LIST OF TABLES
Page
Table 2.1. Current population and labor status of communes in 2019 63
Table 3. 1. Spatial data sources 49
Table 3. 2. Factors and criteria used in the analysis of suitability for DLST 52
Maybe you are interested!
-
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Research on potential and solutions for developing ecotourism in some key tourist areas of the North Central region - 30 -
Research on potential and solutions for developing ecotourism in some key tourist areas of the North Central region - 31 -
Research proposal for developing ecotourism to support biodiversity conservation in Vu Quang National Park, Vu Quang district, Ha Tinh province - 13 -
Research on developing ecotourism in Nui Coc Lake area, Thai Nguyen - 14
Table 3. 3. Scale of importance of factors 57
Table 3. 4. Level of community participation 58

Table 4. 1. Current status of tourism infrastructure of Cat Ba National Park 83
Table 4. 2. Current status of Cat Ba National Park forests in 2020 95
Table 4. 3. Composition of forest animal species recorded in Cat Ba archipelago Biosphere Reserve98 Table 4. 4. Area statistics according to visibility 115
Table 4. 5. Statistics of area according to current forest status 117
Table 4.6. Area statistics by biodiversity conservation level 119
Table 4.7. Area statistics according to the level of diversity of rare and precious species 121
Table 4.8. Area statistics according to slope 123
Table 4.9. Area statistics by height 125
Table 4. 10. Statistics of area according to accessibility to roads... 127 Table 4. 11. Statistics of area according to accessibility to cultural sites... 129 Table 4. 12. Statistics of area according to accessibility to surface water sources 131 Table 4. 13. Indicator parameters 133
Table 4. 14. Results of assessing the potential of ecotourism in Cat Ba National Park 134
Table 4.15. Sociological profile of interviewees 136
Table 4. 16. Community awareness of the benefits of ecotourism 141
Table 4. 17. Community awareness of the benefits of ecotourism 148
Table 4.18. Summary of weights of the system of solutions to promote DLST activities ..160
LIST OF IMAGES
Page
Figure 1.1. Model of sustainable tourism principles and values 22
Figure 3. 1. Diagram of steps to determine suitable areas for eco-tourism development…..55 Figure 4. 1. Ngu Lam Peak 70
Figure 4. 2. MT 70 Education Line
Figure 4. 3. Visit RNM 71
Figure 4. 4. Frog Pond 71
Figure 4. 5. Viet Hai fishing village 73
Figure 4. 6. Military Hospital Cave 73
Figure 4. 7. Trung Cave Page 74
Figure 4. 8. Botanical Garden 75
Figure 4.9.Bird and animal observation route 75
Figure 4.10. Map of some ecotourism routes in Cat Ba National Park 76
Figure 4. 11. Thien Long Cave 78
Figure 4. 12. Lan Ha Bay - Van Boi 78 tourist route
Figure 4. 13. Pineapple Island 79
Figure 4. 14. Bright Cave - Van Ta 79
Figure 4.15. Tra Bau fishing village 80
Figure 4. 16. Golden Fruit Cave 80
Figure 4.17. Nam Cat Island 81
Figure 4.18. Organizational structure and management of ecotourism activities of Cat Ba National Park 85
Figure 4. 19. Functions and tasks of the Center for Education and Training 86
Figure 4.20. Composition of tourists participating in tour 88
Figure 4. 21. Chart of tourists' length of stay at Cat Ba National Park. 88 Figure 4. 22. Chart of statistics of the number of visitors to both the forest and sea routes of Cat Ba National Park. 89
Figure 4.23. Statistical chart of the number of visitors to the forest route in the central area of Cat Ba National Park 90
Figure 4.24. Statistical chart of number of visitors 90
Figure 4.25. Statistical chart of reasons why tourists choose to travel to Cat Ba National Park and the routes and tourist attractions of Cat Ba National Park that tourists are interested in 91
Figure 4.26. Chart of the time tourists want to visit Cat Ba National Park 92
Figure 4.27. Current status map of Cat Ba National Park forest status 97
Figure 4. 28. Distribution map of rare and precious animal species of Cat Ba National Park. 105 Figure 4. 29. Distribution map of rare and precious plant species of Cat Ba National Park.. 107 Figure 4. 30. Image of Cat Ba langur at Cat Ba National Park 109
Figure 4.31. Image of the mountain goat species at Cat Ba National Park 109
Figure 4. 32. Image of Golden Monkey at Cat Ba National Park 110
Figure 4.33. Image of species 111
Figure 4. 34. Image of the Cat Ba Gecko at Cat Ba National Park..111 Figure 4. 35. Image of the Cat Ba Gecko at Cat Ba National Park 113
Figure 4. 36. Image of the Northern Tree Frog at Cat Ba National Park 113
Figure 4.37. Map of tourist attractions in Cat Ba National Park 116
