Practical Application of Law in Cases of Prohibited Marriage

The 1999 Law, amended in 2009, stipulates specific crimes that violate the marriage and family regime, including provisions that stipulate crimes that violate cases of marriage prohibition:

- In case of violating the monogamous marriage regime: After applying educational measures, persuasion combined with punishment but still refusing to correct, re-offending causing serious consequences such as: causing the victim's family to break up, husband and wife to separate, parents to separate from their children or the incident has not broken up the family but the family's life is stressful causing the children to be affected, damaged, ..., then criminal liability will be prosecuted according to Article 147 of the Penal Code:

A person who is married and marries or lives with another person as husband and wife, or a person who is unmarried and marries or lives with a person whom he or she clearly knows to be married, causing serious consequences, or who has been administratively sanctioned for this act and still commits the violation, shall be subject to a warning, non-custodial reform for up to one year, or imprisonment from three months to one year.

Committing a crime in a case where there has been a court decision to annul the marriage or to force the termination of cohabitation as husband and wife contrary to the monogamous regime but still maintaining that relationship, shall be punished with imprisonment from six months to three years [51].

- In the case of violations related to marriage with close relatives, Article 150 of the Penal Code stipulates: "Anyone who has sexual intercourse with a person of the same bloodline, with siblings of the same parents, siblings of the same father but different mothers, or siblings of the same mother but different fathers, shall be sentenced to imprisonment from six months to five years" [51].

Maybe you are interested!

Thus, only people of the same bloodline who marry each other are criminally prosecuted for incest. People who are relatives within three generations when marrying are not considered criminals. In fact, in the past

When handling criminal cases, there have been some people who violated the prohibitions of the Law on Marriage and Family, such as having sexual intercourse with nieces, nephews, aunts, uncles, etc. (within three generations of relatives) and have been prosecuted by the Court for incest. However, according to the Penal Code, this is not considered a crime and these cases are considered wrongful convictions and of course the parties have the right to request the prosecuting agency to compensate for material and spiritual damages. It is thought that the criminal law should add the case of marriage between relatives within three generations to Article 150 of the Penal Code because once the Law on Marriage and Family has stipulated cases of prohibited marriage, it means that the harmful effects of the violation on social life have been carefully considered, and if not prohibited, it will not ensure healthy development of society. Moreover, marriage between such close relatives cannot be limited to administrative handling but criminal sanctions must be added for these violations.

Practical Application of Law in Cases of Prohibited Marriage

In addition, Article 146 of the Penal Code also stipulates: "Crime of forcing marriage or preventing voluntary, progressive marriage" [51]; Article 148 stipulates: "Crime of organizing child marriage, crime of child marriage" [51]. These crimes have objective acts constituting the crime as serious circumstances, knowing the serious consequences or having been administratively punished but still violating, the People's Court has decided to annul the illegal marriage but still continuing to maintain it.

According to Resolution No. 02/2000/NQ-HDTP dated December 23, 2000, when resolving a request to annul an illegal marriage and finding that the violation has signs of constituting a crime, the Court shall request the People's Procuracy at the same level to initiate criminal proceedings. If the People's Procuracy at the same level does not agree, the Court shall have the right to make a recommendation to the People's Procuracy at a higher level for consideration. If the People's Procuracy at a higher level also does not agree, the Court shall continue to resolve the request to annul an illegal marriage according to general procedures.

Chapter 3

PRACTICAL APPLICATION OF LAW

ON CASES WHERE MARRIAGE IS PROHIBITED AND SOME SOLUTIONS TO IMPROVE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF IMPLEMENTATION AND APPLICATION OF THE LAW


3.1. PRACTICAL APPLICATION OF THE LAW IN CASES WHERE MARRIAGE IS PROHIBITED

After more than 10 years of implementation, the Law on Marriage and Family 2000 has demonstrated many positive advantages, contributing to building happy and progressive families, having a positive impact on ensuring civil rights in general, rights to marriage and family in particular, the stability and development of Vietnamese families and the socio-economic development of the country. Specifically:

- The Law on Marriage and Family has greatly contributed to eliminating backward customs and practices on marriage and family, has promoted the role of family in social life, made an important contribution to preserving and promoting the traditions and good customs and practices of the Vietnamese people, enhanced the responsibility of citizens, the State and society in building and consolidating the Vietnamese marriage and family regime, and at the same time inherited and developed the law on marriage and family in Vietnam;

- Has contributed significantly to the construction, improvement and protection of progressive marriage and family regimes, the establishment of legal standards for the conduct of family members, the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of family members, the inheritance and promotion of the fine ethical traditions of Vietnamese families in order to build prosperous, equal, progressive, happy and sustainable families.

