***

(0.0111)


Horizontal

-2.0690***

( 0.5051 )

-2.2582***

( 0.2751 )

-2.3038***

( 0.2774 )


Backward

-1.4362***

( 0.0.939 )

-1,9018***

(0 .4450 )

-1.8668***

( 0.4474 )


Forward

6,4518***

( 1,9540 )

7,2587***

( 0.9441 )

7,2075***

( 0.9492 )


Region

-

-0.2286

(0.01101)

-


Constant

-

-0.2438

( 0.1452 )

-0.1994***

(0.1561)

Number of observations

2435

2435

2435

Number of groups

331

261

261

Hausman test


Chi2(4)=2.82

Prob>chi2 = 0.8316

Source: estimated from data source Note:

1) ***/**/* these symbols indicate that the estimated parameters are statistically significant at

significance levels of 1%, 5% and 10% respectively. Standard errors are in parentheses below the coefficients.

2) Coefficients without the symbols ***/**/* are not statistically significant or

has statistical confidence greater than 10%.

Comment


Agree Privacy Policy *