160. Tangen, S. (2004), 'Performance measurement: from philosophy to practice', International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management , Vol. 53 No. 8, pp. 726-737.
161. Tapper, R., & Font, X. (2004), 'Tourism supply chains', Report of a Desk Research Project for The Travel Foundation, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds .
162. The Council of Supply chain Management Professionals (2009), CSCMP's Definition of Supply Chain Management, Accessed 22 Apr 2009,
<http://cscmp.org/aboutcscmp/definitions.asp>.
163. The Supply Chain Council (2009a). About Supply Chain Council, Accessed 12 May 2009, < http://supply-chain.org/about>.
164. The Supply Chain Council (2009b). What is SCOR? Accessed May 15, 2009,
<http://supply-chain.org/scor>.
165. Theeranuphattana, A. and Tang, JCS (2008), 'A conceptual model of performance measurement for supply chains Alternative considerations' , Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol 19 No 1, pp.125-148.
166. Thirumalai, S., & Sinha, K.K. (2005), 'Customer satisfaction with order fulfillment in retail supply chains: implications of product type in electronic B2C transactions'. Journal of Operations Management , Vol 23 No 3-4, pp.291-303.
167. Thomas Friedman (2017), 'Introduction to Supply Chain Management',
Managing Supply Chain Operations, 1–12
168. Tigu, G and B. Calaretu, (2013), 'Supply chain management performance in tourism continental hotels chain case' , Amfiteatru Economic Journal, Vol 15, chapter 3, pp.37-54.
169. Trkman, P., & McCormack, K. (2009), 'Supply chain risk in turbulent environments—A conceptual model for managing supply chain network risk', International Journal of Production Economics , Vol 119 No 2, pp.247- 258.
170. Tracey, M., & Tan, CL (2001), 'Empirical analysis of supplier selection and involvement, customer satisfaction, and firm performance', Supply Chain Management: An International Journal.
171. Venter, I. (2006), ' Hotel property development: a framework for successful developments' , (Doctoral thesis, University of Pretoria).
172. Véronneau, S. and Roy, J. (2009), 'Global service supply chains: An empirical study of current practices and challenges of a cruise line corporation', Tourism Management Vol 30 No 1, pp. 128-139
173. Wei, L. and Lu, K. (2008), 'The Appliance of Supply Chain Management Theory to Tourism Development', Proceeding of the International Conference on Management of e‐Commerce and e‐Government , pp.14‐17.
174. Wilding, Richard and Beverly Wagner (2012), 'Systematic review and the need for evidence', Supply Chain Forum: an International Journal 17(5).
175. Yılmaz, Umit S. Bititci (2006), 'Performance measurement in tourism: a value chain model', International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol 55 No 5, pp.371-389.
176. Yan, H., Yu, Z., & Cheng, T.E. (2003), 'A strategic model for supply chain design with logical constraints: formulation and solution', Computers & Operations Research , Vol 30 No 14, pp.2135 -2155.
177. Yang, S., Huang, GQ, Song, H. and Liang, L (2009), 'Game‐Theoretic Approach to Competitive Dynamics in Tourism Supply Chains', Journal of Travel Research Vol 47 No 4, pp.425- 439.
178. Zhang, Y. and Murphy, P. (2009), 'Supply-chain considerations in marketing underdeveloped regional destinations: A case study of Chinese to Goldfields region of Victoria', Tourism Management, Vol 30 No 2, pp. 278-287.
179. Zhang, Q., Vonderembse, M.A., & Lim, J.S. (2003), 'Manufacturing flexibility: defining and analyzing relationships among competence, capability, and customer satisfaction', Journal of Operations Management , Vol 21 No 2, pp.173 -191.
180. Zhang, X., Song, H., and Huang, GQ (2009), 'Tourism supply chain management: A new research agenda', Tourism Management , Vol 30 No 3, pp.345–358.
181. Zhang, X. (2010), 'An investigation into the vertical coordination in tourism supply chains through buyback policy'. In Proceedings of the 6th CIRP- Sponsored International Conference on Digital Enterprise Technology, pp. 1331-1340. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
182. Zhang, SH, & Cheung, KL (2011), 'The impact of information sharing and advance order information on a supply chain with balanced ordering', Production and Operations Management , Vol 20 No 2, pp. 253-267.