- Has had a positive and effective impact on the implementation of regulations on marriage and family regime, and on the implementation of the responsibilities of citizens, the State and society in

Building and consolidating the Vietnamese marriage and family regime. Ensuring recognition, implementation and protection of human rights in marriage and family in Vietnam, especially current legal regulations on human rights in marriage and family have been more practical and highly feasible, such as relatively complete and clear regulations on marriage conditions, marriage registration; rights and obligations of husband and wife; regulations on mutual representation between husband and wife; divorce; common property, separate property of husband and wife; division of common property during marriage;

alimony; guardianship; recognition of father, mother and children;... at the same time, recognizing and affirming the rights and obligations of citizens in the relationship of marriage and family, in building an equal, prosperous, happy and progressive family (relationship between husband and wife; relationship between parents and children; relationship between grandparents and grandchildren; between brothers and sisters...), when implementing the provisions of the Law, it also ensures the civil rights of each individual citizen as stipulated in the Civil Code (right to self-determination of private property; right to recognition of father, mother and children, right to marriage;...), handling violations and protecting victims of human rights violations in the field of marriage and family.

- Create stability and development for Vietnamese families in general , socio -economic development of the country and localities in particular , build a mechanism to ensure political, economic, cultural and social policies to recognize,

implement and protect human rights on marriage and family, take measures to create conditions for male and female citizens to establish voluntary and progressive marriages and for families to fully perform their functions [74].

In particular, the regulations on cases of marriage prohibition in particular are generally regulations that are relatively suitable for the economic and political circumstances and conditions, based on the country's fine customs and traditions, so they are agreed upon and complied with by the majority of people from all walks of life. Therefore, the application of marriage prohibition regulations in practice has been relatively widely disseminated to all walks of life, strictly followed by the majority of people, gradually becoming a consciousness in people's perception of the issue of marriage, more and more

Ethnic minority areas with backward customs have had access to the law on marriage and family; reduced polygamous marriages due to remnants of the old regime, or marriages between blood relatives, etc., contributing to the formation of new, more progressive, sustainable and happy families.

However, the application of regulations on cases of marriage prohibition in practice still has many limitations. This comes from many subjective and objective reasons, leading to violations of the provisions of the Law on Marriage and Family on cases of marriage prohibition.

Firstly , in reality, the situation of law violations regarding cases of prohibited marriage under the Law on Marriage and Family 2000 is quite complicated and diverse, occurring in many regions, many fields, and many different forms. Some typical examples that appear in society can be cited as follows:

- Cases of prohibiting marriage with people who are married. Although the law has specific regulations, violations of the case of prohibiting marriage with people who are married are still happening in many places. For example, the case of Mr. Nguyen Thanh Ph. in Dong Nai. He has been married for four years, the couple lives very harmoniously. Mr. Ph. has never returned to his wife's hometown to visit, because Ms. MP's (his wife's) parents have passed away, there are not many relatives left, the wedding only has two aunts living in the Central Highlands who traveled down to represent the family. But suddenly there was a complaint against Mr. Ph. for stealing someone else's wife, sent to the agency where Mr. Ph. works. The complaint clearly stated that Mr. Ph.'s wife MP was the wife of a man named Trung in 1999, that year MP was just over 18 years old. Attached to the complaint was a marriage certificate clearly showing that his wife and the man named Trung were married. Mr. Ph. Shocked, she asked her wife and found out that it was the truth. Because her mother died early, her father was an alcoholic and greedy for money, forcing her to marry a man fifteen years older than her. She did not dare tell her future husband for fear of being abandoned, so she had to lie about her parents dying early to hide it. She also got the single certificate through her friends [40].

Another case that caused a stir in public opinion in 2009 was that of Mr. N in Tan Buu commune, Ben Luc district, Long An province: In 1994, Mr. N married his first wife (who registered their marriage at the People's Committee of Tan Buu commune). In 1996, before divorcing his first wife, Mr. N got married and lived together without a marriage certificate with his second wife. In 2000, Mr. N got married again and lived together with his third wife (who was registered for marriage by the People's Committee of Tan Buu commune in 2004). It was not until July 2008 that Mr. N used the excuse that his third wife had left him for someone else and filed for divorce, and the case was discovered by the People's Court of Ben Luc district [15].

Or another case in Thua Thien Hue: Mr. Vo Van Giau (born in 1966, residing at 58/8 Phan Chu Trinh - Hue city) registered his marriage with Ms. Ton Nu Bich Thuy (residing at Phan Dinh Phung - Hue city) in 1993 and was granted a marriage certificate by the People's Committee of Phuoc Vinh commune (Hue city). In 1999, Mr. Vo Van Giau continued to register his marriage with Ms. Tran Thi Kim Quy (born in 1975), a teacher at Huong Thuy High School - in Thua Thien - Hue province, and was granted a marriage certificate by the People's Committee of Phong Son commune (Phong Dien district). Only when Ms. Thuy knew that Mr. Giau had betrayed her, she filed a petition everywhere, sent it to the local authorities, the Board of Directors of Huong Thuy High School to denounce teacher Kim Quy for violating the law, violating the Law on Marriage and Family, did the case come to light [60].