Figure 4. 38. Map assessing the current forest status suitability in Cat Ba National Park.118 Figure 4. 39. Map of protection level in Cat Ba National Park 120
Figure 4.40. Map of the diversity of rare and endangered species 122
Figure 4.41. Map of the suitability of slopes for development 124
Figure 4. 42. Elevation map suitable for ecotourism development in Cat Ba National Park 126 Figure 4. 43. Road accessibility map 128
Figure 4.44. Map of accessibility to cultural sites 130
Figure 4. 45. Map of surface water accessibility in Cat Ba National Park 132 Figure 4. 46. Map of ecotourism potential in Cat Ba National Park 135
Figure 4.47. Level of community participation in local ecotourism development 138
Figure 4. 48. Diagram of community tourism service provision activities... 140 Figure 4. 49. Barriers to people participating in ecotourism 146
Figure 4.50. Chart of changes in the level of natural resource use by people after participating in ecotourism activities at Cat Ba National Park. 150
INFORMATION PAGE ON NEW CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE THESIS
I. General information:
- Thesis title: Research on ecotourism development associated with biodiversity conservation in Cat Ba National Park - Hai Phong".
- Name of training institution: Forestry University
- PhD student:
+ Full name: Le Thi Ngan
+ Degree: Master
+ PhD training course: K25
+ Major: Forest resource management
+ Code: 9620211
II. New contributions of the thesis:
The first new point of the thesis is the first use of the combination of GIS and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) methods to evaluate potential areas suitable for ecotourism development in Cat Ba National Park based on natural resources, human resources and cultural resources.
The thesis also identified important results on the level of participation, factors hindering and promoting community participation as well as community awareness and attitudes towards ecotourism development and biodiversity conservation in Cat Ba National Park.
The thesis has proposed a number of priority solutions for ecotourism development associated with biodiversity conservation in Cat Ba National Park based on the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. This system of solutions is the basis for Cat Ba National Park to consider implementing ecotourism development associated with biodiversity conservation in the trend of financial autonomy of national parks and protected areas in Vietnam in the coming time.
Graduate Student Guidance Team
Associate Professor, Dr. Pham Ngoc Linh Associate Professor, Dr. Dong Thanh Hai Le Thi Ngan
INTRODUCTION
1. Necessity of the Topic
The Law on Tourism No. 09/2017/QH14 dated June 19, 2017 of the National Assembly of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam defined Ecotourism as “a type of tourism based on nature, associated with local cultural identity, with the participation of the local community, combined with education on environmental protection”. Up to now, there are many definitions of ecotourism used by different organizations, in general, all of which aim at 3 main goals including social equity, economic development and environmental integrity (TIES, 2015). Ecotourism is a branch of sustainable tourism. Ecotourism is considered an effective tool for sustainable development, which is the main reason why developing countries are now actively embracing ecotourism and incorporating it into their economic development and conservation strategies (Kiper, 2013).
Vietnam is ranked 16th among the countries with the highest biodiversity in the world and is one of the 10 richest centers of biodiversity in the world (MONRE, 2015). However, biodiversity in Vietnam has been and is being degraded due to excessive human activities such as habitat destruction, hunting, and illegal animal trade. To conserve biodiversity, the Vietnamese Government has proposed many solutions, in which the establishment of national parks/protected areas is the key solution. According to Decision 1976/QD-TTg in 2014 approving the National Special-use Forest System Planning to 2020, with a vision to 2030 issued by the Prime Minister, 167 special-use forests have been established nationwide with a total area of 2,303,961 hectares (accounting for 14.19% of the land area planned for forestry), including 33 national parks, 57 nature reserves, 14 species and habitat conservation areas and 54 landscape protection areas. These are places that conserve biodiversity, typical ecosystems, rare and endangered species and have great potential for developing ecotourism, one of the main and competitive tourism products of Vietnam.