APPENDIX
APPENDIX 1
INFORMATION ABOUT THE INTERVIEWER
Information
Title | Work unit | Level education | Gender calculate | Terrible test | |
Expert 1 | Head of Department | Department of Training, Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism Sports and Tourism | Assoc.Prof.Dr. | Male | 25 |
Expert 2 | Lecturer | BM Tourism Marketing, Faculty of Hotel Management DL, University of Commerce | Assoc.Prof.Dr. | Male | 41 |
Expert 3 | Head of BM | BM Business Logistics, Faculty Marketing, University of Commerce | Assoc.Prof.Dr. | Female | 34 |
Expert 4 | Head of BM | BM DNDL Management, Faculty of Hotel Management DL, University of Commerce | PhD | Female | 20 |
Expert 5 | Lecturer | BM Tourism Marketing, Faculty of Hotel Management DL, University of Commerce | PhD | Female | 14 |
Expert 6 | Lecturer | BM Tourism Marketing, Faculty of Hotel Management DL, University of Commerce | PhD | Female | 15 |
Expert 7 | Lecturer | BM Business Logistics, Faculty Marketing, University of Commerce | PhD | Female | 15 |
Expert 8 | Manager | Vietnam Sun Company | Master | Male | 15 |
Expert 9 | Head of Department | Hanoi Daewoo Hotel, Hanoi | Master | Male | 15 |
Expert 10 | Prefect | Passenger Marketing of General Vietnam Airlines Corporation | Master | Male | 15 |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Stages and Flows in the Tourism Service Supply Chain -
Solutions for tourism development in Tien Lang - 10
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism, tourism development
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
- District People's Committees and authorities of communes with tourist attractions should support, promote, and provide necessary information to people, helping them improve their knowledge about tourism. Raise tourism awareness for local people.
*
* *
Due to limited knowledge and research time, the thesis inevitably has shortcomings. Therefore, I look forward to receiving guidance from teachers, experts as well as your comments to make the thesis more complete.
Chapter III Conclusion
Through the issues presented in Chapter II, we can come to some conclusions:
Based on the strengths of available tourism resources, the types of tourism in Tien Lang that need to be promoted in the coming time are sightseeing and resort tourism, discovery tourism, weekend tourism. To improve the quality and diversify tourism products, Tien Lang district needs to combine with local cultural tourism resources, at the same time combine with surrounding areas, build rich tourism products. The strengths of Tien Lang tourism are eco-tourism and cultural tourism, so developing Tien Lang tourism must always go hand in hand with restoring and preserving types of cultural tourism resources. Some necessary measures to support and improve the efficiency of exploiting tourism resources in Tien Lang are: strengthening the construction of technical facilities and labor force serving tourism, actively promoting and advertising tourism, and expanding forms of capital mobilization for tourism development.
CONCLUDE
I Conclusion
1. Based on the results achieved within the framework of the thesis's needs, some basic conclusions can be drawn as follows:
Tien Lang is a locality with great potential for tourism development. The relatively abundant cultural tourism resources and ecological tourism resources have great appeal to tourists. Based on this potential, Tien Lang can build a unique tourism industry that is competitive enough with other localities within Hai Phong city and neighboring areas.
In recent years, the exploitation of the advantages of resources to develop tourism and build tourist routes in Tien Lang has not been commensurate with the available potential. In terms of quantity, many resource objects have not been brought into the purpose of tourism development. In terms of time, the regular service time has not been extended to attract more visitors. Infrastructure and technical facilities are still weak. The labor force is still thin and weak in terms of expertise. Tourism programs and routes have not been organized properly, the exploitation content is still monotonous, so it has not attracted many visitors. Although resources have not been mobilized much for tourism development, they are facing the risk of destruction and degradation.
2. Based on the results of investigation, analysis, synthesis, evaluation and selective absorption of research results of related topics, the thesis has proposed a number of necessary solutions to improve the efficiency of exploiting tourism resources in Tien Lang such as: promoting the restoration and conservation of tourism resources, focusing on investment and key exploitation of ecotourism resources, strengthening the construction of infrastructure and tourism workforce. Expanding forms of capital mobilization. In addition, the thesis has built a number of tourist routes of Hai Phong in which Tien Lang tourism resources play an important role.
Exploiting Tien Lang tourism resources for tourism development is currently facing many difficulties. The above measures, if applied synchronously, will likely bring new prospects for the local tourism industry, contributing to making Tien Lang tourism an important economic sector in the district's economic structure.