From the above examples, it can be seen that the violation here is not only the non-compliance with the regulations on marriage prohibition of the person getting married, but also partly stems from the wrongdoings of the People's Committee of Tan Buu Commune, Ben Luc District, Long An Province and the People's Committee of Phong Son Commune, Phong Dien District, Thua Thien Hue Province in verifying the marital status of the parties.

In such cases of marriage between married people, when discovered, at the request of the person with the right to request, the Court will implement the provisions of the Law on Marriage and Family to annul the marriage.

Thus, in reality, people who are married and marry others still exist, the application of the law prohibiting marriage to people who are married has not been thoroughly implemented, and violations are still occurring. The main reason for this situation is due to people's awareness of obeying the law, in addition to the negligence of local authorities when confirming marital status, leading to some cases where people naturally have two or three legal wives.

- The case of prohibiting marriage for people who have lost civil capacity. In practice, this violation is not rare, specifically marriage with a person with mental illness. For example, in the case of Ms. Tran Thi T., although she knew that Mr. Nguyen Van B. had a mental illness for a long time, for some reasons, she still decided to marry Mr. B. After the wedding, she and her husband moved to live separately in a house near the field. Every day, Ms. T took care of the farm work, cooked for her husband, and their life together was peaceful and smooth. But gradually, her husband became more and more seriously ill with very aggressive "attacks". He often beat her brutally, and neighbors who came to stop him were also beaten by him. Her husband's family was also afraid of his beatings, so they tried to stay away. Many times, she wanted to go back to her mother's house but was afraid of being rejected, so she tried to stay with Mr. B. When she was three months pregnant, one night, while she was sleeping, her husband beat her repeatedly with a wooden stick. As a result, her child was born with congenital mental illness and shrunken limbs. Many times, she took her child to a neighbor's house for help, but her husband dragged her back and beat her savagely. The local government intervened by sending him to the provincial mental hospital. From then on, she escaped Mr. B's beatings, but every month she had to go in and out of the hospital to visit her husband. On top of that, she had to take care of her disabled child, who lived unconsciously and had no intellectual development [24]. This was a case where she knew the other person was sick but still voluntarily married, and most of the reasons were that before entering married life, the parties had

Not thoroughly understanding the other person, not conducting a medical examination or assessment, leading to an uncertain future marriage, can even lead to the tragedy of killing a loved one because the patient is no longer aware of and cannot control his or her behavior. For example, in Xuan Thu commune, Soc Son district, Hanoi: In 2011, Ms. Nguyen Thi L., born in 1994, was introduced by her doctor to meet and marry Nguyen Van Thuc, born in 1985. After a month of marriage, she

L. discovered that her husband was not normal. One day, while the couple was working at the carpentry workshop, Thuc suddenly grabbed a piece of wood and threw it at his wife. A few days later, Thuc was discovered by people slitting his throat and causing bleeding. Another time, Thuc took a knife and wanted to "deal with" his friend because he borrowed his motorbike but returned it late. When she found out she was pregnant, as happy as Thuc was, she became depressed. When she asked him, Thuc was about to get angry. What surprised L. was that her husband sought death because they had a child. But that time Thuc failed to commit suicide. And the tragedy happened at around 1:00 a.m. on March 25, 2012, when L. was sleeping, Thuc slashed his young wife with scissors. L. shouted but it was too late. By the time her mother and sister-in-law intervened, L. had already been slashed five times, and at that time she was two months pregnant [44]. Not only domestic marriages have occurred with mentally ill people, but marriages with mentally ill people have also occurred with foreign marriages. In the past 5 years, when the "trend" of marrying Koreans and Taiwanese people became popular in some provinces and cities across the country, it also led to many heartbreaking incidents, the most recent of which was the case of bride Thach Thi Hoang Ngoc in Can Tho. After only 8 days of being a bride in a foreign land, Hoang Ngoc was murdered by her husband, who was 26 years older than her. And it is worth mentioning that this Korean groom had a history of mental illness with 57 times of treatment in the hospital [18 ].

Through the above examples, it can be seen that the situation of marrying a mentally ill person happens a lot, causing unhappiness for the family, affecting the happiness and rights of the woman - the wife, and at the same time, the child born may also inherit mental illness. Even most recently

Comment


Agree Privacy Policy *