Ecotourism plays an important role in the activities of national parks/protected areas because it generates a significant source of income to support biodiversity conservation and local community development (García-Herrera, 2016). However, ecotourism in national parks/protected areas in Vietnam has not yet developed commensurate with its potential. The main reason for the limitation of ecotourism development is the lack of cooperation between the government and different sectors in the development of ecotourism policies and plans. The tourism industry is related to many sectors, so close cooperation between stakeholders is needed for its development (García-Herrera, 2016). In addition, the development of ecotourism has not yet had a unified operating mechanism in the national park/protected area system and has only been concentrated in a few national parks such as Cat Ba, Cat Tien, Ba Vi, Tam Dao, Bach Ma... Tourism products are not yet diverse, especially typical products such as wildlife viewing are organized by very few national parks/protected areas. The issue of planning tourist routes and areas suitable for ecotourism development is also not systematic. More importantly, the connection between ecotourism development and biodiversity conservation and the participation of local communities is still limited in national parks/protected areas in Vietnam.
The relationship between ecotourism development, biodiversity conservation and local participation has been discussed in many previous studies. Holmes (2013) suggests that local people can be a direct threat to protected areas when they do not cooperate with protected area management or participate in conservation initiatives and ecotourism activities. A deeper understanding of local people’s attitudes and perceptions as well as the factors that promote and hinder their participation will be an important basis for developing appropriate strategies to attract widespread local support for biodiversity conservation and ecotourism management (Holmes, 2013).
As a national park established in 1986, home to the most important island ecosystem in Vietnam, Cat Ba National Park plays an important role in the work of
biodiversity conservation, natural resource conservation, in addition, this place also has great significance for the ecological environment protection of Hai Phong city and is a place with great potential for ecotourism development. Cat Ba National Park is associated with Ha Long Bay complex - a world natural heritage with many unique natural landscapes, many amazing caves, beautiful and poetic beaches; diverse and rich ecosystems with hundreds of rare species of animals and plants, long-standing indigenous culture attracting tourists when visiting and experiencing the Park.
Implementing the policy of ecotourism development, Cat Ba National Park is one of 07 national parks that are implementing joint ventures and partnerships to organize ecotourism activities. Revenue from organizing ecotourism activities has initially contributed to the development of the Park. However, like other national parks/reserves in Vietnam, the implementation of ecotourism activities here is still facing many obstacles in terms of policy mechanisms, master plans, and participating parties... Up to now, Cat Ba National Park has not yet had an approved ecotourism development project. To develop ecotourism sustainably, the National Park needs a specific project and comprehensive solutions. One of those solutions is to develop ecotourism associated with biodiversity conservation.
The scientific basis for developing ecotourism associated with biodiversity conservation is first to clarify the potential of biodiversity for ecotourism development in Cat Ba National Park . According to previous studies (Hoang Van Cau, 2017; Hoang Van Phuc, 2016), the ecotourism routes and points here have only exploited the potential of biodiversity in the areas surrounding the National Park Center. Moreover, the typical ecotourism types that attract tourists to the National Park such as watching wildlife (Cat Ba langur, Son Duong, Cat Ba gecko...) have not been exploited. The second question is to clearly identify the potential areas for ecotourism development in Cat Ba National Park. The number of routes currently being exploited in the National Park seems to be disproportionate to the potential of the Park. Therefore, it is necessary to have a comprehensive assessment based on criteria of natural characteristics, socio-economic population.
and culture of adaptive zones, which is the scientific basis for planning ecotourism zones of the National Park. The third question is how to attract the participation of local communities in ecotourism activities of the National Park? Up to now, the participation of local communities and these activities of the people are only spontaneous, there is no mechanism for participation, so the participation of local communities is still limited. Research on the current status of participation, factors promoting and hindering participation as well as the attitudes and perceptions of the community towards ecotourism development and biodiversity conservation is essential for proposing policies to attract community participation. Once the biodiversity potential for ecotourism development, potential areas for ecotourism development and factors promoting and hindering community participation as well as their awareness and attitudes towards ecotourism development have been clarified, it will be a scientific basis for the National Park and planners to develop policies and plans for sustainable ecotourism development in Cat Ba National Park.
2. Research objectives
General Objective
Providing scientific and practical basis for the orientation of ecotourism development associated with biodiversity conservation for sustainable development of Cat Ba National Park, Hai Phong.
Specific goals
- Assess the current status of ecotourism development in Cat Ba National Park;
- Identify potential ecotourism areas in Cat Ba National Park;
- Assess the level of participation, attitude and awareness of the community towards ecotourism development in Cat Ba National Park;
- Propose solutions for developing eco-tourism associated with biodiversity conservation.
3. New contributions of the Thesis
The first new point of the thesis is the first use of the combination of GIS and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) methods to evaluate potential areas.