REFERENCES
1. Nhuan Ha, Trinh Minh Hien, Tran Phuong, Hai Phong - Historical and cultural relics, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1993
2. Hai Phong City History Council, Hai Phong Gazetteer, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1990.
3. Hai Phong City History Council, History of Tien Lang District Party Committee, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1990.
4. Hai Phong City History Council, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, VNU, Hai Phong Place Names Encyclopedia, Hai Phong Publishing House. 2001.
5. Law on Cultural Heritage and documents guiding its implementation, National Political Publishing House, Hanoi, 2003.
6. Tran Duc Thanh, Lecture on Tourism Geography, Faculty of Tourism, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, VNU, 2006
7. Hai Phong Center for Social Sciences and Humanities, Some typical cultural heritages of Hai Phong, Hai Phong Publishing House, 2001
8. Nguyen Ngoc Thao (editor-in-chief, Tourism Geography, Hai Phong Publishing House, two volumes (2001-2002)
9. Nguyen Minh Tue and group of authors, Hai Phong Tourism Geography, Ho Chi Minh City Publishing House, 1997.
10. Nguyen Thanh Son, Hai Phong Tourism Territory Organization, Associate Doctoral Thesis in Geological Geography, Hanoi, 1996.
11. Decision No. 2033/QD – UB on detailed planning of Tien Lang town, Hai Phong city until 2020.
12. Department of Culture, Information, Hai Phong Museum, Hai Phong relics
- National ranked scenic spot, Hai Phong Publishing House, 2005. 13. Tien Lang District People's Committee, Economic Development Planning -
Culture - Society of Tien Lang district to 2010.
14.Website www.HaiPhong.gov.vn
APPENDIX 1
List of national ranked monuments
STT
Name of the monument
Number, year of decisiondetermine
Location
1
Gam Temple
938 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Cam Khe Village- Toan Thang commune
2
Doc Hau Temple
9381 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Doc Hau Village –Toan Thang commune
3
Cuu Doi Communal House
3207 VH/QĐDecember 30, 1991
Zone II of townTien Lang
4
Ha Dai Temple
938 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Ha Dai Village –Tien Thanh commune
APPENDIX II
STT
Name of the monument
Number, year of decision
Location
1
Phu Ke Pagoda Temple
178/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Zone 1 - townTien Lang
2
Trung Lang Temple
178/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Zone 4 – townTien Lang
3
Bao Khanh Pagoda
1900/QD-UBAugust 24, 2006
Nam Tu Village -Kien Thiet commune
4
Bach Da Pagoda
1792/QD-UB11/11/2002
Hung Thang Commune
5
Ngoc Dong Temple
177/QD-UBNovember 27, 2005
Tien Thanh Commune
6
Tomb of Minister TSNhu Van Lan
2848/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2003
Nam Tu Village -Kien Thiet commune
7
Canh Son Stone Temple
2160/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2003
Van Doi Commune –Doan Lap
8
Meiji Temple
2259/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2002
Toan Thang Commune
9
Tien Doi Noi Temple
477/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2005
Doan Lap Commune
10
Tu Doi Temple
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Doan Lap Commune
11
Duyen Lao Temple
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Tien Minh Commune
12
Dinh Xuan Uc Pagoda
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Bac Hung Commune
13
Chu Khe Pagoda
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Hung Thang Commune
14
Dong Dinh
2848/QD-UBNovember 21, 2002
Vinh Quang Commune
15
President's Memorial HouseTon Duc Thang
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
NT Quy Cao
Ha Dai Temple
Ben Vua Temple
Tien Lang hot spring
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 16pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 6pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Factors affecting the cooperative relationship of travel companies with suppliers in the tourism supply chain - 1 -
Some recommendations to improve the business strategy of Tay Ho Tourism Service Company - 9

EXPERT IN-DEPTH INTERVIEW SCRIPT
Purpose: To collect information and evaluate the Development of the DVDL supply chain in the Red River Delta and the Eastern Sea Region.
Object:
- Experts at state management agencies
- Researchers, experts in tourism and marketing
- Businesses
Form of organization: Personal interview
Interview tools: Office, recording, notes
Script content
Introduction
Hello Dear Sir/Madam: I am currently a PhD student, my doctoral thesis is researching the supply chain of the food processing industry in the Red River Delta and the Red River Delta. Today, I am very pleased to interview you about the core issues of the performance of the food processing industry supply chain in the region, the issues raised and the orientations for choosing a research model for the food processing industry supply chain in the Red River Delta and the Red River Delta at present. We look forward to receiving your accurate, profound and frank opinions, analysis and comments. Your opinions will be kept confidential if you request, we will only publish the summary results. Once again, thank you for your cooperation and please provide some personal information:
Full name:……………..
Currently working at:……………….
Current position (if working):……………
Content section
1. According to you, which of the following factors measure the performance of the DVDL supply chain in the Red River Delta and the Mekong Delta?
STT
Recommended measurement factors | Agree | Disagree | |
1. | Satisfaction | ||
2. | Finance | ||
Additional measurement elements | |||
….………. | |||
…………. | |||
2. If you choose Satisfaction as a factor to measure supply chain performance, what specific indicators would you measure?
3. If you choose Finance as the factor to measure supply chain performance, what specific indicators will you measure?
4. According to you, which of the following factors affect the performance of the DVDL supply chain in the Red River Delta and the Central Highlands?
STT
Proposed influencing factors | Agree | Disagree | |
1 | Supply chain configuration | ||
2 | Supply chain relationships | ||
3 | Supply chain coordination | ||
Additional influencing factors | |||
…………. | |||
….………. | |||
5. If you choose Supply Chain Configuration as a factor affecting supply chain performance, what specific indicators would you measure? 6. If you choose Supply Chain Configuration as a factor affecting supply chain performance, what specific indicators would you measure?
7. If you choose Supply Chain Relationship as a factor affecting supply chain performance, then according to you, what specific scales will be used to measure it?
8. If Supply Chain Coordination is chosen as a factor affecting supply chain performance, then according to you, what specific scales will be used to measure it?
9. According to you, to conduct quantitative research, which subjects need to be surveyed by questionnaire?
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR COOPERATION!
SUMMARY AND SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWS WITH EXPERTS
1. Viewpoints on answering questions (1-2) on factors and scales to measure the performance of the supply chain of DVDL; questions (3-5) on factors affecting and scales to measure the impact of factors on the performance of the supply chain of DVDL in the Red River Delta and the Mekong Delta
TT
Measurement factors | Rating scales | CG1 | CG2 | CG3 | CG4 | CG5 | CG6 | CG7 | CG8 | CG9 | CG10 | |
1. | Satisfaction | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
Transaction waiting time | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
Value of services businesses receive | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
Service system | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
2. | Finance | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
Total cost | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
Distribution costs | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
DVDL design cost | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
Rate of return | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
Total revenue | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
Profit | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
Inventory costs | X | X | ||||||||||
Market share | X | X | ||||||||||
Commission Rate | X | X | X | |||||||||
Influencing factors | Rating scales | CG1 | CG2 | CG3 | CG4 | CG5 | CG6 | CG7 | CG8 | CG9 | CG10 | |
3. | String Configuration | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
Number and structure of members | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
Vertical distance (distance from first supplier to final customer) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
Distribution channel | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
The core business's operations are outsourced to external partners. | X | X | ||||||||||
TT
Measurement factors | Rating scales | CG1 | CG2 | CG3 | CG4 | CG5 | CG6 | CG7 | CG8 | CG9 | CG10 | |
4. | Chain relationship | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
Share information | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
Share volume, price | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
Share vision, ideas | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
Share investment plan | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
Share the new product introduction process | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
Share financial information | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
Decision Synchronization | X | X | X | |||||||||
Coordinate communication | X | X | X | |||||||||
Share the risk | X | X | X | |||||||||
Sharing resources | X | X | ||||||||||
5. | Chain coordination | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
Supply capacity | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
General operating forecast | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
Supply planning | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
Customer service | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
* Conclusion: Factors and evaluation criteria with a rate of <50% are all excluded from the research framework on the performance of the supply chain of the food processing industry in the Red River Delta and the Mekong Delta. Thus, there are 02 measurement factors: Satisfaction (3 scales) and Finance (6 scales); 03 factors affecting the performance of the supply chain of the food processing industry in the Red River Delta and the Mekong Delta: Chain configuration (3 scales); Chain relationship (6 scales) and Chain coordination (4 scales).
* Views on the subject were investigated through questionnaires to conduct quantitative research.
Managers of tourism service enterprises, managers of tourism transportation service enterprises, managers of hotels providing accommodation services, managers of tourism entertainment service enterprises (10/10 experts commented). The purpose of the thesis is to improve the performance of the tourism supply chain, which also brings satisfaction and financial benefits to the members participating in the chain.





